Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Issues on Clinical Child Psychology ((ICCP))

  • 4731 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on contemporary program evaluation activities in adult developmental disabilities (DD) services. Program evaluation is best understood as a:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Adams, D., & Allen, D. (2001). Assessing the need for reactive behaviour management strategies in children with intellectual disability and severe challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 335–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ager, A., & O’May, F. (2001). Issues in the definition and implementation of “best practice” for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 26, 243–256,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. T., Piachaud, J., & Singh, I. (2001). Two districts, two models: In-patient care in the psychiatry of learning disability. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 47(93), 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algozzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test., D. W., & Wood, W. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. A. (2000). Measurement of community participation and use of leisure by service users with intellectual disabilities: The Guernsey Community Participation and Leisure Assessment (GCPLA). Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability. New York: Teacher’s College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, S. N. (1999). Normalization and residential services: The Vermont studies. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 241–270). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. W., Cain, N. N., Sloane-Reeves, J. E., Van Speybroech, A., Segel, J., Gutkin, J., Quijano, L. E., & Kramer, B. M. (1994). Characteristics of community-based individuals with mental retardation and aggressive behavioral disorders. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 704–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R. B. (1993). The cloak of competence (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, E., & Forrest, J. (1996). Community support teams for people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviours: Results of a national survey. Journal of Mental Health, 5, 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, E., Robertson, J., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., & Kessissoglou, S., Hallam, A. (2000). Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 81–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., de Kock, U., Mansell, J., & Jenkins, J. (1984). Providing systematic individual teaching for severely disturbed and profoundly mentally-handicapped adults in residential care. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22, 299–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., Lowe, K., Perry, J., Jones, E., & Baxter, H., Baxter, H. (1999). The quality of residential and day services for adults with intellectual disabilities in eight local authorities in England: Objective data gained in support of a social services inspectorate inspection. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12, 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, D. B. (1992). Postmodernism comes to program evaluation: A critical review of Guba and Lincoln’s fourth generation evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, N., Robertson, J., Kessissglou, S., Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (2001). Factors associated with expressed satisfaction among people with intellectual disability receiving residential supports. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 279–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, C., & Emerson, E. (1993). Organizational predictors of staff stress, satisfaction, and intended turnover in a service for people with multiple disabilities. Mental Retardation, 31, 388–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, C., Rivers, M., Mason, H., Mason, L., & Emerson, E., Kiernan, C. (1999). Organizational culture and staff outcomes in services for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 206–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, C. S., Jacobson, J. W., Schwartz, A., Flori, M., & Vietze, P. (2004). The Willowbrook Futures Project: A longitudinal analysis of person-centered planning. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 109, 63–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, S., & Jacobson, J. W. (2004). Implementing and researching person-centered planning. In L.Williams (Ed.), Developmental disabilities: Advances in scientific understanding, clinical treatments, and community integration (pp. 315–330). Reno, NV: Context.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, S., & Jacobson, J. W. (2004). Implementing and researching person-centered planning. In L. Williams (Ed.), Developmental disabilities: Advances in scientific understanding, clinical treatments and community integration (pp. 315–330). Reno, NV: Context press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, S., Jacobson, J. W., Schwartz, A. A., Flory, M. J., & Vietze, P. M. (in press). The Willowbrook Futures Project: A longitudinal analysis of person-centered planning. American Journal on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, S., Jacobson, J. W., Vietze, P. M., Schwartz, A. A., & Sersen, E. (2000). Quantifying the process and outcomes of person-centered planning. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 402–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J., & Holburn, S. (2004). Research to practice: Management, staff training, and improvement of service in technology transfer. In L. Williams (Ed.), Developmental disabilities: Advances in scientific understanding, clinical treatments, and community integration (pp. 331–363). Reno, NV: Context.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W. (1987). Individual program plan goal content in developmental disabilities programs. Mental Retardation, 3, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W., & Holburn, S. (in press). Residential services research in the developmental disabilities sector. In L. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. San Diego, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W., & Holburn, S. (2004). Research to practice: Management, staff training, and improvement of services. In W. L. Williams (Ed.), Developmental disabilities: Advances in scientific understanding, clinical treatments and community integration (pp. 331–363). Reno, NV: Context press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J.W., & Regula, C. R. (1988). Evaluation issues and resources for community living situations. In M. P. Janicki, M. W. Krauss, & M. M. Seltzer (Eds.), Community residences for people with developmental disabilities: Here to stay (pp. 85–101). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W., & Schwartz, A. A. (1983). Evaluation of community living alternatives. In J. L. Matson & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation (pp. 39–66). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. W., & Schwartz, A. A. (1991). Evaluating the living situations of persons with developmental disabilities. In J. L. Matson & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation (2nd ed., pp. 35–62). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, T., Ditchfield, H., & Harris, P. (2001). Challenging behaviour in community services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 130–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, C., & Alborz, A. (1996). Persistence and change in challenging and problem behaviours of young adults with intellectual disability living in the family home. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landesman-Dwyer, S., Sackett, G. P., & Kleinman, J. S. (1980). Relationship of size to resident and staff behavior in small community residences. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 6–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linhorst, D. M., McCutchen, T. A., & Bennett, L. (2003). Recidivism among offenders with developmental disabilities participating in a case management program. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 210–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrer, S. P., Greene, E., Browning, C. J., & Lesser, M. S. (2002). Dual diagnosis: Examination of service use and length of stay during psychiatric hospitalization. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., Felce, D., & Blackman, D. (1996). Challenging behaviour: The effectiveness of specialist support teams. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40, 336–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, J., Elliott, T., Beadle-Brown, J., Ashman, B., & Macdonald, S. (2002). Engagement in meaningful activity and “active support” of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 342–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F. L., Howard, K. I., Windle, C. D., & Hohmann, A. A. (1994). Introduction to the special section on seeking new methods in mental health services research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 667–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nottestad, J. A., & Linaker, O. M. (1999). Psychiatric health needs and services before and after complete deinstitutionalization of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 523–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. B., Cash, V. B., & Reid, D. H. (1989). Improving residential treatment services: Implementation and norm-referenced evaluation of a comprehensive management system. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 143–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, G., Rapley, M., & Bramston, P. (2002). Neighbourhood and community experience, and the quality of life of rural adolescents with and without an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 27, 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. H. (1992). Recent developments in treating severe behavior disorders: Advances or impediments for residential services? Behavioral Residential Treatment, 7, 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., Kessissoglou, S., Hallam, A., et al. (2001). Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential settings. Mental Retardation, 39, 201–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., & Berkson, G. (1980). Social ecology of supervised communal facilities for mentally disabled adults: III. Predictors of social choice. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 243–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., & Berkson, G. (1981). Social ecology of supervised communal facilities for mentally disabled adults: IV. Characteristics of social behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 28–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. W., & Burchard, S. N. (1990). Community activities and social support networks: A social comparison of adults with and adults without mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, C., Lakin, K. C., Oslund, J. M., & Larson, W. (1998). Evaluation of outcomes and cost effectiveness of a community behavioral support and crisis response demonstration project. Mental Retardation, 36, 187–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L. (2000). Three decades of quality of life. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. A., Jacobson, J. W., & Holburn, S. C. (2000). Defining person centeredness: Results of two consensus methods. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Felce, D., Jones, E., & Lowe, K. (2002). Responsiveness to staff support: Evaluating the impact of individual characteristics on the effectiveness of active support training using a conditional probability approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 594–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., Avery, B. H., & Smith, J. (2000). Personal control and the ecology of community living settings: Beyond living-unit size and type. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 431–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., Hayden, M. F., & Lakin, K. C. (1999a). Effectiveness and quality of individual planning in residential settings: An analysis of outcomes. Mental Retardation, 37, 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., Hayden, M. F., & Lakin, K. C. (1999b). Effectiveness of challenging behavior IHP objectives in residential settings: A longitudinal study. Mental Retardation, 37, 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., Hayden, M. F., & Lakin, K. C. (1999c). Interventions for challenging behavior in residential settings. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104, 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., & Keane, S. (2000). Outcomes and costs of community living: A matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 25, 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R. J., & Lakin, K. C. (1999). A longitudinal comparison of day services and outcomes of people who left institutions and those who stayed. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, B., & Einfeld, S. (2000). The trajectory of psychiatric disorders in young people with intellectual disabilities. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. M., Trigler, J. S., & Pfeiffer, K. T. (2001). Community services, issues, and service gaps for individuals with developmental disabilities who exhibit inappropriate sexual behaviors. Mental Retardation, 39, 11–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobson, J.W. (2007). Evaluating Developmental Disabilities Services. In: Jacobson, J.W., Mulick, J.A., Rojahn, J. (eds) Handbook of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Issues on Clinical Child Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32931-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics