Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2012

01-05-2012 | Commentary

Can quality or quality-of-life be defined?

Auteur: Ivan Barofsky

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the oft-heard concern that quality or quality-of-life cannot be defined. This concern persists today, even in the presence of countless studies that claim to be assessing quality or quality-of-life. There is obviously a disconnect here that warrants some attention, if not explanation. In this study, I summarize the extent of this disconnect and offer a number of potential explanations of why this situation exists. I review the role that operational definitions, statistical and empirical models, and content-specific definitions play in defining quality and/or quality-of-life. I conclude that none of these approaches provide a comprehensive definition of quality or quality-of-life. In its stead, I will argue that quality or quality-of-life represents a distinctive pattern of thinking. I establish this pattern by examining the cognitive–linguistic basis of these definitions and argue that when this is done it will be possible to identify an universal cognitive (hybrid) construct that describes how a person thinks about all types of qualitative assessments. The implication of this is that for a study to claim that it is defining or assessing quality or quality-of-life, it will first have to demonstrate the presence of the elements of this hybrid construct.
Voetnoten
1
This article is partially based on Chap. 1, from a book [13] entitled; “Quality—Its Definition and Assessment as Applied to the Medically Ill.”
 
2
The terms, quality, quality-of-life, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) will be distinguished throughout this article. The term “quality,” or the phrase “qualitative assessment,” will be the most general form of expression, referring to all types of qualitative assessments (e.g., quality of an object, quality of the environment, quality of working life, quality of life, and so on). I am not using the term qualitative as those who use the term to refer to a particular type of data or to “qualitative methods”, rather I am using the term to refer to a class of judgments. Of course, qualitative judgments can be studied using both qualitative and psychometric research approaches. The phrase “quality-of-life” will be differentiated from the phrase “HRQOL” in that one refers to the general population, while the other refers to persons who are medically or psychiatrically ill.
 
3
This discussion will focus mostly on the single global self-assessed items, including the self-assessed health status (SAHS) or other self-assessed quality-of-life items.
 
4
The SAHS item is sometimes referred to as a quality-of-life self-report, but it is more appropriate to consider the item as an indicator of health status.
 
5
In Chap. 8 of Barofsky [13], I make clear how a health status and HRQOL item differs. The information summarized in this paper is more about the value of a single global health status item, rather than informative about whether a single global quality-of-life item is a good predictor of mortality.
 
6
It is also possible that a culture exists where a person may not have any experience with attaching numbers to feelings or other types of states. This would only be relevant if it could also be demonstrated that the members of this culture could not learn to do this task. If this was so, then providing a means whereby these people could be assessed would remain an issue.
 
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Ferrans, C. E. (2005). Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life. In J. Lipscomb, C. C. Gotay, & C. Synder (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 14–30). NY: Cambridge University Press. Ferrans, C. E. (2005). Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life. In J. Lipscomb, C. C. Gotay, & C. Synder (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 14–30). NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
go back to reference Hunt, S. M. (1991). The problem of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 6, 205–226. Hunt, S. M. (1991). The problem of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 6, 205–226.
3.
go back to reference Nord, E., Arnesen, T., Menzel, P., & Pinto, J.-L. (2001). Towards a more restricted use of the term “quality of life”. News Letter Quality of Life, 26, 3–4. Nord, E., Arnesen, T., Menzel, P., & Pinto, J.-L. (2001). Towards a more restricted use of the term “quality of life”. News Letter Quality of Life, 26, 3–4.
4.
go back to reference Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
go back to reference Editorial. (1995). Quality of life and clinical trials. Lancet, 346(8966), 1–2. Editorial. (1995). Quality of life and clinical trials. Lancet, 346(8966), 1–2.
6.
go back to reference Wolfensberger, W. (1994). Lets hang up “quality of life” as a hopeless term. In D. Goode (Ed.), Quality of life for persons with disabilities: International perspectives and issues (pp. 285–321). Cambridge: Brookline. Wolfensberger, W. (1994). Lets hang up “quality of life” as a hopeless term. In D. Goode (Ed.), Quality of life for persons with disabilities: International perspectives and issues (pp. 285–321). Cambridge: Brookline.
7.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2000). Measuring healthy days: Population assessment of health related quality of life. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2000). Measuring healthy days: Population assessment of health related quality of life. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control.
8.
go back to reference Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1916). The quality of American life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1916). The quality of American life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
go back to reference Feinstein, A. R. (1981). Clinimetric perspective. Journal of Chronical Disease, 40, 635–640.CrossRef Feinstein, A. R. (1981). Clinimetric perspective. Journal of Chronical Disease, 40, 635–640.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Feinstein, A. R. (1981). Clinimetrics. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale. Feinstein, A. R. (1981). Clinimetrics. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale.
11.
go back to reference Gill, T. M., & Feinstein, A. R. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. Journal of Medical Association, 26, 619–626.CrossRef Gill, T. M., & Feinstein, A. R. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. Journal of Medical Association, 26, 619–626.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Reeves, C. A., & Bednar, D. A. (1994). Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review, 19, 419–445. Reeves, C. A., & Bednar, D. A. (1994). Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review, 19, 419–445.
13.
go back to reference Barofsky, I. (in press). Quality: Its definition and assessment as applied to the medically ill. New York, NY: Springer. Barofsky, I. (in press). Quality: Its definition and assessment as applied to the medically ill. New York, NY: Springer.
14.
go back to reference Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
go back to reference Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Boyle, M. (1995). Multi-attribute preference functions: Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 503–520.PubMedCrossRef Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Boyle, M. (1995). Multi-attribute preference functions: Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 503–520.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1990). The general health policy model: An integrated approach. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York, NY: Ravens. Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1990). The general health policy model: An integrated approach. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York, NY: Ravens.
17.
go back to reference Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787–805.PubMedCrossRef Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787–805.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fryback, D. G., Palta, M., Cherepanov, D., Bolt, D., et al. (2009). Comparison of 5 health-related quality of life indexes using item response theory analysis. Medical Decision Making. First published online October 20, 2009. Print edition: Jan–Feb 2010. doi:10.1177/0272989X09347016. Fryback, D. G., Palta, M., Cherepanov, D., Bolt, D., et al. (2009). Comparison of 5 health-related quality of life indexes using item response theory analysis. Medical Decision Making. First published online October 20, 2009. Print edition: Jan–Feb 2010. doi:10.​1177/​0272989X09347016​.
19.
go back to reference Nord, E., Daniels, N., & Kamlett, M. (2009). QALYs: Some challenges. Values Health, 12(S1), S10–S15.CrossRef Nord, E., Daniels, N., & Kamlett, M. (2009). QALYs: Some challenges. Values Health, 12(S1), S10–S15.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
go back to reference Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRef Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Haase, J. E., & Braden, C. J. (1998). Guidelines for achieving clarity of concepts related to quality of life. In C. R. King & P. S. Hinds (Eds.), Quality of life: From nursing to patient perspectives, theory, research, practice (pp. 13–54). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. Haase, J. E., & Braden, C. J. (1998). Guidelines for achieving clarity of concepts related to quality of life. In C. R. King & P. S. Hinds (Eds.), Quality of life: From nursing to patient perspectives, theory, research, practice (pp. 13–54). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
23.
go back to reference Joyce, C. R. B. (1988). Quality of life: The state of the art in clinical assessment. In S. W. Walker & R. M. Rosser (Eds.), Quality of life assessment and application (pp. 119–169). Lancaster, PA: MTP Press. Joyce, C. R. B. (1988). Quality of life: The state of the art in clinical assessment. In S. W. Walker & R. M. Rosser (Eds.), Quality of life assessment and application (pp. 119–169). Lancaster, PA: MTP Press.
24.
go back to reference Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., et al. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: The patient generated inventory (PGI). Medical Care, 32, 149–166.CrossRef Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., et al. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: The patient generated inventory (PGI). Medical Care, 32, 149–166.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Donaldson, G. W., & Moinpour, C. M. (2002). Individual differences in quality-of-life treatment response. Medical Care, 40(Suppl. 6), III39–III53.PubMed Donaldson, G. W., & Moinpour, C. M. (2002). Individual differences in quality-of-life treatment response. Medical Care, 40(Suppl. 6), III39–III53.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 573–605. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 573–605.
27.
go back to reference Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., et al. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 905–917.CrossRef Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., et al. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 905–917.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Hartel. Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Hartel.
29.
go back to reference Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics the elements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics the elements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
go back to reference Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York, NY: Macmillan. Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York, NY: Macmillan.
31.
go back to reference Ferguson, A., Myers, C. S., Bartlett, R. J., Banister, H., et al. (1940). Final report of the committee appointed to consider and report upon the possibility of quantitative estimates of sensory events. British Association for the Advancement of Science, 2, 331–349. Ferguson, A., Myers, C. S., Bartlett, R. J., Banister, H., et al. (1940). Final report of the committee appointed to consider and report upon the possibility of quantitative estimates of sensory events. British Association for the Advancement of Science, 2, 331–349.
32.
go back to reference Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 221–263.CrossRef Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 221–263.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.CrossRef Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Academic Press. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Academic Press.
35.
go back to reference Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Academic Press. Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Academic Press.
36.
go back to reference Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
go back to reference Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Cliff, N. (1992). Abstract measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193. Cliff, N. (1992). Abstract measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193.
39.
go back to reference Fraser, C. O. (1980). Measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 23–34.CrossRef Fraser, C. O. (1980). Measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 23–34.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology and measurement. London, UK: Routledge. Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology and measurement. London, UK: Routledge.
41.
go back to reference Michell, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: A class of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 398–407.CrossRef Michell, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: A class of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 398–407.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
go back to reference Benyamini, Y., & Idler, E. L. (1999). Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality: Additional studies, 1995–1998. Research on Aging, 21, 392–401.CrossRef Benyamini, Y., & Idler, E. L. (1999). Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality: Additional studies, 1995–1998. Research on Aging, 21, 392–401.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Idler, E. L. (1999). Self-assessment of health: The next stage of studies. Research on Aging, 21, 381–391. Idler, E. L. (1999). Self-assessment of health: The next stage of studies. Research on Aging, 21, 381–391.
45.
go back to reference Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1991). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of 27 community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–31.CrossRef Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1991). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of 27 community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–31.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Idler, E., Leventhal, H., McLaughlin, J., & Leventhal, E. (2004). In sickness but not in health: Self-ratings, identity and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 454, 336–356.CrossRef Idler, E., Leventhal, H., McLaughlin, J., & Leventhal, E. (2004). In sickness but not in health: Self-ratings, identity and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 454, 336–356.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ganz, P. A., Lee, J. J., & Siau, J. (1991). Quality of life assessment. An independent prognostic variables for survival in lung cancer. Cancer, 61, 3131–3135.CrossRef Ganz, P. A., Lee, J. J., & Siau, J. (1991). Quality of life assessment. An independent prognostic variables for survival in lung cancer. Cancer, 61, 3131–3135.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kaplan, M., Berthelot, J.-M., Feeny, D., McFarland, B. H., et al. (2001). The predictive validity of health-related quality of life measures; mortality in a longitudinal population-based study. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1539–1546.CrossRef Kaplan, M., Berthelot, J.-M., Feeny, D., McFarland, B. H., et al. (2001). The predictive validity of health-related quality of life measures; mortality in a longitudinal population-based study. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1539–1546.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Anthony, T., Hyman, L. S., Rosen, D., Kim, L., et al. (2003). The association of pretreatment health-related quality of life with surgical complications for patients undergoing open surgical resection for colorectal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 238, 690–696.PubMedCrossRef Anthony, T., Hyman, L. S., Rosen, D., Kim, L., et al. (2003). The association of pretreatment health-related quality of life with surgical complications for patients undergoing open surgical resection for colorectal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 238, 690–696.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Efficace, F., Bottomley, A., Coens, C., Van Steen, K., et al. (2006). Does a patient’s self-reported health-related quality of life predict survival beyond key biomedical data in advanced colorectal cancer? European Journal of Cancer, 42, 42–49.PubMedCrossRef Efficace, F., Bottomley, A., Coens, C., Van Steen, K., et al. (2006). Does a patient’s self-reported health-related quality of life predict survival beyond key biomedical data in advanced colorectal cancer? European Journal of Cancer, 42, 42–49.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Blazeby, J. M., Brookes, S. T., & Alderson, D. (2001). The prognostic value of quality of life scores during treatment for oesophageal cancer. Gut, 49, 221–230.CrossRef Blazeby, J. M., Brookes, S. T., & Alderson, D. (2001). The prognostic value of quality of life scores during treatment for oesophageal cancer. Gut, 49, 221–230.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Blazeby, J. M., Metcalfe, C., Nicklin, J., Barham, C. P., et al. (2005). Association between quality of life scores and short -term outcome after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or gastric cardia. British Journal of Surgery, 92, 1501–1502.CrossRef Blazeby, J. M., Metcalfe, C., Nicklin, J., Barham, C. P., et al. (2005). Association between quality of life scores and short -term outcome after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or gastric cardia. British Journal of Surgery, 92, 1501–1502.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Can quality or quality-of-life be defined?
Auteur
Ivan Barofsky
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9961-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2012

Quality of Life Research 4/2012 Naar de uitgave