Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

03-02-2020 | ORIGINAL PAPER | Uitgave 4/2020

Mindfulness 4/2020

Applying Generalizability Theory to Differentiate Between Trait and State in the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)

Tijdschrift:
Mindfulness > Uitgave 4/2020
Auteurs:
Quoc C. Truong, Christian U. Krägeloh, Richard J. Siegert, Jason Landon, Oleg N. Medvedev
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12671-020-01324-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objectives

Accurate evaluation of mindfulness-based training requires understanding of the differences between state and trait changes, and the Generalizability Theory (G-Theory) is the most appropriate method to differentiate these aspects in a measure. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is widely used measure of dispositional mindfulness, but its ability to accurately capture stable aspects of mindfulness has not been rigorously investigated using appropriate methodology.

Method

G-Theory was applied to differentiate between trait and state aspects of mindfulness and to examine temporal reliability of the FFMQ in a sample of 83 participants who completed the scale at three occasions separated by 2-week intervals.

Results

The total 39-item FFMQ and its short version FFMQ-18 have demonstrated good reliability in measuring trait mindfulness with G coefficients of 0.89 and 0.75, respectively, while individual facet subscales of the FFMQ appeared less reliable in measuring either trait or state. Subsequent analysis attempted to combine the FFMQ items that were least stable over time into a state mindfulness subscale. However, this did not result in acceptable psychometric properties for such a state subscale.

Conclusions

The findings of this study indicate that reliable measurement of stable aspects of mindfulness can be achieved by using the full FFMQ scale or its short version FFMQ-18 with scores generalizable across sample population and occasions. The scores obtained on individual facet subscales of the FFMQ predominantly measuring trait mindfulness, but their reliability is affected by measurement error due to interaction between person, item, and occasion.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Extra materiaal
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Mindfulness 4/2020 Naar de uitgave