Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 6/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Paper

An Approach to Examining the Proximal and Intermediate Outcomes of an Intensive Family Preservation Program

Auteurs: Kristin Duppong Hurley, Annette Griffith, Stephanie Ingram, Claudine Bolivar, W. Alex Mason, Alexandra Trout

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 6/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This study examined the effects of the Boys Town In-Home Family Program (BT-IHFP) on parenting skills, family functioning, and child behavior for at-risk families involved with child protective services. The BT-IHFP is designed as a home-based, family-centered alternative to out-of-home placement with the goal of improving family functioning, keeping families together, and preventing further involvement with child protective services. The model uses a hands-on cognitive-behavioral approach, promotes family engagement, provides 24/7 services to families, and links families to community resources. While it is essential to examine ultimate, long-term outcomes such as family preservation, it is also important to investigate the proximal and intermediate outcomes that address the key changes in behavior that support successful long-term outcomes. The goals of this study were to (1) examine the pre-post change of proximal and intermediate outcomes and (2) examine if improvements in parenting skills, parental roles, and parental stress (proximal outcomes) will be related to improvements in child behavior at home, child behavior at school, and family functioning (intermediate outcomes). Inspecting intake and discharge data for 44 families, 94% were intact at discharge and significant pre-post improvements were found in proximal and intermediate outcomes. These findings suggest that this six-week intensive BT-IHFP holds promise for teaching at-risk families skills to promote positive family functioning.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index: Professional manual (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index: Professional manual (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
go back to reference Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
go back to reference Ascher, B. H., Farmer, E. M. Z., Burns, B. J., & Angold, A. (1996). The child and adolescent services assessment (CASA): Description and psychometrics. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 12–20.CrossRef Ascher, B. H., Farmer, E. M. Z., Burns, B. J., & Angold, A. (1996). The child and adolescent services assessment (CASA): Description and psychometrics. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 12–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Berry, M. (1992). An evaluation of family preservation services: Fitting agency services to family needs. Social Work, 37, 314–321. Berry, M. (1992). An evaluation of family preservation services: Fitting agency services to family needs. Social Work, 37, 314–321.
go back to reference Berry, M., Cash, S. J., & Brook, J. P. (2000). Intensive family preservation services: An examination of critical service components. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 191–203.CrossRef Berry, M., Cash, S. J., & Brook, J. P. (2000). Intensive family preservation services: An examination of critical service components. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 191–203.CrossRef
go back to reference Blythe, B. J., Salley, M. P., & Jayaratne, S. (1994). A review of intensive family preservation services research. Social Work Research, 18, 213–224. Blythe, B. J., Salley, M. P., & Jayaratne, S. (1994). A review of intensive family preservation services research. Social Work Research, 18, 213–224.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
go back to reference Davis, J., & Daly, D. L. (2003). Ecological family-based services program: Training manual. Boys Town, NE: Boys Town Press. Davis, J., & Daly, D. L. (2003). Ecological family-based services program: Training manual. Boys Town, NE: Boys Town Press.
go back to reference Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
go back to reference Epstein, M. H. (2004). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strength based approach to assessment- (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Epstein, M. H. (2004). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strength based approach to assessment- (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
go back to reference Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The Mcmaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.CrossRef Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The Mcmaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Fraser, M. W., Nelson, K. E., & Rivard, J. C. (1997). Effectiveness of family preservation services. Social Work Research, 21, 138–153.CrossRef Fraser, M. W., Nelson, K. E., & Rivard, J. C. (1997). Effectiveness of family preservation services. Social Work Research, 21, 138–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Fraser, M. W., Walton, E., Lewis, R. E., Pecora, P. J., & Walton, W. K. (1996). An experiment in family reunification: Correlates of outcomes at one-year follow-up. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4/5), 335–361.CrossRef Fraser, M. W., Walton, E., Lewis, R. E., Pecora, P. J., & Walton, W. K. (1996). An experiment in family reunification: Correlates of outcomes at one-year follow-up. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4/5), 335–361.CrossRef
go back to reference Kabacoff, R., Miller, I., Bishop, D., Epstein, N., & Keitner, G. (1990). A psychometric study of McMaster family assessment device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. Journal of Family Psychology, 3, 431–439.CrossRef Kabacoff, R., Miller, I., Bishop, D., Epstein, N., & Keitner, G. (1990). A psychometric study of McMaster family assessment device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. Journal of Family Psychology, 3, 431–439.CrossRef
go back to reference Kinney, J., Haapala, D. A., & Booth, C. (1991). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. Kinney, J., Haapala, D. A., & Booth, C. (1991). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
go back to reference Kinney, J., Madsen, B., Fleming, T., & Haapala, D. A. (1977). Homebuilders: Keeping families together. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 667–673.PubMedCrossRef Kinney, J., Madsen, B., Fleming, T., & Haapala, D. A. (1977). Homebuilders: Keeping families together. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 667–673.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kirk, R., & Griffith, D. (2004). Intensive family preservation services: Demonstrating placement prevention using event history analysis. Social Work Research, 28(1), 5–15.CrossRef Kirk, R., & Griffith, D. (2004). Intensive family preservation services: Demonstrating placement prevention using event history analysis. Social Work Research, 28(1), 5–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirk, R., & Griffith, D. (2008). Impact of intensive family preservation services on disproportionality of out-of-home placement of children of color in one state’s child welfare system. Child Welfare, 87(5), 87–105.PubMed Kirk, R., & Griffith, D. (2008). Impact of intensive family preservation services on disproportionality of out-of-home placement of children of color in one state’s child welfare system. Child Welfare, 87(5), 87–105.PubMed
go back to reference Kirk, R. S., & Reed-Ashcraft, K. (2001). North Carolina family assessment scale (NCFAS): Research report. Buhl, ID: National Family Preservation Network. Kirk, R. S., & Reed-Ashcraft, K. (2001). North Carolina family assessment scale (NCFAS): Research report. Buhl, ID: National Family Preservation Network.
go back to reference Larzelere, R. E., Daly, D. L., Davis, J. L., Chmelka, M. B., & Handwerk, M. L. (2004). Outcome evaluation of girls and Boys Town’s family home program. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 130–149. Larzelere, R. E., Daly, D. L., Davis, J. L., Chmelka, M. B., & Handwerk, M. L. (2004). Outcome evaluation of girls and Boys Town’s family home program. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 130–149.
go back to reference Lewis, R. E. (2005). The effectiveness of families first services: An experimental study. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 499–509.CrossRef Lewis, R. E. (2005). The effectiveness of families first services: An experimental study. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 499–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Littell, J. H. (2004). Client participation and outcomes of intensive family preservation services. Social Work Research, 25(2), 103–113.CrossRef Littell, J. H. (2004). Client participation and outcomes of intensive family preservation services. Social Work Research, 25(2), 103–113.CrossRef
go back to reference McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1998). Family-centered services: Approaches and effectiveness. The Future of Children, 8(1), 54–71.PubMedCrossRef McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1998). Family-centered services: Approaches and effectiveness. The Future of Children, 8(1), 54–71.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Morris, E., Suarez, L., & Reid, J. C. (1997). Behavioral outcomes of home-based services for children and adolescents with serious emotional disorders. Family Preservation Journal, 2(2), 21–32. Morris, E., Suarez, L., & Reid, J. C. (1997). Behavioral outcomes of home-based services for children and adolescents with serious emotional disorders. Family Preservation Journal, 2(2), 21–32.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
go back to reference Nelson, K. E., & Nash, J. K. (2008). The effectiveness of aftercare services for African American families in an intensive family preservation program. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 189–197.CrossRef Nelson, K. E., & Nash, J. K. (2008). The effectiveness of aftercare services for African American families in an intensive family preservation program. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 189–197.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Reilly, R., Wilkes, L., Luck, L., & Jackson, D. (2010). The efficacy of family support and family preservation services on reducing child abuse and neglect: What the literature reveals. Journal of Child Health Care, 14(1), 82–94.PubMedCrossRef O’Reilly, R., Wilkes, L., Luck, L., & Jackson, D. (2010). The efficacy of family support and family preservation services on reducing child abuse and neglect: What the literature reveals. Journal of Child Health Care, 14(1), 82–94.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pecora, P. J., Fraser, M. W., & Haapala, D. A. (1991). Client outcomes and issues for program design. In K. Wells & D. A. Haapala (Eds.), Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 3–32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pecora, P. J., Fraser, M. W., & Haapala, D. A. (1991). Client outcomes and issues for program design. In K. Wells & D. A. Haapala (Eds.), Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 3–32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Reed-Ashcraft, K., Kirk, R., & Fraser, M. (2001). The reliability and validity of the North Carolina family assessment scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 503–520.CrossRef Reed-Ashcraft, K., Kirk, R., & Fraser, M. (2001). The reliability and validity of the North Carolina family assessment scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 503–520.CrossRef
go back to reference Rodenhiser, R. W., Chandy, J., & Ahmed, K. (1995). Intensive family preservation services: Do they have any impact on family functioning? Family Preservation Journal, Summer 69–86. Rodenhiser, R. W., Chandy, J., & Ahmed, K. (1995). Intensive family preservation services: Do they have any impact on family functioning? Family Preservation Journal, Summer 69–86.
go back to reference Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. K. (1981). Distinctions between treatment outcomes and their implications for treatment evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(3), 418–425.PubMedCrossRef Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. K. (1981). Distinctions between treatment outcomes and their implications for treatment evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(3), 418–425.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rossi, P. H. (1992a). Assessing family preservation programs. Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 77–97.CrossRef Rossi, P. H. (1992a). Assessing family preservation programs. Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 77–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Rossi, P. H. (1992b). Strategies for evaluation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 167–191.CrossRef Rossi, P. H. (1992b). Strategies for evaluation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 167–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Tyuse, S. W., Hong, P. P., & Stretch, J. J. (2010). Evaluation of an intensive in-home family treatment program to prevent out-of-home placement. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7(3), 200–218.PubMedCrossRef Tyuse, S. W., Hong, P. P., & Stretch, J. J. (2010). Evaluation of an intensive in-home family treatment program to prevent out-of-home placement. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7(3), 200–218.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van Puyenbroeck, H., Loots, G., Grietens, H., Jacquet, W., Vanderfaeillie, J., & Escudero, V. (2009). Intensive family preservation services in Flanders: An outcome study. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 222–232.CrossRef Van Puyenbroeck, H., Loots, G., Grietens, H., Jacquet, W., Vanderfaeillie, J., & Escudero, V. (2009). Intensive family preservation services in Flanders: An outcome study. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 222–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Walton, E. (1998). In-home family-focused reunification: A six-year follow-up of a successful experiment. Social Work Research, 22(4), 205–214.CrossRef Walton, E. (1998). In-home family-focused reunification: A six-year follow-up of a successful experiment. Social Work Research, 22(4), 205–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M., & Hammond, M. (2004). Treating children with early onset conduct problems: Intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 105–124.PubMedCrossRef Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M., & Hammond, M. (2004). Treating children with early onset conduct problems: Intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 105–124.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
An Approach to Examining the Proximal and Intermediate Outcomes of an Intensive Family Preservation Program
Auteurs
Kristin Duppong Hurley
Annette Griffith
Stephanie Ingram
Claudine Bolivar
W. Alex Mason
Alexandra Trout
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9563-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2012

Journal of Child and Family Studies 6/2012 Naar de uitgave