Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Researchers and practitioners conduct multi-informant assessments of child and family behavior under the assumption that informants have unique perspectives on these behaviors. These unique perspectives stem, in part, from differences among informants in the settings in which they observe behaviors (e.g., home, school, peer interactions). These differences are assumed to contribute to the discrepancies commonly observed in the outcomes of multi-informant assessments. Although assessments often prompt informants to think about setting-specific behaviors when providing reports about child and family behavior, the notion that differences in setting-based behavioral observations contribute to discrepant reports has yet to be experimentally tested. We trained informants to use setting information as the basis for providing behavioral reports, with a focus on parental knowledge of children’s whereabouts and activities. Using a within-subjects controlled design, we randomly assigned 16 mothers and adolescents to the order in which they received a program that trains informants to use setting information when providing parental knowledge reports (Setting-Sensitive Assessment), and a control program involving no training on how to provide reports. Relative to the control program, the Setting-Sensitive Assessment training increased the differences between mother and adolescent reports of parental knowledge, suggesting that mothers and adolescents observe parental knowledge behaviors in different settings. This study provides the first experimental evidence to support the assumption that discrepancies arise because informants incorporate unique setting information into their reports.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Darling, N., Cumsille, P., Caldwell, L. L., & Dowdy, B. (2006). Predictors of adolescents’ disclosure to parents and perceived parental knowledge: Between- and within-person differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 667–678. CrossRef
De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quiñones, K. R. (2010). The longitudinal consistency of mother-child reporting discrepancies of parental monitoring and their ability to predict child delinquent behaviors two years later. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1417–1430. PubMedCrossRef
De Los Reyes, A., & Weersing, V. R. (2009). A brief manual of an Attribution Bias Context Model assessment paradigm for parent- youth discrepancies on questionnaire ratings of parental monitoring. Unpublished manual. University of Maryland at College Park.
De Los Reyes, A., Youngstrom, E. A., Pabón, S. C., Youngstrom, J. K., Feeny, N. C., & Findling, R. L. (2011b). Internal consistency and associated characteristics of informant discrepancies in clinic referred youths age 11 to 17 years. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 36–53. PubMedCrossRef
De Los Reyes, A., Youngstrom, E. A., Swan, A. J., Youngstrom, J. K., Feeny, N. C., & Findling, R. L. (2011c). Informant discrepancies in clinical reports of youths and interviewers’ impressions of the reliability of informants. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 21, 417–424. PubMedCrossRef
Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 597–616. CrossRef
Frick, P. J., Christian, R. E., & Wootton, J. M. (1999). Age trends in the association between parenting practices and conduct problems. Behavior Modification, 23, 106–128. CrossRef
IBM Corporation. (2009). IBM SPSS Data Collection (version 5.6) [computer software]. Somers, NY: IBM Corporation.
Jansen, R. G., Wiertz, L. F., Meyer, E. S., & Noldus, L. P. J. J. (2003). Reliability analysis of observational data: Problems, solutions, and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 391–399. CrossRef
Kraemer, H. C., Measelle, J. R., Ablow, J. C., Essex, M. J., Boyce, W. T., & Kupfer, D. J. (2003). A new approach to integrating data from multiple informants in psychiatric assessment and research: Mixing and matching contexts and perspectives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1566–1577. PubMedCrossRef
Lutz, M. N., Fantuzzo, J. F., & McDermott, P. A. (2002). Contextually relevant assessment of the emotional and behavioral adjustment of low-income preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 338–355. CrossRef
McDermott, P. A. (1993). National standardization of uniform multisituational measures of child and adolescent behavior pathology. Psychological Assessment, 5, 413–424. CrossRef
Shelton, K. K., Frick, P. J., & Wootton, J. M. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 317–329. CrossRef
Smetana, J. G. (2008). ‘‘It’s 10 o’clock: Do you know where your children are?’’ Recent advances in understanding parental monitoring and adolescents’ information management. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 19–25. CrossRef
Stanton, B., Cole, M., Galbraith, J., Li, X., Pendleton, S., Cottrel, L., et al. (2004). Randomized trial of a parent intervention: Parents can make a difference in long-term adolescent risk behaviors, perceptions, and knowledge. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 158, 947–955. PubMedCrossRef
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- An Experimental Test of Whether Informants can Report About Child and Family Behavior Based on Settings of Behavioral Expression
Andres De Los Reyes
Katherine B. Ehrlich
Anna J. Swan
Tana J. Luo
Michael Van Wie
Shairy C. Pabón
- Springer US