Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2025 | Research

Anchoring bias in mental arithmetic

Auteurs: Samuel Shaki, Martin H. Fischer

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2025

Abstract

Mental arithmetic is widely studied, both with symbolic digits and with non-symbolic dot patterns that require operand estimation. Several studies reported surprising biases in adults’ performance with both formats while their direction (over/underestimation in addition/subtraction) remains controversial (operational momentum effect or OM; Prado & Knops, Prado and Knops, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in Press., 2024). Theoretical accounts of OM make opposing predictions, thus enabling a decisive test: Using symbolic stimuli and responses, we enabled accurate operand encoding and result reporting, thus leaving mental calculation as only source of bias. Importantly, we manipulated operand order through calculation instructions (e.g., “29 + 19” vs. “add 19 to 29”) to assess the crucial role of first operand size as cognitive anchor. With both auditory (Experiment 1, N = 30) and visual presentation (Experiment 2, N = 30), we observed reverse OM, i.e., overestimations in subtraction and underestimations in addition. Importantly, this instance of operation-based anchoring was independent of a second anchoring effect related to operand order: A large operand is a stronger anchor when mentioned first. Our discovery of both operation-based and order-based anchoring extends the well-known anchoring effect into mental arithmetic and eliminates several competing theories about the origin of OM.

vorige artikel Autonomy-supportive instructional language does not enhance skill acquisition compared to controlling instructional language

volgende artikel Visuospatial working memory and (free and cued) recall of survey knowledge after environment navigation

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Blini, E., Pitteri, M., & Zorzi, M. (2019). Spatial grounding of symbolic arithmetic: An investigation with optokinetic stimulation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83, 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1053-0CrossRefPubMed

Chen, Q., & Verguts, T. (2012). Spatial intuition in elementary arithmetic: A neurocomputational account. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e31180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

D’Ascenzo, S., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Fischer, M. H. (2020). Assessing orienting of attention to understand the time course of mental calculation. Cognitive Processing, 21(4), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00970-yCrossRefPubMed

Dehaene, S., & Marques, J. F. (2002). Cognitive euroscience: Scalar variability in price estimations and the cognitive consequences of switching to the euro. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(3), 705–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000044CrossRef

Ebbinghaus, H. (1902). The principles of psychology. Veit

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146CrossRefPubMed

Glaser, M., & Knops, A. (2020). When adding is right: Temporal order judgements reveal spatial attention shifts during two-digit mental arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(7), 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218209029CrossRef

Glaser, M., & Knops, A. (2023). Spatial biases in approximate arithmetic are subject to sequential dependency effects and dissociate from attentional biases. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.8373CrossRef

Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106(3), 1221–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.004CrossRefPubMed

Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow (chapter 11). Penguin.

Knops, A., Viarouge, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 803–821. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.803CrossRef

LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 216–230.CrossRef

Lemaire, P., & Arnaud, L. (2008). Young and older adults’ strategies in complex arithmetic. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 1–16.CrossRefPubMed

Liu, D., Cai, D., Verguts, T., & Chen, Q. (2017). The time course of spatial attention shifts in elementary arithmetic. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01037-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Masson, N., Dormal, V., Stephany, M., & Schiltz, C. (2024). Eye movements reveal that young school children shift attention when solving additions and subtractions. Developmental Science, 27, e13452. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13452CrossRefPubMed

Masson, N., Pesenti, M., & Dormal, V. (2017). Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 81(4), 840–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0784-zCrossRefPubMed

Mathieu, R., Epinat-Duclos, J., Sigovan, M., Breton, A., Cheylus, A., Fayol, M., & Prado, J. (2018). What’s behind a “+” sign? Perceiving an arithmetic operator recruits brain circuits for spatial orienting. Cerebral Cortex, 28(5), 1673–1684.CrossRefPubMed

McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1324–1333.CrossRef

McCrink, K., & Hubbard, T. (2017). Dividing attention increases operational momentum. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.34CrossRef

McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2009). Operational momentum in large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.013CrossRefPubMed

Mioni, G., Fischer, M.H., & Shaki, S. (2021).M Heuristics and biases in the mental manipulation of magnitudes: Evidence from length and time production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3): 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820967663

Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition, 109(3), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.003CrossRefPubMed

Pinhas, M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Heed the signs: Operation signs have spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1527–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.892516CrossRefPubMed

Pinhas, M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Addition goes where the big numbers are: Evidence for a reversed operational momentum effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 993–1000. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0786-zCrossRef

Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Didino, D., Haase, V. G., Wood, G., & Knops, A. (2018). The developmental trajectory of the operational momentum effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01062CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Popper, K. (2005/1935). The logic of scientific discovery (Die Logik der Forschung). Taylor & Francis (original published by Springer, Vienna).

Prado, J., & Knops, A. (2024). Spatial attention in mental arithmetic: A literature review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in Press. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02499-zCrossRef

Salvaggio, S., Masson, N., Zénon, A., & Andres, M. (2022). The predictive role of eye movements in mental arithmetic. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06329-3CrossRefPubMed

Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). 1 + 2 is more than 2 + 1: Violations of commutativity and identity axioms in mental arithmetic. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.973414CrossRef

Shaki, S., Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2018). Heuristics and biases in mental arithmetic: Revisiting and reversing operational momentum. Thinking & Reasoning. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1348987CrossRef

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Anchoring bias in mental arithmetic
Auteurs: Samuel Shaki
Martin H. Fischer
Publicatiedatum: 01-02-2025
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2025
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02035-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2025

Interpolated pretesting can boost memory of related and distinct prose materials

Open Access
Research

Effects of global information on the estimation of point-light walker directions

Research

How a co-actor’s (Un-) reliability modulates goal selection in a novel joint goal-setting paradigm

Open Access
Research

Implications of neural integration of math and spatial experiences for math ability and math anxiety

Original

Hyper-binding: the surprising roles of age and affect

Research

The role of inhibition in the processing of peripheral cues

Open Access
Research