Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A History

  • Chapter
Cochlear Implants

Part of the book series: Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing ((MASP))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atlas, L. E., M. K. Herndon, F. B. Simmons, L. J. Dent and R. L. White. 1983. Results of stimulus and speech-coding schemes applied to multichannel electrodes. Cochlear Prostheses, an international symposium. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 377–386.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. Proceedings of the International Cochlear Implant Symposium, Sept. 7–12, 1987, Düren, West Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfai, P. 1987. Cochlear implant: current situation. International Cochlear Implant Symposium, Duren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfai, P., G. Hortmann and S. Kubik. 1985. Extracochlear eight-channel electrode system. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 99(6): 549–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfai, P., A. Karczag, S. Kubik, P. Luers and W. Sarth. 1986. Extracochlear sixteen channel electrode system. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 19: 371–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfai, P., A. Karczag and P. Luers. 1984a. Cochlear implants. Clinical results: the rehabilitation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (suppl 411): 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfai, P., S. Kubik and G. Hortmann. 1984b. Our extra-scalar operating method of cochlear implantation. Experience with 46 cases. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (suppl 411): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battmer, R. D., E. Lehnhardt and R. Lasig. 1987. Speech perception for the German language. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 467–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, K. 1984. The hearing aid—its operation and development. 3rd ed. Livonia, MI, National Hearing Aid Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger-Vachon, C. and R. Mouhssine. 1985. Analysis of spectral models developed for the adaptation of a cochlear prosthesis. International AMSE Conference “Modelling and Simulation” 2: 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, K. I. and L. S. Eisenberg. 1985. Methods and issues in the cochlear implantation of children: an overview. Ear and Hearing 6(3 suppl): 6S–13S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, K. I., L. L. Tonokawa, L. M. Dye and W. F. House. 1989. Open-set speech recognition in children with a single-channel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 10: 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilger, R. C., F. O. Black and N. T. Hopkinson. 1977. Evaluation of subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 86(suppl 38): 1–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. C. and G. M. Clark. 1978. Electrical network properties and distribution of potentials in the cat cochlea. Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society 9: 71P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. C. and G. M. Clark. 1980. Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67(3): 868–874.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, Y. C. Tong, A. M. Brown, S. M. Luscombe and G. M. Clark. 1984a. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76: 104–110.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., R. C. Dowell, Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1984b. An acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76: 97–103.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bredberg, G., B. Ossean-Corp and B. Lindstrom. 1987. Results from 10 patients with extracochlear 3M/Vienna single electrode implant. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 175–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, S. B. and M. J. Turner. 1975. Electrical stimulation of the nervous system: the principle of safe charge injection with noble metal electrodes. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 2: 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, S. B. and M. J. Turner. 1977. Electrochemical considerations for safe electrical stimulation of the nervous system with platinum electrodes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 24: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, P. A., Y. C. Tong and G. M. Clark. 1986. Speech perception studies in the first year of usage of a multiple-electrode cochlear implant by prelingually deaf patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80(suppl 1): 30.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. A., I. T. Diamond and W. D. Neff. 1957. Role of auditory cortex in discrimination of changes in frequency. Journal of Neurophysiology 20: 108–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. A. and W. D. Neff. 1950. Role of the auditory cortex in the discrimination of changes in frequency. American Journal of Psychology 5: 474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouard, C. H. 1980. The surgical rehabilitation of total deafness with the multichannel cochlear implant. indications and results. Audiology 19: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouard, C. H., C. Fugain, B. Meyer and F. Chabolle. 1985. The Chorimac-12. A multichannel cochlear implant for total deafness. Description and clinical results. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica 39(4): 735–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouard, C. H., C. Fugain, B. Meyer and F. Chabolle. 1987. Indications for multi-or single-channel cochlear implant for rehabilitation of total deafness. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 10: 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouard, C. H., C. Fugain, B. Meyer and H. Lacombe. 1983. Long-term results of the multichannel cochlear implant. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 387–411.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chouard, C. H. and P. MacLeod. 1976. Implantation of multiple intracochlear electrodes for rehabilitation of total deafness: preliminary report. Laryngoscope 86: 1743–1751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1969a. Hearing due to electrical stimulation of the auditory system. Medical Journal of Australia 1: 1346–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1969b. Middle ear and neural mechanisms in hearing and the management of deafness. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1969c. Responses of cells in the superior olivary complex of the cat to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Experimental Neurology 24: 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1970a. A neurophysiological assessment of the surgical treatment of perceptive deafness. International Audiology 9: 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1970b. The surgical treatment of perceptive deafness. An experimental study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 39: 319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1973a. Experimental studies on the surgical treatment of perceptive deafness. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 3: 571–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1973b. A hearing prosthesis for severe perceptive deafness—experimental studies. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 87: 929–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1975. A surgical approach for a cochlear implant. An anatomical study. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 89: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1977. An evaluation of per-scalar cochlear electrode implantation techniques. An histopathogical study in cats. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 91: 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1987. The University of Melbourne—Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Volume 38. Basel, Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1993. The University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple-channel cochlear implant. Acoustics Australia 21: 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1995. Cochlear implants: historical perspectives. In: Plant, G. and K.-E. Spens, eds. Profound deafness and communication. London, Whurr: 165–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 1997. Historical perspectives. In: Clark, G. M., R. S. C. Cowan and R. C. Dowell, eds. Cochlear implantation for infants and children: advances. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group: 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 2000a. The cochlear implant: a search for answers. Cochlear Implants International 1: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. 2000b. Sounds from silence. St. Leonards, NSW, Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. J. Blamey, P. A. Busby, et al. 1987. A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant for children. Archives of Otolaryngology 113: 825–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. A. Busby, R. C. Dowell, et al. 1992. The development of the Melbourne/Cochlear multiple-channel cochlear implant for profoundly deaf children. Australian Journal of Oto-Laryngology 1: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., P. A. Busby, S. A. Roberts, et al. 1987. Preliminary results for the Cochlear Corporation multi-electrode intracochlear implants on six prelingually deaf patients. American Journal of Otology 8: 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., R. C. Dowell, R. S. C. Cowan, B. C. Pyman and R. L. Webb. 1996. Multicenter evaluations of speech perception in adults and children with the Nucleus (Cochlear) 22-channel cochlear implant. In: Portmann, M., ed. Transplants and implants in otology III. Amsterdam, Kugler: 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. and R. J. Hallworth. 1976. A multiple-electrode array for a cochlear implant. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 90: 623–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., R. J. Hallworth and K. Zdanius. 1975. A cochlear implant electrode. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 89: 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., H. G. Kranz and H. Minas. 1973a. Behavioral thresholds in the cat to frequency modulated sound and electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Experimental Neurology 41: 190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., H. G. Kranz and H. J. Minas. 1973b. Response thresholds to frequency modulated sound and electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society 4: 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., H. G. Kranz, H. J. Minas and J. M. Nathar. 1975. Histopathological findings in cochlear implants in cats. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 89: 495–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., H. G. Kranz and J. M. Nathar. 1972. Behavioural responses in the cat to electrical stimulation of the cochlea and auditory neural pathways. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Research 3: 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., J. M. Nathar, H. G. Kranz and J. S. Maritz. 1972. A behavioral study on electrical stimulation of the cochlea and central auditory pathways of the cat. Experimental Neurology 36: 350–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., B. C. Pyman, R. L. Webb, B. K.-H. G. Franz, T. J. Redhead and R. K. Shepherd. 1987. Surgery for safe the insertion and reinsertion of the banded electrode array. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., R. K. Shepherd, J. F. Patrick, R. C. Black and Y. C. Tong. 1983. Design and fabrication of the banded electrode array. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 191–201.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M. and Y. C. Tong. 1981. Multiple-electrode cochlear implant for profound or total hearing loss: a review. Medical Journal of Australia 1: 428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong and L. F. Martin. 1981a. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using open-set CID sentences. Laryngoscope 91: 628–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y C. Tong, L. F. Martin and P. A. Busby. 1981b. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. An evaluation using an open-set word test. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91: 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. M., Y. C. Tong and J. F. Patrick. 1990. Cochlear prostheses. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danley, M. J. and R. J. Fretz. 1982. Design and functioning of the single-electrode cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology-supplement 91(2 pt 3): 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., P. J. Blamey, G. M. Clark, et al. 1989. Results in children using the 22 electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(suppl 1): 81.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. W., P. J. Blamey, L. C. Rowland, et al. 1992. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents and prelinguistically deafened adult: speech perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 401–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deguine, O., B. Fraysse, A. Uziel, et al. 1993. Predictive factors in cochlear implant surgery. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 48: 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillier, N. and T. Spillmann. 1984. Results and perspectives with extracochlear round window electrodes. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (suppl 411): 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, H. 2001. Hearing aids. Sydney, Australia, Boomerang Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djourno, A. and C. Eyriès. 1957. Prosthese auditive par excitation electrique a distance du nerf sensoriel a l’aide d’un bobinage includ a demeure. Presse Medicale 35: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, P. E. 1987. Inductive RF link for an auditory prosthesis. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 25(3): 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doring, W. H., S. Klajman, W. Huber and E. Becker. 1987. An interactive concept of speech processor fitting. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 520–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, M. F., K. Dankowski and G. McCandless. 1989. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 10: 288–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormer, K. J., G. Richard, P. E. Hough and J. V. D. Hough. 1980. The cochlear implant (auditory prosthesis) utilizing rare earth magnets. American Journal of Otology 2(1): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douek, E., A. J. Fourcin, B. C. J. Moore and G. P. Clarke. 1977. A new approach to the cochlear implant. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 70: 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. J. Blamey, P. M. Seligman, A. M. Brown and G. M. Clark. 1986a. Speech recognition performance with a two-formant coding strategy for a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis. Australian Journal of Audiology (suppl 2): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., D. J. Mecklenburg and G. M. Clark. 1986b. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology 112:1054–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., P. M. Seligman, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1987. Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 104(5–6): 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. C., L. A. Whitford, P. M. Seligman, B.K.-H. Franz and G. M. Clark. 1990. Preliminary results with a miniature speech processor for the 22-electrode/cochlear hearing prosthesis. In: Sacristan, T., ed. Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Amsterdam, Kugler and Ghedini: 1167–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. B., H. D. Doyle, F. M. Turnbull, J. Abbey and L. House. 1963. Electrical stimulation in eighth nerve deafness. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society 28:148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. H., J. B. Doyle and F. M. Turnbull. 1964. Electrical stimulation of eighth cranial nerve. Archives of Otolaryngology 80: 388–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K. 1980. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 885–91.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K. 1983. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 405: 241–258.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K., W. H. Dobelle and D. E. Brackmann. 1978a. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Annals of Otology 87: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, D. K., W. H. Dobelle, D. Brackmann, M. G. Mladejovsky and J. Parkin. 1978b. Place and periodicity pitch elicited by stimulation of multiple scala tympani electrodes in deaf volunteers. Transactions—American Society for Artificial Internal Organs 24: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, B. J. 1985. Implications of optimized single-channel cochlear implants. The Hearing Journal 38: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, M. D. Submitted. History of the cochlear implant I: Djourno, Eyriès, and the first cochlear (?) implant. Otology and Neurotology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flottorp, G. 1953. Effect of different types of electrodes in electrophonic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25: 236–245.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcin, A. J., S. M. Rosen, B. C. Moore, et al. 1979. External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: clinical, psychophysical, speech-perceptual and histological findings. British Journal of Audiology 13(3): 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, B. K.-H. G., R. C. Dowell, G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1987. Recent developments with the Nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise. American Journal of Otology 8: 516–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J. G. 1987. UCH/RNID cochlear implant programme—an overview: patient selection and surgical technique. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretz, R. J. and R. P. Fravel. 1985. Design and function: a physical and electrical description of the 3M House cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing 6: 14S–19S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, A. H. 1961. Auditory system response to radio frequency energy—technical note. Aerospace Medicine 32: 1140–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugain, C., B. Meyer, F. Chabolle and C. H. Chouard. 1984. Clinical results of the French multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 411: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., B. F. McCabe, R. S. Tyler and J. P. Preece. 1987. Evaluation of four cochlear implant designs. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96: 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, B. J., N. Tye-Murray and R. S. Tyler. 1989. Word recognition performance with single-channel and multichannel cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology 10: 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genin, J. and R. Charachon. 1984. Electrical characteristics of a set of electrodes. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 411: 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersuni, G. V. and A. A. Volokhov. 1936. On the electrical excitability of the auditory organ: on the effect of alternating currents on the normal auditory apparatus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19: 370–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisselsson, L. 1950. Experimental investigation into the problem of humoral transmission in the cochlea. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (suppl 82): 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J. M. and W. D. Neff. 1961. Frequency discrimination after bilateral section of the brachium of the inferior colliculus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 116: 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhill, V. 1979. Progress in otology. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 88: 658–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. M. 1987. Selection of patients for cochlear implantation: electrophysiological testing and promontory stimulation. Tinnitus; site of lesion; implants for children. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, C. 1996. The contributions of the National Institutes of Health to the development of cochlear prostheses. Personal communication, April 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair, E. S. and I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer. 1983. Percepts elicited by different speech coding strategies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 268–279.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair, E. S., I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer and K. Burian. 1979. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea. International Journal of Artificial Organs 2(5): 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., E. S. Hochmair and K. Burian. 1981. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses. Medical Progress Technology 8: 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., E. S. Hochmair, R. E. Fischer and K. Burian. 1980. Cochlear prostheses in use: recent speech comprehension results. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 229: 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, L. R. 1987. Cochlear implant: the beginning. Laryngoscope 97: 996–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, W. F., K. I. Berliner and L. S. Eisenberg. 1981. The cochlear implant: 1980 update. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91: 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, W. F. and J. Urban. 1973. Long-term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in man. In: Fields, W. S. and L. A. Leavitt, eds. Neural organization and its relevance to prosthetics. New York, Intercontinental Medical Book: 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerger, J. F. 1960. Audiological manifestations of lesions in the auditory nervous system. Laryngoscope 70: 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, L.-G., W. F. House and F. H. Linthicum. 1982. Otopathological findings in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 91: 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. C., S. S. Stevens and M. H. Lurie. 1940. Three mechanisms of hearing by electrical stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 12: 281–290.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Katsuki, Y and Y. Kanno. 1962. Neural mechanism of the peripheral and central auditory system in monkeys. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34: 1396–1410.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. and H. F. Schuknecht. 1968. The spiral ganglion in profound deafness. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 65: 568–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiang, N. Y.-S., R. F. Pfeiffer and W. B. Warr. 1965. Stimulus coding in the cochlear nucleus. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 74: 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, K. I. 2000. Challenges in the clinical investigation of cochlear implant outcomes. In: Niparko, J. K., K. I. Kirk, N. K. Mellon, et al, eds. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, R. K. 1979. The bioengineering development of a sound encoder for an implantable hearing prosthesis for the profoundly deaf. Master of Engineering Science thesis, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. 1964. Direct stimulation of auditory nerve fibers. Archives of Otolaryngology 80: 367–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, D. T., B. S. Wilson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1996. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third quarterly progress report. NIH contract 1-DC-5-2103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leake-Jones, P. A. and S. J. Rebscher. 1983. Cochlear pathology with chronically implanted scala tympani electrodes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 203–223.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Legouix, J. P. 1957. Technique d’enrigistrement des potentials cochlearieres sur l’animal éveillé. Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biologie et de Ses Filiales 151: 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnhardt, E., R. Laszig, R. L. Webb, B. K.-H. G. Franz and G. M. Clark. 1987. Surgery for multielectrode cochlear implants. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 477–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, B. 1987. Electric stimulation: pre and postoperatively. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 179–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, G. E., M. W. White and W. M. Jenkins. 1983. Biophysical considerations in electrical stimulation of the auditory nervous system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 123–136.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lybarger, S. F. 1944. U.S. patent application SN 543, 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey, J. D. 1995. Cochlear implants-some considerations of a more or less ethical character. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104: 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, H. J., C. M. McKay and A. Vandali. 1992. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multi-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 3367–3371.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott and G. M. Clark. 1991. Preliminary results with a six spectral maxima speech processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus multiple electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Oto-Laryngological Society of Australia 6: 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott, A. Vandali and G. M. Clark. 1992. A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (Multipeak) processor. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 112: 752–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M. M., D. K. Kessler, S. J. Rebscher and R. A. Schindler. 1987. Progress in development and application of the University of California at San Francisco/Storz multichannel cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M. M., R. P. Michelson and C. R. Pettit. 1973. Neural encoding of sound sensation evoked by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. Annals of Otology 82: 486–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M. M. and M. D. Reid. 1974. Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus. Brain Research 77: 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M. M., M. White, M. C. Vivion, P. A. Leake-Jones and S. Walsh. 1979. Some considerations of multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf: interfacing electrode arrays with the auditory nerve array. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 87: 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, R. P. 1971. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea-a preliminary report. Archives of Otolaryngology 93: 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. and P. E. Nicely. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(3): 338–352.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., L. G. Duckert, D. Sutton, B. E. Pfingst, M. A. Malone and F. A. Spelman. 1985. Animal models: relevance to implant use in humans. In: Schindler, R. and M. Merzenich, eds. Cochlear implants. New York, Raven Press 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., M. A. Malone and L. G. Duckert. 1983. Functional and histological effects of electrical stimulation of the cochlea. In: Webster, W., and L. Aitkin, eds. Mechanisms of hearing. Clayton, Victoria, Canada, Monash University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgon, A., C. Berger-Vachon, J. M. Chanal, G. Kalfoun and C. Dubreuil. 1984. Cochlear implant: experience of the Lyon team. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 411: 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxon, E. C. 1971. Neural and mechanical responses to electrical stimulation of the cat’s inner ear. PhD dissertation. Cambridge, MA, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrevergne, M., R. Dauman, P. Lagourgue and M. Bourdon. 1987. Extra-cochlear implant Prelco. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuys, T. G. W., G. N. Musgrave, P. A. Busby, et al. 1987. Educational assessment and management of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, I. S., J. Marquet, E. Offeciers, et al. 1987. The Laura cochlear prosthesis development description. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingst, B. E., J. A. Donaldson, J. M. Miller and F. A. Spelman. 1979. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 88(5 pt 1): 613–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingst, B. E. and N. L. Rush. 1985. Discrimination of simultaneous frequency and level changes in electrical stimuli. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingst, B. E., D. Sutton and J. M. Miller. 1981. Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 92: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pialoux, P., C. H. Chouard and B. Meyer. 1979. Indications and results of the multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 87: 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. P. and S. D. Erulkar. 1962. Transneuronal cell degeneration in the auditory relay nuclei of the cat. Journal of Anatomy 96: 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riseberg, A. and E. Aglefors. 1987. Relation between speech perception ability and results on psychoacoustic tests for single channel cochlear implants. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. E., J. F. Brugge, D. J. Anderson and J. E. Hind. 1967. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 30: 769–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. E., R. Galambos and J. R. Hughes. 1959. Microelectrode studies of the cochlear nuclei of the cat. Bulletin of John Hopkins Hospital 104: 211–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, A., G. Moushegian and R. Galambos. 1963. Unit responses to sound from auditory nerve of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 26: 449–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. A., M. M. Merzenich, M. W. White and B. Bjorkroth. 1977. Multi electrode intracochlear implants—nerve survival and stimulation patterns. Archives of Otolaryngology 103: 691–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, H. 1953. Techniques for study of cochlear function and pathology in experimental animals. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 58: 377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, H. F. and R. C. Woellner. 1955. An experimental and clinical study of deafness from lesions of the cochlear nerve. Journal of Laryngology 69: 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, P. M. and H. J. McDermott. 1995. Architecture of the SPECTRA 22 speech processor. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 104(suppl 166): 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. K., G. M. Clark and R. C. Black. 1983a. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results. Acta Oto-Laryngologica-supplement 399: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. K., G. M. Clark and R. C. Black. 1983b. Physiological and histopathological effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation. In: Webster, W. R. and L. M. Aitkin, eds. Mechanisms of hearing. Clayton, Melbourne, Australia, Monash University Press: 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. K., G. M. Clark, R. C. Black and J. F. Patrick. 1982. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society 13: 211P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. K., G. M. Clark, R. C. Black and J. F. Patrick. 1983c. The histopathological effects of chronic electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 97: 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, F. B. 1966. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Archives of Otolaryngology 84: 2–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, F. B. 1967. Permanent intracochlear electrodes in cats. Tissue tolerance and cochlear microphonics. Laryngoscope 77: 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, F. B., J. M. Epley, R. C. Lummins, et al. 1965. Auditory nerve: electrical stimulation in man. Science 148(366): 104–106.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, F. B., C. J. Monegeon, W. R. Lewis and D. A. Huntington. 1964. Electrical stimulation of acoustical nerve and inferior colliculus. Archives of Otolaryngology 79: 559–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, M. W., G. M. Clark, L. A. Whitford, et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channels cochlear implant system. American Journal of Otology 15: 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoorenburg, G. F. and A. F. van Olphen. 1987. Pre-operative electrostimulation of the auditory nerve and post-operative results with the House/3M implant. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 227–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. L., S. J. Rebscher, K. Cao, P. A. Leake and K. Kelly. 1990. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I. Expansion of central representation. Hearing Research 50: 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. L., S. J. Rebscher, P. Leake, K. Kelly and K. Cao. 1991. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hearing Research 56: 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, H. C. and H. E. von Gierke. 1964. Hearing sensations in electric fields. Aeroscopic Medicine 35: 834–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman, T. and N. Dillier. 1985. Cochlear implants in the deaf: indications, methods, results. Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis 74: 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, S. J., R. C. Dowell, A. L. Beiter and J. A. Brimacombe. 1991. Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 12(suppl 4): 34S–47S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. and R. C. Jones. 1939. The mechanism of hearing by electrical stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 10: 261–269.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, D., J. M. Miller and B. E. Pfingst. 1980. Comparison of cochlear histopathology following two implant designs for use in scala tympani. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 89: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasaki, I. 1954. Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibres of the guinea pig. Journal of Neurophysiology 17: 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielemeir, M. A., L. L. Tonokawa, B. Petersen and L. S. Eisenberg. 1985. Audiological results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 6(3 suppl): 27S–35S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., R. C. Black, G. M. Clark, et al. 1979. A preliminary report on a multiplechannel cochlear implant operation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 93: 679–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell and G. M. Clark. 1983. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74: 73–80.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C, P. A. Busby and G. M. Clark. 1986. Psychophysical studies on prelingual patients using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80(suppl 1): S30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., P. A. Busby and G. M. Clark. 1988. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 951–962.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., G. M. Clark, P. J. Blamey, P. A. Busby and R. C. Dowell. 1982. Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71: 153–160.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., G. M. Clark, P. M. Seligman and J. F. Patrick. 1980. Speech processing for a multiple-electrode cochlear implant hearing prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68: 1897–1899.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., R. C. Dowell, P. J. Blamey and G. M. Clark. 1983. Two-component hearing sensations produced by two-electrode stimulation in the cochlea of a deaf patient. Science 219: 993–994.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. C., J. B. Millar, G. M. Clark, L. F. Martin, P. A. Busby and J. F. Patrick. 1980. Psychophysical and speech perception studies on two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 94: 1241–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., M. W. Lowder and S. R. Otto. 1984. Initial Iowa results with the multichannel cochlear implant from Melbourne. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27: 596–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. S., N. Tye-Murray, J. P. Preece, B. J. Gantz and B. F. McCabe. 1987. Vowel and consonant confusions among cochlear implant patients: do different implants make a difference? Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvoda, M., J. Betka and J. Hruby. 1987. The first experience with cochlear implantations in Czechoslovakia. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situations. International cochlear implant symposium. West Germany, Duren: 235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Helmholtz, H. L. F. 1863. Die Lehre von den tonempfindungen als physiologische grundlage fur die theorie der musik. Braunschweig, F Vieweg and Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliker, J. R., H. Carson, E. E. Douek, A. J. Fourcin and S. Rosen. 1987. Prosthesis development in the external pattern input group. In: Banfai, P., ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walloch, R. A., J. A. Fenwick and R. Boberg. 1980. A reaction-time analysis of electrocochlear stimulation in cats. Laryngoscope 90: 861–6. See Battmer et al 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E. G. and C. W. Bray. 1930. Auditory nerve impulses. Science 71: 215.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. L., L. A. Roberts, N. E. Cotter and O. H. Kwon. 1983. Thin-film electrode fabrication techniques. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405: 183–90.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. J., G. M. Clark and G. V. Stanley. 1974. Behavioural responses in the cat to simple patterns of electrical stimulation of the terminal auditory nerve fibres. Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society 5(2): 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. J., G. M. Clark and G. V. Stanley. 1976. Pitch discrimination in the cat through electrical stimulation of the terminal auditory nerve fibers. Physiological Psychology 4: 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S. 1997. The future of cochlear implants. British Journal of Audiology 31: 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1992. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Twelfth quarterly progress report, April 1992. NIH contract N01-DC-9-2401. Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, M. Zerbi and C. C. Finley. 1993. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Fifth quarterly progress report, Oct 1993. NIH contract N01-DC-2-2401. Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., R. C. Dowell and G. M. Clark. 1987. Results for Chinese and English in a multichannel cochlear implant patient. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96(suppl 128): 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollner, F. and W. D. Keidel. 1963. Gerorvermittlung durch elektrische erregung des nervus acousticus. Archiv Ohr Nas Kehlkopfheilk 181: 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology and The Bionic Ear Institute, The University of Melbourne, 348-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia

    Graeme Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). A History. In: Clark, G. (eds) Cochlear Implants. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21550-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95583-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21550-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation