Abstract
The South African Quality of Life Project has tracked subjective well-being, life satisfaction and happiness, since the early eighties at the national level. In most democratic countries around the globe, the average citizen says he or she is satisfied with life in general. In South Africa this is not the case. Since the early 1980s, the trend study shows up disparities between one sector of the South African population that is satisfied with life in general and various aspects of life and another sector that is very dissatisfied. Generally, the better-off report higher levels of satisfaction and happiness than the worse-off. The most plausible explanation for the South African quality-of-life constellation is the huge gap in living standards between rich and poor, a legacy of the apartheid era, which discriminated against blacks and to a lesser extent against Indian and coloured people. Euphoria following on the first democratic elections in April 1994, which registered equally high aggregate levels of happiness and life satisfaction among all sectors of the population, was short-lived. Under democracy, expectations “for a better life for all”, the election slogans for the 1994 and 1999 general elections, has risen. South Africa has one of the most enlightened constitutions, which guarantees basic human rights and supports advancement of the previously disadvantaged. As long as South Africans perceive barriers to accessing the material rewards of democracy, they do not see justice has been done. South Africa is currently grappling with problems common to other societies in transition to democracy. Since 1994, government programmes and policies have been devised to address the critical twin problems of poverty and inequality in society. The latest round of research for the South African Quality of Life Trends Project probes popular assessments of the policies and programmes aimed at improving the quality of life of ordinary South Africans. Interviews with a panel of 25 opinion leaders in the run-up to the June 1999 general elections were followed by a nationally representative opinion survey in October 1999. The paper outlines the role of social indicators in monitoring quality of life in South Africa and reports findings from the elite and rank-and-file surveys. Generally, the winners and losers in the new political dispensation see changes from a different perspective. The disadvantaged are more likely to have seen material gains and recommend increased delivery of services and opportunities for social mobility. The advantaged, who have mainly experienced non-material or no gains since 1994, are more likely to be pessimistic about the future. It is concluded that the grounds well of optimism will sustain the majority of South Africans who are still dissatisfied with life until their dreams of the good life are fulfilled.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
African National Congress: 1994, The Reconstruction and Development Programme: A Policy Framework (Umanyano Publications, Johannesburg).
Brown, B.V. and T. Corbett: 1998, Social Indicators and Public Policy in the Age of Devolution (IRP Special report series. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty).
Central Statistical Service (CSS):. 1996, Living in South Africa: Selected findings of the 1995 October Household Survey (Central Statistical Service, Pretoria).
Central Statistical Service (CSS): 1997, Census’ 96: Preliminary Estimates of the Size of the Population of South Africa (Central Statistical Service, Pretoria).
Eckersley, R.: 2001, ‘The mixed blessings of material progress: Diminishing returns in the pursuit of happiness’, Journal of Happiness Studies 1, pp. 267–292.
International Herald Tribune: 2000, ‘South Africa to withold data on crime’. August 4, p. 12.
Johnson, R.W.: 1999, ‘How to use that huge majority’, Focus 16, pp. 33–36 (Helen Suzman Foundation, Johannesburg).
Kotzé, H.: 1993, ‘Attitudes in transition II: Elites on economy’, Indicator South Africa 10(3), pp. 23–28.
MacGregor, K.: 1999, ‘“Sunny with some stormclouds”: The Reality Check survey’, Indicator South Africa 16(2), pp. 20–28.
Mattes, R., H. Taylor and C. Africa: 1999, ‘Judgement and choice in the 1999 South African election’, Politikon 26(2), pp. 235–247.
May, J. (ed.): 1998a, Poverty and Inequality in South Africa (Praxis Publishing, Durban, South Africa).
May, J. (ed.): 1998b, Experience and Perceptions of Poverty in South Africa (Praxis Publishing, Durban, South Africa).
May, J., M.R. Carter, L. Haddad and J.A. Maluccio: 2000, ‘KwaZulu Natal Income Dynamics Study (KIDS) 1993–98: a longitudinal household database for South African policy analysis’, Development Southern Africa 17(4), pp. 567–581.
Møller, V.: 1995, ‘Indicators for Africa: The October household survey’, Indicator South Africa 12(3), pp. 86–90.
Møller, V.: 1998, ‘Quality of life in South Africa: Post-apartheid trends’, Social Indicators Research 43, pp. 27–68.
Møller, V.: 1999, ‘South African quality of life trends in the late 1990s: major divides in perceptions’, Society in Transition 30(2), pp. 93–105.
Møller, V. and H. Dickow.: 2001, Five Years into Democracy (Les cahiers de ľIFAS No 1, French Institute of South Africa, Pretoria).
Møller, V., H. Dickow and M. Harris: 1999. ‘South Africa’s “rainbow people”, national pride and happiness’, Social Indicators Research 47, pp. 245–280.
Møller, V. and L. Schlemmer: 1983, ‘Quality of life in South Africa: Towards an instrument for the assessment of quality of life and basic needs’, Social Indicators Research 12, pp. 225–279.
National Economic Development and Labour Council Forum(Nedlac): 2000, ‘Infrastructure delivery’, Indicator South Africa 17(2).
Nicholson, J. (ed.): 2000, Quality of Life of Durban’s People (Urban Strategy Department, Durban Metropolitan Council, Durban, South Africa).
Nzimande, B. and M. Shikosana (eds.): 1998, Affirmative Action and Transformation (Indicator Press, University of Natal, Durban).
Schlemmer, L. and V. Møller: 1997, ‘The shape of South African society and its challenges’, Social Indicators Research 41, pp. 15–50.
Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit (Saldru): 1994. South Africans Rich and Poor: Baseline Household Statistics (School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch).
Truth and Reconciliation Commission: 1998, Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report.
Orkin, M.: 1997, Living in Gauteng: Selected Findings of the 1995 October Household Survey (Central Statistical Service, Pretoria).
Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP), Ministry in the Office of the President: 1995, Key Indicators of Poverty in South Africa (Government Printer, Pretoria).
Whiteford, A. and D.E. van Seventer: 2000, Winners and Losers: South Africa’s Changing Income Distribution in the 1990s (Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates, Johannesburg).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Møller, V., Dickow, H. (2002). The Role of Quality of Life Surveys in Managing Change in Democratic Transitions: The South African Case. In: Hagerty, M.R., Vogel, J., Møller, V. (eds) Assessing Quality of Life and Living Conditions to Guide National Policy. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47513-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47513-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0727-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47513-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive