Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Assess and compare among Dutch cardiothoracic surgeons and cardiologists: opinion on (1) patient involvement, (2) conveying risk in aortic valve selection, and (3) aortic valve preferences.
A survey among 117 cardiothoracic surgeons and cardiologists was conducted. Group responses were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Most respondents agreed that patients should be involved in decision-making, with surgeons leaning more toward patient involvement (always: 83 % versus 50 % respectively; p < 0.01) than cardiologists. Most respondents found that ideally doctors and patients should decide together, with cardiologists leaning more toward taking the lead compared with surgeons (p < 0.01).
Major risks of the therapeutic options were usually discussed with patients, and less common complications to a lesser extent. A wide variation in valve preference was noted with cardiologists leaning more toward mechanical prostheses, while surgeons more often preferred bioprostheses (p < 0.05).
Patient involvement and conveying risk in aortic valve selection is considered important by cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons. The medical profession influences attitude with regard to aortic valve selection and patient involvement, and preference for a valve substitute. The variation in valve preference suggests that in most patients both valve types are suitable and aortic valve selection may benefit from evidence-based informed shared decision-making.
Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1–44. PubMedCrossRef
Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29:21–43. PubMed
Wilson IB, Green ML, Goldman L, et al. Is experience a good teacher? How interns and attending physicians understand patients’ choices for end-of-life care. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Med Dec Making. 1997;17:217–27. CrossRef
Cher D, Miyamoto J, Lenert L. Incorporating risk attitude into Markov-process decision models: importance for individual decision-making. Med Dec Making. 1997;17:340–50. CrossRef
Ruel M, Chan V, Bédard P, et al. Very long-term survival implications of heart valve replacement with tissue versus mechanical prostheses in adults <60 years of age. Circulation. 2007;116(11 Suppl):I294–300. PubMed
- Cardiologist and cardiac surgeon view on decision-making in prosthetic aortic valve selection: does profession matter?
N. M. Korteland
R. J. M. Klautz
J. W. Roos-Hesselink
M. I. M. Versteegh
A. J. J. C. Bogers
J. J. M. Takkenberg
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum