Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Article

Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks

Auteurs: Alicia Leiva, Fabrice B. R. Parmentier, Pilar Andrés

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Aging is typically considered to bring a reduction of the ability to resist distraction by task-irrelevant stimuli. Yet recent work suggests that this conclusion must be qualified and that the effect of aging is mitigated by whether irrelevant and target stimuli emanate from the same modalities or from distinct ones. Some studies suggest that aging is especially sensitive to distraction within-modality while others suggest it is greater across modalities. Here we report the first study to measure the effect of aging on deviance distraction in cross-modal (auditory–visual) and uni-modal (auditory–auditory) oddball tasks. Young and older adults were asked to judge the parity of target digits (auditory or visual in distinct blocks of trials), each preceded by a task-irrelevant sound (the same tone on most trials—the standard sound—or, on rare and unpredictable trials, a burst of white noise—the deviant sound). Deviant sounds yielded distraction (longer response times relative to standard sounds) in both tasks and age groups. However, an age-related increase in distraction was observed in the cross-modal task and not in the uni-modal task. We argue that aging might affect processes involved in the switching of attention across modalities and speculate that this may due to the slowing of this type of attentional shift or a reduction in cognitive control required to re-orient attention toward the target’s modality.
Literatuur
go back to reference Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (1999). Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. Psychology and Aging, 14, 507–519.CrossRefPubMed Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (1999). Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. Psychology and Aging, 14, 507–519.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Andrés, P., Guerrini, C., Phillips, L. H., & Perfect, T. J. (2008). Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 101–123.CrossRefPubMed Andrés, P., Guerrini, C., Phillips, L. H., & Perfect, T. J. (2008). Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 101–123.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Andrés, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Escera, C. (2006). The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2564–2568.CrossRefPubMed Andrés, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Escera, C. (2006). The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2564–2568.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beaman, C. P. (2005). Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: objective findings and subjective insights. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 241–265.CrossRef Beaman, C. P. (2005). Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: objective findings and subjective insights. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 241–265.CrossRef
go back to reference Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory and Cognition, 35, 352–364.CrossRefPubMed Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory and Cognition, 35, 352–364.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Belleville, S., Rouleau, N., Van der Linden, M., & Collette, F. (2003). Effect of manipulation and irrelevant noise on working memory capacity of patients with Alzheimer’s dementia. Neuropsychology, 17, 69–81.CrossRefPubMed Belleville, S., Rouleau, N., Van der Linden, M., & Collette, F. (2003). Effect of manipulation and irrelevant noise on working memory capacity of patients with Alzheimer’s dementia. Neuropsychology, 17, 69–81.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Mädebach, A., & Schröger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2131–2139.CrossRef Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Mädebach, A., & Schröger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2131–2139.CrossRef
go back to reference Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677.CrossRefPubMed Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berti, S. (2008). Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608–620.CrossRefPubMed Berti, S. (2008). Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608–620.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berti, S. (2012). Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection. NeuroReport, 23, 441–446.PubMed Berti, S. (2012). Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection. NeuroReport, 23, 441–446.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., Grunwald, M., & Schröger, E. (2013). Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: an event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1491, 156–166.CrossRefPubMed Berti, S., Grunwald, M., & Schröger, E. (2013). Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: an event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1491, 156–166.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioural and event-related indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544–2590. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioural and event-related indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544–2590.
go back to reference Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119–1122.CrossRefPubMed Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119–1122.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction effects in vision: behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport, 15, 665–669.CrossRefPubMed Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction effects in vision: behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport, 15, 665–669.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2006). Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans. NeuroReport, 17, 151–155.CrossRefPubMed Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2006). Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans. NeuroReport, 17, 151–155.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873.CrossRefPubMed Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Boll, S., & Berti, S. (2009). Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 46, 645–654.CrossRefPubMed Boll, S., & Berti, S. (2009). Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 46, 645–654.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Colcombe, S. J., Kramer, A. F., Erickson, K. I., & Scalf, P. (2005). The implications of cortical recruitment and brain morphology for individual differences in inhibitory function in aging humans. Psychology and Aging, 20, 363–375.CrossRefPubMed Colcombe, S. J., Kramer, A. F., Erickson, K. I., & Scalf, P. (2005). The implications of cortical recruitment and brain morphology for individual differences in inhibitory function in aging humans. Psychology and Aging, 20, 363–375.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: the impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533–541.CrossRefPubMed Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: the impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533–541.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Einstein, G. O., Earles, J. L., & Collins, H. M. (2002). Gaze aversion: spared inhibition for visual distraction in older adults. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 65–73.CrossRef Einstein, G. O., Earles, J. L., & Collins, H. M. (2002). Gaze aversion: spared inhibition for visual distraction in older adults. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 65–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Enmarker, I. (2004). The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers’ attention, episodic and semantic memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 393–405.CrossRefPubMed Enmarker, I. (2004). The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers’ attention, episodic and semantic memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 393–405.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 151–166.CrossRefPubMed Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 151–166.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604.CrossRefPubMed Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Friedman, P., Cycowic, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). Novelty P3: an event-related brain potential ERP sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 25, 355–373.CrossRef Friedman, P., Cycowic, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). Novelty P3: an event-related brain potential ERP sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 25, 355–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2013b). Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 1952–1962.CrossRefPubMed Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2013b). Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 1952–1962.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., Hengstler, J. G., Falkenstein, M., & Beste, C. (2013c). BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and goal-directed behavior in healthy elderly—evidence from auditory distraction. Neuroimage, 64, 290–298.CrossRefPubMed Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., Hengstler, J. G., Falkenstein, M., & Beste, C. (2013c). BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and goal-directed behavior in healthy elderly—evidence from auditory distraction. Neuroimage, 64, 290–298.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Geyer, M., & Braff, D. L. (1990). Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 171–179.CrossRefPubMed Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Geyer, M., & Braff, D. L. (1990). Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 171–179.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2010). The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 975–1022.CrossRefPubMed Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2010). The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 975–1022.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2013). Making sense of age-related distractibility: the critical role of sensory modality. Acta Psychologica, 142, 184–194.CrossRefPubMed Guerreiro, M. J. S., Murphy, D. R., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2013). Making sense of age-related distractibility: the critical role of sensory modality. Acta Psychologica, 142, 184–194.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Guerreiro, M. J. S., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction. Psychology and Aging, 26, 415–426.CrossRefPubMed Guerreiro, M. J. S., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction. Psychology and Aging, 26, 415–426.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.
go back to reference Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., Winkler, I., & Gervai, J. (2009). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 1157–1172.CrossRefPubMed Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., Winkler, I., & Gervai, J. (2009). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 1157–1172.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., Winkler, I., & Bendixen, A. (2008). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction. Biological Psychology, 79, 139–147.CrossRefPubMed Horváth, J., Winkler, I., & Bendixen, A. (2008). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction. Biological Psychology, 79, 139–147.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hugenschmidt, C. E., Mozolic, J. L., Tan, H., Kraft, R. A., & Laurienti, P. J. (2009). Age-related increase in cross-sensory noise in resting and steady-state cerebral perfusion. Brain Topography, 21, 241–251.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hugenschmidt, C. E., Mozolic, J. L., Tan, H., Kraft, R. A., & Laurienti, P. J. (2009). Age-related increase in cross-sensory noise in resting and steady-state cerebral perfusion. Brain Topography, 21, 241–251.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall—violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.CrossRefPubMed Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall—violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds—support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.CrossRefPubMed Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds—support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Bridges, A., Tremblay, S., & Macken, W. J. (1999). Organizational factors in selective attention: the interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 464–473.CrossRef Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Bridges, A., Tremblay, S., & Macken, W. J. (1999). Organizational factors in selective attention: the interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 464–473.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369–381.CrossRef Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369–381.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing. Memory and Cognition, 21, 318–328.CrossRef Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing. Memory and Cognition, 21, 318–328.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, D. M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 645–669.CrossRefPubMed Jones, D. M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 645–669.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 550–558.CrossRefPubMed Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 550–558.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kray, J., Eppinger, B., & Mecklinger, A. (2005). Age differences in attentional control: an event-related potential approach. Psychophysiology, 42, 407–416.CrossRefPubMed Kray, J., Eppinger, B., & Mecklinger, A. (2005). Age differences in attentional control: an event-related potential approach. Psychophysiology, 42, 407–416.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound’s informational value: evidence from an auditory discrimination task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 260–268.CrossRefPubMed Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound’s informational value: evidence from an auditory discrimination task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 260–268.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lobo, A., Ezquerra, J., Gómez Burgada, F., Sala, J. M., & Seva Díaz, A. (1979). El mini examen cognoscitivo: un test “sencillo”, práctico, para detectar alteraciones intelectuales en pacientes médicos. Actas Luso-Españolas de Neurología, Psiquiatría y Ciencias afines, 7, 189–202.PubMed Lobo, A., Ezquerra, J., Gómez Burgada, F., Sala, J. M., & Seva Díaz, A. (1979). El mini examen cognoscitivo: un test “sencillo”, práctico, para detectar alteraciones intelectuales en pacientes médicos. Actas Luso-Españolas de Neurología, Psiquiatría y Ciencias afines, 7, 189–202.PubMed
go back to reference Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: recent developments in a “new view”. In C. M. MacLeod & D. S. Gorfein (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: recent developments in a “new view”. In C. M. MacLeod & D. S. Gorfein (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Maylor, E. A., & Lavie, N. (1998). The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology and Aging, 13, 563–573.CrossRefPubMed Maylor, E. A., & Lavie, N. (1998). The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology and Aging, 13, 563–573.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miles, E., Brown, R., & Poliakoff, E. (2011). Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 871–888.CrossRef Miles, E., Brown, R., & Poliakoff, E. (2011). Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 871–888.CrossRef
go back to reference Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177–181.CrossRefPubMed Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177–181.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., & Wilcox, K. A. (1999). Inhibition and aging: similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information. Psychology and Aging, 14, 44–59.CrossRefPubMed Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., & Wilcox, K. A. (1999). Inhibition and aging: similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information. Psychology and Aging, 14, 44–59.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murphy, D., Pelletier, D., Bailey, H., & Howell, D. (2004). Inhibitory functioning in younger and older adults: differences according to modality when processing unattended auditory and visual information. Poster presented at the 10th Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA. Murphy, D., Pelletier, D., Bailey, H., & Howell, D. (2004). Inhibitory functioning in younger and older adults: differences according to modality when processing unattended auditory and visual information. Poster presented at the 10th Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
go back to reference Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544–2590.CrossRefPubMed Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544–2590.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., & Takegata, R. (2007). Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. NeuroReport, 18, 159–163.CrossRefPubMed Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., & Takegata, R. (2007). Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. NeuroReport, 18, 159–163.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Paavilainen, P., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). Neuronal populations in the human brain extracting invariant relationships from acoustic variance. Neuroscience Letters, 265, 179–182.CrossRefPubMed Paavilainen, P., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). Neuronal populations in the human brain extracting invariant relationships from acoustic variance. Neuroscience Letters, 265, 179–182.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359–365.CrossRefPubMed Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359–365.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty; the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty; the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F., & Andrés, P. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F., & Andrés, P. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & SanMiguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & SanMiguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011a). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011a). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010a). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter’s informational value. Cognition, 115, 504–511.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010a). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter’s informational value. Cognition, 115, 504–511.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1635–1641.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1635–1641.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Ljungberg, J. K., Elsley, J. V., & Lindkvist, M. (2011b). A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1134–1139.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Ljungberg, J. K., Elsley, J. V., & Lindkvist, M. (2011b). A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1134–1139.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Maybery, M. T., & Elsley, J. V. (2010b). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 279–284.CrossRef Parmentier, F. B. R., Maybery, M. T., & Elsley, J. V. (2010b). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: a study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 279–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Elsley, J. V. (2011c). Distraction by auditory novelty: the course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Experimental Psychology, 58, 92–101.CrossRefPubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Elsley, J. V. (2011c). Distraction by auditory novelty: the course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Experimental Psychology, 58, 92–101.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Perez, L. (2014). A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 38–45.CrossRef Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Perez, L. (2014). A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 38–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Pick, D. F., & Proctor, R. W. (1999). Age differences in the effects of irrelevant location information. In M. Scerbo & M. W. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance (pp. 258–261). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Pick, D. F., & Proctor, R. W. (1999). Age differences in the effects of irrelevant location information. In M. Scerbo & M. W. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance (pp. 258–261). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Prakash, R. S., Erickson, K. I., Colcombe, S. J., Kim, J. S., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2009). Age related differences in the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control. Brain and Cognition, 71, 328–335.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Prakash, R. S., Erickson, K. I., Colcombe, S. J., Kim, J. S., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2009). Age related differences in the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control. Brain and Cognition, 71, 328–335.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., Pick, D. F., Vu, K. P. L., & Anderson, R. E. (2005). The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus. Acta Psychologica, 119, 21–40.CrossRefPubMed Proctor, R. W., Pick, D. F., Vu, K. P. L., & Anderson, R. E. (2005). The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus. Acta Psychologica, 119, 21–40.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rodway, P. (2005). The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Acta Psychologica, 120, 199–226.CrossRefPubMed Rodway, P. (2005). The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Acta Psychologica, 120, 199–226.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roeber, U., Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003a). Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: an event-related potential and behavioral study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 341–349.CrossRefPubMed Roeber, U., Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003a). Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: an event-related potential and behavioral study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 341–349.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roeber, U., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2003b). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347–357.CrossRefPubMed Roeber, U., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2003b). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347–357.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rouleau, N., & Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: an assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51B, 356–363.CrossRef Rouleau, N., & Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: an assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51B, 356–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Roye, A., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2013). Discrimination of personally significant from nonsignificant sounds: a training study. Cognitive and Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 930–943.CrossRef Roye, A., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2013). Discrimination of personally significant from nonsignificant sounds: a training study. Cognitive and Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 930–943.CrossRef
go back to reference Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Representation of abstract stimulus attributes in human brain. NeuroReport, 3, 1149–1151.CrossRefPubMed Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Representation of abstract stimulus attributes in human brain. NeuroReport, 3, 1149–1151.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Salthouse, T. A. (1996). General and specific speed mediation of adult age differences in memory. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51, 30–42.CrossRef Salthouse, T. A. (1996). General and specific speed mediation of adult age differences in memory. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51, 30–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Salthouse, T. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & McGuthry, K. E. (1998). Shared age-related influences on cognitive and noncognitive variables. Psychology and Aging, 13, 486–500.CrossRefPubMed Salthouse, T. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & McGuthry, K. E. (1998). Shared age-related influences on cognitive and noncognitive variables. Psychology and Aging, 13, 486–500.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Robertson, E. R., Mikels, J. A., Carstensen, L. L., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain. Psychology and Aging, 24, 519–529.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Robertson, E. R., Mikels, J. A., Carstensen, L. L., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain. Psychology and Aging, 24, 519–529.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527–539.CrossRefPubMed Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527–539.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257.CrossRefPubMed Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355–3358.CrossRefPubMed Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355–3358.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Neuropsychological perspectives on memory and cognitive decline in normal human aging. Seminars in the Neuroscience, 6, 387–394.CrossRef Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Neuropsychological perspectives on memory and cognitive decline in normal human aging. Seminars in the Neuroscience, 6, 387–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 247–253.CrossRefPubMed Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 247–253.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Simon, J. R., & Pouraghabagher, A. R. (1978). The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 553–561.CrossRefPubMed Simon, J. R., & Pouraghabagher, A. R. (1978). The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 553–561.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Stevens, W. D., Hasher, L., Chiew, K. S., & Grady, C. L. (2008). A neural mechanism underlying memory failure in older adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12820–12824.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Stevens, W. D., Hasher, L., Chiew, K. S., & Grady, C. L. (2008). A neural mechanism underlying memory failure in older adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12820–12824.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Townsend, J., Adamo, M., & Haist, F. (2006). Changing channels: an fMRI study of aging and cross-modal attention shifts. NeuroImage, 31, 1682–1692.CrossRefPubMed Townsend, J., Adamo, M., & Haist, F. (2006). Changing channels: an fMRI study of aging and cross-modal attention shifts. NeuroImage, 31, 1682–1692.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628–639.PubMed Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628–639.PubMed
go back to reference Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Bridgeman, B., & Umiltà, C. (2004). Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 301–310.CrossRefPubMed Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Bridgeman, B., & Umiltà, C. (2004). Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 301–310.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Verleger, R. (2002). Aging and the Simon task. Psychophysiology, 39, 100–110.CrossRefPubMed Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Verleger, R. (2002). Aging and the Simon task. Psychophysiology, 39, 100–110.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van Gerven, P. W. M., Meijer, W. A., Vermeeren, A., Vuurman, E. F., & Jolles, J. (2007). The irrelevant speech effect and the level of interference in aging. Experimental Aging Research, 33, 323–339.CrossRefPubMed Van Gerven, P. W. M., Meijer, W. A., Vermeeren, A., Vuurman, E. F., & Jolles, J. (2007). The irrelevant speech effect and the level of interference in aging. Experimental Aging Research, 33, 323–339.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van Gerven, P. W. M., & Murphy, D. R. (2010). Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter? Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 667–670.CrossRef Van Gerven, P. W. M., & Murphy, D. R. (2010). Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter? Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 667–670.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Zuijen, T., Sussman, E., Winkler, I., Näätänen, R., & Tervaniemi, M. (2005). Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity—a mismatch study comparing musicians and nonmusicians. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 270–276.CrossRefPubMed Van Zuijen, T., Sussman, E., Winkler, I., Näätänen, R., & Tervaniemi, M. (2005). Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity—a mismatch study comparing musicians and nonmusicians. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 270–276.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179–189.CrossRefPubMed West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179–189.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 664–674.PubMed Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 664–674.PubMed
go back to reference Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147–163.CrossRef Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 456–468.CrossRefPubMed Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 456–468.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wurm, L. H., Labouvie-Vief, G., Aycock, J., Rebucal, K. A., & Koch, H. E. (2004). Performance in auditory and visual emotional Stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 523–535.CrossRefPubMed Wurm, L. H., Labouvie-Vief, G., Aycock, J., Rebucal, K. A., & Koch, H. E. (2004). Performance in auditory and visual emotional Stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 523–535.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Yela, M., & Cordero, A. (2000). Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para ancianos. S.A.: TEA Ediciones. Yela, M., & Cordero, A. (2000). Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para ancianos. S.A.: TEA Ediciones.
Metagegevens
Titel
Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks
Auteurs
Alicia Leiva
Fabrice B. R. Parmentier
Pilar Andrés
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0573-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2015

Psychological Research 3/2015 Naar de uitgave