Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

19. Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) en Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF)

Auteurs : Ank Eijkelkamp, MSc, Marly Kammerer, MSc

Gepubliceerd in: Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Ergotherapeuten focussen op het betrokken zijn in het dagelijks handelen en de betekenis die personen daaraan geven binnen hun context. Het Canadian Model of Occupational performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) maakt de ondersteunende en belemmerende factoren in het dagelijks handelen van personen, organisaties en gemeenschappen duidelijk. De bij het CMOP-E ontwikkelde Fit Chart is een tool om de (interacties in de) relevante variabelen in het dagelijks handelen, de persoon, organisatie of gemeenschap én in de omgeving te ontdekken. Dit is belangrijk voor het herkennen en oplossen van uitdagingen in het dagelijks handelen. Het Canadian Practice Proces Framework (CPPF) beschrijft in acht actiepunten het ergotherapieproces met inzet van specifieke vaardigheden van de persoon, de organisatie, de gemeenschap en de ergotherapeut. Het CPPF ondersteunt persoonsgericht en op dagelijks handelen gericht werken. Het CMOP-E en het CPPF zijn op basis van wetenschappelijk onderzoek ontwikkeld en worden breed toegepast in de praktijk, het onderwijs en het onderzoek.
vorige hoofdstuk Het Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP)-model en het PEOP Occupational Therapy Process
volgende hoofdstuk Model Of Human Occupation (MOHO)
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Rogers C. Mens worden. Een visie op persoonlijke groei. Utrecht: Bijleveld; 1969.
2.
Polatajko HJ, Davis J, Stewart D, Cantin N, Amoroso B, Purdie L. Specifying the domain of concern: occupation as core. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 13–36.
3.
Craik J, Davis J, Polatajko HJ. Introducing the Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF): amplifying the context. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 229–46.
4.
Farias L, Laliberte Rudman D, Pollard N, Schiller S, Serrata Malfitano AP, Thomas K, et al. Critical dialogical approach: a methodological direction for occupation-based social transformative work. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;26(4):235–45.
5.
Rudman DL. Mobilizing occupation for social transformation: radical resistance, disruption, and re-configuration: mobiliser l’occupation pour une transformation sociale: résistance radicale, perturbation et reconfiguration. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88(2):96–107.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Irvine-Brown L, Tommaso AD, Malfitano APS, Molineux M. Experiences of occupational therapy education: contexts, communities and social occupational therapy. Cad Bras Ter Ocupacional. 2020;28(1):330–42.
7.
Leclair LL, Lauckner H, Yamamoto C. An occupational therapy community development practice process. Can J Occup Ther. 2019;86(5):345–56.
8.
Gerlach AJ, Teachman G, Laliberte-Rudman D, Aldrich RM, Huot S. Expanding beyond individualism: engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scand J Occup Ther januari. 2018;25(1):35–43.CrossRef
9.
Restall GJ, Egan MY. Collaborative relationship-focused occupational therapy: evolving lexicon and practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88(3):220–30.CrossRef
10.
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko, H., Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). 5th edition. Altona: COPM Inc; 2019.
11.
Eijssen I, Van Hartingsveldt M, Verkerk G. COPM: de nieuwe Nederlandse vertaling. Ergother Mag. 2018;3:32–5.
12.
Bailliard AL, Dallman AR, Carroll A, Lee BD, Szendrey S. Doing occupational justice: a central dimension of everyday occupational therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther Rev Can Ergother. 2020;87(2):144–52.CrossRef
13.
Townsend EA, Beagan B, Kumas-Tan Z, Versnel J, Iwama M, Landry J, et al. Enabling: occupational therapy’s core competency. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health well-being, & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 87–133.
14.
Restall GJ, MacLeod Schroeder NJ, Dubé CD. The equity lens for occupational therapy: a program development and evaluation tool: L’Equity Lens for Occupational Therapy: un outil pour le développement et l’évaluation de programme. Can J Occup Ther Rev Can Ergother. 1 juni 2018;85(3):185–95.
15.
Vandemaele S, Collier C, Castelein N, Geel S. Ergotherapie bij psychische kwetsbaarheid. Basisboek voor kwaliteitsvolle hulpverlening. Leuven: Acco; 2020.
16.
Evenhuis E, Eyssen I. Ergotherapierichtlijn vermoeidheid bij MS, CVA of de ziekte van Parkinson. Amsterdam: VUmc afdeling revalidatiegeneeskunde, sectie Ergotherapie; 2012.
17.
Steultjens E, Cup E, Zajec J, van Hees S. Ergotherapierichtlijn CVA. Nijmegen/Utrecht. Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen/Ergotherapie Nederland; 2013.
18.
Brown C. Ecological models in occupational therapy. In: Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. pp. 622–32.
19.
Schell B, Gillen G. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
20.
McColl MA. Spirituality and occupational therapy. Ottawa: CAOT; 2011.
21.
Canadian Association of Occupational therapists. Enabling occupation, an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2002.
22.
Hasselkus BR. The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2011.
23.
Hemphill B. Occupational therapy and spirituality. London: Routledge; 2019.CrossRef
24.
Law M, Polatajko, H., Baptiste S, Townsend EA. Core concepts of occupational therapy. In: Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2002. pp. 29–56.
25.
Pierce D. Untangling occupation and activity. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55(2):138–46.CrossRef
26.
Reed KD, Hocking CS, Smythe LA. Exploring the meaning of occupation: the case for phenomenology. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78(5):303–10.
27.
Wright R, Sugarman L. Occupational therapy and life course development: a workbook for professional practice. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell; 2009.
28.
Davis JA, Polatajko HJ. Occupational development. In: Introduction to occupation, the art and science of living. New Yersey: Pearson Education Inc.; 2011. pp. 135–74.
29.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation, an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 1997.
30.
Davis J, Craik J, Polatajko HJ. Using the Canadian Practice Process Framework: amplifying the process. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 247–72.
31.
Fearing VG, Law M, Clark J. An occupational performance process model: fostering client and therapist alliances. Can J Occup Ther. 1997;64(1):7–15.
32.
Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippingcot: Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
33.
Baum C, Christiansen C, Bass J. The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) Model. In: Christiansen C, Baum C, Bass J. Occupational therapy: performance participation and well-being. 4th edition. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2015.
34.
Christiansen C, Baum C, Bass J. Occupational therapy: performance, participation and well-being. 4th edition. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2015.
35.
Iwama M. The Kawa model: culturally relevant occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier; 2006.
36.
Rodger S. Occupational-centered practice with children – a practical guide for occupational therapists. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.CrossRef
37.
Rodger S. Becoming more occupation-centered when working with children. In: Occupational-centered practice with children – a practical guide for occupational therapists. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 21–44.
38.
Kramer P, Hinojosa J, Tsu-Hsin Howe. Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy. 4th edition. Baltimore MD: Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
39.
Rogers C, Kazin A. Counseling and psychotherapy new concepts in practice. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1942.
40.
Mroz TM, Pitonyak JS, Fogelberg D, Leland NE. Client centeredness and health reform: key issues for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69(5):6905090010p1–8.
41.
Trentham B. Diffident no longer: building structures for a proud profession CAOT in the 1980’s. Occup Ther Now. 2001;3–7(3).
42.
Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 1996;63(1):9–23.
43.
Wong S, Fisher G. Comparing and using occupation-focused models. Occup Ther Health Care. 2015;29.
44.
Hammell KW. Self-care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories”. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(2):107–14.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Hammell KRW. Occupation, well-being, and culture: theory and cultural humility. Can J Occup Ther. 2013;80(4):224–34.CrossRef
46.
Hammell KRW. Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: an exploration. Appartenance, occupation et bien-être humain: une étude exploratoire. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81(1):39–50.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Csíkszentmihályi M. Flow: psychologie van de optiumale ervaring. Amsterdam: Boom; 1999.
48.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1986.
49.
Whiteford G, Wright-St CV. Occupation & practice in context. Sydney: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
50.
Townsend EA, Trentham B, Clark J, Dubouloz-Wilner C, Pentland W, Doble S. Enabling individual change. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health well-being, & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 135–52.
51.
Townsend EA, Cockburn L, Letts L, Thibeault R, Trentham B. Enabling social change. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health well-being, & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 53–176.
52.
Polatajko HJ, Davis JA, Cantin N, Dubouloz-Wilner C, Trentham B. Occupation-based practice: the essential elements. In: Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health well-being, & justice through occupation. 2nd edition. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013. pp. 203–28.
53.
Townsend EA, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013.
54.
Phoenix M, Vanderkaay S. Client-centred occupational therapy with children: a critical perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(4):318–21.CrossRef
55.
Jansa J, Aragon A. Living with Parkinson’s and the emerging role of occupational therapy. Park Dis. 2015:1–8.
Metagegevens
Titel
Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) en Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF)
Auteurs
Ank Eijkelkamp, MSc
Marly Kammerer, MSc
Copyright
2023
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2828-4

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2829-1

Copyright: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2829-1_19