Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2012

Applying mixed methods to pretest the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life (PU-QOL) instrument

Auteurs: C. Gorecki, D. L. Lamping, J. Nixon, J. M. Brown, S. Cano

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Pretesting is key in the development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments. We describe a mixed-methods approach based on interviews and Rasch measurement methods in the pretesting of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life (PU-QOL) instrument.

Methods

We used cognitive interviews to pretest the PU-QOL in 35 patients with pressure ulcers with the view to identifying problematic items, followed by Rasch analysis to examine response options, appropriateness of the item series and biases due to question ordering (item fit). We then compared findings in an interactive and iterative process to identify potential strengths and weaknesses of PU-QOL items, and guide decision-making about further revisions to items and design/layout.

Results

Although cognitive interviews largely supported items, they highlighted problems with layout, response options and comprehension. Findings from the Rasch analysis identified problems with response options through reversed thresholds.

Conclusions

The use of a mixed-methods approach in pretesting the PU-QOL instrument proved beneficial for identifying problems with scale layout, response options and framing/wording of items. Rasch measurement methods are a useful addition to standard qualitative pretesting for evaluating strengths and weaknesses of early stage PRO instruments.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 14, 1–74.CrossRef Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 14, 1–74.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 7351, 1417–1422.CrossRef Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 7351, 1417–1422.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hobart, J., Cano, S., Zajicek, J., & Thompson, A. (2007). Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: Problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurology, 1094–1095. Hobart, J., Cano, S., Zajicek, J., & Thompson, A. (2007). Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: Problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurology, 1094–1095.
4.
go back to reference Hobart, J. C., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 12, 1–200. Hobart, J. C., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 12, 1–200.
6.
go back to reference Jobe, J. B., & Mingay, D. J. (1989). Cognitive research improves questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 1053–1055. Jobe, J. B., & Mingay, D. J. (1989). Cognitive research improves questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 1053–1055.
7.
go back to reference Jobe, J. B. (2003). Cognitive psychology and self-reports: Models and methods. Quality of Life Research, 3, 219–227.CrossRef Jobe, J. B. (2003). Cognitive psychology and self-reports: Models and methods. Quality of Life Research, 3, 219–227.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73–100). Washington DC: National Academy Press. Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73–100). Washington DC: National Academy Press.
9.
go back to reference Mullin, P. A., Lohr, K. N., Bresnahan, B. W., & McNulty, P. (2000). Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments. Quality of Life Research, 1, 13–27.CrossRef Mullin, P. A., Lohr, K. N., Bresnahan, B. W., & McNulty, P. (2000). Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments. Quality of Life Research, 1, 13–27.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988). The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 724–735. Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988). The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 724–735.
11.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., Rogers, B., & Reese, PR. (1997). MAP-R for windows: Multitrait/multi-item analysis program—revised user’s guide. Boston: Health Assessment Lab. Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., Rogers, B., & Reese, PR. (1997). MAP-R for windows: Multitrait/multi-item analysis programrevised user’s guide. Boston: Health Assessment Lab.
12.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago.
14.
go back to reference Green, K. E., & Smith, R. M. (1987). A comparison of two methods of decomposing item difficulties. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 369–381.CrossRef Green, K. E., & Smith, R. M. (1987). A comparison of two methods of decomposing item difficulties. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 369–381.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 4, 328. Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 4, 328.
16.
go back to reference Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies Rasch model. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51–61). New York: Academic Press Inc. Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies Rasch model. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51–61). New York: Academic Press Inc.
17.
go back to reference Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., et al. (2009). Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1175–1183. Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Nelson, E. A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., et al. (2009). Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1175–1183.
19.
go back to reference Franks, P. J., & Collier, M. E. (2001). Quality of life: The cost to the individual. In M. Morison (Ed.), The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers (pp. 37–45). London: Harcourt Publishers Limited. Franks, P. J., & Collier, M. E. (2001). Quality of life: The cost to the individual. In M. Morison (Ed.), The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers (pp. 37–45). London: Harcourt Publishers Limited.
20.
go back to reference Lyons, S., & Sorenson, M. (2007). Quality of life in spinal cord injury patients with pressure ulcers. SCI Nursing: Electronic Journal, 3. Lyons, S., & Sorenson, M. (2007). Quality of life in spinal cord injury patients with pressure ulcers. SCI Nursing: Electronic Journal, 3.
21.
go back to reference Thein, H. H., Gomes, T., Krahn, M. D. & Wodchis, W. P. (2009). Health status utilities and the impact of pressure ulcers in long-term care residents in Ontario. Quality of Life Research, 81–89. Thein, H. H., Gomes, T., Krahn, M. D. & Wodchis, W. P. (2009). Health status utilities and the impact of pressure ulcers in long-term care residents in Ontario. Quality of Life Research, 81–89.
22.
go back to reference Essex, H. N., Clark, M., Sims, J., Warriner, A., & Cullum, N. (2009). Health-related quality of life in hospital inpatients with pressure ulceration: Assessment using generic health-related quality of life measures. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 6, 797–805.CrossRef Essex, H. N., Clark, M., Sims, J., Warriner, A., & Cullum, N. (2009). Health-related quality of life in hospital inpatients with pressure ulceration: Assessment using generic health-related quality of life measures. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 6, 797–805.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Franks, P. J., Winterberg, H., & Moffatt, C. J. (2002). Health-related quality of life and pressure ulceration assessment in patients treated in the community. Wound Repair & Regeneration, 3, 133–140.CrossRef Franks, P. J., Winterberg, H., & Moffatt, C. J. (2002). Health-related quality of life and pressure ulceration assessment in patients treated in the community. Wound Repair & Regeneration, 3, 133–140.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gorecki, C., Lamping, D. L., Brown, J. M., Madill, A., Firth, J., & Nixon, J. (2010). Development of a conceptual framework of health-related quality of life in pressure ulcers: a patient-focused approach. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 1525–1534. Gorecki, C., Lamping, D. L., Brown, J. M., Madill, A., Firth, J., & Nixon, J. (2010). Development of a conceptual framework of health-related quality of life in pressure ulcers: a patient-focused approach. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 1525–1534.
25.
go back to reference Andrich, D. (2002). Implication and applications of modern test theory in the context of outcomes based research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2, 103–121.CrossRef Andrich, D. (2002). Implication and applications of modern test theory in the context of outcomes based research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2, 103–121.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference McColl, E. (2005). Developing questionnaires. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (pp. 9–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press. McColl, E. (2005). Developing questionnaires. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (pp. 9–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
go back to reference Christodoulou, C., Junghaenel, D. U., DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., & Stone, A. A. (2008). Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Quality of Life Research, 10, 1239–1246.CrossRef Christodoulou, C., Junghaenel, D. U., DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., & Stone, A. A. (2008). Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: Results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Quality of Life Research, 10, 1239–1246.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 561–573. Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 561–573.
32.
go back to reference Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2010). RUMM 2030. Perth, WA: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2010). RUMM 2030. Perth, WA: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd.
33.
go back to reference Andrich, D., Luo, G., & Sheridan, B. E. (2004). RUMM 2020 [program]. 4.0 for windows (upgrade 4600.0109) version. Perth, WA: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd; 1997–2004. Andrich, D., Luo, G., & Sheridan, B. E. (2004). RUMM 2020 [program]. 4.0 for windows (upgrade 4600.0109) version. Perth, WA: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd; 1997–2004.
34.
go back to reference Hagquist, C., & Andrich, D. (2004). Is the sense of coherence instrument applicable on adolescents? A latent trait analysis using Rasch modelling. Personality Individual Differences, 955–968. Hagquist, C., & Andrich, D. (2004). Is the sense of coherence instrument applicable on adolescents? A latent trait analysis using Rasch modelling. Personality Individual Differences, 955–968.
35.
go back to reference Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chocago: MESA. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chocago: MESA.
36.
go back to reference Hobart, J. C., Riazi, A., Thompson, A. J., Styles, I. M., Ingram, W., Vickery, P. J., et al. (2006). Getting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: The Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88). Brain, 224–234. Hobart, J. C., Riazi, A., Thompson, A. J., Styles, I. M., Ingram, W., Vickery, P. J., et al. (2006). Getting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: The Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88). Brain, 224–234.
37.
go back to reference Lamping, D. L., Schroter, S., Marquis, P., Marrel, A., Duprat-Lomon, I., & Sagnier, P. P. (2002). The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: A new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest, 3, 920–929.CrossRef Lamping, D. L., Schroter, S., Marquis, P., Marrel, A., Duprat-Lomon, I., & Sagnier, P. P. (2002). The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: A new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest, 3, 920–929.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Schroter, S., & Lamping, D. L. (2004). Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): Development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty. Heart, 90(12), 1460–1466.PubMedCrossRef Schroter, S., & Lamping, D. L. (2004). Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): Development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty. Heart, 90(12), 1460–1466.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Skevington, S. M., Sartorius, N., Amir, M., Sartorius, N., Orley, J., et al. (2004). Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings—the history of the WHOQOL instruments. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1, 1–8.CrossRef Skevington, S. M., Sartorius, N., Amir, M., Sartorius, N., Orley, J., et al. (2004). Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings—the history of the WHOQOL instruments. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1, 1–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Rothman, M., Burke, L., Erickson, P., Kline Leidy, N., Patrick, D. L., & Petrie, C. D. (2009). Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value in Health, 8, 1075–1083.CrossRef Rothman, M., Burke, L., Erickson, P., Kline Leidy, N., Patrick, D. L., & Petrie, C. D. (2009). Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value in Health, 8, 1075–1083.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Applying mixed methods to pretest the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life (PU-QOL) instrument
Auteurs
C. Gorecki
D. L. Lamping
J. Nixon
J. M. Brown
S. Cano
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9980-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

Quality of Life Research 3/2012 Naar de uitgave