We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative Selection

  • Chapter

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Cochlear Implants

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allum, J. H. J., R. Greisiger, S. Straubhaar and M. G. Carpenter. 2000. Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. British Journal of Audiology 34: 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI. 1989. Specifications for audiometers. New York, American National Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archbold, S. 1994. Monitoring progress in children at the pre-verbal stage. In: McCormick, B. and S. Sheppard, eds. Cochlear implants for young children. London, Whurr Publishers: 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, P., S. Staller, J. Arcaroli, A. Hines and K. Ebinger. 1999. Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Cochlear Corporation Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E., T. Daniels, R. Dowell, et al. 2000. Long term speech production outcomes in children who received cochlear implants before and after 2 years of age. 5th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Antwerp, Belgium: 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battmer, R.-D., D. Gnadeberg, D. J. Allum-Mecklenburg and T. Lenarz. 1995. Matchedpaired comparisons for adults using the Clarion or Nucleus devices. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench, R. J. and J. Bamford. 1979. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., P. Arndt, F. Bergeron, et al. 1996. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 1: 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., E. Parisi and G. M. Clark. 1995. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 220–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., B. C. Pyman, M. Gordon, et al. 1992. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 101: 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Z. Sarant, T. A. Serry, et al. 1998. Speech perception and spoken language in children with impaired hearing. In: Mannell, R. H. and J. Robert-Ribes, eds. ICSLP’ 98 proceedings. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 2615–2618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1968. Developments in speech audiometry. Sound 2: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1993. Speech perception, sensorineural hearing loss, and hearing aids. In: Studebaker, G. A. and I. Hochberg, eds. Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance. Needham Heights, MA, Allyn and Bacon: 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1997. Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: issues of efficacy and assessment. Scandinavian Audiology Supplementum 46: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1998. Evaluating the efficacy of hearing aids and cochlear implants in children who are hearing-impaired. In: Bess, F. H., ed. Children with hearing impairment: contemporary trends. Nashville, Bill Wilkerson Center Press: 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A., L. Hanin and O. Eran 1996. Speech perception and production in children with hearing impairment. In: Bess, F. H., J. S. Gravel and A. M. Tharpe, eds. Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Nashville, Wilkerson Center Press: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. M., R. C. Dowell, G. M. Clark, L. F. Martin and B. C. Pyman. 1985. Selection of patients for multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. In: Schindler, R. A. and M. M. Merzenich, eds. Cochlear implants. New York, Raven Press: 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 21: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., S. A. Roberts, Y C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1991. Results of speech perception and speech production training for three prelingually deaf parents using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. British Journal of Audiology 25: 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 2002. Learning to understand speech with the cochlear implant. In: Textbook of Perceptual Learning. Fahle, M. and T. Poggio, eds. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1999. Cochlear implants in the third millennium. American Journal of Otology 20: 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. J. Blamey, P. A. Busby, et al. 1987. A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant for children. Archives of Otolaryngology 113: 825–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. A. Busby, S. A. Roberts, et al. 1987. Preliminary results for the Cochlear Corporation multi-electrode intracochlear implants on six prelingually deaf patients. American Journal of Otology 8: 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., B. J. O’Loughlin, F. W. Rickards, Y. C. Tong and A. J. Williams. 1977. The clinical assessment of cochlear implant patients. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 91: 697–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. and B. C. Pyman. 1997. Preoperative medical evaluation. In: Clark, G., R. Cowan and R. Dowell, eds. Cochlear implantation for infants and children. Advances. San Diego, Singular: 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., R. K. Shepherd, B. K.-H. G. Franz and D. Bloom. 1984. Intracochlear electrode implantation. Round window membrane sealing procedures and permeability studies. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (suppl 410): 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y. C. Tong, L. F. Martin and P. A. Busby. 1981. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using an open-set word test. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91: 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. L., S. B. Waltzman and S. G. Fisher. 1993. A prospective, randomised study of cochlear implants. New England Journal of Medicine 328: 233–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consensus. 1995. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference Cochlear implants in adults and children. JAMA 274: 1955–1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. C., C. D. Brown, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1995. Speech perception in children using the advanced SPEAK speech-processing strategy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, M. A. 1982. Phonological intervention concepts and procedures. San Diego, College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D., P. Fletcher and M. Garman. 1976. The grammatical analysis of language disability. London, Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damsma, H., J. A. M. de Groot and F. W. Zonneveld. 1984. CT of cochlear otosclerosis. Radiologic Clinics of North America 22(1): 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. and S. R. Silverman. 1978. Hearing and Deafness. 4th edition. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., P. J. Blamey, G. M. Clark, et al. 1989. Results in children using the 22 electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(suppl 1): 81.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1995a. A clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, L. C. Rowland, et al. 1995b. A clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, M. F., K. Dankowski and G. McCandless. 1989. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 10: 288–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, M. F., L. Smith, G. McCandless, G. Dunnavant, J. Parkin and K. Dankowski. 1990. Pitch scaling and speech understanding by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 11: 310–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C. 1997. Preoperative audiological, speech, and language evaluation. In: Advances. Clark, G. M., R. S. C. Cowan and R. C. Dowell, eds. Cochlear implantation for infants and children. San Diego, Singular: 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1995. Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1997. Factors affecting outcomes in children with cochlear implants. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey, A. M. Brown and Y. C. Tong. 1986a. Perception of connected speech without lipreading, using a multi-channel hearing prosthesis. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 102: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., R. S. C. Cowan, G. Rance, R. D. Hollow, S. J. Dettman and E. J. Barker. 1998. Issues in the selection of children for cochlear implantation. Australian Journal of Audiology 20(suppl): 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. W. Dawson, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1991. Multichannel cochlear implantation in children. A summary of current work at the University of Melbourne. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., S. J. Dettman, P. J. Blamey, E. J. Barker and G. M. Clark. 2002a. Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes. Cochlear Implants International 3(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., S. J. Dettman, K. Hill, E. Winton, E. J. Barker and G. M. Clark. 2002b. Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: older is not always poorer. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., M. A. Marsh, R. D. Hollow, et al. 1993. Clinical comparison of open-set speech perception with the MSP and WSPIII speech processors and preliminary results for the new SPEAK processor. Abstracts of Third International Cochlear Implant Conference, Innsbruck: 14.6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. F. Martin, G. M. Clark and A. M. Brown. 1985. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 94: 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., D. J. Mecklenburg and G. M. Clark. 1986b. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 112: 1054–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and L. M. Dunn. 1981. Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and L. M. Dunn. 1997. Peabody picture vocabulary test, 3rd ed. Circle Pines, American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L. L. and D. R. Katz. 1980. Northwestern University children’s perception of speech (NU-CHIPS). St. Louis, Auditec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. 1982. Auditory training. Washington, DC, Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. and C. M. Alencewicz. 1976. Audiological evaluation of deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 41: 256–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. and C. Lind. 1994. Communication therapy: theory and practice. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 27: 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finitzo-Hieber, T., I. J. Gerling, N. D. Matkin and E. Cherow-Skalka. 1980. A sound effects recognition test for the pediatric audiological evaluation. Ear and Hearing 1: 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. B. and J. A. Logemann. 1971. Test of articulation competence. New York, Houghton and Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryauf-Bertschy, H., R. S. Tyler, D. M. Kelsay and B. J. Gantz. 1992. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryauf-Bertschy, H., R. S. Tyler, D. M. Kelsay, B. J. Gantz and G. G. Woodworth. 1997. Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant use and length of device use. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 40: 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., R. S. Tyler, G. Woodworth, N. Tye-Murray and H. Fryauf-Bertschy. 1994. Results of multichannel cochlear implant in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. American Journal of Otology 15(suppl 2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., G. G. Woodworth, J. F. Knutson, P. J. Abbas and R. S. Tyler. 1993. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 102(12): 909–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, L. and C. Hughes. 2000. A second look at “tweeners”. Candidacy considerations for 8 to 14. Presented at International Cochlear Implant Conference, Miami, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A., C. Brenner, J. Nicholas, R. Uchanski, N. Tye-Murray and E. Tobey. 2002. Rehabilitation factors contributing to implant benefit in children. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorlin, R. J., H. V. Toxiello and M. M. Cohen. 1995. Hereditary hearing loss and its syndromes. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, H. 1949. A phonetically balanced test of speech discrimination for children. Master’s thesis, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, H. A. 1964. Kindergarten PB word lists. In: Newby, H. A., ed. Audiology. New York, Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J. and K. Burian. 1985. Reimplantation of a molded scala tympani electrode: impact on psychophysical and speech discrimination abilities. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 94(1 pt 1): 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, J. D. and J. P. Poole. 1971. Speech audiometry in conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Sound 5: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D. 1976. Phonological disability in children. New York, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, A., H. L. Seldon and G. M. Clark. 1996. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal’s canal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 105: 701–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, A., H. L. Seldon, G. M. Clark and R. Ramsden. 1998. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 118: 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, A. S., H. L. Seldon, G. M. Clark, R. Madsen and C. Raine. 1995. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation: a case study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. K., G. E. Loeb and M. J. Barker. 1995. Distribution of speech recognition results with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 283–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-N., M.-H. Chung, Y.-T. Shim and J.-S. Yoon. 1995. Aided versus implanted speech recognition abilities in severe to profound postlingual deafness. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I., R. T. Miyamoto, C. L. Lento, E. Ying, T. O’Neill and B. Fears. 2002. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl189): 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I., D. B. Pisoni and M. J. Osberger. 1995. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamore, P. J. J., C. Verweij and M. P. Brocaar. 1985. Investigations of the residual hearing capacity of severely hearing-impaired and profoundly deaf subjects. Audiology 24: 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. 1976. Speech and the hearing impaired child: theory and practice. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. and A. H. Ling. 1978. Aural habilitation: the foundations of verbal learning in hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafee, M. F., G. E. Valvassori, R. L. Deitch, et al. 1985. Use of CT in the evaluation of cochlear otosclerosis. Radiology 156: 703–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarr, N. S. 1983. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 26: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., K. I. Kirk, A. M. Robbins, S. Todd and A. Riley. 1996. Speech perception and speech production skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngologica 116: 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., K. I. Kirk, A. M. Robbins, S. Todd, A. Riley and D. B. Pisoni. 1997. Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children with multichannel cochlear implants. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 52: 198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, J. S. and A. E. Geers. 1979. Grammatical analysis of elicited language: simple sentence level. St. Louis, Central Institute for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, J. S. and A. E. Geers. 1980. Grammatical analysis of elicited language: complex sentence level. St. Louis, Central Institute for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, J. S. and A. E. Geers. 1990. Early speech perception test for profoundly hearing-impaired children. St. Louis, Central Institute for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myer, B., M. Drira, D. Geger and C. H. Chouard. 1984. Results of round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness. Acta Otolaryngologica suppl 411: 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadol, J. B., Y.-S. Young and R. B. Glynn. 1989. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 98: 411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulos, T., G. O’Donoghue and S. Archbold. 1999. Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 109: 595–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M. J., S. D. Soli and D. J. Gelnett. 1996. Development and norming of a hearing in noise test for children. Los Angeles, House Ear Institute Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1085–1099.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordeen, K. W., H. P. Killackey and L. M. Kitzes. 1983. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 214: 144–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, G. M., T. P. Nikolopoulos and S. M. Archbold. 2000. Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet 356: 466–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, S. J., T. E. Mitchell, W. P. R. Gibson and H. Sanli. 2000. Abnormal positive potentials in round window electrocochleography. American Journal of Otology 21: 813–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, J. J., R. T. Miyamoto and S. Zimmerman-Phillips. 1991. Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl): 66S–80S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M., L. Fisher, L. Zimmerman-Phillips and M. Barker. 1998. Speech recognition performance of older children with cochlear implants. The American Journal of Otology 19: 152–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., A. M. Robbins, S. L. Todd, A. I. Riley, K. I. Kirk and A. E. Carney. 1996. Cochlear implants and tactile aids for children with profound hearing impairment. In: Bess, F., J. Gravel and A. M. Tharpe, eds. Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Nashville, TN, Bill Wilkerson Center Press: 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, P., S. Ellul, R. C. Dowell, B. C. Pyman and G. M. Clark. 1997. The relationship between aetiology of hearing loss and outcome following cochlear implantation in a paediatric population. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, E., D. K. Kessler and E. D. Schubert. 1982. Interim assessment of candidates for cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 108: 478–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, E. and C. C. Telleen. 1981. Speech perception with hearing aids and cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 107: 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, J. L., B. E. Stewart, K. Dankowski and L. J. Haas. 1989. Prognosticating speech performance in multichannel cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 101: 314–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pass, R. F., S. Stagno, G. J. Myers and C. A. Alford. 1980. Outcome of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: results of long-term congenital follow-up. Pediatrics 66: 758–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. E. and I. Lehiste. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 27: 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, G. 1984. A diagnostic speech test for severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children. Australian Journal of Audiology 6: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C. A. 1986. Pragmatics. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Speech and Hearing Conference, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyman, B. C., A. M. Brown, R. C. Dowell and G. M. Clark. 1990. Preoperative evaluation and selection of adults. In: Clark, G., Y. Tong and J. Patrick, eds. Cochlear prostheses. London, Churchill Livingstone: 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyman, B., P. Lacy, G. Clark and R. Dowell. 2000. The development of speech perception in children using cochlear implants: effects of etiologic factors and delayed milestones. American Journal of Otology 21: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S. P., M. W. Steinkamp, D. J. Power and B. W. Jones. 1978. Test of syntactic abilities. Beaverton, Oregon, Dormac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittner, A. L. and J. T. Steck. 1991. Predictors of cochlear implant use in children. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., R. C. Dowell, F. W. Rickards, D. E. Beer and G. M. Clark. 1998. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioural hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear and Hearing 19: 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., R. C. Dowell, F. W. Rickards and G. M. Clark. 1997. Evoked potential assessment of children with severe/profound hearing loss: a comparison of steady-state evoked potential (SSEP) and behavioural hearing threshold levels in subjects with absent click evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR). In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., F. W. Rickards, L. T. Cohen and G. M. Clark. 1994a. Accuracy of behavioural threshold predicition using steady-state evoked potentials. Australian Journal of Audiology 15(2 suppl): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., F. W. Rickards, L. T. Cohen, S. De Vidi and G. M. Clark. 1995. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hearing 16: 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., F. W. Rickards, R. C. Dowell, L. T. Cohen and G. M. Clark. 1994b. Steady-state potentials (SSEPs); an objective measure of residual hearing in young cochlear implant candidates. In: I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J. and E. S. Hochmair, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna, Manz: 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. 1990. Immune responses to human cytomegalorvirus infection. In: McDougall, J., ed. Cytomegalovirus. Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 221–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, F. W. and G. M. Clark. 1984. Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. In: Anodar, R. H., and C. Barber, eds. Evoked potentials II. Boston, Butterworths: 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, F. W., S. J. Dettman, P. A. Busby, et al. 1990. Preoperative evaluation and selection of children and teenagers. In: Clark, G. M., Y. C. Tong and J. F. Patrick, eds. Cochlear prostheses. Avon, Great Britain, Churchill Livingstone: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., J. J. Renshaw and S. W. Berry. 1991. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing impaired children. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F. P. and N. J. Spekman. 1984a. Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: part 1. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F. P. and N. J. Spekman. 1984b. Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: part 2. Guidelines, considerations, and specific evaluation procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B. F. and B. L. Joiner. 1994. Minitab handbook. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1996. The effect of language knowledge on speech perception in children with impaired hearing. In: McCormack, P. and A. Russell, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell, G. M. Clark and W. P. R. Gibson. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 22: 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrivener, B. P. and W. P. R. Gibson. 1987. Cochlear implant after radical mastoidectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, R. V., F.-G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wyginski and M. Ekelid. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270: 303–304.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shipp, D. B. and J. M. Nedzelski. 1994. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates. Journal of Otolaryngology 23(3): 172–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., G. M. Clark, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channels cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 15: 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., D. Tupper, A. Risser, H. Tuokke and D. Edgell. 1984. Human developmental neurophysiology. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J. 1990. Perceptual and production abilities in profoundly deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1(1): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J., A. L. Beiter, J. A. Brimacombe and P. Arndt. 1991a. Paediatric performance with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 126–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J., R. C. Dowell, A. L. Beiter and J. A. Brimacombe. 1991b. Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl 4): 34S–47S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S., C. Menapace and E. Domico. 1997. Speech perception abilities of adult and pediatric Nucleus implant recipients using Spectral Peak (SPEAK) coding strategy. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117: 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S., A. Parkinson, J. Arcaroli and P. Arndt. 2002. Pediatric outcomes with the Nucleus 24 contour: North American clinical trial. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapells, D. R., J. S. Gravel and B. A. Martin. 1995. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 16: 361–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. R. and M. J. M. Raffin. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 21: 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, T. W. and R. Carhart. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6, SAM-TR-66-55. Technical Report Sam-Tr: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomblin, J. B., L. Spencer, S. Flock, R. Tyler and B. Gantz. 1999. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42: 497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., P. A. Busby and G. M. Clark. 1988. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 951–962.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N., L. Spencer, E. G. Bedia and G. Woodworth. 1996. Initial evaluation of an interactive test of sentence gist recognition. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 7: 396–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N., L. Spencer and G. Woodworth. 1995. Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N., R. S. Tyler, G. G. Woodworth and B. J. Gantz. 1992. Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 13: 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman, S. and N. Cohen. 1998. Cochlear implants in children younger than 2 years old. American Journal of Otology 19: 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E. 1980. Assessment of cognitive and language abilities through play. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 11: 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, I. L., V. C. Steiner and R. E. Pond. 1979. Preschool language scale. Colombus, Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman-Phillips, S., A. M. Robbins and M. J. Osberger. 2000. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 109(suppl 185): 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology and The Bionic Ear Institute, The University of Melbourne, 348-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia

    Graeme Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). Preoperative Selection. In: Clark, G. (eds) Cochlear Implants. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95583-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21550-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation