Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Attention Bias Modification Training Via Smartphone to Reduce Social Anxiety: A Randomized, Controlled Multi-Session Experiment

Auteurs: Philip M. Enock, Stefan G. Hofmann, Richard J. McNally

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 2/2014

Abstract

Testing feasibility and efficacy of psychological treatment via mobile devices is important, given its potential benefits for high-dosage treatment delivery, widespread and inexpensive dissemination, and efficient research methods. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial of attention bias modification training delivered via smartphones, comparing this training to control training in a double-blind design, also including a waitlist condition. All participants performed a variant of dot-probe training involving faces with neutral and disgust (representative of social threat) expressions in brief sessions three times daily over 4 weeks on their own smartphones, at home or anywhere they chose. Attention bias modification, also known as cognitive bias modification of attention, training included a contingency to induce attentional deployment away from disgust faces, whereas the control training included no contingency. Participants completed weekly Internet-based self-report symptom assessments as well as smartphone-delivered dot-probe attention bias assessments, whose reliability findings supported the viability of using smartphones for reaction-time based assessments. The between-groups training effect on attention bias scores was small, showing statistical significance in some analyses and not in others. On measures of social anxiety, intention-to-treat analyses (n = 326) revealed significant pre–post treatment declines with medium to large effect sizes in both training groups, whereas small declines in a waitlist group were nonsignificant. Both training groups showed greater reductions in social anxiety than did waitlist; however, the benefits under these two training conditions were statistically indistinguishable. Improvements in the two training conditions beyond those of waitlist could be attributable to any factors common to them, but not to the contingency training specific to active attention bias modification training.

vorige artikel Rumination Moderates the Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification of Attention

volgende artikel Can Memory Bias be Modified? The Effects of an Explicit Cued-Recall Training in Two Independent Samples

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Data from study signup was missing for one participant, and the answer on handheld device type was missing for 1.4 % of participants.

Due to a programming error, in two of the eight pairs, the face of one model (ID YY2) was paired with the face of another model (ID ES2) who shared similar features. Because many participants had already completed training when we discovered this problem, we maintained the same stimuli throughout the study without mentioning it to participants. Two participants reported noticing the mismatch. However, the error did not violate the requirement for attention bias modification that each pair consist of a neutral and a threat stimulus.

All p values are two-tailed. T tests employ Welch’s method (equal variances are not assumed). Those appearing in the second paragraph under each symptom heading (e.g., under LSAS above) apply to comparisons of change scores, whereas those in the third paragraph apply to scores at one time, either postassessment or two-month follow-up. For pre–post Cohen’s d effect sizes within each group, we used the formula (M _post − M _pre)/SD_pre. For between-groups Cohen’s d effect sizes, we employed the standard Cohen’s d formula using pooled standard deviation, (M _Group1 − M _Group2)/SD_pooled.

Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009a). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(1), 28–33. doi:10.1037/a0012589.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Amir, N., Beard, C., Taylor, C. T., Klumpp, H., Elias, J., Burns, M., et al. (2009b). Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 961–973. doi:10.1037/a0016685.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(11), 1325–1335. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00039-1.PubMedCrossRef

Amir, N., Weber, G., Beard, C., Bomyea, J., & Taylor, C. T. (2008). The effect of a single-session attention modification program on response to a public-speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(4), 860–868. doi:10.1037/a0013445.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 176–181. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.CrossRef

Ataya, A. F., Adams, S., Mullings, E., Cooper, R. M., Attwood, A. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2012). Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121(1–2), 148–151. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.023.PubMedCrossRef

Baker, S. L., Heinrichs, N., Kim, H.-J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2002). The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: A preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 701–715. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2.PubMedCrossRef

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1.PubMedCrossRef

Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy, 43(4), 724–740. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.01.002.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Boettcher, J., Berger, T., & Renneberg, B. (2012). Internet-based attention training for social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 522–536. doi:10.1007/s10608-011-9374-y.CrossRef

Boettcher, J., Leek, L., Matson, L., Holmes, E., Browning, M., MacLeod, C., et al. (2013). Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: A randomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e71760. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071760.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Browning, M., Grol, M., Ly, V., Goodwin, G. M., Holmes, E. A., & Harmer, C. J. (2011). Using an experimental medicine model to explore combination effects of pharmacological and cognitive interventions for depression and anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(13), 2689–2697. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.159.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Bunnell, B. E., Beidel, D. C., & Mesa, F. (2013). A randomized trial of attention training for generalized social phobia: Does attention training change social behavior? Behavior Therapy. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.010.

Carlbring, P., Apelstrand, M., Sehlin, H., Amir, N., Rousseau, A., Hofmann, S., et al. (2012). Internet-delivered attention bias modification training in individuals with social anxiety disorder—a double blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1), 66. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Cox, B. J., Ross, L., Swinson, R. P., & Direnfeld, D. M. (1998). A comparison of social phobia outcome measures in cognitive-behavioral group therapy. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 285–297. doi:10.1177/01454455980223004.PubMedCrossRef

Damian, M. F. (2010). Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards? Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 205–211. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.205.PubMedCrossRef

Eldar, S., Apter, A., Lotan, D., Edgar, K. P., Fox, N. A., Pine, D. S., et al. (2012). Attention bias modification treatment for pediatric anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 213–220. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491316/.

Enock, P. M., & McNally, R. J. (2010). Feasibility and efficacy of attention bias modification via iPhone and other handheld devices to reduce social anxiety and worry. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Enock, P. M., & McNally, R. J. (2013). How mobile apps and other web-based interventions can transform psychological treatment and the treatment development cycle. The Behavior Therapist, 36(3), 56, 58, 60, 62–66. Retrieved from http://www.abct.org/docs/PastIssue/36n3.pdf.

Enock, P. M., Robinaugh, D. J., Reese, H. E., & McNally, R. J. (2012). Improved reliability estimation and psychometrics of the dot-probe paradigm on smartphones and PC. Poster session presented at the meeting of The Association of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, National Harbor, MD.

Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.681.CrossRef

Fresco, D. M., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Leibowitz, M. R., Hami, S., Stein, M. B., et al. (2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: A comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31(6), 1025–1035. doi:10.1017/S0033291701004056.PubMedCrossRef

Fresco, D. M., Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2003). Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to identify individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34(3–4), 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2003.09.001.PubMedCrossRef

Gee, A. (2011). Therapist-free therapy: Cognitive-bias modification may put the psychiatrist’s couch out of business. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/18276234.

Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models (p. 648). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Regression-Multilevel-Hierarchical-Models/dp/052168689X.

Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., et al. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.021.

Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., et al. (2012). Erratum: Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 72(5), 429. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.07.015.CrossRef

Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137(6), 940–958. doi:10.1037/a0024355.PubMedCrossRef

Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Rück, C., Furmark, T., Carlbring, P., Lindefors, N., et al. (2010). Internet administration of self-report measures commonly used in research on social anxiety disorder: A psychometric evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 736–740. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.010.CrossRef

Heeren, A., Reese, H. E., McNally, R. J., & Philippot, P. (2012). Attention training toward and away from threat in social phobia: Effects on subjective, behavioral, and physiological measures of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(1), 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.10.005.PubMedCrossRef

Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., Hope, D. A., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The social interaction anxiety scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behavior Therapy, 23(1), 53–73. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80308-9.CrossRef

Li, S., Tan, J., Qian, M., & Liu, X. (2008). Continual training of attentional bias in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(8), 905–912. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.005.PubMedCrossRef

Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173.PubMed

Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation.

MacLeod, C. (1995). Training selective attention: A cognitive-experimental technique for reducing anxiety vulnerability? In World congress of behavioural and cognitive therapies (p. 118).

MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15–20. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15.PubMedCrossRef

MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L. W., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 107–123. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.1.107.PubMedCrossRef

MacLeod, C., Soong, L. Y., Rutherford, E. M., & Campbell, L. W. (2007). Internet-delivered assessment and manipulation of anxiety-linked attentional bias: Validation of a free-access attentional probe software package. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 533–538. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17958165.

Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) and Neutral Faces (JACNeuF). San Francisco, CA: Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University.

Mattick, R., & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(4), 455–470. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6.PubMedCrossRef

McNally, R. J., Enock, P. M., Tsai, C., & Tousian, M. (2013). Attention bias modification for reducing speech anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51(12), 882–888. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.10.001.PubMedCrossRef

Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(6), 487–495. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6.PubMedCrossRef

Neubauer, K., von Auer, M., Murray, E., Petermann, F., Helbig-Lang, S., & Gerlach, A. L. (2013). Internet-delivered attention modification training as a treatment for social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51(2), 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.10.006.PubMedCrossRef

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar, D. (2010). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme.

R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/.

Rodebaugh, T. L., Woods, C. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2007). The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: The reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong. Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 192–206. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.001.PubMedCrossRef

Rytwinski, N. K., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Coles, M. E., Liebowitz, M. R., & Cissell, S. (2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26(1), 34–38. doi:10.1002/da.20503.PubMedCrossRef

Sawyer, A. T., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Amir, N., Fang, A., Richey, A., et al. (2012). Attention retraining in SAD: Treatment outcome and neurobiological correlates. In A. Asnaani & A. T. Sawyer (Chairs), Modifying cognitive biases: Emerging data on applications and effects on clinical disorders. Symposium conducted at the meeting of The Association of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, National Harbor, MD.

Schmidt, N. B., Richey, J. A., Buckner, J. D., & Timpano, K. R. (2009). Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(1), 5–14. doi:10.1037/a0013643.PubMedCrossRef

Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19(7), 595–605. doi:10.1002/per.554.CrossRef

SPSS Inc. (2009). PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21476197

Staugaard, S. R. (2009). Reliability of two versions of the dot-probe task using photographic faces. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(3), 339–350.

Ulrich, R., & Giray, M. (1989). Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement-Good news for bad clocks. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42(1), 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb01111.x.CrossRef

Waechter, S., Nelson, A. L., Wright, C., Hyatt, A., & Oakman, J. (2013). Measuring attentional bias to threat: Reliability of dot probe and eye movement indices. Cognitive Therapy and Research. doi:10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2.

Wald, I., Lubin, G., Holoshitz, Y., Muller, D., Fruchter, E., Pine, D. S., et al. (2011). Battlefield-like stress following simulated combat and suppression of attention bias to threat. Psychological Medicine, 41(4), 699–707. doi:10.1017/S0033291710002308.PubMedCrossRef

Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(4), 448–457. doi:10.1037/h0027806.PubMedCrossRef

Wells, T., & Beevers, C. G. (2010). Biased attention and dysphoria: Manipulating selective attention reduces subsequent depressive symptoms. Cognition and Emotion, 24(4), 719–728. doi:10.1080/02699930802652388.CrossRef

Zlomke, K. R. (2009). Psychometric properties of internet administered versions of Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 841–843. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.003.CrossRef

Titel: Attention Bias Modification Training Via Smartphone to Reduce Social Anxiety: A Randomized, Controlled Multi-Session Experiment
Auteurs: Philip M. Enock
Stefan G. Hofmann
Richard J. McNally
Publicatiedatum: 01-04-2014
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9606-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Rumination Moderates the Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification of Attention

Change Processes During Cognitive Bias Modification for Obsessive Compulsive Beliefs

Can Memory Bias be Modified? The Effects of an Explicit Cued-Recall Training in Two Independent Samples

Editorial for the Special Issue on Cognitive Bias Modification Techniques: An Introduction to a Time Traveller’s Tale

Positive Imagery Cognitive Bias Modification in Treatment-Seeking Patients with Major Depression in Iran: A Pilot Study

When Ignorance is Bliss: Explicit Instruction and the Efficacy of CBM-A for Anxiety