Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2018

21-04-2017 | Original Article

Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach

Auteurs: Tarek Amer, Davood G. Gozli, Jay Pratt

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We investigated the influence of conceptual processing on visual attention from the standpoint of Theory of Event Coding (TEC). The theory makes two predictions: first, an important factor in determining the influence of event 1 on processing event 2 is whether features of event 1 are bound into a unified representation (i.e., selection or retrieval of event 1). Second, whether processing the two events facilitates or interferes with each other should depend on the extent to which their constituent features overlap. In two experiments, participants performed a visual-attention cueing task, in which the visual target (event 2) was preceded by a relevant or irrelevant explicit (e.g., “UP”) or implicit (e.g., “HAPPY”) spatial-conceptual cue (event 1). Consistent with TEC, we found relevant explicit cues (which featurally overlap to a greater extent with the target) and implicit cues (which featurally overlap to a lesser extent), respectively, facilitated and interfered with target processing at compatible locations. Irrelevant explicit and implicit cues, on the other hand, both facilitated target processing, presumably because they were less likely selected or retrieved as an integrated and unified event file. We argue that such effects, often described as “attentional cueing”, are better accounted for within the event coding framework.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Making this assumption a priori might seem problematic. The alternative assumption, namely that both words could be selected at once and to the same degree, seems defensible if we entertain the possibility that the vertically arranged words are grouped into a single perceptual object. However, this assumption gives rise to the prediction that cue Relevance should have no impact on performance (Duncan, 1984), which is disconfirmed in both Experiments 1 and 2. Hence, our assumption that the relevant word is selected with a higher likelihood at the expense of the irrelevant word was confirmed by the findings.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Casasanto, D. (2010). Space for thinking. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: State of the art and new directions (pp. 453–478). London: Equinox Publishing. Casasanto, D. (2010). Space for thinking. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: State of the art and new directions (pp. 453–478). London: Equinox Publishing.
go back to reference Cho, Y. S., Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 826–839. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.826.PubMed Cho, Y. S., Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 826–839. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​32.​4.​826.PubMed
go back to reference Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.CrossRef Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 454–465. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2.CrossRef Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 454–465. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-011-0243-2.CrossRef
go back to reference Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235. doi:10.1037/a0015220.CrossRef Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235. doi:10.​1037/​a0015220.CrossRef
go back to reference Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Taddese, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2755–2767. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0959-5.CrossRef Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Taddese, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2755–2767. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-015-0959-5.CrossRef
go back to reference Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be… included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 37, 1209–1227. doi:10.1037/a0023915.CrossRef Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be… included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 37, 1209–1227. doi:10.​1037/​a0023915.CrossRef
go back to reference Gibson, B. S., Scheutz, M., & Davis, G. J. (2009). Symbolic control of visual attention: Semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 363–374. doi:10.3758/APP.71.2.363.CrossRef Gibson, B. S., Scheutz, M., & Davis, G. J. (2009). Symbolic control of visual attention: Semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 363–374. doi:10.​3758/​APP.​71.​2.​363.CrossRef
go back to reference Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40, 373–387. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1.CrossRef Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40, 373–387. doi:10.​3758/​s13421-011-0157-1.CrossRef
go back to reference Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: Experimental dissociations of distractor–response and distractor–target bindings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 645–659. doi:10.1037/a0035278.CrossRefPubMed Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: Experimental dissociations of distractor–response and distractor–target bindings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 645–659. doi:10.​1037/​a0035278.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gozli, D. G., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2013a). The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1028–1046. doi:10.1037/a0030362.CrossRef Gozli, D. G., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2013a). The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1028–1046. doi:10.​1037/​a0030362.CrossRef
go back to reference Kiss, M., Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2013). Top-down task sets for combined features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 216–228. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0391-z.CrossRef Kiss, M., Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2013). Top-down task sets for combined features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 216–228. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-012-0391-z.CrossRef
go back to reference Lachmair, M., Ruiz Fernández, S., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Priming effects between spatial meaning of verbs and numbers are modulated by time intervals: Early interference and late facilitation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi:10.1037/cep0000085.PubMed Lachmair, M., Ruiz Fernández, S., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Priming effects between spatial meaning of verbs and numbers are modulated by time intervals: Early interference and late facilitation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi:10.​1037/​cep0000085.PubMed
go back to reference Lakens, D. (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 726–736. doi:10.1037/a0024955.CrossRefPubMed Lakens, D. (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 726–736. doi:10.​1037/​a0024955.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lynott, D., & Coventry, K. R. (2014). On the ups and downs of emotion: Testing between conceptual-metaphor and polarity accounts of emotional valence-spatial location interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 218–226. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0481-5.CrossRef Lynott, D., & Coventry, K. R. (2014). On the ups and downs of emotion: Testing between conceptual-metaphor and polarity accounts of emotional valence-spatial location interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 218–226. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-013-0481-5.CrossRef
go back to reference Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Montoro, P. R., Elosúa, M. R., Contreras, M. J., & Jiménez-Jiménez, W. A. (2014). The activation of representative emotional verbal contexts interacts with vertical spatial axis. Cognitive Processing, 15, 253–267. doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0620-6.CrossRefPubMed Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Montoro, P. R., Elosúa, M. R., Contreras, M. J., & Jiménez-Jiménez, W. A. (2014). The activation of representative emotional verbal contexts interacts with vertical spatial axis. Cognitive Processing, 15, 253–267. doi:10.​1007/​s10339-014-0620-6.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 959–978. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9.CrossRef Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 959–978. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-014-0648-9.CrossRef
go back to reference Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64.CrossRef Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 121–147). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 121–147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Ostarek, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2017). Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 579–590. doi:10.1037/xlm0000318.PubMed Ostarek, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2017). Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 579–590. doi:10.​1037/​xlm0000318.PubMed
go back to reference Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Funes, M. J., & Lupiánez, J. (2010). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17–24. doi:10.1037/a0017176.PubMed Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Funes, M. J., & Lupiánez, J. (2010). Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 17–24. doi:10.​1037/​a0017176.PubMed
go back to reference Rajsic, J., Wilson, D. E., & Pratt, J. (2015). Confirmation bias in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, 41, 1353–1364. doi:10.1037/xhp0000090.CrossRef Rajsic, J., Wilson, D. E., & Pratt, J. (2015). Confirmation bias in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, 41, 1353–1364. doi:10.​1037/​xhp0000090.CrossRef
go back to reference Sasaki, K., Yamada, Y., & Miura, K. (2016). Emotion biases voluntary vertical action only with visible cues. Acta Psychologica, 163, 97–106.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki, K., Yamada, Y., & Miura, K. (2016). Emotion biases voluntary vertical action only with visible cues. Acta Psychologica, 163, 97–106.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Zanolie, K., van Dantzig, S., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T. W., Giessner, S. R., & Pecher, D. (2012). Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78, 50–58. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006.CrossRefPubMed Zanolie, K., van Dantzig, S., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T. W., Giessner, S. R., & Pecher, D. (2012). Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78, 50–58. doi:10.​1016/​j.​bandc.​2011.​10.​006.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach
Auteurs
Tarek Amer
Davood G. Gozli
Jay Pratt
Publicatiedatum
21-04-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0867-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2018

Psychological Research 5/2018 Naar de uitgave