Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Brief Report

Brief Report: Learning Via the Electronic Interactive Whiteboard for Two Students with Autism and a Student with Moderate Intellectual Disability

Auteurs: Gulnoza Yakubova, Teresa Taber-Doughty

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 6/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The effects of a multicomponent intervention (a self-operated video modeling and self-monitoring delivered via an electronic interactive whiteboard (IWB) and a system of least prompts) on skill acquisition and interaction behavior of two students with autism and one student with moderate intellectual disability were examined using a multi-probe across students design. Students were taught to operate and view video modeling clips, perform a chain of novel tasks and self-monitor task performance using a SMART Board IWB. Results support the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention in improving students’ skill acquisition. Results also highlight the use of this technology as a self-operated and interactive device rather than a traditional teacher-operated device to enhance students’ active participation in learning.
Literatuur
go back to reference Campbell, M. L., & Mechling, L. C. (2009). Small group computer-assisted instruction with SMART Board technology: An investigation of observational and incidental learning of nontarget information. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 47–57.CrossRef Campbell, M. L., & Mechling, L. C. (2009). Small group computer-assisted instruction with SMART Board technology: An investigation of observational and incidental learning of nontarget information. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 47–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 14, 155–170.CrossRef Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 14, 155–170.CrossRef
go back to reference Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media, & Technology, 32, 213–225.CrossRef Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media, & Technology, 32, 213–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Horner & Baer. (1978). Multiple probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.PubMedCrossRef Horner & Baer. (1978). Multiple probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hutinger, P. L. (1996). Computer applications in programs for young children with disabilities: Recurring themes. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 105–114.CrossRef Hutinger, P. L. (1996). Computer applications in programs for young children with disabilities: Recurring themes. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 105–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
go back to reference Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13, 291–303.CrossRef Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13, 291–303.CrossRef
go back to reference Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Krupa, K. (2007). Impact of SMART Board Technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1869–1882.PubMedCrossRef Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Krupa, K. (2007). Impact of SMART Board Technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1869–1882.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Thompson, K. L. (2008). Comparison of the effects of SMART Board technology and flash card instruction on sight word recognition and observational learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, 34–46. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Thompson, K. L. (2008). Comparison of the effects of SMART Board technology and flash card instruction on sight word recognition and observational learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, 34–46.
go back to reference Okolo, C. M., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 1–27. Okolo, C. M., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 1–27.
go back to reference Schroeder, R. (2007). An overview of ethical and social issues in shared virtual environments. Futures, 39, 704–717.CrossRef Schroeder, R. (2007). An overview of ethical and social issues in shared virtual environments. Futures, 39, 704–717.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–457.CrossRef Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–457.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.CrossRef Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in key stage 2. Management in Education, 17, 29–33.CrossRef Thompson, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in key stage 2. Management in Education, 17, 29–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Wehmeyer, M., Smith, S., Palmer, S., & Davies, D. (2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 7–21. Wehmeyer, M., Smith, S., Palmer, S., & Davies, D. (2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 7–21.
Metagegevens
Titel
Brief Report: Learning Via the Electronic Interactive Whiteboard for Two Students with Autism and a Student with Moderate Intellectual Disability
Auteurs
Gulnoza Yakubova
Teresa Taber-Doughty
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1682-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2013

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 6/2013 Naar de uitgave