Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 12/2015

03-06-2015

Assessment of the Swedish EQ-5D experience-based value sets in a total hip replacement population

Auteurs: Szilárd Nemes, Kristina Burström, Niklas Zethraeus, Ted Eneqvist, Göran Garellick, Ola Rolfson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Background

All patients undergoing elective total hip replacement (THR) in Sweden are asked to complete a survey, including the EQ-5D. Thus far, EQ-5D values have been presented using the UK TTO value set based on hypothetical values. Shift to the use of the recently introduced Swedish experience-based value set, derived from a representative Swedish population, is an appealing alternative.

Purpose

To investigate how accurate the Swedish experience-based VAS value set predicts observed EQ VAS values and to compare correlations between Swedish and UK value sets including two provisional value sets derived from the THR population.

Methods

Pre- and one-year postoperative data from 56,062 THR patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register were used. Agreement between the observed and the predicted EQ VAS values was assessed with correlation. Based on pre- and postoperative data, we constructed two provisional VAS value sets.

Results

Correlations between observed and calculated values using the Swedish VAS value set were moderate (r = 0.46) in preoperative data and high (r = 0.72) in postoperative data. Correlations between UK and register-based value sets were constantly lower compared to Swedish value sets. Register-based values and Swedish values were highly correlated.

Conclusions

The Swedish value sets are more accurate in terms of representation of the Swedish THR patients than the currently used UK TTO value set. We find it feasible to use the experience-based Swedish value sets for further presentation of EQ-5D values in the Swedish THR population.
vorige artikel Population-level impact of loss on survivor mortality risk
volgende artikel Assessing the impact of non-severe hypoglycemic events and treatment in adults: development of the Treatment-Related Impact Measure—Non-severe Hypoglycemic Events (TRIM-HYPO)
Literatuur
1.
Smith, P. C., & Street, A. D. (2013). On the uses of routine patient-reported health outcome data. Health Economics, 22(2), 119–131.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Rolfson, O., Rothwell, A., Sedrakyan, A., Chenok, K. E., Bohm, E., Bozic, K. J., & Garellick, G. (2011). Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 93(3), 66–71.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ, 346, f167.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Sprangers, M. G., Hall, P., Morisky, D., Narrow, W., & Dapueto, J. (2013). Using patient-reported measurement to pave the path towards personalized medicine. Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2631–2637.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Vogl, M., Leidl, R., Plötz, W., & Gutacker, N. (2015). Comparison of pre- and post-operative health-related quality of life and length of stay after primary total hip replacement in matched English and German patient cohorts. Quality of Life Research, 24(2), 513–520.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337–343.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., Stoddart, G. L., Drummond, M. F., et al. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programme (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Szende, A., Oppe, M., & Devlin, N. (2007). EQ-5D value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
9.
Xie, F., Gaebel, K., Perampaladas, K., Doble, B., & Pullenayegum, E. (2014). Comparing EQ-5D valuation studies: A Systematic review and methodological reporting checklist. Medical Decision Making, 34(1), 8–20.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health States. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Burström, K., Sun, S., Gerdtham, U.-G., Henriksson, M., Johannesson, M., Levin, L.-Å., & Zethraeus, N. (2014). Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states. Quality of Life Research, 23(2), 431–442.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
Leidl, R., & Reitmeir, P. (2011). A value set for the EQ-5D based on experienced health states. PharmacoEconomics, 29(6), 521–534.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Brazier, J., Akehurst, R., Brennan, A., Dolan, P., Claxton, K., McCabe, C., et al. (2005). Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 4(4), 201–208.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Dolan, P. (2008). Developing methods that really do value the ‘Q’ in the QALY. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 3(01), 69–77.
15.
Dolan, P. (2011). Thinking about it: Thoughts about health and valuing QALYs. Health Economics, 20(12), 1407–1416.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Norman, R., Cronin, P., Viney, R., King, M., Street, D., & Ratcliffe, J. (2009). International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: A review and analysis. Value in Health, 12(8), 1194–1200.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Greiner, W., Weijnen, T., Nieuwenhuizen, M., Oppe, S., Badia, X., Busschbach, J., et al. (2003). A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly, 4(3), 222–231.CrossRef
18.
Konig, H. H., Bernert, S., Angermeyer, M. C., Matschinger, H., Martinez, M., Vilagut, G., et al. (2009). Comparison of population health status in six european countries results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Medical Care, 47(2), 255–261.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Burstrom, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F. (2001). Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 10(7), 621–635.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Greene, M., Rolfson, O., Nemes, S., Gordon, M., Malchau, H., & Garellick, G. (2014). Education attainment is associated with patient-reported outcomes: Findings from the swedish hip arthroplasty register. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(6), 1868–1876.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
Greene, M., Rolfson, O., Gordon, M., Garellick, G., & Nemes, S. (2015). Standard comorbidity measures do not predict patient-reported outcomes 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ®, 1–10. doi:10.​1007/​s11999-015-4195-z.
22.
Emilsson, L., Lindahl, B., Köster, M., Lambe, M., & Ludvigsson, J. F. (2015). Review of 103 swedish healthcare quality registries. Journal of Internal Medicine, 277(1), 94–136.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Rolfson, O., Karrholm, J., Dahlberg, L. E., & Garellick, G. (2011). Patient-reported outcomes in the swedish hip arthroplasty register. Results of a nationwide prospective observational study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume, 93B(7), 867–875.CrossRef
24.
Little, M. H. R., Reitmeir, P., Peters, A., & Leidl, R. (2014). The impact of differences between patient and general population EQ-5D-3 l values on the mean tariff scores of different patient groups. Value in Health, 17(4), 364–371.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Dolan, P., & Kahneman, D. (2008). Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. The Economic Journal, 118(525), 215–234.CrossRef
26.
27.
Whynes, D. (2013). Does the correspondence between EQ-5D health state description and VAS score vary by medical condition? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 155.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
Lau, D., Agborsangaya, C., Sayah, F., Wu, X., Ohinmaa, A., & Johnson, J. (2012). Population-level response shift: Novel implications for research. Quality of Life Research, 21(9), 1495–1498.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Assessment of the Swedish EQ-5D experience-based value sets in a total hip replacement population
Auteurs
Szilárd Nemes
Kristina Burström
Niklas Zethraeus
Ted Eneqvist
Göran Garellick
Ola Rolfson
Publicatiedatum
03-06-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1020-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2015

Quality of Life Research 12/2015 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Development and validation of the Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Impact (DPNPI) measure, a patient-reported outcome measure

OriginalPaper

Examining differential responses of youth with and without autism on a measure of everyday activity performance

OriginalPaper

Clinical improvement and satisfaction after total joint replacement: a prospective 12-month evaluation on the patients’ perspective

Erratum

Erratum to: The subjective well-being of individuals diagnosed with comorbid intellectual disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders

OriginalPaper

Dynamic weight-bearing assessment of pain in knee osteoarthritis: a reliability and agreement study

OriginalPaper

Quality of life of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the Netherlands: results of a longitudinal multicentre study