Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

01-07-2015 | Brief Report

Brief Report: Coherent Motion Processing in Autism: Is Dot Lifetime an Important Parameter?

Auteurs: Catherine Manning, Tony Charman, Elizabeth Pellicano

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 7/2015

Abstract

Contrasting reports of reduced and intact sensitivity to coherent motion in autistic individuals may be attributable to stimulus parameters. Here, we investigated whether dot lifetime contributes to elevated thresholds in children with autism. We presented a standard motion coherence task to 31 children with autism and 31 typical children, with both limited and unlimited lifetime conditions. Overall, children had higher thresholds in the limited lifetime condition than in the unlimited lifetime condition. However, children with autism were affected by this manipulation to the same extent as typical children and were equally sensitive to coherent motion. Our results suggest that dot lifetime is not a critical stimulus parameter and speak against pervasive difficulties in coherent motion perception in children with autism.

vorige artikel Brief Report: Theory of Mind, Relational Reasoning, and Social Responsiveness in Children With and Without Autism: Demonstration of Feasibility for a Larger-Scale Study

volgende artikel Brief Report: Linking Early Joint Attention and Play Abilities to Later Reports of Friendships for Children with ASD

Nine children with autism and four TD children had previously participated in the study reported by Manning et al. (2013). Excluding these participants did not change the pattern of results, so these participants were retained in the dataset to increase statistical power.

Twenty children with autism met criteria for an autism spectrum condition on both the SCQ and ADOS. We included all participants who met criteria on at least one of the measures in order to allow comparability with the results of Manning et al. (2013). Notwithstanding, the same pattern of results was obtained when excluding participants who did not meet criteria on both measures.

Barlow, H., & Tripathy, S. P. (1997). Correspondence noise and signal pooling in the detection of coherent visual motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(20), 7954–7966. PubMed

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17. PubMedCrossRef

Braddick, O. J., Lin, M.-H., Atkinson, J., & Wattam-Bell, J. (1998). Motion coherence thresholds: Effect of dot lifetime and comparison with form coherence. Perception, 27 ( ECVP Abstract Supplement).

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. PubMedCrossRef

Dakin, S. C., Mareschal, I., & Bex, P. J. (2005). Local and global limitations on direction integration assessed using equivalent noise analysis. Vision Research, 45(24), 3027–3049. PubMedCrossRef

Davis, R. A. O., Bockbrader, M. A., Murphy, R. R., Hetrick, W. P., & O’Donnell, B. F. (2006). Subjective perceptual distortions and visual dysfunction in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 199–210. PubMedCrossRef

de Jonge, M. V., Kemner, C., de Haan, E. H., Coppens, J. E., van den Berg, T. J. T. P., & van Engeland, H. (2007). Visual information processing in high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders and their parents. Neuropsychology, 21(1), 65–73. PubMedCrossRef

Del Viva, M. M., Igliozzi, R., Tancredi, R., & Brizzolara, D. (2006). Spatial and motion integration in children with autism. Vision Research, 46(8–9), 1242–1252. PubMedCrossRef

Festa, E. K., & Welch, L. (1997). Recruitment mechanisms in speed and fine-direction discrimination tasks. Vision Research, 37(22), 3129–3143. PubMedCrossRef

Foss-Feig, J. H., Tadin, D., Schauder, K. B., & Cascio, C. J. (2013). A substantial and unexpected enhancement of motion perception in autism. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8243–8249.

Gotham, K., Risi, S., Dawson, G., Tager-Flusberg, H., Joseph, R., Carter, A., et al. (2008). A replication of the autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) revised algorithms. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(6), 642–651.

Gotham, K., Risi, S., Pickles, A., & Lord, C. (2007). The autism diagnostic observation schedule: Revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 613–627.

Hiris, E., & Blake, R. (1995). Discrimination of coherent motion when local motion varies in speed and direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(2), 308–317. PubMed

Jackson, B. L., Blackwood, E. M., Blum, J., Carruthers, S. P., Nemorin, S., Pryor, B. A., et al. (2013). Magno- and parvocellular contrast responses in varying degrees of autistic trait. PLoS One, 8(6), e66797. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Jones, C. R. G., Swettenham, J., Charman, T., Marsden, A. J. S., Tregay, J., Baird, G., et al. (2011). No evidence for a fundamental visual motion processing deficit in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 4, 347–357. PubMedCrossRef

Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., & Pelli, D. G. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Supplement).

Koldewyn, K., Weigelt, S., Kanwisher, N., & Jiang, Y. (2013). Multiple object tracking in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(6), 1394–1405. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Lee, A. L. F., & Lu, H. (2010). A comparison of global motion perception using a multiple-aperture stimulus. Journal of Vision, 10(4), 1–16. PubMedCrossRef

Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule (WPS edition). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. L. (2012). Autism diagnostic observation schedule, second edition (ADOS-2). Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Manning, C., Charman, T., & Pellicano, E. (2013). Processing slow and fast motion in children with autism spectrum conditions. Autism Research, 6(6), 531–541. PubMedCrossRef

Manning, C., Dakin, S. C., Tibber, M. S., & Pellicano, E. (2014). Averaging, not internal noise, limits the development of coherent motion processing. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 44–56. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Milne, E., Swettenham, J., Hansen, P., Campbell, R., Jeffries, H., & Plaisted, K. (2002). High motion coherence thresholds in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(2), 255–263. PubMedCrossRef

Milne, E., White, S., Campbell, R., Swettenham, J., Hansen, P., & Ramus, F. (2006). Motion and form coherence detection in autistic spectrum disorder: relationship to motor control and 2:4 digit ratio. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 225–237. PubMedCrossRef

Newsome, W. T., & Paré, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8(6), 2201–2211. PubMed

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. PubMedCrossRef

Pellicano, E., & Gibson, L. Y. (2008). Investigating the functional integrity of the dorsal visual pathway in autism and dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2593–2596. PubMedCrossRef

Pellicano, E., Gibson, L., Maybery, M., Durkin, K., & Badcock, D. R. (2005). Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence? Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 1044–1053. PubMedCrossRef

Pilly, P. K., & Seitz, A. R. (2009). What a difference a parameter makes: A psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms. Vision Research, 49(13), 1599–1612. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Robertson, C. E., Martin, A., Baker, C. I., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Atypical integration of motion signals in autism spectrum conditions. PLoS One, 7(11), 1–9.

Ronconi, L., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Franceschini, S., Urbani, B., Molteni, M., & Facoetti, A. (2012). Decreased coherent motion discrimination in autism spectrum disorder: The role of attentional zoom-out deficit. PLoS One, 7(11), 1–9. CrossRef

Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Simmons, D. R., Robertson, A. E., McKay, L. S., Toal, E., McAleer, P., & Pollick, F. E. (2009). Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49(22), 2705–2739. PubMedCrossRef

Spencer, J., & O’Brien, J. M. D. (2006). Visual form-processing deficits in autism. Perception, 35(8), 1047–1055. PubMedCrossRef

Spencer, J., O’Brien, J., Riggs, K., Braddick, O., Atkinson, J., & Wattam-Bell, J. (2000). Motion processing in autism: evidence for a dorsal stream deficiency. NeuroReport, 11(12), 2765–2767. PubMedCrossRef

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research, 35(17), 2503–2522. PubMedCrossRef

Watamaniuk, S. N., Flinn, J., & Storh, R. E. (2003). Segregation from direction differences in dynamic random-dot stimuli. Vision Research, 43, 171–180. PubMedCrossRef

Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics, 33(2), 113–120. PubMedCrossRef

Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Wechsler, D. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (2nd ed.). San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation.

World Health Organisation. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organisation: Geneva.

Titel: Brief Report: Coherent Motion Processing in Autism: Is Dot Lifetime an Important Parameter?
Auteurs: Catherine Manning
Tony Charman
Elizabeth Pellicano
Publicatiedatum: 01-07-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2365-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2015

Clinical Outcomes of Behavioral Treatments for Pica in Children with Developmental Disabilities

Brief Report: Gestures in Children at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorders

The Experience of Military Families with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders During Relocation and Separation

Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Review

Perception of Melodic Contour and Intonation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence From Mandarin Speakers

Reliability and Validity of the Interactive Drawing Test: A Measure of Reciprocity for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder