Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2013

01-11-2013

Changing values, changing outcomes: the influence of reprioritization response shift on outcome assessment after spine surgery

Auteurs: Carolyn E. Schwartz, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Lisa M. Lix, Brian R. Quaranto, Joel A. Finkelstein

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Background

When patients experience a substantial health state change, they may undergo changes in the underlying meaning of their self-report to standardized outcome measures. These response shifts can reflect changes in the patient’s internal standards, values or conceptualization of quality of life. We investigated the presence of changing values (reprioritization response shift) in a longitudinal cohort of spine surgery patients.

Methods

Spinal decompression surgery patients (mean age 52 years; 39 % female, 36 % working) provided visual analogue scale (VAS) back and leg pain items, the Short-Form-36 (SF-36v1), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data pre- and post-surgery (n pre = 169; n 6weeks = 102; n 3months = 106; n 6months = 68). Improved and No-Effect patient groups were compared using the VAS minimally important difference (±15 points) as a cutoff. Reprioritization response shift detection was based on change in the relative importance of the SF-36 domains for group discrimination pre- and post-surgery.

Results

The Improved group evidenced significant post-surgery differences from the No-Effect group on bodily pain, general health, physical functioning, social functioning, vitality, and the ODI. The relative importance analysis showed a differential effect with bodily pain (p < 0.01) and physical functioning (p < 0.05) becoming more important, and role physical (p < 0.01) becoming less important post-surgery in distinguishing the Improved group as compared to the No-Effect group. The Improved patients also evidenced stronger associations between bodily pain and physical functioning, vitality and general health (p < 0.05). The No-Effect group evidenced increased inter-correlations of bodily pain with social functioning, mental health, and general health (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Patients who report clinically significant change in leg and back pain post-surgery using VAS pain scores are also distinguished by increased importance of bodily pain and physical functioning, and decreased importance of role physical. Bodily pain is primarily reflective of physical item response post-surgery among Improved patients, but reflects physical, social, and emotional item response among No-Effect patients. These changes in values may reflect a “moving goal post” in outcome assessment that complicates the interpretation of mean differences over time on standard spine outcome measures.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2011). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.​1007/​s11136-011-0054-x. Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2011). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.​1007/​s11136-011-0054-x.
3.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedCrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference FDA. (2009). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. In F. A. D. Administration (Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. FDA. (2009). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. In F. A. D. Administration (Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
5.
go back to reference Sloan, J. A., Halyard, M. Y., Frost, M. H., Dueck, A. C., Teschendorf, B., & Rothman, M. L. (2007). The mayo clinic manuscript series relative to the discussion, dissemination, and operationalization of the Food and Drug Administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes. Value Health, 10(Suppl 2), S59–S63. doi: 10.​1111/​j.​1524-4733.​2007.​00267.​x. PubMedCrossRef Sloan, J. A., Halyard, M. Y., Frost, M. H., Dueck, A. C., Teschendorf, B., & Rothman, M. L. (2007). The mayo clinic manuscript series relative to the discussion, dissemination, and operationalization of the Food and Drug Administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes. Value Health, 10(Suppl 2), S59–S63. doi: 10.​1111/​j.​1524-4733.​2007.​00267.​x. PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bombardier, C. (2000). Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: Summary and general recommendations. SPINE, 25(24), 3100–3103. PubMedCrossRef Bombardier, C. (2000). Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: Summary and general recommendations. SPINE, 25(24), 3100–3103. PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 23(18), 2003–2013. Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., et al. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 23(18), 2003–2013.
9.
go back to reference Sloan, J. A., Cella, D., & Hays, R. D. (2005). Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. (Editorial). Journal Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 1217–1219. CrossRef Sloan, J. A., Cella, D., & Hays, R. D. (2005). Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. (Editorial). Journal Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 1217–1219. CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sloan, J. A., Aaronson, N., Cappelleri, J. C., Fairclough, D. L., & Varricchio, C. (2002). Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(5), 479–487. PubMed Sloan, J. A., Aaronson, N., Cappelleri, J. C., Fairclough, D. L., & Varricchio, C. (2002). Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(5), 479–487. PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sloan, J. A., Cella, D., Frost, M., Guyatt, G. H., Sprangers, M., & Symonds, T. (2002). Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patient quality of life: Introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 367–370. PubMedCrossRef Sloan, J. A., Cella, D., Frost, M., Guyatt, G. H., Sprangers, M., & Symonds, T. (2002). Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patient quality of life: Introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 367–370. PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ostelo, R. W., Deyo, R. A., Stratford, P., Waddell, G., Croft, P., Von Korff, M., et al. (2008). Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33(1), 90–94. doi: 10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31815e3a10​. Ostelo, R. W., Deyo, R. A., Stratford, P., Waddell, G., Croft, P., Von Korff, M., et al. (2008). Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33(1), 90–94. doi: 10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31815e3a10​.
17.
go back to reference Kutner, J. S., Nowels, D. E., Kassner, C. T., Houser, J., Bryant, L. L., & Main, D. S. (2003). Confirmation of the “disability paradox” among hospice patients: Preservation of quality of life despite physical ailments and psychosocial concerns. Palliative and Supportive Care, 1(3), 231–237. PubMed Kutner, J. S., Nowels, D. E., Kassner, C. T., Houser, J., Bryant, L. L., & Main, D. S. (2003). Confirmation of the “disability paradox” among hospice patients: Preservation of quality of life despite physical ailments and psychosocial concerns. Palliative and Supportive Care, 1(3), 231–237. PubMed
18.
go back to reference Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48(8), 977–988. PubMedCrossRef Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48(8), 977–988. PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kagawa-Singer, M. (1993). Redefining health: Living with cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 295–304. PubMedCrossRef Kagawa-Singer, M. (1993). Redefining health: Living with cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 295–304. PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Padilla, G. V., Mishel, M. H., & Grant, M. M. (1992). Uncertainty, appraisal and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 1(3), 155–165. PubMedCrossRef Padilla, G. V., Mishel, M. H., & Grant, M. M. (1992). Uncertainty, appraisal and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 1(3), 155–165. PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wilson, I. B. (1999). Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response shift. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1577–1588. PubMedCrossRef Wilson, I. B. (1999). Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response shift. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1577–1588. PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Aristotle (384-322 BC). Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle (384-322 BC). Nicomachean Ethics.
23.
go back to reference Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515. PubMedCrossRef Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515. PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548. PubMedCrossRef Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548. PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., & Rapkin, B. D. (2004). Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 16. PubMedCrossRef Schwartz, C. E., & Rapkin, B. D. (2004). Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 16. PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef
28.
go back to reference George, L. K. (1979). The happiness syndrome: Methodological and substantive issues in the study of social-psychological well-being in adulthood. The Gerontologist, 19, 210–216. PubMedCrossRef George, L. K. (1979). The happiness syndrome: Methodological and substantive issues in the study of social-psychological well-being in adulthood. The Gerontologist, 19, 210–216. PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference George, L. K., & Bearon, L. B. (1980). Quality of life in older persons: Meaning and measurement. New York: Human Sciences Press. George, L. K., & Bearon, L. B. (1980). Quality of life in older persons: Meaning and measurement. New York: Human Sciences Press.
30.
go back to reference Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
go back to reference Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia geriatric center morale scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89. PubMedCrossRef Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia geriatric center morale scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89. PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1968). Personality patterns of aging. In B. L. Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging (pp. 173–177). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1968). Personality patterns of aging. In B. L. Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging (pp. 173–177). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
go back to reference Finkelstein, J. A., Razmjou, H., & Schwartz, C. E. (2009). Response shift and outcome assessment in orthopedic surgery: Is there is a difference between complete vs. partial treatment? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 82, 1189–1190. CrossRef Finkelstein, J. A., Razmjou, H., & Schwartz, C. E. (2009). Response shift and outcome assessment in orthopedic surgery: Is there is a difference between complete vs. partial treatment? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 82, 1189–1190. CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lix, L. M., Sajobi, T. T., Sawatzky, R., Liu, J., Mayo, N. E., Huang, Y., et al. (2012). Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0198-3. Lix, L. M., Sajobi, T. T., Sawatzky, R., Liu, J., Mayo, N. E., Huang, Y., et al. (2012). Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0198-3.
36.
37.
go back to reference Gudex, C., Dolan, P., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Quality of Life Research, 5(6), 521–531. PubMedCrossRef Gudex, C., Dolan, P., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Quality of Life Research, 5(6), 521–531. PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.
39.
go back to reference Zhou, G. Y. (2007). Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 399–413. CrossRef Zhou, G. Y. (2007). Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 399–413. CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Huberty, C. J., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1992). Variable importance in multivariate group comparisons. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 75–91. CrossRef Huberty, C. J., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1992). Variable importance in multivariate group comparisons. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 75–91. CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Thomas, D. R. (1992). Interpreting discriminant functions: A data analytic approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 335–362. CrossRef Thomas, D. R. (1992). Interpreting discriminant functions: A data analytic approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 335–362. CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Thomas, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (1996). Using a measure of variable importance to investigate the standardization of discriminant coefficients. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 110–130. Thomas, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (1996). Using a measure of variable importance to investigate the standardization of discriminant coefficients. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 110–130.
43.
go back to reference Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
44.
go back to reference Menard, S. (2004). Six approaches to calculating standardized logistic regression coefficients. The American Statistician, 58, 218–223. CrossRef Menard, S. (2004). Six approaches to calculating standardized logistic regression coefficients. The American Statistician, 58, 218–223. CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Pratt, J. W. (1987). Dividing the indivisible: Using simple symmetry to partition variance explained. In T. Pukkila & S. Puntanen (Eds.), Second international conference in statistics (pp. 245–260). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere. Pratt, J. W. (1987). Dividing the indivisible: Using simple symmetry to partition variance explained. In T. Pukkila & S. Puntanen (Eds.), Second international conference in statistics (pp. 245–260). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
46.
go back to reference Thomas, D. R., Hughes, E., & Zumbo, B. D. (1998). On variable importance in linear regression. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 45, 253–275. Thomas, D. R., Hughes, E., & Zumbo, B. D. (1998). On variable importance in linear regression. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 45, 253–275.
47.
go back to reference Thomas, D. R., Zumbo, B. D., Zhu, P., & Dutta, S. (2008). On measuring the relative importance of explanatory variables in a logistic regression. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 7, 21–38. Thomas, D. R., Zumbo, B. D., Zhu, P., & Dutta, S. (2008). On measuring the relative importance of explanatory variables in a logistic regression. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 7, 21–38.
48.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., Bode, R. K., & Vollmer, T. (2012). The symptom inventory disability-specific short-forms for multiple sclerosis: Reliability and factor structure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. doi: 10.​1016/​j.​apmr.​2012.​03.​006. Schwartz, C. E., Bode, R. K., & Vollmer, T. (2012). The symptom inventory disability-specific short-forms for multiple sclerosis: Reliability and factor structure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. doi: 10.​1016/​j.​apmr.​2012.​03.​006.
Metagegevens
Titel
Changing values, changing outcomes: the influence of reprioritization response shift on outcome assessment after spine surgery
Auteurs
Carolyn E. Schwartz
Tolulope T. Sajobi
Lisa M. Lix
Brian R. Quaranto
Joel A. Finkelstein
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0377-x