Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Quantitative Methods Special Section

Cancer patients’ function, symptoms and supportive care needs: a latent class analysis across cultures

Auteurs: Jennifer Barsky Reese, Amanda Blackford, Jonathan Sussman, Toru Okuyama, Tatsuo Akechi, Daryl Bainbridge, Doris Howell, Claire F. Snyder

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an umbrella term covering a range of outcomes, including symptoms, functioning, health-related quality of life, and supportive care needs. Research regarding the appropriate PRO questionnaires to use is informative. A previously published latent class analysis (LCA) examined patterns of function, symptoms, and supportive care needs in a sample of US cancer patients. The current analysis investigated whether the findings from the original study were replicated in new samples from different countries and whether a larger sample combining all the data would affect the classes identified.

Methods

This secondary analysis of data from 408 Japanese and 189 Canadian cancer patients replicated the methods used in the original LCA using data from 117 US cancer patients. In all samples, subjects completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34). We first dichotomized individual function, symptom, and need domain scores. We then performed LCA to investigate the patterns of domains for each of the outcomes, both in the individual country samples and then combining the data from all three samples.

Results

Across all analyses, class assignment was made by level of function, symptoms, or needs. In individual samples, only two-class models (“high” vs. “low”) were generally identifiable while in the combined sample, three-class models (“high” vs. “moderate” vs. “low”) best fit the data for all outcomes.

Conclusions

In this analysis, the level of burden experienced by patients was the key factor in defining classes.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Acquadro, C., Berzon, R., Dubois, D., Leidy, N. K., Marquis, P., Revicki, D., et al. (2003). Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value in Health, 6(5), 522–531.PubMedCrossRef Acquadro, C., Berzon, R., Dubois, D., Leidy, N. K., Marquis, P., Revicki, D., et al. (2003). Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value in Health, 6(5), 522–531.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims.
3.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Dy, S. M., Hendricks, D. E., Brahmer, J. R., Carducci, M. A., Wolff, A. C., et al. (2007). Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15(9), 1075–1085.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Dy, S. M., Hendricks, D. E., Brahmer, J. R., Carducci, M. A., Wolff, A. C., et al. (2007). Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15(9), 1075–1085.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Geller, G., Carducci, M. A., & Wu, A. W. (2010). Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1045–1055.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Geller, G., Carducci, M. A., & Wu, A. W. (2010). Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1045–1055.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Blackford, A. L., Brahmer, J. R., Carducci, M. A., Pili, R., et al. (2009). Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 991–998.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Blackford, A. L., Brahmer, J. R., Carducci, M. A., Pili, R., et al. (2009). Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 991–998.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Brahmer, J. R., Carducci, M. A., Pili, R., Stearns, V., et al. (2008). Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: How are they related? Quality of Life Research, 17(5), 665–677.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Garrett-Mayer, E., Brahmer, J. R., Carducci, M. A., Pili, R., Stearns, V., et al. (2008). Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: How are they related? Quality of Life Research, 17(5), 665–677.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Okuyama, T., Akechi, T., Yamashita, H., Toyama, T., Endo, C., Sagawa, R., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J). Psychooncology, 18(9), 1003–1010.PubMedCrossRef Okuyama, T., Akechi, T., Yamashita, H., Toyama, T., Endo, C., Sagawa, R., et al. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J). Psychooncology, 18(9), 1003–1010.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Burton, L., Cook, P., & Boyes, A. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer, 88(1), 217–225.PubMedCrossRef Bonevski, B., Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Burton, L., Cook, P., & Boyes, A. (2000). Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer, 88(1), 217–225.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., Bonevski, B., Burton, L., & Cook, P. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer, 88(1), 226–237.PubMedCrossRef Sanson-Fisher, R., Girgis, A., Boyes, A., Bonevski, B., Burton, L., & Cook, P. (2000). The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer, 88(1), 226–237.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lanza, S. T., Bray, B. C., Collins, L. M. (2013). An introduction to latent class and latent transition analysis. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Second Edition, Vol. 2, pp. 691–716). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Lanza, S. T., Bray, B. C., Collins, L. M. (2013). An introduction to latent class and latent transition analysis. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Second Edition, Vol. 2, pp. 691–716). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12.
go back to reference Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC reference values. Brussels: EORTC. Fayers, P. M., Weeden, S., Curran, D., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC reference values. Brussels: EORTC.
13.
go back to reference Dodd, M. J., Miaskowski, C., & Paul, S. M. (2001). Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28(3), 465–470.PubMed Dodd, M. J., Miaskowski, C., & Paul, S. M. (2001). Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28(3), 465–470.PubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M., Lee, K. (2004). Symptom clusters: The new frontier in symptom management research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs (32), 17–21. Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M., Lee, K. (2004). Symptom clusters: The new frontier in symptom management research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs (32), 17–21.
16.
go back to reference Gift, A. G., Stommel, M., Jablonski, A., & Given, W. (2003). A cluster of symptoms over time in patients with lung cancer. Nursing Research, 52(6), 393–400.PubMedCrossRef Gift, A. G., Stommel, M., Jablonski, A., & Given, W. (2003). A cluster of symptoms over time in patients with lung cancer. Nursing Research, 52(6), 393–400.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Cancer patients’ function, symptoms and supportive care needs: a latent class analysis across cultures
Auteurs
Jennifer Barsky Reese
Amanda Blackford
Jonathan Sussman
Toru Okuyama
Tatsuo Akechi
Daryl Bainbridge
Doris Howell
Claire F. Snyder
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0629-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2015

Quality of Life Research 1/2015 Naar de uitgave