Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Results

  • Chapter
Cochlear Implants

Part of the book series: Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing ((MASP))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allum, J. H. J., R. Greisiger, S. Straubhaar and M. G. Carpenter. 2000. Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. British Journal of Audiology 34: 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, A., D. Bogle, T. T. Ingram and M. W. McIsaac. 1971. The Edinburgh articulation test. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archbold, S. 1994. Monitoring progress in children at the pre-verbal stage. In: McCormick, B. and S. Sheppard, eds. Cochlear implants for young children. London, Whurr: 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, P., S. Staller, J. Arcaroli, A. Hines and K. Ebinger. 1999. Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Cochlear Corporation Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J., P. Blamey, K. Lee and D. Cheung. 2000. Differentiation in tone production in Cantonese-speaking hearing-impaired children. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Beijing, China, Military Friendship: Vol 1: 669–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. G., P. J. Blamey and L. F. A. Martin. 2002a. A multidimensional scaling analysis of tone discrimination ability in Cantonese-speaking children using a cochlear implant. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16: 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. G., P. J. Blamey, L. F. A. Martin, et al. 2002b. Tone discrimination in Cantonese-speaking children with cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16: 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battmer, R.-D., D. Gnadeberg, D. J. Allum-Mecklenberg and T. Lenarz. 1994. Matchedpair comparisons for adults using the Clarion or Nucleus devices. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battmer, R. D., S. P. Gupta, D. J. Allum-Mecklenburg and T. Lenarz. 1995. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench, R. J. and J. Bamford. 1979. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, K. I. and L. S. Eisenberg. 1985. Methods and issues in the cochlear implantation of children: an overview. Ear and Hearing 6(3 suppl): 6S–13S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, K. I., L. L. Tonokawa, L. M. Dye and W. F. House. 1989. Open-set speech recognition in children with a single-channel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 10: 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J. 2002. Development of spoken language by deaf children. In: Marschark, M. and P. Spencer, eds. Handbook of deaf studies, language and education. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Barry, C. Bow, J. Sarant, L. Paatsch and R. Wales. 2001a. The development of speech production following cochlear implantation. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 15: 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Barry and P. Jacq. 2001b. Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44: 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J. and G. M. Clark. 1986. A model of auditory visual perception. Proceedings of the first Australian conference on speech and technology, Canberra: 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., P. W. Dawson, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1992a. Speech perception, production and language results in a group of children using the 22-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 1: 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, A. M. Brown, G. M. Clark and P. M. Seligman. 1987. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82: 48–57.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, Y. C. Tong, A. M. Brown, S. M. Luscombe and G. M. Clark. 1984a. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76: 104–110.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1984b. An acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76:97–103.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., M. Grogan and M. B. Shields. 1994. Using an automatic word-tagger to analyse the spoken language of children with impaired hearing. In: Togneri, R., ed. Fifth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., C. J. James, G. J. Dooley and E. S. Parisi. 2000. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear and Hearing 21: 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., L. F. Martin and G. M. Clark. 1985. A comparison of three speech coding strategies using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 209–217.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., E. Parisi and G. M. Clark. 1995. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 220–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., B. C. Pyman, M. Gordon, et al. 1992b. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 101: 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Sarant, L. Paatsch, et al. 2001c. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44: 264–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Z. Sarant, T. A. Serry, et al. 1998. Speech perception and spoken language in children with impaired hearing. In: Mannell, R. H. and J. Robert-Ribes, eds. Proceedings of ICSLP’ 98 Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 2615–2618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollard, P., A. Popp, P. Chute and S. Parisier. 1999. Specific language growth in young children using the Clarion cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 108: 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1968. Developments in speech audiometry. Sound 2: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1991a. CASPER: a user friendly system for Computer Assisted Speech Perception Testing and Training. New York, City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1991b. Speech perception measures and their role in the evaluation of hearing aid performance in a pediatric population. In: Feigin, J. A. and P. G. Stelmachowicz, eds. Pediatric amplification. Omaha, Boys Town National Research Hospital: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1997. Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: issues of efficacy and assessment. Scandinavian Audiology Supplementum 46: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A. 1998. Evaluating the efficacy of hearing aids and cochlear implants in children who are hearing-impaired. In: Bess, F. H., ed. Children with hearing impairment: contemporary trends. Nashville, Bill Wilkerson Center Press: 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A., A. E. Geers and J. S. Moog. 1991. Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl 4): 81S–89S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A., L. Hanin and O. Eran. 1996. Speech perception and production in children with hearing impairment. In: Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Bess, F. H., J. S. Gravel and A. M. Tharpe, eds. Nashville, Tenn, Wilkerson Center Press: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A., T. Hnath-Chisolm and L. Hanin. 1985. A sentence of test of speech perception: reliability, set-equivalence, and short-term learning. New York, City University of New York, report no. RC110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, H. and K. Saulnier. 1981. Signed English: a brief follow-up to the first evaluation. American Annals of the Deaf 126: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, H., K. Saulnier and L. Hamilton. 1980. Signed English: a first evaluation. American Annals of the Deaf 125: 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimacombe, J. A., P. L. Arndt, S. J. Staller and C. M. Menapace. 1995. Multichannel cochlear implants in adults with residual hearing. NIH Consensus Development Conference on Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. 1973. A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000a. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 21: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000b. Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107: 547–558.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., S. A. Roberts, Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1991. Results of speech perception and speech production training for three prelingually deaf parents using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. British Journal of Audiology 25: 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., Y C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1984. Underlying dimensions and individual differences in auditory, visual and auditory-visual vowel perception by hearing impaired children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75: 1858–1865.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., Y C. Tong, S. A. Roberts, et al. 1989. Results for two children using a multiple-electrode intracochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(6): 2088–2102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y R. 1930. A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45: 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chute, P. M. 1993. Cochlear implants in adolescents. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 48: 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciocca, V., A. L. Francis, R. Aisha and L. Wong. 2002. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111: 2250–2256.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1986. The University of Melbourne/Cochlear Corporation (Nucleus) program. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 19: 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. J. Blamey, P. A. Busby, et al. 1987a. A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant for children. Archives of Otolaryngology 113: 825–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. A. Busby, S. A. Roberts, et al. 1987b. Preliminary results for the Cochlear Corporation multielectrode intracochlear implants on six prelingually deaf patients. American Journal of Otology 8: 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. A. Crosby, R. C. Dowell, et al. 1983. The preliminary clinical trial of a multichannel cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74: 1911–1914.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., R. C. Dowell, A. M. Brown, et al. 1983. The clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. An initial study in four patients with a profound total hearing loss. Medical Journal of Australia 2: 430–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., R. C. Dowell, R. S. C. Cowan, B. C. Pyman and R. L. Webb. 1996. Multicenter evaluations of speech perception in adults and children with the Nucleus (Cochlear) 22-channel cochlear implant. In: Portmann, M., ed. Transplants and Implants in Otology III. Amsterdam, Kugler: 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. and Y. C. Tong. 1981. Multiple-electrode cochlear implant for profound or total hearing loss: a review. Medical Journal of Australia 1: 428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. and Y. C. Tong. 1982. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. A summary of results for two patients. Archives of Otolaryngology 108: 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, Q. R. Bailey, et al. 1978. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 4: 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and R. C. Dowell. 1982. Single versus multiple-channel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in speech processing for a totally deaf patient. Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society 13: 212P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and R. C. Dowell. 1983. Clinical results with a multi-channel pseudobipolar system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 370–377.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and L. F. Martin. 1981a. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using closed-set spondaic words. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 95: 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and L. F. Martin. 1981b. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using open-set CID sentences. Laryngoscope 91: 628–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, L. F. Martin and P. A. Busby. 1981c. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using an open-set word test. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91: 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, L. F. A. Martin, et al. 1981d. A multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using nonsense syllables. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 90: 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. T., F. W. Rickards and G. M. Clark. 1991. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90: 2467–2479.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. L., S. B. Waltzman and S. G. Fisher. 1993. A prospective, randomised study of cochlear implants. New England Journal of Medicine 328: 233–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., S. Hieber, H. A. Arts and T. A. Zwolan. 2000. Speech, vocabulary, and the education of children using cochlear implants: oral or total communication? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43: 1185–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. C., C. D. Brown, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1995. Speech perception in children using the advanced SPEAK speech-processing strategy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. M., G. C. Alexander and C. Gilmore. 1987. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear and Hearing 8(suppl 5): 119S–126S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, M. A. 1982. Phonological intervention concepts and procedures. San Diego, College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. 1981. Clinical linguistics. Vienna, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. 1992. Profiling linguistic disability, 2nd ed. London, Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D., P. Fletcher and M. Garman. 1989. Grammatical analysis of language disability, 2nd ed. London, Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. and S. R. Silverman. 1978. Hearing and deafness. 4th edition New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. M., J. Elfenbeing, R. Schum and R. A. Bentler. 1986. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language educational and psychosocial behaviour of children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 51: 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., P. J. Blamey, G. M. Clark, et al. 1989. Results in children using the 22 electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(suppl 1): 81.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1995a. A clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, L. C. Rowland, et al. 1992. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents and prelinguistically deafened adult: speech perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 401–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, L. C. Rowland, et al. 1995b. A clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fillipo, C. L. and B. L. Scott. 1978. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64: 1186–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, B. 1976. The phonological systems of deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 41: 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, B., B. McIntosh and L. Woodhouse. 1998. Early lipreading ability and speech and language development of hearing-impaired pre-schoolers. In: Campbell, R., B. Dodd and D. Burnham, eds. Hearing by eye II. Hove, UK, Psychology Press: 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, M. F., K. Dankowski and G. McCandless. 1989. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 10: 288–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C. 1990. Speech perception in noise using the multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Australian Journal of Audiology (suppl 4): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1995. Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166):324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1997. Factors affecting outcomes in children with cochlear implants. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi: 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., A. M. Brown and D. J. Mecklenburg. 1990a. Clinical assessment of implanted deaf adults. In: Clark, G., Y. Tong and J. Patrick, eds. Cochlear prostheses. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone: 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. W. Dawson, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1991. Multichannel cochlear implantation in children. A summary of current work at the University of Melbourne. American Journal of Otology (suppl 12): 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. F. A. Martin, P. J. Blamey and A. M. Brown. 1985a. Assessment of implant patient speech discrimination. In: Schindler, R. and M. Merzenich, eds. Cochlear implants. New York, Raven Press: 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. F. Martin, G. M. Clark and A. M. Brown. 1985b. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 94: 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. F. Martin, Y. C. Tong, G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1982. A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 25: 509–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., D. J. Mecklenburg and G. M. Clark. 1986. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 112:1054–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1987a. Evaluation of a two-formant speech-processing strategy for a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1987b. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 104(5–6): 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. A. Whitford, P. M. Seligman, B. K.-H. Franz and G. M. Clark. 1990b. Preliminary results with a miniature speech processor for the 22-electrode/Cochlear hearing prosthesis. In: Sacristan, T., ed. Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Amsterdam, Kugler and Ghedini: 1167–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and L. M. Dunn. 1981. Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, Minnesota American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and L. M. Dunn. 1997. Peabody picture vocabulary test, 3rd ed. Circle Pines, Minnesota American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K. 1980. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 885–91.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K. 1983. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 405: 241–258.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L. L. and D. R. Katz. 1980. Northwestern University children’s perception of speech (NU-CHIPS). St Louis, Auditec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. 1972. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual speech recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15: 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. 1982. Auditory training. Washington, DC, Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. and C. M. Alencewicz. 1976. Audiological evaluation of deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 41: 256–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. B. and J. A. Logemann. 1971. Test of articulation competence. New York, Houghton and Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, D. C. 2002. Pediatric performance with the Med El Combi 40 + cochlear implant system. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandour, J. 1981. Perceptual dimensions of tone: evidence from Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9: 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandour, J. T. and R. A. Harshman. 1978. Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: a multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech 21: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., B. F. McCabe, R. S. Tyler and J. P. Preece. 1987. Evaluation of four cochlear implant designs. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96: 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., R. S. Tyler, J. F. Knutson, et al. 1988. Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope 98: 1100–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., R. S. Tyler, G. Woodworth, N. Tye-Murray and H. Fryauf-Bertschy. 1994. Results of multichannel cochlear implant in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. American Journal of Otology 15(suppl 2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., G. G. Woodworth, J. F. Knutson, P. J. Abbas and R. S. Tyler. 1993. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 102(12): 909–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. 1979. Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test. Novato, CA, Academic Therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaunaurd, G. C. and G. F. Kuhn. 1980. Phase-and group-velocities of acoustic waves around a sphere simulating the human head. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: S57.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. E. and J. S. Moog. 1988. Predicting long-term benefits from single-channel cochlear implants in profoundly hearing-impaired children. American Journal of Otology 9: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. E. and J. S. Moog. 1991. Evaluating the benefits of cochlear implants in an education setting. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. E. and J. S. Moog. 1994. Effectiveness of cochlear implants and tactile aids for deaf children. The Volta Review 96: 1–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. E. and E. A. Tobey. 1995. Longitudinal comparison of the benefits of cochlear implants and tactile aide in a controlled educational setting. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 328–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbertson, M. and A. G. Kamhi. 1995. Novel word learning in children with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 630–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayden, D. B. 2000. The effect of rate of stimulation on consonant recognition for users of the CI24M cochlear implant. Abstracts of the Twenty-third midwinter research meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology. St Petersburg Beach, Florida, February 20–24, 2000: 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayden, D. B. and G. M. Clark. 2000. The effect of rate stimulation of the auditory nerve on phoneme recognition. In: Barlow, M., ed. Proceedings of the Eighth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayden, D. B. and G. M. Clark. 2001. Improved sound processor for cochlear implants. International patent application No. PCT/AU00/01038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, D. 1982. Sentences for speech intelligibility in noise. Scandanavian Audiology 11: 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, D. 1984. Clinical measurements of speech reception thresholds in noise. Scandanavian Audiology 13: 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenstab, M. S. and E. M. Tobey. 1991. Language development in children receiving Nucleus multi-channel cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 12: 55S–65S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, H. A. 1964. Kindergarten PB word lists. In: Newby, H. A., ed. Audiology. New York, Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, J., J. Muller and F. Schon. 1997. Evaluation of performance with the COMBI 40 cochlear implant in adults: a muticentric clinical study. ORL Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and its Related Specialties 59: 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollow, R. D., R. C. Dowell, R. S. C. Cowan, M. C. Skok, B. C. Pyman and G. M. Clark. 1995. Continuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudgins, C. and F. Numbers. 1942. An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf. Genetic Psychology Monographs 25: 289–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D. 1976. Phonological disability in children. New York, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerger, S., S. Lewis and J. Jerger. 1980. Paediatric speech intelligibility test 1. Generation of speech materials. International Journal of Paediatric Otolaryngology 2: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalikow, D. N., K. N. Stevens and L. L. Elliott. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61: 1337–1351.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. T. 1978. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64: 1386–1391.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. K. 1998. New directions in speech processing II: the electrode connection. Paper presented at the 7th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. K., G. E. Loeb and M. J. Barker. 1995. Distribution of speech recognition results with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 283–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J., V. Gall, C. Desloovere, R. Knecht, A. Mikowski and C. von Ilberg. 1996. A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 253: 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I. 2000. Challenges in the clinical investigation of cochlear implant outcomes. In: Niparko, J. K., K. I. Kirk, N. K. Mellon, et al, eds. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I. and C. Hill-Brown. 1985. Speech and language results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 6(suppl): 36S–47S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I., D. B. Pisoni and M. J. Osberger. 1995. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G. F. 1979. Stop consonant place perception with single-formant stimuli: evidence for the role of the front-cavity resonance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65: 991–1000.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G. F. and E. D. Burnett. 1977. Acoustic pressure field alongside a manikin’s head with a view towards in situ hearing-aid tests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62: 157–161.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. 1978. Adaptive testing in audiology. Scandinavian Audiology (suppl 6): 241–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H., N. McGarr and D. Geffner. 1987. Development of language and communication skills in hearing-impaired children. Introduction. ASHA Monographs 26: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. and S. B. Resnick. 1978. Speech reception by the hearing impaired: methods of testing and the development of new tests. Scandinavian Audiology (suppl 6): 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limbrick, E. A., S. McNaughton and M. M. Clay. 1992. Time engaged in reading: a critical factor in reading achievement. American Annals of the Deaf 137: 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. 1976. Speech and the hearing impaired child: theory and practice. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. 1984. Early intervention for hearing-impaired children: oral options. San Diego, College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. and A. H. Ling. 1978. Aural habilitation: the foundations of verbal learning in hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. and T. G. Nienhuys. 1983. The deaf child: habilitation with and without a cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 92: 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, N. J. and J. F. Duchan. 1993. Assessing children’s language in naturalistic contexts 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magner, M. E. 1972. A speech intelligibility test for deaf children. Northampton, MA, Clarke School for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. A., J. Xu, P. J. Blamey, et al. 1993. Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth [published erratum appears in Am J Otol 1993 Nov;14(6):627]. American Journal of Otology 14(4): 386–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, H. J., C. M. McKay and A. Vandali. 1992. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multi-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 3367–3371.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr, N. S. 1983. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 26: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott and G. M. Clark. 1991. Preliminary results with a six spectral maxima speech processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 6: 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott, A. Vandali and G. M. Clark. 1992. A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (Multipeak) processor. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 112: 752–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M., C. Byers and M. White. 1984. Scalatympani electrode arrays. Fifth quarterly progress report. NIH contract NO1-NS9-2353: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M. M., M. White, M. C. Vivion, P. A. Leake-Jones and S. Walsh. 1979. Some considerations of multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf; interfacing electrode arrays with the auditory nerve array. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 87: 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T., M. Svirsky, K. Kirk and R. Miyamoto. 1998. Improvements in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: effects of device, communication mode and chronological age. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 41: 846–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. and P. E. Nicely. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(3): 338–352.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., K. I. Kirk, A. M. Robbins, S. Todd and A. Riley. 1996. Speech perception and speech production skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngologica 116: 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., K. I. Kirk, S. L. Todd, A. M. Robbins and M. J. Osberger. 1995a. Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 334–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R., M. Osberger, A. Robbins, W. Myers and K. Kessler. 1993. Prelingually deafened children’s performance with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology 14: 437–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., M. J. Osberger, A. M. Robbins, W. A. Myres, K. Kessler and M. L. Pope. 1992. Longitudinal evaluation of communication skills of children with single or multichannel cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology 13: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., M. J. Osberger and S. L. Todd. 1994. Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. In: Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J. and E. S. Hochmair, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna, Manz: 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., A. M. Robbins, M. J. Osberger, S. L. Todd, A. I. Riley and K. I. Kirk. 1995b. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments. American Journal of Otology 16: 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, J. S. and A. E. Geers. 1990. Early speech perception test for profoundly hearing-impaired children. St Louis, Central Institute for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moores, D. F., K. L. Weiss and M. W. Goodwin. 1973. Receptive abilities of deaf children across five modes of communication. Exceptional Children 40: 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E. and P. A. Herman. 1987. Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: implications for acquisition and instruction. In: McKeown, M. G. and M. E. Curtis, eds. The nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. 1995. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Cochlear implants in adults and children. JAMA 274: 1955–1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1085–1099.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M. J., S. D. Soli and D. J. Gelnett. 1996. Development and norming of a hearing in noise test for children. Los Angeles, House Ear Institute Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, G., T. Nikolopoulos, S. Archbold and M. Tait. 1999. Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility. Ear and Hearing 20: 419–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, J. J., R. T. Miyamoto and S. Zimmerman-Phillips. 1991a. Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl): 66S–80S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., A. Robbins, S. Berry, S. Todd, L. Hesketh and A. Sedey. 1991b. Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with a cochlear implant or tactile aid. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., A. M. Robbins and R. T. Miyamoto. 1991c. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M., A. Robbins, S. Todd and A. Riley. 1994. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants. Volta Review 96: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., A. M. Robbins, S. L. Todd, A. I. Riley, K. I. Kirk and A. E. Carney. 1996. Cochlear implants and tactile aids for children with profound hearing impairment. In: Bess, F., J. Gravel and A. M. Tharpe, eds. Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Nashville, Bill Wilkerson Center Press: 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, E., D. K. Kessler, C. C. Telleen and E. D. Schubert. 1980. The minimal auditory capabilities battery. Department Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, E. and C. C. Telleen. 1981. Speech perception with hearing aids and cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 107: 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, A. J., R. S. Tyler, G. G. Woodworth, M. W. Lowder and B. J. Gantz. 1996. A within-subject comparison of adult patients using the Nucleus F0F1F2 and F0F1F2B3B4B5 speech processing strategies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39: 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni, D. B. 2000. Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning and memory in speech perception. Ear and Hearing 21: 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, G. 1984. A diagnostic speech test for severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children. Australian Journal of Audiology 6: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R. and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 18: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlman, A. G. and R. W. Kranz. 1924. Binaural minimum audition in a subject with ranges of deficient acuity. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 20: 335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C. A. 1986. Pragmatics. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Speech and Hearing Conference, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarros, C., K. Plant, L. Whitford, et al. 2000. Speech perception and speech production changes in children following alteration of speech processing strategy. Australian Journal of Audiology 22(suppl): 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarros, C. E., K. L. Plant, K. Lee, J. A. Decker, L. A. Whitford and R. S. C. Cowan. 2002. Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception and speech production outcomes. Ear and Hearing 23(1 Suppl): 18S–27S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S. and P. Paul. 1990. Language and deafness. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittner, A. L., L. B. Smith, M. J. Osberger, T. V. Mitchell and D. B. Katz. 1994. The impact of audition on the development of visual attention. Psychological Science 5: 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffin, M. J. M. and A. R. Thornton. 1980. Confidence levels for differences between speech discrimination scores: a research note. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 23: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramkalawan, T. W. and A. C. Davis. 1992. The effects of hearing loss and age of intervention on some language metrics in young hearing-impaired children. British Journal of Audiology 26: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., F. W. Rickards, L. T. Cohen, M. J. Burton and G. M. Clark. 1993. Steady state evoked potentials: a new tool for the accurate assessment of hearing in cochlear implant cadidates. In: Fraysse, B. and O. Deguine, eds. Cochlear implants: new perspectives. Basel, Karger: 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, G., F. W. Rickards, L. T. Cohen, S. De Vidi and G. M. Clark. 1995. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hearing 16: 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynell, J. K. 1983. Reynell developmental language scales manual-revised. Windsor, NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynell, J. K. and C. P. Gruber. 1990. Reynell developmental language scales. Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, F. W. and G. M. Clark. 1984. Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. In: Anodar, R. H. and C. Barber, eds. Evoked potentials II. Boston, Butterworths: 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., M. J. Osberger, R. T. Miyamoto and K. S. Kessler. 1995. Language development in children with cochlear implants. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 50: 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., J. J. Renshaw and S. W. Berry. 1991. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing impaired children. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., M. A. Svirsky and K. I. Kirk. 1997. Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate? Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117: 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F. P. and N. J. Spekman. 1984a. Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: part 1. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F. P. and N. J. Spekman. 1984b. Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: part 2. Guidelines, considerations, and specific evaluation procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, E. 1972. When are speech sounds learned? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37: 55–63.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1996. The effect of language knowledge on speech perception in children with impaired hearing. In: McCormack, P. and A. Russell, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell, G. M. Clark and W P. R. Gibson. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 22: 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. 1990. Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics 11: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, B. and M. P. Moeller. 1992. What is learnable in manually coded English sign systems? Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 313–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. A., D. K. Kessler and M. A. Barker. 1995. Clarion patient performance: an update on the clinical trials. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, S. T., K. I. Kirk, M. Svirsky and R. T. Miyamoto. 1998. The effects of processor strategy on the speech perception performance of pediatric Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 19: 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, P. M. and H. J. McDermott. 1995. Architecture of the SPECTRA 22 speech processor. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., E. Wiig and W. A. Secord. 1995. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals, 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipp, D. B. and J. M. Nedzelski. 1995. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 194–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, L. D., D. Austin, B. A. Lewis, J. L. McSweeny and D. L. Wilson. 1997. The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 40: 708–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, L. D. and J. Kwiatkowski. 1982. Phonological disorders III: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47: 256–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. 1968. A distinctive feature analysis of responses to a multiple choice intelligibility test. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6: 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., G. M. Clark, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channels cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 15: 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., M. S. Fourakis, T. A. Holden, L. K. Holden and M. E. Demorest. 1996. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels. Ear and Hearing 17: 182–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, T. A. Holden, et al. 1991. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 12: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, L. A. Whitford, K. L. Plant, C. Psarros and T. A. Holden. 2002. Speech recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, Ace, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear and Hearing 23(3): 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. R. 1975. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18: 795–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L., N. Tye-Murray and J. B. Tomblin. 1998. The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 19: 310–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. 2002. Language development of children with cochlear implants. In: Christiansen, J., ed. Cochlear implants in children. Washington, DC, Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J. 1990. Perceptual and production abilities in profoundly deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1(1): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J., A. L. Beiter, J. A. Brimacombe and P. Arndt. 1991a. Paediatric performance with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 126–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J., R. C. Dowell, A. L. Beiter and J. A. Brimacombe. 1991b. Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl 4): 34S–47S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S., C. Menapace and E. Domico. 1997. Speech perception abilities of adult and pediatric Nucleus implant recipients using Spectral Peak (SPEAK) coding strategy. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117: 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S., A. Parkinson, J. Arcaroli and P. Arndt. 2002. Pediatric outcomes with the Nucleus 24 contour: North American clinical trial. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapells, D. R., J. S. Gravel and B. A. Martin. 1995. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 16: 361–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoel-Gammon, C. 1998. Sounds and words in early language acquisition. The relationship between lexical and phonological development. In: Paul, R., ed. Explaining the speech-language connection. Baltimore, Paul H Brookes: 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, V. N., J. Z. Sarant, P. Maruff, P. J. Blamey, P. A. Busby and G. M. Clark. 2002. Cognitive processing in children using cochlear implants: the relationship between visual memory, attention and executive functions and developing language skills. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirsky, M. and T. Meyer. 1999. Comparison of speech perception in pediatric Clarion cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 108: 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirsky, M., A. Robbins, K. Kirk, D. Pisoni and R. Miyamoto. 2000. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science 11: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svirsky, M. A., R. B. Sloan, M. Caldwell and R. T. Miyamoto. 1998. Speech intelligibility of prelingually deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants. Presented at the 7th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielemeir, M. A., L. L. Tonokawa, B. Petersen and L. S. Eisenberg. 1985. Audiological results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 6(3 suppl): 27S–35S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. R. and M. J. M. Raffin. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 21: 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, T. W. and R. Carhart. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 SAM-TR-66-55. Technical Report: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, T. W., R. Carhart and L. Wilbur. 1963. A test for speech discrimination composed of CNC monosyllabic words, Northwestern University Auditory Test No 4. Texas, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, E., S. Angelette and C. Murchison. 1991. Speech production in children receiving a multichannel cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 48S–54S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, E., A. Geers and C. Brenner. 1994. Speech production results: speech feature acquisition. Volta Review 96: 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, E. and S. Hasenstab. 1991. Effects of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl): 48S–54S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, E., S. Staller, J. Brimacombe and A. Beiter. 1988. Objective measures of speech production in children using cochlear implants. American Speech Hearing Association 30: 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomblin, J. B., L. Spencer, S. Flock, R. Tyler and B. Gantz. 1999. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42: 497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., R. C. Black, G. M. Clark, et al. 1979. A preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 93: 679–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., P. A. Busby and G. M. Clark. 1988. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 951–962.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y C, G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1980. Speech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 1897–1899.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y C, J. M. Harrison, A. Vandali. 1991. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Ninth quarterly progress report. NIH contract No. 1-DC-9-2400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N., L. Spencer and G. Woodworth. 1995. Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S. 1988. Open-set word recognition with the 3M/Vienna single-channel cochlear implant. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery 114: 1123–1126.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., B. J. Gantz, B. F. McCabe, M. W. Lowder, S. R. Otto and J. P. Preece. 1985. Audiological results with two single channel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 94: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S. and M. W. Lowder. 1992. Audiological management and performance of adult cochlear-implant patients. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 71:117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., M. W. Lowder and S. R. Otto. 1984. Initial Iowa results with the multichannel cochlear implant from Melbourne. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27: 596–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., B. C. J. Moore and F. K. Kuk. 1989a. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 887–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., J. P. Preece and M. W. Lowder. 1983. The Iowa cochlear implant test battery. University of Iowa, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Iowa City, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., N. Tye-Murray and B. C. J. Moore. 1989b. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Audiology 28: 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., N. Tye-Murray, J. P. Preece, B. J. Gantz and B. F. McCabe. 1987. Vowel and consonant confusions among cochlear implant patients: do different implants make a difference? Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. 1998. Bilateral electrical stimulation with multi-channel cochlear implants. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1995. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M. and G. M. Clark. 1997. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102: 495–507.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R. J. M., Y. C. Tong, R. D. Hollow, J. Huigen and G. M. Clark. 1990. Preliminary studies on a bilateral cochlear implant user. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(suppl 1): S193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandali, A. E., L. A. Whitford, K. L. Plant and G. M. Clark. 2000. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing 21: 608–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman, S. B., N. Cohen, R. H. Gomolin, W. H. Shapiro, S. R. Ozdamar and R. A. Hoffman. 1994. Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children. American Journal of Otology 15(suppl 2): 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman, S. B., N. L. Cohen and W. H. Shapiro. 1992. Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population. Laryngoscope 102(4): 395–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E. 1980. Assessment of cognitive and language abilities through play. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 11: 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, L. A., P. M. Seligman, C. Everingham, et al. 1995. Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 115: 629–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E., W. A. Secord and E. Semel. 1992. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals—preschool. San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S. 2000. Strategies for representing speech information with cochlear implants. In: Niparko, J. K., ed. Cochlear implants: principles and practice. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1992. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Twelfth quarterly progress report, April. 1992. NIH contract N01-DC-9-2401. Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1993. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Fifth quarterly progress report, Oct 1993. NIH contract N01-DC-2-2401. Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. and N. Mather. 1989. Woodcock-Johnson tests of cognitive ability. Allen, TX, DLM Teaching Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., R. C. Dowell and G. M. Clark. 1987. Results for Chinese and English in a multichannel cochlear implant patient. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshinaga-Itano, C., A. L. Sedey, D. K. Coulter and A. L. Mehl. 1998. Language of early-and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 102: 1161–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, I. L., V. C. Steiner and R. E. Pond. 1979. Preschool language scale. Colombus, Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman-Phillips, S., A. M. Robbins and M. J. Osberger. 2000. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 109(suppl 185): 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology and The Bionic Ear Institute, The University of Melbourne, 348-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia

    Graeme Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). Results. In: Clark, G. (eds) Cochlear Implants. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95583-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21550-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation