Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The present paper assessed the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures by comparing single-item measures to the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)—a more psychometrically established measure.
Two large samples from Washington (N = 13,064) and Oregon (N = 2,277) recruited by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and a representative German sample (N = 1,312) recruited by the Germany Socio-Economic Panel were included in the present analyses. Single-item life satisfaction measures and the SWLS were correlated with theoretically relevant variables, such as demographics, subjective health, domain satisfaction, and affect. The correlations between the two life satisfaction measures and these variables were examined to assess the construct validity of single-item life satisfaction measures.
Consistent across three samples, single-item life satisfaction measures demonstrated substantial degree of criterion validity with the SWLS (zero-order r = 0.62–0.64; disattenuated r = 0.78–0.80). Patterns of statistical significance for correlations with theoretically relevant variables were the same across single-item measures and the SWLS. Single-item measures did not produce systematically different correlations compared to the SWLS (average difference = 0.001–0.005). The average absolute difference in the magnitudes of the correlations produced by single-item measures and the SWLS was very small (average absolute difference = 0.015–0.042).
Single-item life satisfaction measures performed very similarly compared to the multiple-item SWLS. Social scientists would get virtually identical answer to substantive questions regardless of which measure they use.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)11136_2014_726_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(1), 1–43.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Wagner, G. G., Joachim, R. F., & Jürgen, S. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)–scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127(1), 139–169.
Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2009). British Household Panel Survey user manual volume A: Introduction, technical report, and appendices. Colchester: University of Essex. http://iserwww.essex.ac.uk/ulsc/bhps/doc/.
Voorpostel, M., Tillmann, R., Lebert, F., Kuhn, U., Lipps, O., Ryser, V.-A., et al. (2012). Swiss Household Panel Userguide (1999–2011), Wave 13, October 2012. Lausanne: FORS.
“Gallup Daily: U.S. Life Evaluation.” (2013). Retrieved November 11, 2013 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/110125/gallup-daily-life-evaluation.aspx.
“Gallup World Poll Knowledge Center.” (2013). Retrieved November 11, 2013 from http://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/en-us/worldpoll.aspx.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2010). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. CrossRef
Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). The trait–state models for longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Kobau, R., Sniezek, J., Zack, M. M., Lucas, R. E., & Burns, A. (2010). Well‐being assessment: An evaluation of well‐being scales for public health and population estimates of well‐being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 2(3), 272–297.
Kobau, R., Bann, C., Lewis, M., Zack, M. M., Boardman, A. M., Boyd, R., et al. (2013). Mental, social, and physical well-being in New Hampshire, Oregon, and Washington, 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Implications for public health research and practice related to Healthy People 2020 foundation health measures on well-being. Population Health Metrics, 11(19), 1–16.
del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2011). Education as a positional good: A life satisfaction approach. Social Indicators Research, 103(3), 409–426. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gerlitz, J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes, 4, 1–36.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28. CrossRef
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. CrossRef
- Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples
Richard E. Lucas
- Springer International Publishing