Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-12-2008 | Research | Uitgave 1/2008 Open Access

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2008

Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research > Uitgave 1/2008
Auteurs:
Thomas G McPoil, Mark W Cornwall, Lynn Medoff, Bill Vicenzino, Kelly Forsberg, Dana Hilz
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1757-1146-1-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

TGM conceived the study, participated in the design of the study, and carried out data analyses. MWC conceived the study, participated in the design of the study, and carried out data analyses. LM coordinated and carried out data analyses. BV participated in the design of the study and carried out data analyses. KKF coordinated and carried out data analyses. DH coordinated and carried out data analyses.

Abstract

Background

A study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of a new foot mobility assessment method that utilizes digital images to measure the change in dorsal arch height measured at 50% of the length of the foot during the Sit-to-Stand test.

Methods

Two hundred – seventy five healthy participants participated in the study. The medial aspect of each foot was photographed with a digital camera while each participant stood with 50% body weight on each foot as well as in sitting for a non-weight bearing image. The dorsal arch height was measured at 50% of the total length of the foot on both weight bearing and non-weight bearing images to determine the change in dorsal arch height. The reliability and validity of the measurements were then determined.

Results

The mean difference in dorsal arch height between non-weight bearing and weight bearing was 10 millimeters. The change in arch height during the Sit-to-Stand test was shown to have good to high levels of intra- and inter-reliability as well as validity using x-rays as the criterion measure.

Conclusion

While the navicular drop test has been widely used as a clinical method to assess foot mobility, poor levels of inter-rater reliability have been reported. The results of the current study suggest that the change in dorsal arch height during the Sit-to-Stand test offers the clinician a reliable and valid alternative to the navicular drop test.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Authors’ original file for figure 1
13047_2008_3_MOESM1_ESM.png
Authors’ original file for figure 2
13047_2008_3_MOESM2_ESM.png
Authors’ original file for figure 3
13047_2008_3_MOESM3_ESM.png
Authors’ original file for figure 4
13047_2008_3_MOESM4_ESM.png
Authors’ original file for figure 5
13047_2008_3_MOESM5_ESM.png
Authors’ original file for figure 6
13047_2008_3_MOESM6_ESM.png
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2008

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2008 Naar de uitgave