Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2003 | Original Article

Asynchronous perception of motion and luminance change

Auteur: Dirk Kerzel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2003

Abstract.

Observers were asked to indicate when a target moving on a circular trajectory changed its luminance. The judged position of the luminance change was displaced from the true position in the direction of motion, indicating differences between the times-to-consciousness of motion and luminance change. Motion was processed faster than luminance change. The latency difference was more pronounced for a small (116–134 ms) than for a large luminance decrement (37 ms). The results show that first-order motion is perceived before an accurate representation of luminance is available. These findings are consistent with current accounts of the flash-lag effect. Two control experiments ruled out that the results were due to a general forward tendency. Localization of the target when an auditory signal was presented did not produce forward displacement, and the judged onset of motion was not shifted in the direction of motion.

volgende artikel Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect

Aschersleben, G., & Müsseler, J. (1999). Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1709–1720.

Braddick, O. J. (1980). Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Science, 290(1038), 137–151.

Brenner, E., Smeets, J. B., & van den Berg, A. V. (2001). Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation. Vision Research, 41(17), 2253–2259.CrossRefPubMed

Burkhardt, D. A., Gottesman, J., & Keenan, R. M. (1987). Sensory latency and reaction time: dependence on contrast polarity and early linearity in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America [A], 4(3), 530–539.CrossRefPubMed

Cavanagh, P., & Mather, G. (1989). Motion: the long and short of it. Spatial Vision, 4(2–3), 103–129.PubMed

DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11(5), 219–226.CrossRef

Dubner, R., & Zeki, S. M. (1971). Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. Brain Research, 35(2), 528–532.CrossRefPubMed

Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287(5460), 2036–2038.CrossRefPubMed

Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1(1), 1–47.CrossRefPubMed

Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427–438.CrossRefPubMed

Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit. [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 54, 58–78.

Hazelhoff, F. F., & Wiersma, H. (1924). Die Wahrnehmungszeit. Erster Artikel: Die Bestimmung der Schnelligkeit der Wahrnehmung von Lichtreizen nach der Lokalisationsmethode. [The time to perception: First article: The determination of the speed of perception of light stimuli with the localization method]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 96, 171–188.

Kerzel, D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40(27), 3703–3715.CrossRefPubMed

Kerzel, D. (2002a). Different localization of motion onset with pointing and relative judgements. Experimental Brain Research, 145(3), 340–350.CrossRefPubMed

Kerzel, D. (2002b). Memory for the position of stationary objects: Disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging. Vision Research, 42(2), 159–167.CrossRefPubMed

Kerzel, D., Jordan, J. S., & Müsseler, J. (2001). The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 829–840.PubMed

Kerzel, D., & Müsseler, J. (2002). Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion. Vision Research, 42(2), 181–189.CrossRefPubMed

Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research, 39, 3702–3709.CrossRefPubMed

Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences, 24(6), 335–339.CrossRefPubMed

Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240(4853), 740–749.CrossRefPubMed

Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (1995). The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research, 35(19), 2697–2722.CrossRefPubMed

Mateeff, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (1989). The role of the adjacency between background cues and objects in visual localization during ocular pursuit. Perception, 18(1), 93–104.CrossRefPubMed

Mateeff, S., Yakimoff, N., & Dimitrov, G. (1981). Localization of brief visual stimuli during pursuit eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 48(1–3), 133–140.CrossRefPubMed

Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402.CrossRefPubMed

Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997). Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Science, 264(1387), 1407–1414.

Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Frohlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(4), 683–695.CrossRef

Neuhaus, W. (1930). Experimentelle Untersuchung der Scheinbewegung [Experimental investigations of apparent motion]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 775, 315–458.

Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370(6487), 256–257.CrossRefPubMed

Patel, S. S., Ogmen, H., Bedell, H. E., & Sampath, V. (2000). Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Science, 290(5494), 1051a.CrossRef

Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1986). The perception of apparent motion. Scientific American, 254(6), 102–109.CrossRefPubMed

Roufs, J. A. J. (1963). Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Research, 3, 81–91.CrossRef

Thornton, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision, 15(2), 219–244.CrossRefPubMed

Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience, 1(8), 656–657.CrossRefPubMed

Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research, 40(2), 137–149.CrossRefPubMed

Zeki, S. (1980). The representation of colours in the cerebral cortex. Nature, 284(5755), 412–418.CrossRefPubMed

Zeki, S., & Bartels, A. (1998). The autonomy of the visual systems and the modularity of conscious vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Science, 353(1377), 1911–1914.

Zeki, S. M. (1978). Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature, 274(5670), 423–428.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Asynchronous perception of motion and luminance change
Auteur: Dirk Kerzel
Publicatiedatum: 01-11-2003
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2003
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0121-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2003

Irrelevant auditory attention shifts prime corresponding responses

The effect of discordant sensory information in graphic production: two distinct subject groups

The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks

Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect

Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition

The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: The role of order information in free recall