Erratum to: Hum Genet DOI 10.1007/s00439-009-0766-y

Unfortunately, the wrong Fig. 6 was published in the online published article. Please see the correct figure 6 and the legend below.

Fig. 6
figure a

cDNA from mother (I.1) amplified with two sets of primers for CCBE1 and run on an agarose gel. Lane 1 is a 100-kb ladder. Lanes 2 and 7 are negative controls. Lanes 3–6 are amplicons from primers in exons 1 and 6 (480 bp product). 3 and 6 are from skin biopsy of I.1, 4 is from lymphocytes of I.1, 5 is a control skin biopsy. Lanes 8–11 are amplified with primers from exons 1 and 11 (960 bp product). Lanes 8 and 11 are from skin biopsy of I.1, Lane 9 is from lymphocytes of I.1, Lane 10 is a control skin biopsy