Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

18-10-2016 | Brief Report

Brief Report: Reduced Optimism Bias in Self-Referential Belief Updating in High-Functioning Autism

Auteurs: Bojana Kuzmanovic, Lionel Rigoux, Kai Vogeley

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 7/2019

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated irrational asymmetry in belief updating: people tend to take into account good news and neglect bad news. Contradicting formal learning principles, belief updates were on average larger after better-than-expected information than after worse-than-expected information. In the present study, typically developing subjects demonstrated this optimism bias in self-referential judgments. In contrast, adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were significantly less biased when updating self-referential beliefs (each group n = 21, matched for age, gender and IQ). These findings indicate a weaker influence of self-enhancing motives on prospective judgments in ASD. Reduced susceptibility to emotional and motivational biases in reasoning in ASD could elucidate impairments of social cognition, but may also confer important cognitive benefits.

vorige artikel Gender Differences in Social Inclusion of Youth with Autism and Intellectual Disability

volgende artikel Brief Report: The ADOS Calibrated Severity Score Best Measures Autism Diagnostic Symptom Severity in Pre-School Children

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Trait optimism was assessed only in the control group by using LOT-R, and correlated significantly with OB_SELF (r = .58, p = .006), but not with OB_OTHER (r = .39, p = .081), or with the difference between these two measures (OB_SELF − OB_OTHER; r = .22, p = .332). Note that this is not in full accordance to prior findings (Kuzmanovic et al. 2015, 2016).

Bortolotti, L., & Antrobus, M. (2015). Costs and benefits of realism and optimism. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, 194–198. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000143. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brewer, R., et al. (2015). The impact of autism spectrum disorder and alexithymia on judgments of moral acceptability. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 589–595. doi: 10.1037/abn0000076. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chase, H. W., Kumar, P., Eickhoff, S. B., & Dombrovski, A. Y. (2015). Reinforcement learning models and their neural correlates: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 435–459. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0338-7. CrossRef

Chowdhury, R., Sharot, T., Wolfe, T., Duzel, E., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Optimistic update bias increases in older age. Psychological Medicine, 44, 2003–2012. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002602. CrossRefPubMed

Damiano, C. R., Aloi, J., Treadway, M., Bodfish, J. W., & Dichter, G. S. (2012). Adults with autism spectrum disorders exhibit decreased sensitivity to reward parameters when making effort-based decisions. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4, 13. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-4-13. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

De Martino, B., Harrison, N. A., Knafo, S., Bird, G., & Dolan, R. J. (2008). Explaining enhanced logical consistency during decision making in autism. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 28, 10746–10750. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2895-08.2008. CrossRef

De Martino, B., Kumaran, D. Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687. doi: 10.1126/science.1128356. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eil, D., & Rao, J. M. (2011). The good news-bad news effect: Asymmetric processing of objective information about yourself. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 114–138. doi: 10.1257/mic.3.2.114. CrossRef

Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., Montague, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Computational psychiatry: The brain as a phantastic organ. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 148–158. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70275-5. CrossRefPubMed

Garrett, N., & Sharot, T. (2014). How robust is the optimistic update bias for estimating self-risk and population base rates? PLoS One, 9, e98848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098848. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Garrett, N., & Sharot, T. (2016). Optimistic update for positive life events? An unbiased test. Conscious Cogn, In revision.

Garrett, N., Sharot, T., Faulkner, P., Korn, C. W., Roiser, J. P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Losing the rose tinted glasses: Neural substrates of unbiased belief updating in depression. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 639 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00639. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harris, A. J. L., Shah, P., Catmur, C., Bird, G., & Hahn, U. (2013). Autism, optimism and positive events: Evidence against a general optimistic bias. In Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Austin, TX.

Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H., & Keller, F. (2005). Beck-depressions-inventar (BDI). Bearbeitung der deutschen Ausgabe. Testhandbuch., 2., überarbeitete edn. Bern: Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG.

Hughes, B. L., & Zaki, J. (2015). The neuroscience of motivated cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 62–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006. CrossRefPubMed

Huys, Q. J., Daw, N. D., & Dayan, P. (2015). Depression: A decision-theoretic analysis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 38, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033928. CrossRefPubMed

Huys, Q. J., Pizzagalli, D. A., Bogdan, R., & Dayan, P. (2013). Mapping anhedonia onto reinforcement learning: A behavioural meta-analysis. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 3, 12 doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-3-12. CrossRef

Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2007). Frames and brains: Elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 45–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.007. CrossRefPubMed

Kessler, R. C., et al. (2007). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry, 6, 168–176.

Klin, A., & Jones, W. (2006). Attributing social and physical meaning to ambiguous visual displays in individuals with higher-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Brain and Cognition, 61, 40–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.12.016. CrossRefPubMed

Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2003). The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 345–360 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1202. CrossRefPubMed

Korn, C. W., Prehn, K., Park, S. Q., Walter, H., & Heekeren, H. R. (2012). Positively biased processing of self-relevant social feedback. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32, 16832–16844. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3016-12.2012. CrossRef

Korn, C. W., Sharot, T., Walter, H., Heekeren, H. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Depression is related to an absence of optimistically biased belief updating about future life events. Psychological Medicine, 44, 579–592. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001074. CrossRefPubMed

Kuzmanovic, B., Jefferson, A., & Vogeley, K. (2015). Self-specific optimism bias in belief updating is associated with high trait optimism. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 281–293. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1849. CrossRef

Kuzmanovic, B., Jefferson, A., & Vogeley, K. (2016). The role of the neural reward circuitry in self-referential optimistic belief updates. NeuroImage, 133, 151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.014. CrossRefPubMed

Kuzmanovic, B., & Rigoux, L. (2016). Optimistic belief updating deviates from bayesian learning. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2810063.

Kuzmanovic, B., Schilbach, L., Lehnhardt, F.-G., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2011). A matter of words: Impact of verbal and nonverbal information on impression formation in high-functioning autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 5, 604–613 doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.07.005. CrossRef

Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085658. CrossRefPubMed

Lefebvre, G., Lebreton, M., Meyniel, F., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., & Palminteri, S. (2016). Asymmetric reinforcement learning: Computational and neural basis of positive life orientation. bioRxiv ( not peer-reviewed preprint).

Makridakis, S., & Moleskis, A. (2015). The costs and benefits of positive illusions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 859 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00859. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Marsh, L. E., & Hamilton, A. F. (2011). Dissociation of mirroring and mentalising systems in autism. NeuroImage, 56, 1511–1519. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.003. CrossRefPubMed

Marsh, L. E., Pearson, A., Ropar, D., & Hamilton, A. F. (2015). Predictive gaze during observation of irrational actions in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 245–261. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2215-6. CrossRefPubMed

Pizzagalli, D. A., Iosifescu, D., Hallett, L. A., Ratner, K. G., & Fava, M. (2008). Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: Evidence from a probabilistic reward task. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schilbach, L. (2015). Eye to eye, face to face and brain to brain: novel approaches to study the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of social interactions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 130–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.03.006. CrossRef

Schmidt, K.-H., & Metzler, P. (1992). Wortschatztest (WST). Weinheim, Beltz Test GmbH.

Sevgi, M., Diaconescu, A. O., Tittgemeyer, M., & Schilbach, L. (2016). Social Bayes: Using Bayesian modeling to study autistic trait-related differences in social cognition. Biological Psychiatry, 80, 112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.025. CrossRefPubMed

Shah, P., Harris, A. J. L., Bird, G., Catmur, C., & Hahn, U. (2016). A pessimistic view of optimistic belief updating. Cognitive Psychology. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.004. CrossRefPubMed

Sharot, T., & Garrett, N. (2016). Forming beliefs: Why valence matters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.002.

Sharot, T., & Garrett, N. (in press). Optimistic Update Bias Holds Firm: Three Tests of Robustness Following Shah et al. Consciousness and Cognition.

Sharot, T., Korn, C. W., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1475–1479. doi: 10.1038/nn.2949. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shepperd, J. A., Klein, W. M. P., Waters, E. A., & Weinstein, N. D. (2013). Taking stock of unrealistic optimism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 395–411. doi: 10.1177/1745691613485247. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stewart, M. E., Barnard, L., Pearson, J., Hasan, R., & O’Brien, G. (2006). Presentation of depression in autism and Asperger syndrome: A review. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 10, 103–116. doi: 10.1177/1362361306062013. CrossRef

Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315, 515–518. doi: 10.1126/science.1134239. CrossRefPubMed

Vivanti, G., et al. (2011). Intact and impaired mechanisms of action understanding in autism. Developmental Psychology, 47, 841–856. doi: 10.1037/a0023105. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

von Aster, M., Neubauer, A., & Horn, R. (Eds.). (2006). Wechsler intelligenztest für Erwachsene WIE. Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung und Adaptation des WAIS-III von David Wechsler. Frankfurt, Pearson Assessment.

Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health-problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481–500. CrossRefPubMed

Wheelwright, S., et al. (2006). Predicting autism spectrum quotient (AQ) from the systemizing quotient-revised (SQ-R) and empathy quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.012. CrossRefPubMed

Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., & Garon, N. (2013). Early identification of autism spectrum disorders. Behavioural Brain Research, 251, 133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.004. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Brief Report: Reduced Optimism Bias in Self-Referential Belief Updating in High-Functioning Autism
Auteurs: Bojana Kuzmanovic
Lionel Rigoux
Kai Vogeley
Publicatiedatum: 18-10-2016
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2940-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2019

Autism Spectrum Disorder and Psychiatric Comorbidity in a Patient with Myhre Syndrome

Autistic Traits are Linked to Individual Differences in Familiar Voice Identification

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Hansen Research Services Matrix Adaptive Test: A Measure of Nonverbal IQ

A Protocol for Sedation Free MRI and PET Imaging in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

A Developmental Perspective of Global and Local Visual Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Gender Differences in Social Inclusion of Youth with Autism and Intellectual Disability