Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Self-rated health (SRH) is widely used to measure and compare the health status of different groups of individuals. However, SRH can suffer from heterogeneity in reporting styles, making health comparisons problematic. Anchoring vignettes is a promising technique for improving inter-group comparisons of SRH. A key identifying assumption of the approach is response consistency—that respondents rate themselves using the same underlying response scale that they rate the vignettes. Despite growing research into response consistency, it remains unclear how respondents rate vignettes and why respondents may not assess vignettes and themselves consistently.
Vignettes for the EQ-5D-5L were developed and included in an online survey. In-depth interviews were conducted with participants following survey completion. Response consistency was examined through qualitative analysis of the interview responses and quantitative coding of participants’ thought processes.
Our analysis showed that anchoring vignettes for the EQ-5D-5L is feasible, but that response consistency may not hold for some participants. Respondents are more likely to rate their own health and vignettes in the same way if presented with overall health state vignettes than single health dimension vignettes, and if they imagined themselves in the health state of the hypothetical individual.
This research highlights opportunities to improve the design of anchoring vignettes in order to enhance response consistency. It additionally provides new evidence on the feasibility of employing anchoring vignettes for the EQ-5D-5L, which is promising for future work to address reporting heterogeneity in the EQ-5D-5L.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 322(7297), 1297. CrossRef
Euroqol Group. (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208. CrossRef
Murray, C. J. L., Tandon, A., Salomon, J. A., Mathers, C. D., & Sadana, R. (2002). Cross-population comparability of evidence for health policy. GPE Discussion Paper No. 46. Geneva: WHO/EIP.
Baron-Epel, O., Kaplan, G., Haviv-Messika, A., Tarabeia, J., Green, M. S., & Nitzan Kaluski, D. (2005). Self-reported health as a cultural health determinant in Arab and Jewish Israelis: MABAT—National Health and Nutrition Survey 1999–2001. Social Science and Medicine, 61(6), 1256–1266. PubMedCrossRef
Sadana, R., Mathers, C. D., Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J. L., & Iburg, K. (2000). Comparative analyses of more than 50 household surveys on health status. GPE Discussion Paper No. 15. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
King, G., Murray, C. J. L., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98(01), 191–207. CrossRef
Baker, M., Stabile, M., & Deri, C. (2004). What do self-reported, objective, measures of health measure? Journal of Human Resources, 39(4), 1067–1093. CrossRef
Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., & Van Soest, A. (2007). Vignettes and self-reports of work disability in the United States and the Netherlands. The American Economic Review, 97(1), 461–473. CrossRef
Kapteyn, A., Smith, J., & Van Soest, A. (2011). Are Americans really less happy with their incomes? RAND Working Paper Series WR- 858.
Bago d’Uva, T., Lindeboom, M., O’Donnell, O., & van Doorslaer, E. (2011). Slipping anchor? Testing the vignettes approach to identification and correction of reporting heterogeneity. Journal of Human Resources, 46(4), 875–906. CrossRef
Van Soest, A., Delaney, L., Harmon, C., Kapteyn, A., & Smith, J. P. (2011). Validating the use of anchoring vignettes for the correction of response scale differences in subjective questions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 174(3), 575–595. PubMedCentralCrossRef
König, H.-H., Bernert, S., Angermeyer, M. C., Matschinger, H., Martinez, M., Vilagut, G., et al. (2009). Comparison of population health status in six European countries: Results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D Questionnaire. Medical Care, 47(2), 255–261. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318184759e. PubMedCrossRef
Lubetkin, E., Jia, H., Franks, P., & Gold, M. (2005). Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: Examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2187–2196. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-8028-5. PubMedCrossRef
Euroqol Group. (2012). Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index Value Calculator. http://www.euroqol.org/news/news/article/interim-scoring-for-the-eq-5d-5l-eq-5d-5l-crosswalk-index-value-calculator.html.
Marmot, M., Banks, J., Blundell, R., Lessof, C., & Nazroo, J. (2003). Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England: ELSA 2002. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Börsch-Supan, A., Hank, K., & Jürges, H. (2005). A new comprehensive and international view on ageing: Introducing the ‘Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe’. European Journal of Ageing, 2(4), 245–253. CrossRef
- Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency
Paula K. Lorgelly
- Springer International Publishing