Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2006

01-11-2006 | Original Article

Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies

Auteur: Jeff Miller

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2006

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Three experiments using psychological refractory period (PRP) tasks documented backward crosstalk effects in which the nature of the second-task response influenced the first-task response latencies. Such effects are difficult to explain within currently popular bottleneck models, according to which second-task response selection does not begin until first-task response selection has finished. In Experiments 1 and 2, the first of the PRP tasks required a choice reaction time (RT) response, whereas the second task required a go/no-go decision. Task 1 responses were faster when the second task required a go response than when it required a no-go response. Experiment 3 showed that Task 1 RTs were also influenced by the complexity of second-task responses. These backward crosstalk effects indicate that significant second-task processing is carried out in time to influence first-task responses and thus challenge strictly serial bottleneck models.
Voetnoten
1
Moreover, Logan and Schulkind (2000, Experiments 3 and 4) found no evidence of backward crosstalk in PRP paradigms using two manual responses, so it is clear that the use of two manual responses is not sufficient by itself to cause such crosstalk.
 
2
Chamberlin (1987) found no effect of second-task response complexity on RT1 with a simple RT task as the first task, but simple RT responses seem unlikely to be influenced by crosstalk in the first place because they can be completely preplanned.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Adam, J. J., & Van Veggel, L. M. (1991). Discrete finger response latencies in a simple reaction time task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 863–866.PubMedCrossRef Adam, J. J., & Van Veggel, L. M. (1991). Discrete finger response latencies in a simple reaction time task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 863–866.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1969). Refractory period of C-reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 122–128.CrossRef Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1969). Refractory period of C-reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 122–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Brunia, C. H. (1983). Motor preparation: Changes in amplitude of Achilles tendon reflexes during a fixed foreperiod of one second. Psychophysiology, 20, 658–664.PubMed Brunia, C. H. (1983). Motor preparation: Changes in amplitude of Achilles tendon reflexes during a fixed foreperiod of one second. Psychophysiology, 20, 658–664.PubMed
go back to reference Chamberlin, C. J. (1987). Effect of complexity of the second response on reaction time to the first response in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1075–1080. Chamberlin, C. J. (1987). Effect of complexity of the second response on reaction time to the first response in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1075–1080.
go back to reference De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965–980.CrossRefPubMed De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965–980.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. [On the speed of mental processes.] (W. G. Koster, Trans.). In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North Holland. Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. [On the speed of mental processes.] (W. G. Koster, Trans.). In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North Holland.
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1977). Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 49–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Duncan, J. (1977). Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 49–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Gemba, H., Sasaki, K., & Tsujimoto, T. (1990). No-go potential in monkeys and human subjects. In C. H. M. Brunia, A. W. K. Gaillard, & A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological brain research, vol. 1 (pp. 133–136). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press. Gemba, H., Sasaki, K., & Tsujimoto, T. (1990). No-go potential in monkeys and human subjects. In C. H. M. Brunia, A. W. K. Gaillard, & A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological brain research, vol. 1 (pp. 133–136). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
go back to reference Gottsdanker, R. (1969). Interacting responses to crowded signals. Acta Psychologica, 30, 168–176.CrossRef Gottsdanker, R. (1969). Interacting responses to crowded signals. Acta Psychologica, 30, 168–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Hackley, S. A., & Miller, J. O. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 32, 230–241.PubMed Hackley, S. A., & Miller, J. O. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 32, 230–241.PubMed
go back to reference Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321–329.CrossRefPubMed Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321–329.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 527–545.CrossRefPubMed Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 527–545.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heil, M., Osman, A. M., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-task: Inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 218–225.CrossRef Heil, M., Osman, A. M., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-task: Inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 218–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kerr, B. (1983). Preplanning for aimed movements: Disruption from a preliminary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 596–606.CrossRef Kerr, B. (1983). Preplanning for aimed movements: Disruption from a preliminary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 596–606.CrossRef
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. M. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. M. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260–1280.CrossRefPubMed Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260–1280.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Logan, G. D., & Delheimer, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 668–685.PubMedCrossRef Logan, G. D., & Delheimer, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 668–685.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090.CrossRefPubMed Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.CrossRef Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, J. O., & Alderton, M. (2002). Backward motor crosstalk in a psychological refractory period task. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, November. Miller, J. O., & Alderton, M. (2002). Backward motor crosstalk in a psychological refractory period task. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, November.
go back to reference Miller, J. O., & Reynolds, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1126–1142.CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. O., & Reynolds, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1126–1142.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Muroi, M., Naito, E., & Matsumura, M. (1997). Evidence for psychological refractory effect in motor inhibition for a dual-response go/no-go task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 563–568.PubMedCrossRef Muroi, M., Naito, E., & Matsumura, M. (1997). Evidence for psychological refractory effect in motor inhibition for a dual-response go/no-go task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 563–568.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Navon, D. (1984). Resources—a theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234.CrossRef Navon, D. (1984). Resources—a theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Navon, D., & Miller, J. O. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193–251.CrossRefPubMed Navon, D., & Miller, J. O. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193–251.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pashler, H. E. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.CrossRefPubMed Pashler, H. E. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pashler, H. E., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. D. (2000). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629–651.CrossRef Pashler, H. E., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. D. (2000). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629–651.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.CrossRefPubMed Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ruthruff, E. D., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21.CrossRefPubMed Ruthruff, E. D., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ruthruff, E. D., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 280–289.CrossRefPubMed Ruthruff, E. D., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 280–289.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ruthruff, E. D., Miller, J. O., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 552–570.CrossRefPubMed Ruthruff, E. D., Miller, J. O., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 552–570.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ruthruff, E. D., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 73–80. Ruthruff, E. D., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 73–80.
go back to reference Sasaki, K., Gemba, H., Nambu, A., & Matsuzaki, R. (1993). No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects. Neuroscience Research, 18, 249–252.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki, K., Gemba, H., Nambu, A., & Matsuzaki, R. (1993). No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects. Neuroscience Research, 18, 249–252.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101–108.CrossRefPubMed Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101–108.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sternberg, S. (1969a). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef Sternberg, S. (1969a). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Sternberg, S. (1969b). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457. Sternberg, S. (1969b). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
go back to reference Stief, V., Leuthold, H., Miller, J. O., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1998). The effect of response complexity on the lateralized readiness potential. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 206, 305–319. Stief, V., Leuthold, H., Miller, J. O., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1998). The effect of response complexity on the lateralized readiness potential. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 206, 305–319.
go back to reference Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18.CrossRefPubMed Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83–94.CrossRefPubMed Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83–94.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 905–921.CrossRefPubMed Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 905–921.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vincent, S. B. (1912). The function of the viborissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs, 1 (5), 1–82 Vincent, S. B. (1912). The function of the viborissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs, 1 (5), 1–82
Metagegevens
Titel
Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies
Auteur
Jeff Miller
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2006
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2006

Psychological Research 6/2006 Naar de uitgave