Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2012

01-04-2012 | Commentary

Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research

Auteurs: Ann C. Klassen, John Creswell, Vicki L. Plano Clark, Katherine Clegg Smith, Helen I. Meissner

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Excerpt

There is a growing priority in all areas of health research to develop new methodologies to improve the quality and scientific power of data, and this is leading to an extraordinary surge in methodological diversity. This diversity reflects the nature of the problems facing health sciences and health care delivery, such as disparities among populations, age groups, ethnicities, and cultures; poor adherence to recommended treatments; behavioral risk factors contributing to disability and health; and the translation of research findings into applied settings. The diversity in methodology also signals a growing acceptance of behavioral and social science perspectives in clinical research, the formation of interdisciplinary research teams, and use of multi-faceted approaches. Such approaches are important to investigations of complex health problems, which call for incorporating patient and family point of view, and cultural models of illness and health. …
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U. S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428–440.CrossRef Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U. S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428–440.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442–1452.PubMedCrossRef Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442–1452.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Almarsdottir, A. B., & Traulsen, N. M. (2009). Multimethod research into policy changes in the pharmacy sector—the Nordic case. Research Social Administrative Pharmacy, 5(1), 82–90.CrossRef Almarsdottir, A. B., & Traulsen, N. M. (2009). Multimethod research into policy changes in the pharmacy sector—the Nordic case. Research Social Administrative Pharmacy, 5(1), 82–90.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stange, K. C., Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292–294.PubMedCrossRef Stange, K. C., Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292–294.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilkins, K., & Woodgate, R. (2008). Designing a mixed methods study in pediatric oncology nursing research. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 25(1), 24–33.PubMedCrossRef Wilkins, K., & Woodgate, R. (2008). Designing a mixed methods study in pediatric oncology nursing research. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 25(1), 24–33.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612–621.PubMed Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612–621.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M. S., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: A review. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 255–263.PubMedCrossRef Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M. S., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: A review. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 255–263.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
go back to reference Klassen, A. C., Smith, K. C., Black, M. M., & Caulfield, L. E. (2009). Mixed method approaches to understanding cancer-related dietary risk reduction among public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 86(4), 624–640.CrossRef Klassen, A. C., Smith, K. C., Black, M. M., & Caulfield, L. E. (2009). Mixed method approaches to understanding cancer-related dietary risk reduction among public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 86(4), 624–640.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McVea, K., Crabtree, B. F., Medder, J. D., Susman, J. L., Lukas, L., McIlvain, H. E., et al. (1996). An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of the ‘put prevention into practice’ program. Journal of Family Practice, 43(4), 73–81. McVea, K., Crabtree, B. F., Medder, J. D., Susman, J. L., Lukas, L., McIlvain, H. E., et al. (1996). An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of the ‘put prevention into practice’ program. Journal of Family Practice, 43(4), 73–81.
11.
go back to reference Pasick, R. J., Burke, N. J., Barker, J. C., Galen, J., Bird, J. A., Otero-Sabogal, R., et al. (2009). Behavioral theory in a diverse society: Like a compass on Mars. Health Education Behavior, 36(5), 11S–35S.PubMedCrossRef Pasick, R. J., Burke, N. J., Barker, J. C., Galen, J., Bird, J. A., Otero-Sabogal, R., et al. (2009). Behavioral theory in a diverse society: Like a compass on Mars. Health Education Behavior, 36(5), 11S–35S.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ring, L., Gross, C. R., & McColl, E. (2010). Putting the text back into context: Toward increased use of mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 19, 613–615.PubMedCrossRef Ring, L., Gross, C. R., & McColl, E. (2010). Putting the text back into context: Toward increased use of mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 19, 613–615.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.
14.
go back to reference Morse, J., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Morse, J., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15.
go back to reference Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Metagegevens
Titel
Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research
Auteurs
Ann C. Klassen
John Creswell
Vicki L. Plano Clark
Katherine Clegg Smith
Helen I. Meissner
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0122-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

Quality of Life Research 3/2012 Naar de uitgave