Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research Directions

  • Chapter
Cochlear Implants

Part of the book series: Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing ((MASP))

  • 792 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, M., P. Pegg, C. James and P. J. Blamey. 1997. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. American Journal of Otology 18: S140–S141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., G. J. Dooley, and E. S. Parisi. 1994. Combination and comparison of electric stimulation and residual hearing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama. 2103–2106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., E. S. Parisi, and G. J. Dooley. 1996. Perception of two-formant vowels by normal listeners and people using a hearing aid and a cochlear implant, in opposite ears. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. P. McCormack and A. Russell. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association. 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Sarant, L. Paatsch, et al. 2001. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44: 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. J., R. K. Shepherd and G. M. Clark. 1996. Cochlear histopathologic characteristics following long-term implantation. Safety studies in the young monkey. Archives of Otolaryngology 122: 1097–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000a. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 21: 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000b. Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107: 547–558.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. K., G. M. Clark and R. Jones. 2003. Evaluation of trajectories and contact pressures for the straight Nucleus cochlear implant electrode array—a two-dimensional application of finite element analysis. Medical Engineering and Physics 25(2): 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarey, J., A. G. Paolini and G. M. Clark. 2001. Brainstem encoding of short voice onset times in natural speech. Proceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society, Brisbane 12: 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1996. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the coding of frequency, the perception of pitch and the development of cochlear implant speech processing strategies for profoundly deaf people. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 23: 766–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1997. Advances in cochlear implant, speech processing. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 2001. Editorial Cochlear implants: climbing new mountains. The Graham Fraser Memorial Lecture 2001. Cochlear Implants International 2(2): 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., T. D. Carter, C. L. Maffi and R. K. Shepherd. 1995. Temporal coding of frequency: neuron firing probabilities for acoustic and electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. and D. Lawrence. 2000. Technical features of the Nucleus, Med-El and Clarion cochlear implants. Australian Journal of Oto-Laryngology 3: 516–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. C., E. Saunders and M. Tykocinski. 2000. Clinical outcomes with the Nucleus Contour electrode array. Australian Journal of Audiology 22(suppl): 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, L. N., G. M. Clark, P. F. Bartlett and P. L. Marzella. 2001a. Axonal elongation of mammalian auditory neurons in vitro following treatment with growth factors. Proceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society 12: 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, L. N., G. M. Clark, P. F. Bartlett and P. L. Marzella. 2001b. LIF is more potent than BDNF in promoting neurite outgrowth of mammalian auditory neurons in vitro. Neuroreport 12: 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, L. N., G. M. Clark, P. F. Bartlett and P. L. Marzella. 2002. A continuous supply of BDNF is necessary for sustained auditory neuron survival in deafened guinea pigs. Proceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society 13: 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, L. N., G. M. Clark, P. F. Bartlett and P. L. Marzella. 2003. BDNF-induced survival of auditory neurons in vivo: cessation of treatment leads to a accelerated loss of survival effects. Journal of Neuroscience Research 71(6): 785–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayden, D. B. 2000. The effect of rate of stimulation on consonant recognition for users of the CI24M cochlear implant. Abstracts of the Twenty-third midwinter research meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology. St Petersburg Beach, Florida, February 20–24 2000: 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayden, D. B. and G. M. Clark. 2000. In: Barlow, M. ed. The effect of rate stimulation of the auditory nerve on phoneme recognition. Proceedings of the Eighth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, A.J., M. J. John, T. Campbell, A. Georgevich, S. Woodhouse, T. Aoki, N. Ogata and G. G. Wallace. 1996. Integration of biocomponents with synthetic structures: use of conducting polymer-polyelectrolyte composites. Proc. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials 2716: 164–176.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffress, L. A. 1948. A place theory of sound localization. Physiological Psychology 41: 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotwal, A. and C. E. Schmidt. 2001. Electrical stimulation alters protein adsorption and nerve cell interactions with electrically conducting biomaterials. Biomaterials 22(10):1055–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J. C. R. 1948. The influence of interaural phase upon the masking of speech by white noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 20: 150–159.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. F. A., P. J. Blamey, C. James, K. L. Galvin and D. MacFarlane. 2000a. Adaptive range of optimisation for hearing aids. In: Barlow, M., ed. Proceedings of the Eighth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. F. A., C. James, P. J. Blamey, B. Swanson, Y. Just and D. S. MacFarlane. 1999. Adaptive dynamic range optimisation; pre-processing for cochlear implants. 1999 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses. Asilomar Conference Center, California: 127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. F. A., C. James, P. J. Blamey, et al. 2000b. Adaptive dynamic range optimisation for cochlear implants. Australian Journal of Audiology 22(suppl): 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzella, P. L., G. M. Clark, R. K. Shepherd, P. F. Bartlett and T. J. Kilpatrick. 1997. The interactions between the cytokine LIF and the neurotrophins on spiral ganglion cells. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurk, H. and J. MacDonald. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264: 746–748.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. and P. E. Nicely. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(3): 338–352.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, D., R. K. Shepherd, H. L. Seldon, S. Xu and G. M. Clark. 1992. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens. Hearing Research 62: 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. R., Y. Y Duan, J. F. Patrick, H. B. Harrison, O. Reinhold and G. M. Clark. 1999. Testing of thin-film electrode arrays for cochlear implants of the future. In: Lithgow, B. and I. Cosic, eds. Biomedical Research in the 3rd Millennium. Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the Victorian chapter of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. M., S. M. Wei, W M. Rabinowitz and P. M. Zurek. 1990. Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. Acta Otolaryngology (suppl 469): 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, B. 1989. Surgical anatomy of the ear and temporal bone. New York, Thieme Medical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. T., A. Wise, J. Hardman, D. Casley, G. Clark and S. O’Leary submitted. Identification of cellular targets of neurotrophins delivered to the cochlear scalae of deafened guinea pigs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell, G. M. Clark and W P. R. Gibson. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 22: 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E., L. T. Cohen, W. Aschendorff, et al. 2000. Psychophysical measures and NRT thresholds as a function of electrode position in the cochlea: results of a multi-centre study using the Contour electrode array. 5th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Antwerp, Belgium, June 4–7, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. E., V. R. Shastri, J. P. Vacanti and R. Langer. 1997. Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94(17): 8948–8953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldon, H. L., M. Dahm, G. M. Clark and S. Crowe. 1995. Silastic with polyacrylic acid filler: swelling properties, biocompatibility and potential use in cochlear implants. Biomaterials 15: 1161–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. K., G. M. Clark and R. C. Black. 1983a. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (suppl 399): 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. K., G. M. Clark, R. C. Black and J. F. Patrick. 1983b. The histopathological effects of chronic electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 97: 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, F. B. 1966. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Archives of Otolaryngology 84: 2–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. 1968. A distinctive feature analysis of responses to a multiple choice intelligibility test. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6: 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, V., D. Grayden, R. Dowell, G. Clark, P. Maruff. 2002. The role of visual speech cues in the auditory perception of synthetic stimuli by children using a cochlear implant and children with normal hearing. 9th Australian Speech and Science Technology Conference, Melbourne, 14 December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykocinski, M., E. Saunders, L. T. Cohen, et al. 2001. The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design. American Journal of Otology 22: 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1995a. Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2498–2503.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1995b. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1997. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102: 495–507.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1999. Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise. Australian Journal of Audiology 21: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandali, A. E. 2001. Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 2049–2061.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandali, A. E., J. M. Harrison, J. Huigen, K. Plant and G. M. Clark. 1995. Multichannel cochlear implant speech processing: further variations of the Spectral Maxima sound processor strategy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 378–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S. A., J. Xu, H. L. Seldon, R. K. Shepherd and G. M. Clark. 1993. Investigation of curved intracochlear electrode arrays. Australian Journal of Oto-Laryngology 1: 276–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A., G. M. Clark, B. C. Pyman, M. Brown and R. Zmood. 1997. The development of a tympanic membrane sensor for a totally implantable cochlear implant or hearing aid. In: Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology and The Bionic Ear Institute, The University of Melbourne, 348-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia

    Graeme Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). Research Directions. In: Clark, G. (eds) Cochlear Implants. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95583-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21550-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation