Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Whereas medical shift handovers are increasingly recognized to fulfil important functions beyond information transfer, studies suggest that shift handovers continue to be variably used for reflection, learning or discussion. Little is known of the dynamics of incorporating such functions into ICU shift handovers, resulting in a challenge for the design of educational programs whose underlying philosophies align with the specific requirements of the ICU.
Intensivists, residents and fellows (n = 21) from three ICUs were interviewed to determine perceptions of handover functionality and the boundaries to what must or can be achieved in handover conversations. Interviews were analyzed to isolate training requirements and factors that challenge interactions.
The analysis revealed that ICU physicians value three functions for shift handovers: information transfer, enhancing shared understanding and decision-making, and learning. The functions towards which physicians are oriented were found to be affected by situational characteristics of cases, individuals, teams, and the unit workflow. Whereas some factors are helpful cues for determining communication needs, others raise dilemmas and misaligned expectations with regards to what can be achieved in the handover.
Our findings add to the growing case for the education of handovers in complex settings to involve more than information transfers. As residents gain experience, training should be gradually shifted towards more fluid and adaptable approaches to the handover and residents’ ability to engage in joint reflections and discussions. Challenges for engaging in such interactions need to be alleviated, in order to allow the redefinition of handovers as potential sources of safety and learning, rather than error.
Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:330–4. CrossRef
Pham JC, Aswani MS, Rosen M, et al. Reducing medical errors and adverse events. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:447–63. CrossRef
Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1755–60. CrossRef
Thomas MJW, Schultz TJ, Hannaford N, Runciman WB. Failures in transition: learning from incidents relating to clinical handover in acute care. J Healthc Qual. 2012;35:49–56. CrossRef
Manser T. Minding the gaps: moving handover research forward. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:613–5. CrossRef
Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottowa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1803–12. CrossRef
Wohlauer MV, Arora VM, Horwitz LI, Bass EJ, Mahar SE, Philibert I. The patient handoff: a comprehensive curricular blueprint for resident education to improve continuity of care. Acad Med. 2012;87:411–8. CrossRef
Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Massucci JL, et al. Residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2009;84:1775–87. CrossRef
Cohen MD, Hilligoss B, Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral AC. A handoff is not a telegram: an understanding of the patient is co-constructed. Crit Care. 2012;16:1–6.
Berger JT, Sten MB, Stockwell DC. Patient handoffs: Delivering content efficiently and effectively is not enough. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2012;24:201–5.
Starmer AJ, O’Toole JK, Rosenbluth G, et al. Development, implementation, and dissemination of the I‑PASS Handoff Curriculum. Acad Med. 2014;89:1–9. CrossRef
Manser T, Foster S, Flin R, Patey R. Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures. Hum Factors. 2013;55:138–56. CrossRef
Poot EP, de Bruijne MC, Wouters M, de Groot CJ, Wagner C. Exploring perinatal shift-to-shift handover communication and process: an observational study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20:166–75. CrossRef
Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. What are covering doctors told about their patients? Analysis of sign-out among internal medicine house staff. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:248–55. CrossRef
Greenstein E, Arora VM, Staisiunas PG, Banerjee SS, Farnan JM. Characterising physician listening behaviour during hospitalist handoffs using the HEAR checklist. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:203–9. CrossRef
Hilligoss B, Moffatt-Bruce SD. The limits of checklists: handoff and narrative thinking. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(7):528. CrossRef
Nemeth CP, Kowalsky J, Brandwijk M, Kahana M, Klock PA, Cook RI. Before I forget: how clinicians cope with uncertainty through ICU sign-outs. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2006;50:939–43. CrossRef
Keysar B, Barr DJ, Balin JA, Brauner JS. Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:32–8. CrossRef
Fiore SM, Smith-Jentsch KA, Salas E, Warner N, Letsky M. Towards an understanding of macrocognition in teams: developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2010;11:250–71. CrossRef
Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:493–7.
Flemming D, Hübner U. How to improve change of shift handovers and collaborative grounding and what role does the electronic patient record system play? Results of a systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:580–92. CrossRef
Jeffcott SA, Ibrahim JE, Cameron PA. Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:256–60. CrossRef
Patterson ES. Structuring flexibility: the potential good, bad and ugly in standardisation of handovers. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:4–5. CrossRef
Perry SJ, Wears RL, Patterson ES. High-hanging fruit: improving transitions in health care. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches (vol. 3: performance and tools). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
Sharit J, McCane L, Thevenin DM, Barach P. Examining links between sign-out reporting during shift changeovers and patient management risks. Risk Anal. 2008;28:969–81. CrossRef
Rayo MF, Mount-Campbell AF, O’Brien JM, et al. Interactive questioning in critical care during handovers: a transcript analysis of communication behaviours by physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;23(6):483–9. CrossRef
Foster S, Manser T. The effects of patient handoff characteristics on subsequent care. Acad Med. 2012;87:1105–24. CrossRef
Philibert I. Use of strategies from high-reliability organisations to the patient hand-off by resident physicians: practical implications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:261–6. CrossRef
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88. CrossRef
Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications; 2008. CrossRef
Ilan R, LeBaron C, Christianson M, Heyland D, Day A, Cohen M. Handover patterns: an observational study of critical care physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:1–10. CrossRef
Coffey M, Thomson K, Li SA, et al. Resident experiences with implementation of the I‑PASS handoff bundle. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9:313–20. CrossRef
Wears RL, Perry SJ, Eisenberg E, Murphy L, Shapiro M, Beach C, et al. Transitions in care: signovers in the emergency department. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2004;48:1625–8. CrossRef
Abraham J, Kannampallil TG, Patel VL. Bridging gaps in handoffs: a continuity of care based approach. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:240–54. CrossRef
Abraham J, Kannampallil TG, Almoosa KF, Patel B, Patel VL. Comparative evaluation of the content and structure of communication using two handoff tools: Implications for patient safety. J Crit Care. 2014;29:311.e1–311.e7. CrossRef
Amaral ACKB, Barros BS, Barros CCPP, Innes C, Pinto R, Rubenfeld GD. Nighttime cross-coverage is associated with decreased intensive care unit mortality a single-center study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:1395–401. CrossRef
Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Little BW. Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(3):196–204. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19269930. CrossRef
Aylward M, Nixon J, Gladding S. An Entrustable Professional Activity [EPA] for handoffs as a model for EPA assessment development. Acad Med. 2014;89:1335–40. CrossRef
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. Debriefing with good judgment : combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:361–76. CrossRef
Lingard LA, Haber RJ. What do we mean by ‘relevance’? A clinical and rhetorical definition with implications for teaching and learning the case-presentation format. Acad Med. 1999;74:S124–S7. CrossRef
Klaber RE, Macdougall C. Maximising learning opportunities in handover. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2009;94:118–22. CrossRef
Dhaliwal G, Hauer KE. The oral patient presentation in the era of night float admissions credit and critique. JAMA. 2013;310:2247–8. CrossRef
Ward NS, Read R, Afessa B, Kahn JM. Perceived effects of attending physician workload in academic medical intensive care units: a national survey of training program directors. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:400–5. CrossRef
Chudgar SM, Cox CE, Que LG, Andolsek K, Knudsen NW, Clay AS. Current teaching and evaluation methods in critical care medicine: Has the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education affected how we practice and teach in the intensive care unit? Crit Care Med. 2009;37:49–60. CrossRef
- Challenges for conducting and teaching handovers as collaborative conversations: an interview study at teaching ICUs
Nico F. Leenstra
Oliver C. Jung
Nicole D. Holman
Lieuwe S. Hofstra
Jaap E. Tulleken
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum