Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2017

14-09-2016 | Original Article

Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be

Auteurs: David Dignath, Markus Janczyk

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

According to the ideomotor principle, behavior is controlled via a retrieval of the sensory consequences that will follow from the respective movement (“action-effects”). These consequences include not only what will happen, but also when something will happen. In fact, recollecting the temporal duration between response and effect takes time and prolongs the initiation of the response. We investigated the associative structure of action-effect learning with delayed effects and asked whether participants acquire integrated action-time-effect episodes that comprise a compound of all three elements or whether they acquire separate traces that connect actions to the time until an effect occurs and actions to the effects that follow them. In three experiments, results showed that participants retrieve temporal intervals that follow from their actions even when the identity of the effect could not be learned. Furthermore, retrieval of temporal intervals in isolation was not inferior to retrieval of temporal intervals that were consistently followed by predictable action-effects. More specifically, when tested under extinction, retrieval of action-time and action-identity associations seems to compete against each other, similar to overshadowing effects reported for stimulus–response conditioning. Together, these results suggest that people anticipate when the consequences of their action will occur, independently from what the consequences will be.
Voetnoten
1
Due to a programming error, instructions stated that in some trials a white asterisk would appear and participants would have to freely decide which key they wanted to press. However, these trials were never presented during the experiment.
 
2
Possibly, if participants in the fixed-effect mapping group had formed integrative A–T–E episodes, temporal information would only be retrieved for consistent responses (e.g. E > T>A), but not for inconsistent responses. However, an additional analysis for consistent response choices only showed no evidence for a delay-anticipation effect, |t| < 1.
 
3
A similar effect may have taken place in some studies where multiple action-effects provided contradictory information, for example, with the proprioceptive feedback occurring on the left side, whereas a visual action-effect occurred on the right side (e.g., Hommel, 1993; Janczyk, Pfister, Hommel, & Kunde, 2014). In such studies, one effect feature emerged as the main determinant of behavior and reduced/eliminated the impact of the other feature(s).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ansorge, U. (2002). Spatial intention–response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 109(3), 285–299.CrossRefPubMed Ansorge, U. (2002). Spatial intention–response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 109(3), 285–299.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Arantes, J., & Machado, A. (2008). Context effects in a temporal discrimination task: further tests of the scalar expectancy theory and learning-to-time models. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90(1), 33–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arantes, J., & Machado, A. (2008). Context effects in a temporal discrimination task: further tests of the scalar expectancy theory and learning-to-time models. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90(1), 33–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Capizzi, M., Sanabria, D., & Correa, Á. (2012). Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation. Cognition, 123(2), 293–302.CrossRefPubMed Capizzi, M., Sanabria, D., & Correa, Á. (2012). Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation. Cognition, 123(2), 293–302.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3(3), 216–228.PubMed Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3(3), 216–228.PubMed
go back to reference Correa, Á., Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., & Tudela, P. (2004). Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(2), 264–278.CrossRefPubMed Correa, Á., Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., & Tudela, P. (2004). Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(2), 264–278.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(18), 7426–7435.PubMed Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(18), 7426–7435.PubMed
go back to reference Desantis, A., Hughes, G., & Waszak, F. (2012). Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PLoS One, 7(1), e29557.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Desantis, A., Hughes, G., & Waszak, F. (2012). Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PLoS One, 7(1), e29557.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Dickinson, A. (2001). The 28th Bartlett memorial lecture causal learning: an associative analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B, 54(1), 3–25.CrossRef Dickinson, A. (2001). The 28th Bartlett memorial lecture causal learning: an associative analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B, 54(1), 3–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712.CrossRefPubMed Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Drew, M. R., Zupan, B., Cooke, A., Couvillon, P. A., & Balsam, P. D. (2005). Temporal control of conditioned responding in goldfish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31(1), 31–39.PubMed Drew, M. R., Zupan, B., Cooke, A., Couvillon, P. A., & Balsam, P. D. (2005). Temporal control of conditioned responding in goldfish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31(1), 31–39.PubMed
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240.PubMed Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240.PubMed
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 138–154.CrossRefPubMed Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 138–154.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Flach, R., Osman, M., Dickinson, A., & Heyes, C. (2006). The interaction between response effects during the acquisition of response priming. Acta Psychologica, 122(1), 11–26.CrossRefPubMed Flach, R., Osman, M., Dickinson, A., & Heyes, C. (2006). The interaction between response effects during the acquisition of response priming. Acta Psychologica, 122(1), 11–26.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107(2), 289–344.CrossRefPubMed Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107(2), 289–344.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs. Psychological Research, 76(3), 336–344.CrossRefPubMed Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs. Psychological Research, 76(3), 336–344.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2014). Intentional Binding is independent of the validity of the action effect’s identity. Acta Psychologica, 152, 109–119.CrossRefPubMed Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2014). Intentional Binding is independent of the validity of the action effect’s identity. Acta Psychologica, 152, 109–119.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.CrossRefPubMed Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haggard, P., & Cole, J. (2007). Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 211–220.CrossRefPubMed Haggard, P., & Cole, J. (2007). Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 211–220.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Königsberg: August Wilhelm Unzer. Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Königsberg: August Wilhelm Unzer.
go back to reference Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(11), 1540–1554.CrossRefPubMed Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(11), 1540–1554.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., Lenhard, A., Sebald, A., & Pfister, R. (2009). Movements or targets: what makes an action in action–effect learning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2433–2449.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann, J., Lenhard, A., Sebald, A., & Pfister, R. (2009). Movements or targets: what makes an action in action–effect learning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2433–2449.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55(4), 270–279.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55(4), 270–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press. Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Honig, W. K. (1981). Working memory and the temporal map. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 167–197). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Honig, W. K. (1981). Working memory and the temporal map. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 167–197). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 133–151.CrossRefPubMed Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 133–151.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference James, W. (1890/2011). The principles of psychology, vols. I, II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. James, W. (1890/2011). The principles of psychology, vols. I, II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Janczyk, M., Durst, M., & Ulrich, R. (2016). Action selection by temporally distal action-goals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (in press). Janczyk, M., Durst, M., & Ulrich, R. (2016). Action selection by temporally distal action-goals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (in press).
go back to reference Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2014). The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection. Acta Psychologica, 150, 49–54.CrossRefPubMed Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2014). The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection. Acta Psychologica, 150, 49–54.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30–43.CrossRefPubMed Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30–43.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Janczyk, M., Yamaguchi, M., Proctor, R. W., & Pfister, R. (2015). Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(3), 930–940.CrossRef Janczyk, M., Yamaguchi, M., Proctor, R. W., & Pfister, R. (2015). Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(3), 930–940.CrossRef
go back to reference Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes Factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9.CrossRef Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes Factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
go back to reference Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Variable action-effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 155–162.CrossRefPubMed Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Variable action-effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 155–162.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1297–1303.CrossRefPubMed Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1297–1303.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387–394.PubMed Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387–394.PubMed
go back to reference Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67(3), 153–159.CrossRefPubMed Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67(3), 153–159.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kunde, W., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 703.PubMed Kunde, W., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 703.PubMed
go back to reference Los, S. A., & Van Den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 370–386.PubMed Los, S. A., & Van Den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 370–386.PubMed
go back to reference Love, J., Selker, R., Verhagen, J., Marsman, M., Gronau, Q. F., Jamil, T., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Wild, A., Morey, R., Rouder, J. & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7.5.6) [Computer software]. Love, J., Selker, R., Verhagen, J., Marsman, M., Gronau, Q. F., Jamil, T., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Wild, A., Morey, R., Rouder, J. & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7.5.6) [Computer software].
go back to reference Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4(2), 186–192.CrossRefPubMed Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4(2), 186–192.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matzel, L. D., Held, F. P., & Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: implications for contiguity theory. Learning and Motivation, 19(4), 317–344.CrossRef Matzel, L. D., Held, F. P., & Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: implications for contiguity theory. Learning and Motivation, 19(4), 317–344.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, R. R., & Barnet, R. C. (1993). The role of time in elementary associations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(4), 106–111.CrossRef Miller, R. R., & Barnet, R. C. (1993). The role of time in elementary associations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(4), 106–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Miniussi, C., Wilding, E. L., Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1999). Orienting attention in time. Brain, 122(8), 1507–1518.CrossRefPubMed Miniussi, C., Wilding, E. L., Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1999). Orienting attention in time. Brain, 122(8), 1507–1518.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nattkemper, D., Ziessler, M., & Frensch, P. A. (2010). Binding in voluntary action control. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1092–1101.CrossRefPubMed Nattkemper, D., Ziessler, M., & Frensch, P. A. (2010). Binding in voluntary action control. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1092–1101.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nobre, A. C. (2010). How can temporal expectations bias perception and action? In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 371–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Nobre, A. C. (2010). How can temporal expectations bias perception and action? In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 371–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Paelecke, M., & Kunde, W. (2007). Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 627–644.PubMed Paelecke, M., & Kunde, W. (2007). Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 627–644.PubMed
go back to reference Paulus, M. (2012). Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account. Psychological Research, 76(6), 760–767.CrossRefPubMed Paulus, M. (2012). Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account. Psychological Research, 76(6), 760–767.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(6), 532–552.CrossRefPubMed Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(6), 532–552.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 74–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 74–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychological Research, 75(1), 61–65.CrossRefPubMed Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychological Research, 75(1), 61–65.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 74(1), 71–80.CrossRefPubMed Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 74(1), 71–80.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
go back to reference Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 225–237.CrossRefPubMed Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 225–237.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974.CrossRefPubMed Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Takahata, K., Takahashi, H., Maeda, T., Umeda, S., Suhara, T., Mimura, M., & Kato, M. (2012). It’s not my fault: postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses. PLoS One, 7(12), e53421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Takahata, K., Takahashi, H., Maeda, T., Umeda, S., Suhara, T., Mimura, M., & Kato, M. (2012). It’s not my fault: postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses. PLoS One, 7(12), e53421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Thomaschke, R., Wagener, A., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(12), 2289–2300.CrossRefPubMed Thomaschke, R., Wagener, A., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(12), 2289–2300.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Watson, P., van Steenbergen, H., de Wit, S., Wiers, R.W., & Hommel, B. (2015). Limits of ideomotor action-outcome acquisition. Brain Research, 1626, 45–53.CrossRefPubMed Watson, P., van Steenbergen, H., de Wit, S., Wiers, R.W., & Hommel, B. (2015). Limits of ideomotor action-outcome acquisition. Brain Research, 1626, 45–53.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2015). Through the portal: effect anticipation in the central bottleneck. Acta Psychologica, 160, 141–151.CrossRefPubMed Wirth, R., Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2015). Through the portal: effect anticipation in the central bottleneck. Acta Psychologica, 160, 141–151.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolfensteller, U., & Ruge, H. (2011). On the timescale of stimulus-based action–effect learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1273–1289.CrossRefPubMed Wolfensteller, U., & Ruge, H. (2011). On the timescale of stimulus-based action–effect learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1273–1289.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Yoshie, M., & Haggard, P. (2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23(20), 2028–2032.CrossRefPubMed Yoshie, M., & Haggard, P. (2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23(20), 2028–2032.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be
Auteurs
David Dignath
Markus Janczyk
Publicatiedatum
14-09-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0797-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2017

Psychological Research 5/2017 Naar de uitgave