Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

9. Cardiothoracale beeldvorming

Auteurs : Winnifred van Lankeren, Hans Balink, Nils Planken

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk richten we ons op drie categorieën van de cardiothoracale beeldvorming in de klinische praktijk, namelijk longembolie, sarcoïdose en pijn op de borst. De categorieën worden behandeld naar aanleiding van het bespreken van een drietal klinische casus. Beeldvormende diagnostiek speelt een belangrijke rol bij patiënten met klachten van cardiothoracale origine, zoals pijn-op-de-borstklachten. De keuze voor het type onderzoek is sterk afhankelijk van de klinische gegevens (geslacht, leeftijd en klachten) en heeft te maken met de diagnostische waarde van een specifieke test die afhankelijk is van de techniek, patiëntenpopulatie en lokale expertise.

vorige hoofdstuk Radiologie bij kinderen

volgende hoofdstuk De impact van beeldvorming in de oncologie

https://www.nhg.org/standaarden/samenvatting/diepe-veneuze-trombose-en-longembolie. 2015.

Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1995;345(8961):1326–30.

Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(12):997–1005.

Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:589–602.CrossRefPubMed

Brown MD, Lau J, Nelson RD, et al. Turbidimetric D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmo- nary embolism: a metaanalysis. Clin Chem. 2003;49(11):1846–53.

Roy PM, Colombet I, Durieux P, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. BMJ. 2005;331(7511):259.

Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Prins MH. Management studies using a combination of D-dimer test result and clinical probability to rule out venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:2465–70.CrossRefPubMed

Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353:190–5.CrossRefPubMed

Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B, et al. Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology. 2000;217:447–55.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Winer-Muran HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS, et al. Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital substraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology. 2004;233:806–15.

11.

Ruiz Y, Caballero P, Caniego JL, et al. Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis Interobserver agreement. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:823–9.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie, et al. Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. AJR 2000;175:407–11.

13.

Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I, et al. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multidetector row spiral CT allow analysis. Radiology. 2001;219:629–36.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PhN. Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multidetector row CT. Radiology. 2003;227:455–60.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002;360:1914–20.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Le Faivre J, Duhamel A, Khung S, et al. Impact of CT perfusion imaging on the assessment of peripheral chronic pulmonary thromboembolism: clinical experience in 62 patients. Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):4011–20.

17.

Van Strijen MJ, Bloem JL, De Monye W, et al. Helical computed tomography and alternative diagnosis in patients with excluded pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(11):2449–56.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Van Beek EJR, Reekers JA, Batchelor D, et al. Feasebility, safety and clinical utitlity of angiography in patients with suspected pumonary embolism and non-diagnostic lung scan findings. Eur Rad. 1996;6:415–9.CrossRef

19.

Hudson ER, Smith TP, Mc Dermott VG, et al. Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: complications in 1,434 patients. Radiology. 1996;198:61–5.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Nilsson T, Carlsson A, Mare K. Pulmonary angiography: a safe procedure with modern contrast media and technique. Eur Rad. 1998;8:86–9.CrossRef

21.

British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism.

22.

Guideline development group. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003;58:470–84.CrossRef

23.

Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassesment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch. Radiology. 1999;210:689–91.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2153–65.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Drent M. Sarcoidosis: benefits of a multidisciplinary approach. Eur J Intern Med. 2003;14:217–20.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Morgenthau AS, Iannuzzi MC. Recent advances in sarcoidosis. Chest. 2011;139:174–82.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Keijsers RG, Van den Heuvel DA, Grutters JC. Imaging the inflammatory activity of sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J. 2013 Mar;41(3):743–5.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Mostard RL, Voo S, Van Kroonenburgh MJ, et al. Inflammatory activity assessment by F18 FDG-PET/CT in persistent symptomatic sarcoidosis. RespirMed. 2011;105:1917–24.

29.

Vanderschueren S, Del BE, Ruttens D, et al. Inflammation of unknown origin versus fever of unknown origin: two of a kind. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20:415–8.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Bleeker-Rovers CP, De Kleijn EM, Corstens FH, et al. Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focalinfection or inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:29–37.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Balink H, Bennink R, Veeger NJ, et al. Diagnostic utility of F18-FDG PET/CT in inflammation of unknown origin. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:419–25.

32.

Balink H, Tan SS, Veeger NJ, et al. F18-FDG PET/CT in inflammation of unknown origin: a cost-efficacy pilot-study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1408–13.

33.

Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jun 14;300(24):1350–8.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H, et al. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J. 2011Jun;32(11):1316–30.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR, et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007Oct 9;50(15):1469–75.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012May 8;59(19):1719–28.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(38):2949–3003.

Titel: Cardiothoracale beeldvorming
Auteurs: Winnifred van Lankeren
Hans Balink
Nils Planken
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: De dokter en het beeld
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2869-7

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2870-3

Copyright: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2870-3_9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen