Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rehabilitation and Habilitation

  • Chapter
Cochlear Implants

Part of the book series: Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing ((MASP))

  • 807 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbas, P. J., C. J. Brown, J. K. Shallop, et al. 1999. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing 20: 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcantara, J. I., R. S. C. Cowan, P. J. Blamey, L. A. Whitford and G. M. Clark. 1988. Evaluation of training strategies with an electrotactile speech processor. Australian Journal of Audiology (suppl 3): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpiner, J. G. 1982. Handbook of adult rehabilitative audiology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, P., S. Staller, J. Arcaroli, A. Hines and K. Ebinger 1999. Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Cochlear Corporation Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E., T. Daniels, R. Dowell, et al. 2000. Long term speech production outcomes in children who received cochlear implants before and after 2 years of age. 5th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Antwerp, Belgium: 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench, R. J. and J. Bamford. 1979. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, F. S. 1987. Facilitating classroom listening. San Diego, College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Barry and P. Jacq. 2001. Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44: 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J. and G. M. Clark. 1985. A wearable multiple-electrode electrotactile speech processor for the profoundly deaf. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 1619–1621.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., M. Grogan and M. B. Shields. 1994. Using an automatic word-tagger to analyse the spoken language of children with impaired hearing. In: Togneri, R., ed. Fifth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., J. Z. Sarant, T. A. Serry, et al. 1998. Speech perception and spoken language in children with impaired hearing. In: Mannell, R. H. and J. Robert-Ribes, eds. ICSLP’ 98 proceedings. Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 2615–2618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, A., A. E. Geers and J. S. Moog. 1991. Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl 4): 81S–89S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braida, L. D., N. I. Durlach, R. P. Lippmann, B. L. Hicks, W M. Rabinowitz and C. M. Reed. 1979. Hearing aids-a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. ASHA Monographs 19: 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. M., R. C. Dowell, L. F. Martin and D. J. Mecklenburg. 1990. Training of communication skills in implanted deaf adults. In: Clark, G. M., Y. C. Tong and J. F. Patrick, eds. Cochlear prostheses. United Kingdom, Churchill Livingstone: 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. J., M. L. Hughes, B. Luk, P. J. Abbas, A. Wolaver and J. Gervais, 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor; data from adults. Ear and Hearing 21: 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000a. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 21: 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A. and G. M. Clark. 2000b. Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107: 547–558.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark 1988. Underlying structure of auditory-visual consonant perception by hearing-impaired children and the influences of syllabic compression. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31: 156–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., Y C. Tong, S. A. Roberts, et al. 1989. Results for two children using a multiple-electrode intracochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(6): 2088–2102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., L. A. Whitford, P. J. Blamey, L. M. Richardson and G. M. Clark. 1994. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 2658–2669.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. M., A. R. Fisher, T. M. Nygard, et al. 1995. Monitoring the electrically-evoked compound action potential using a new telemetry system. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1986. The University of Melbourne/Cochlear Corporation (Nucleus) program. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 19: 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 2002. Learning to hear and the cochlear implant. In: Fahle, M. and T. Poggio, eds. Textbook of perceptual learning. Cambridge, MIT Press: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, Q. R. Bailey, et al. 1978. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 4: 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y. C. Tong and J. Gwyther. 1976. Speech perception and the development of language in deaf children. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Audiological Society of Australia: 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. T., E. Saunders and G. M. Clark. 2001a. Psychophysics of a prototype perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hearing Research 155: 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. T., E. Saunders, B. K. Cone-Wesson and G. M. Clark. 1998. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implants: comparison of measurements made using NRT and forward masking. In: Barber, C., ed. Programme and Abstracts of First International Symposium and Workshop Objective Measures in Cochlear Implantation. Nottingham, UK 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. T., E. Saunders, M. R. Knight, R. S. C. Cowan and P. A. Busby. 2001b. Comparison of subjective loudness growth and NRT amplitude growth with stimulus current. 2nd international symposium and workshop on objective measures in cochlear implantation, Lyon, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. and H. Gregory. 1986. Auditory learning. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., S. Hieber, H. A. Arts and T. A. Zwolan. 2000. Speech, vocabulary, and the education of children using cochlear implants: oral or total communication? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43: 1185–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. C., E. J. Barker, P. Pegg, et al. 1998. Speech perception in implanted children: influence of preoperative residual hearing on outcomes. Australian Journal of Audiology 20(suppl): 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. C., C. D. Brown, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1995. Speech perception in children using the advanced SPEAK speech-processing strategy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, M. A. 1982. Phonological intervention concepts and procedures. San Diego, College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1995a. A clinical report on speech production of cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 551–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, L. C. Rowland, et al. 1995b. A clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 16: 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W. and G. M. Clark 1997a. Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore: 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W. and G. M. Clark. 1997b. Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a Multichannel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 18: 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., L. Skok and G. M. Clark. 1997. The effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 18: 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fillipo, C. L. and B. L. Scott. 1978. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64: 1186–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillier, N. 1998. Intracochlear recordings of electrically evoked compound action potentials. First international symposium and workshop on objective measures in cochlear implantation, Nottingham: 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillier, N., W. K. Lai, B. Almquist, et al. 2002. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) via a neural response telemetry (NRT) system. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 111(5 pt 1):407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillier, N., W. K. Lai, D. Cafarelli-Dees and E. von Wallenberg. 2000. Post-operative neural response telemetry findings in adults submitted for publication. Neural esponse telemetry: results from a European field trial, 12th AAA Convention, Chicago: 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, H. 1996. Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times? Ear and Hearing 17: 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, M. F. and P. C. Loizou. 1997. Mechanisms of vowel recognition for Ineraid patients fit with continuous interleaved sampling processors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102: 581–587.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1995. Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1997. Factors affecting outcomes in children with cochlear implants. In: Clark, G. M., ed. Cochlear implants. XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore: 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C. and R. S. C. Cowan. 1997. Evaluation of benefit: infants and children. In: Clark, G. M., R. S. C. Cowan and R. C. Dowell, eds. Cochlear implantation for infants and children—advances. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. W. Dawson, S. J. Dettman, et al. 1991. Multichannel cochlear implantation in children. A summary of current work at the University of Melbourne. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., S. J. Dettman, K. Hill, E. Winton, E. J. Barker and G. M. Clark. 2002. Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: older is not always poorer. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 111(suppl 189): 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1987. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 104(5–6): 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. A. Whitford, P. M. Seligman, B. K.-H. Franz and G. M. Clark. 1990. Preliminary results with a miniature speech processor for the 22-electrode/Cochlear hearing prosthesis. In: Sacristan, T., ed. Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Amsterdam, Kugler and Ghedini: 1167–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and L. M.Dunn. 1981. Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, Minnesota, American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. and L. M. Dunn. 1997. Peabody picture vocabulary test, 3rd ed. Circle Pines, Minnesota, American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyar, D. 1994. Monitoring progress: the role of a speech and language therapist. In: McCormick, B., S. Archbold and S. Shepphard, eds. Cochlear implants for young children. The Nottingham approach to assessment and rehabilitation. London, Whurr: 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K. 1980. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 885–891.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K., W. H. Dobelle and D. E. Brackmann. 1978. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Annals of Otology 87: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggermont, J. J., C. W. Ponton, M. Don, M. D. Waring and B. Kwong. 1997. Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngologica 117: 161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, L. S., K. I. Berliner, M. A. Thielemeir, K. Iler Kirk and N. Tiber. 1983. Cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing 4: 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erber, N. P. 1982. Auditory training. Washington, DC, Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. B. and J. A. Logemann. 1971. Test of articulation competence. New York, Houghton and Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryauf-Bertschy, H., R. S. Tyler, D. M. Kelsay and B. J. Gantz. 1992. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryauf-Bertschy, H., R. S. Tyler, D. M. Kelsay, B. J. Gantz and G. G. Woodworth. 1997. Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant use and length of device use. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 40: 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, S. and J. Ito. 1999. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 108: 634–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., R. S. Tyler, G. Woodworth, N. Tye-Murray and H. Fryauf-Bertschy. 1994. Results of multichannel cochlear implant in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. American Journal of Otology 15(suppl 2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, L. and C. Hughes. 2000. A second look at “tweeners.” Candidacy considerations for 8 to 14. Presented at International Cochlear Implant Conference. Miami, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. E. and J. S. Moog. 1988. Predicting long-term benefits from single-channel cochlear implants in profoundly hearing-impaired children. American Journal of Otology 9: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. E. and J. S. Moog. 1991. Evaluating the benefits of cochlear implants in an education setting. American Journal of Otology 12(suppl): 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A., J. Nicholas, N. Tye Murray, et al. 1999. Cochlear implants and education of the deaf child: second-year results. Central Institute for the Deaf. Research progress report—deaf education (cochlear implants). (http://www.cid.wustl.edu/index).

  • Goldgar, D. and M. J. Osberger. 1986. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. Factors related to academic achievement. ASHA Monographs 23: 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. D. 1990. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hearing Research 45: 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, N. A., A. Martsi-McClintock, L. M. Aitkin and R. K. Shepherd. 1999. The effect of a profound sensorineural hearing loss on the development of synapses in the auditory midbrain. British Society of Audiology News 27: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenstab, M. S. and E. M. Tobey. 1991. Language development in children receiving Nucleus multi-channel cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 12: 55S–65S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, J., N. Dillier and P. J. Abbas. 1996. Neural response telemetry—a new clinical research tool. Third Symposium on Pediatric Cochlear Implantation, Hannover: 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, A. V., M. Ash, T. J. Balkany, J. J. Schloffman and S. L. Butts. 1999. Speech perception results in children with cochlear implants: contributing factors. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 121: 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollow, R., L. Winton, K. Hill, R. Dowell and G. Clark. 2002. Validation of a technique for establishing maximum comfortable levels for children using cochlear implants. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology 23(2): 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. L., C. J. Brown, P. J. Abbas, A. A. Wolaver and J. P. Gervais. 2000a. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear and Hearing 21: 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. L., C. J. Brown, P. J. Abbas, A. A. Wolaver and J. P. Gervais. 2000b. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing 21: 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D. 1976. Phonological disability in children. New York, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. J., P. J. Blamey, L. F. A. Martin, B. A. Swanson, Y. Just and D. MacFarlane. 2002. ADRO (Adaptive dynamic range optimization) for cochlear implants: a preliminary study. Ear and Hearing 23(1 suppl): 49S–58S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerger, S., S. Lewis and J. Jerger. 1980. Paediatric speech intelligibility test 1. Generation of speech materials. International Journal of Paediatric Otolaryngology 2: 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. and E. Newport. 1989. Critical period effects in second-language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, L., M. Kossut and J. Skangiel-Kramska. 1997. Glutamate receptors in cortical plasticity: molecular and cellular biology. Physiology Review 77: 217–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, A. S., H. L. Seldon, G. M. Clark, R. Madsen and C. Raine. 1995. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation: a case study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, A., H. L. Seldon, G. M. Clark and R. Ramsden. 1998. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 118: 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I. 2000. Challenges in the clinical investigation of cochlear implant outcomes. In: Niparko, J. K., K. I. Kirk, N. K. Mellon, et al, eds. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I. and C. Hill-Brown. 1985. Speech and language results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 6(suppl): 36S–47S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kral, A., R. Hartmann, J. Tillein, S. Heid and R. Klinke. 2001. Delayed maturation and sensitive periods in the auditory cortex. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 6: 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, R. and I. Kretschmer. 1994. Discourse and hearing impairment. In: Ripich, D. and N. Creaghead, eds. School discourse problems. San Diego, Singular: 263–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, T. 2002. Auditory and visual information processing in cerebral cortical areas of cochlear implant users-PET activation study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology 23(2): 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, W. K. 1999. Guidelines for making NRT measurements. Cochlear AG, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesner, S. A., S. A. Sandridge and P. B. Kricos. 1987. Training and influences on visual consonant and sentence recognition. Ear and Hearing 8: 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H., N. McGarr and D. Geffner. 1987. Development of language and communication skills in hearing-impaired children. Introduction. ASHA Monographs 26: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. 1976. Speech and the hearing impaired child: theory and practice. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. 1984. Early intervention for hearing-impaired children: oral options. San Diego, College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. 1989. Foundations of spoken language for hearing impaired children. Washington, DC, AG Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. and A. H. Ling. 1978. Aural habilitation: the foundations of verbal learning in hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC, AG Bell Association for the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. and T. G. Nienhuys. 1983. The deaf child: habilitation with and without a cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 92: 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. F. A., Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1981. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. Evaluation using speech tracking. Archives of Otolaryngology 107: 157–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, R., R. Wodlinger-Cohen and S. Goldin-Meadow. 1987. Symbolic development in deaf children. New Directions for Child Development 36: 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P. A. and J. G. Alpiner. 1982. The remediation process. In: Alpiner, J. G., ed. Handbook of adult rehabilitative audiology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, H. J., K. R. Henshall and C. M. McKay. 2002. Benefits of syllabic input compression for users of cochlear implants. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13(1): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, H. J., C. M. McKay and A. Vandali. 1992. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multi-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 3367–3371.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr, N. S. 1983. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 26: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott, A. Vandali and G. M. Clark. 1992. A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (Multipeak) processor. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 112: 752–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C. M., M. D. Remine and H. J. McDermott. 2001. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110: 1514–1524.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mecklenburg, D. J., P. J. Blamey, P. A. Busby, R. C. Dowell, S. Roberts and F. W Rickards. 1990. Auditory (re)habilitation for implanted deaf children and teenagers. In: Clark, G., Y. Tong and J. Patrick, eds. Cochlear prostheses. United Kingdom, Churchill Livingstone: 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecklenburg, D. J., R. C. Dowell and V. Jenison. 1987. Rehabilitation manual. Englewood, Colorado, Cochlear Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M., C. Byers and M. White 1984. Scala tympani electrode arrays. Fifth quarterly progress report. NIH contract NO1-NS9-2353: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., K. I. Kirk, A. M. Robbins, S. Todd and A. Riley. 1996. Speech perception and speech production skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngologica 116: 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, R. T., K. I. Kirk, A. M. Robbins, S. Todd, A. Riley and D. B. Pisoni. 1997. Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children with multichannel cochlear implants. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 52: 198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. R. 1990. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: early cessation of developmental sensitivity of neurons in the cochlear nucleus to removal of the cochlea. Journal of Comparative Neurology 302: 810–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. R. and N. E. Kowalchuk. 1988. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: effects of unilateral cochlear lesions on cochlear nucleus volume and projections to the inferior colliculus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 272: 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morford, J. and R. Mayberry. 2000. A re-examination of “early exposure” and its implications for language acquisition by eye. In: Chamberlain, C., J. Morford and R. Mayberry, eds. Language acquisition by eye. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 111–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B., B. K. Cone-Wesson, R. C. Dowell and L. A. Whitford. 2000a. Perceptual threshold as a function of stimulus rate and its correspondence with electrically evoked 8th nerve action potentials, auditory brainstem and cortical responses. Australian Journal of Audiology 22(suppl): 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B., M. Knight, M. Davies, et al. 2000b. Investigation of an NRT based fitting procedure using high rates of stimulation—a multicentre investigation. Australian Journal of Audiology 22(suppl): 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. A., D. J. Van Tasell, A. C. Schroder, S. Soli and S. Levine. 1995. Electrode ranking of “place pitch” and speech recognition in electrical hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98: 1987–1999.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulos, T., G. O’Donoghue and S. Archbold. 1999. Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 109: 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordeen, K. W., H. P. Killackey and L. M. Kitzes. 1983. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 214: 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, G. M., T. P. Nikolopoulos and S. M. Archbold. 2000. Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet 356: 466–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., A. L. Beiter, V. Jenison and J. Moog. 1986. Auditory skill development in children with cochlear implants. Cochlear implants in children: proceedings from a multidisciplinary colloquium. In: Mecklenberg, D. J., ed. Seminars in hearing. New York, Thieme 7: 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M., L. Fisher, L. Zimmerman-Phillips and M. Barker. 1998. Speech recognition performance of older children with cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology 19: 152–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., M. P. Moeller, M. Eccarius, A. M. Robbins and D. Johnson. 1981. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. Expressive language skills. ASHA Monographs 23: 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M., A. Robbins, S. Todd and A. Riley. 1994. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants. Volta Review 96: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberger, M. J., A. M. Robbins, S. L. Todd, A. I. Riley, K. I. Kirk and A. E. Carney. 1996. Cochlear implants and tactile aids for children with profound hearing impairment. In: Bess, F., J. Gravel and A. M. Tharpe, eds. Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Nashville, Bill Wilkerson Center Press: 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. and S. Irlam 1994. Intelligibility and deafness: the skills of listener and speaker. In: Wirz, S. L., ed. Perceptual approach to communication disorders. London, Whurr. 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parving, A., B. Christensen, G. Salomon, C. B. Pedersen and L. Friberg. 1995. Regional cerebral activation during auditory stimulation in patients with cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 121(4): 438–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patowski, M. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30: 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, P. V. 1998. Literacy and deafness: the development of reading, writing, and literate thought. Boston, Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, D. J. and S. P. Quigley. 1973. Deaf children’s acquisition of the passive voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 16: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisler, G., M. Ahlstrom and A. Tvingstedt. 1997. The development of communication and language in deaf preschool children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 41: 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyman, B., P. Lacy, G. Clark and R. Dowell. 2000. The development of speech perception in children using cochlear implants: effects of etiologic factors and delayed milestones. American Journal of Otology 21: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., D. R. F. Irvine, L. Z. Wise and P. Heil. 1993. Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 338: 17–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanzone, G. H., C. E. Schreiner and M. M. Merzenich. 1993. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 13: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynell, J. K. and C. P. Gruber. 1990. Reynell developmental language scales. Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M. 1994. Guidelines for developing oral communication skills in children with cochlear implants. Volta Review 96: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., P. M. Bollard and J. Green. 1999. Language development in children implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 177: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., M. J. Osberger, R. T. Miyamoto and K. S. Kessler. 1995. Language development in children with cochlear implants. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 50: 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. M., M. A. Svirsky and K. I. Kirk. 1997. Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate? Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117: 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D., G. K. Yates and I. M. Winter. 1989. Primary afferent dynamic ranges and cochlear mechanics. Boden Conference: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodda, M. and C. Grove. 1987. Language, cognition and deafness. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. and T. G. Giolas. 1978. Auditory management of hearing-impaired children: principles and prerequisities for intervention. Baltimore, University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. and A. Boothroyd. 1987. Effect of two approaches to auditory training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. A. 1982. Aural rehabilitation: a management model. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1996. The effect of language knowledge on speech perception in children with impaired hearing. In: McCormack, P. and A. Russell, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology Canberra, Australian Speech Science and Technology Association: 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarant, J. Z., P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell, G. M. Clark and W. P. R. Gibson. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 22: 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., E. Wiig and W. A. Secord. 1995. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals, 3rd edition. San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, L. D. and J. Kwiatkowski. 1982. Phonological disorders III: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47: 256–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, D. G., G. G. Walter and R. L. Whitehead. 1982. Deafness and communication: assessment and training. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., G. M. Clark, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channels cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 15: 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. L., S. Rebscher and R. Beitel. 1995. Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 73: 449–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. 2000. “She’s still deaf, but now she can talk”. 15th Annual Conference on Issues in Language and Deafness. Omaha, Nebraska, Boys Town National Research Hospital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. 2002. Language development of children with cochlear implants. In: Christiansen, J., ed. Cochlear implants in children. Washington, DC, Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. 1975. Psychophysics. New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirsky, M., A. Robbins, K. Kirk, D. Pisoni and R. Miyamoto. 2000. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science 11: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomblin, J. B., L. Spencer, S. Flock, R. Tyler and B. Gantz. 1999. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42: 497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., R. C. Black, G. M. Clark, et al. 1979. A preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 93: 679–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C. and G. M. Clark. 1985. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 1881–1888.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y C. and G. M. Clark. 1986. Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79: 1958–1966.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y C, G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1980. Speech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 1897–1899.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N., L. Spencer and G. Woodworth. 1995. Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, B. E., S. A. Erdman, A. A. Montgomery, D. M. Schwartz and R. A. Prosek. 1981. Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, B. E., R. A. Prosek, A. A. Montgomery, C. K. Scherr and C. J. Jones. 1977. Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 20: 130–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. and H. Dillon. 1982. Compression in hearing aids: an analysis, a review, and some recommendations. National Acoustic Laboratories Report 90. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman, S. and N. Cohen. 1998. Cochlear implants in children younger than 2 years old. American Journal of Otology 19: 158–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E., W. A. Secord and E. Semel. 1992. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-preschool. San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S., C. C. Finley, D. T. Lawson, R. D. Wolford, D. K. Eddington and W M. Rabinowitz. 1991. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352(6332): 236–238.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1992. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Twelfth quarterly progress report, April 1992. NIH contract N01-DC-9-2401. Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, F.-G. and R. V. Shannon. 1992. Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation. Hearing Research 60(2): 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, F. G. and R. V. Shannon. 1994. Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system. Science 264(5158): 564–566.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, F.-G. and R. V. Shannon. 1995. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology and The Bionic Ear Institute, The University of Melbourne, 348-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia

    Graeme Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). Rehabilitation and Habilitation. In: Clark, G. (eds) Cochlear Implants. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95583-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21550-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation