Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Article

Application of the Tripartite Model to a Complicated Sample of Residential Youth with Externalizing Problems

Auteurs: Eu Gene Chin, Chad Ebesutani, John Young

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 3/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The tripartite model of anxiety and depression has received strong support among child and adolescent populations. Clinical samples of children and adolescents in these studies, however, have usually been referred for treatment of anxiety and depression. This study investigated the fit of the tripartite model with a complicated sample of residential youths with externalizing problems. Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the tripartite model relationships between negative affect, positive affect, and mood symptoms. Multiple fit indices were used to provide a reliable and conservative evaluation of the model. As predicted, the tripartite model provided a good fit for symptoms of emotional disorders in this complicated sample of children and adolescents. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of the utility of the tripartite model in understanding anxiety and depression in more diverse populations and recommendations for residential assessment.
vorige artikel Parenting Stress and Child Behavior Problems Among Clinic-Referred Youth: Cross-Cultural Differences Across the US and Korea
Voetnoten
1
We chose to divide our sample into these two age groups in order to have comparable sample sizes in each group.
 
Literatuur
1.
Clark LA, Watson D (1991) Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Child Psychol 100:316–336 CrossRef
2.
Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Barlow DH (1998) Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. J Abnorm Psychol 107:179–192 PubMedCrossRef
3.
Chorpita BF (2002) The tripartite model and dimensions of anxiety and depression: an examination of structure in a large school sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30:177–190 PubMedCrossRef
4.
Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL (2002) Tripartite dimensions of emotion in a child clinical sample: measurement strategies and implications for clinical utility. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:1150–1160 PubMedCrossRef
5.
Joiner TE Jr, Catanzaro SJ, Laurent J (1996) Tripartite structure of positive and negative affect, depression, and anxiety in child and adolescent psychiatric inpatients. J Abnorm Psychol 105:401–409 PubMedCrossRef
6.
Joiner TE Jr, Lonigan CJ (2000) Tripartite model of depression and anxiety in youth psychiatric inpatients: relations with diagnostic status and future symptoms. J Clin Child Psychol 29:372–382 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Watson D, Clark LA, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Strauss ME, McCormick RA (1995) Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. J Abnorm Psychol 104:15–25 PubMedCrossRef
8.
Watson D, Gamez W, Simms LJ (2005) Basic dimensions of temperament and their relation to anxiety and depression: a symptom-based perspective. J Res Pers 39:46–66 CrossRef
9.
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revised, 4th edn. APA, Washington, DC
10.
11.
Dyck MJ, Jolly JB, Kramer T (1994) An evaluation of positive affectivity, negative affectivity, and hyperarousal as markers for assessing between syndrome relationships. Pers Individ Differ 17:637–646 CrossRef
12.
Philipp LM, Washington C, Raouf M, Norton PJ (2008) Cross-cultural examination of the tripartite model in adults. Cogn Behav Ther 37:221–232 PubMedCrossRef
13.
Gorusch R (1983) Factor analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
14.
Loehlin JS (1987) Latent variable models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
15.
Chorpita BF, Albano M, Barlow DH (1998) The structure of negative emotions in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol 107:74–85 PubMedCrossRef
16.
Lambert SF, McCreary BT, Joiner TE, Schmidt NB, Ialongo NS (2004) Structure of anxiety and depression in urban youth: an examination of the tripartite model. J Consult Clin Psychol 72:904–908 PubMedCrossRef
17.
Buckby JA, Cotton SM, Cosgrave EM, Killackey EJ, Yung AR (2008) A factor analytic investigation of the tripartite model of affect in a clinical sample of young Australians. BMC Psychiatry 8:1–12 CrossRef
18.
Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL, Moffitt C, Yim L, Umemoto LA (2000) Assessment of tripartite factors of emotion in children and adolescents I: structural validity and normative data of an affect and arousal scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 22:141–160 CrossRef
19.
Daleiden E, Chorpita BF, Lu W (2000) Assessment of tripartite factors of emotion in children and adolescents II: concurrent validity of the affect and arousal scales for children. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 22:161–182 CrossRef
20.
Joiner TE, Steer RA, Beck AT, Schmidt NB, Rudd DM, Catanzaro SJ (1999) Physiological hyperarousal: construct validity of a central aspect of the tripartite model of depression and anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol 108:290–298 PubMedCrossRef
21.
Fanti KA, Henrich CC (2010) Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: findings from the national institute of child health and human development study of early child care. Dev Psychol 46:1159–1175 PubMedCrossRef
22.
Laurent J, Catanzaro SJ, Joiner TE Jr, Rudo KD, Potter KI, Lambert S et al (1999) A measure of positive and negative affect for children: scale development and preliminary validation. Psychol Assess 11:326–338 CrossRef
23.
Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, Umemoto LA, Francis SE (2000) Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther 38:835–855 PubMedCrossRef
24.
Connor DF, Doerfler LA, Toscano PF, Volungis AM, Steingard RJ (2004) Characteristics of children and adolescents admitted to a residential treatment center. J Child Fam Stud 13:497–510 CrossRef
25.
Hughes AA, Kendall PC (2009) Psychometric properties of the positive and negative affect scale for children (PANAS-C) in children with anxiety disorders. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 40:343–352 PubMedCrossRef
26.
Kovacs M (1981) Rating scales to assess depression in school-aged children. Acta Paedopsychiatria 46:305–315
27.
Spielberger CD (1973) Preliminary manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory for children (“How I feel Questionnaire”). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA
28.
Chorpita BF, Moffitt CE, Gray J (2005) Psychometric properties of the revised child anxiety and depression scale in a clinical sample. Behav Res Ther 43:309–322 PubMedCrossRef
29.
Ullman JB (2007) Structural equation modeling. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LA (eds) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, Boston, pp 676–780
30.
Chorpita BF, Plummer CM, Moffitt CE (2000) Relations of tripartite dimensions of emotion to childhood anxiety and mood disorders. J Abnorm Child Psychol 28:299–310 PubMedCrossRef
31.
Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2007) Mplus user’s guide, 5th edn. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles, CA
32.
Yuan K, Bentler PM (2000) Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with non-normal missing data. Sociol Methodol 30:167–202
33.
Jaccard JC, Wan CK (1996) LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
34.
35.
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55 CrossRef
36.
Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 136–162
37.
Bentler PM (1995) EQS: structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software Inc, Encino, CA
38.
Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588–606 CrossRef
39.
40.
Tucker LR, Lewis C (1973) A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38:1–10 CrossRef
41.
Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:223–297
42.
Satorra A, Bentler P (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye A, Clogg CC (eds) Latent variable analysis: applications for developmental research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 399–419
43.
Cannon MF, Weems C (2006) Do anxiety and depression cluster into distinct groups? A test of tripartite model predictions in a community sample of youth. Depress Anxiety 23:453–460 PubMedCrossRef
44.
Lonigan CJ, Phillips B, Hooe E (2003) Relations of positive and negative affectivity to anxiety and depression in children: evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. J Consult Clin Psychol 71:465–481 PubMedCrossRef
45.
Barlow DF (2000) Unraveling the mysteries of anxiety and its disorders from the perspective of emotion theory. Am Psychol 55:1247–1263 PubMedCrossRef
46.
Brown TA, Antony MM, Barlow DH (1995) Diagnostic comorbidity in panic disorder: effect on treatment outcome and course of comorbid diagnoses following treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:408–418 PubMedCrossRef
47.
Ebesutani C, Smith A, Bernstein A, Chorpita BF, Higa-McMillan C, Nakamura B (2011) A bifactor model of negative affectivity: fear and distress components among younger and older youth. Psychol Assess 23:679–691 PubMedCrossRef
48.
Gaylord-Harden NK, Elmore CA, Campbell CL, Wethington A (2011) An examination of the tripartite model of depressive and anxiety symptoms in African American youth: stressors and coping strategies as common and specific correlates. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 40:360–374 PubMedCrossRef
49.
Ialongo NS, Kellam SG, Poduska J (1999) Manual for the Baltimore how i feel, Tech Rep No. 2. John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
50.
Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105 PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Application of the Tripartite Model to a Complicated Sample of Residential Youth with Externalizing Problems
Auteurs
Eu Gene Chin
Chad Ebesutani
John Young
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0341-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2013

Child Psychiatry & Human Development 3/2013 Naar de uitgave

Original Article

Maternal Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index and Offspring Temperament and Behavior at 1 and 2 Years of Age

Original Research

Anxiety-Promoting Parenting Behaviors: A Comparison of Anxious Parents with and without Social Anxiety Disorder

Original Article

The Role of Caregiver Contingent Responsiveness in Promoting Compliance in Young Children

Original Article

A Unified Model Exploring Parenting Practices as Mediators of Marital Conflict and Children’s Adjustment

Original Article

Mothers’ and Fathers’ Ratings of Family Relationship Quality: Associations with Preadolescent and Adolescent Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in a Clinical Sample

Original Article

Parenting Stress and Child Behavior Problems Among Clinic-Referred Youth: Cross-Cultural Differences Across the US and Korea