Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2012

01-07-2012 | Original Article

Before, during and after you disappear: aspects of timing and dynamic updating of the real-time action simulation of human motions

Auteurs: Jim Parkinson, Anne Springer, Wolfgang Prinz

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The detailed dynamics of action simulation was investigated using the occluder paradigm: a point light actor (PLA) was shown, then briefly occluded from view, during which period action simulation was generated. Following occlusion, the PLA reappeared, either a progression of the motion as it should be post-occlusion or temporally shifted earlier/later. Participants made judgements on whether the reappearing PLA was too early or too late to be a correct continuation (Experiments 1 and 3) or whether it was a veridical continuation or not (Experiment 2). Over three experiments we asked how action simulation is affected by motion information before, during and after occlusion. Reducing motion presented before occlusion retained the accuracy of action simulation judgements. Presenting 4 frames (67 ms) of PLA motion during the occluder duration dynamically updates or altogether regenerates the action simulation. Reducing the duration of the test motion after the occluder decreases judgement precision, which we interpret as a limitation in the process of postdictive motion judgments. Overall, this is further evidence that the action simulation process is remarkably adapted to making human motion predictions.
Voetnoten
1
Repeated measures t test between mean slope values for 1,000 and 500 ms.
 
2
The spatial position of the early/late inserted motions was made equivalent within the occluder box to that of the congruent inserted motions by moving the initial position of the pelvis point of the former to that of the latter. Thus, gross spatial incongruency of where the PLA was on screen when he briefly appeared within the occluder was not an issue.
 
3
Here, this is inferred using psychophysical curve-fitting to “early” and “late” judgements.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Bertenthal, B. I., Longo, M. R., & Kenny, S. (2007). Phenomenal permanence and the development of predictive tracking in infancy. Child Development, 78(1), 350–363.PubMedCrossRef Bertenthal, B. I., Longo, M. R., & Kenny, S. (2007). Phenomenal permanence and the development of predictive tracking in infancy. Child Development, 78(1), 350–363.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brainard, D. H. (1996). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.CrossRef Brainard, D. H. (1996). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.CrossRef
go back to reference Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424(6950), 769–771.PubMedCrossRef Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424(6950), 769–771.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G., Reynold, H. N., & Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 113–116. Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G., Reynold, H. N., & Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 113–116.
go back to reference Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 179–192.PubMedCrossRef Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 179–192.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting pointlight actions in real-time. NeuroImage, 36, T22–T32.PubMedCrossRef Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting pointlight actions in real-time. NeuroImage, 36, T22–T32.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Johansson, G. (1972). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211.CrossRef Johansson, G. (1972). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38(4), 379–393.PubMedCrossRef Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38(4), 379–393.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166.PubMedCrossRef Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36, 14. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36, 14.
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.PubMedCrossRef Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1996). Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76(1), 109–129.PubMed Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1996). Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76(1), 109–129.PubMed
go back to reference Parkinson, J., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2011). Can you see me in the snow? Action simulation aids the detection of visually degraded human motion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1463–1472.CrossRef Parkinson, J., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2011). Can you see me in the snow? Action simulation aids the detection of visually degraded human motion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1463–1472.CrossRef
go back to reference Pelli, D. G. (1996). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442.CrossRef Pelli, D. G. (1996). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442.CrossRef
go back to reference Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38(2), 259–290.PubMedCrossRef Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38(2), 259–290.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sparenberg, P., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Predicting others’ actions: Evidence for a constant time delay in action simulation. Psychological Research, 76(1), 41–49. Sparenberg, P., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Predicting others’ actions: Evidence for a constant time delay in action simulation. Psychological Research, 76(1), 41–49.
go back to reference Springer, A., Brandstädter, S., Liepelt, R., Birngruber, T., Giese, M., Mechsner, F., et al. (2011). Motor execution affects action prediction. Brain and Cognition, 76, 26–36.PubMedCrossRef Springer, A., Brandstädter, S., Liepelt, R., Birngruber, T., Giese, M., Mechsner, F., et al. (2011). Motor execution affects action prediction. Brain and Cognition, 76, 26–36.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2010). Action semantics modulate action prediction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2141–2158.CrossRef Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2010). Action semantics modulate action prediction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2141–2158.CrossRef
go back to reference Stadler, W., Schubotz, R. I., von Cramon, D. Y., Springer, A., Graf, M., & Prinz, W. (2011). Predicting and memorizing observed action: differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Brain Mapping, 32(5), 677–687.PubMedCrossRef Stadler, W., Schubotz, R. I., von Cramon, D. Y., Springer, A., Graf, M., & Prinz, W. (2011). Predicting and memorizing observed action: differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Brain Mapping, 32(5), 677–687.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Thirkettle, M., Benton, C. P., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2008). Contributions of form, motion and task to biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 28.CrossRef Thirkettle, M., Benton, C. P., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2008). Contributions of form, motion and task to biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 28.CrossRef
go back to reference Wichmann, F., & Hill, N. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1293–1313.CrossRef Wichmann, F., & Hill, N. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1293–1313.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.PubMedCrossRef Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 209–216.PubMedCrossRef Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 209–216.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882.PubMedCrossRef Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Before, during and after you disappear: aspects of timing and dynamic updating of the real-time action simulation of human motions
Auteurs
Jim Parkinson
Anne Springer
Wolfgang Prinz
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0422-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2012

Psychological Research 4/2012 Naar de uitgave