Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

25-01-2019

Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology

Auteurs: Chun-Ju Hsiao, Christine Dymek, Bryan Kim, Brigid Russell

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2019

Abstract

Purpose

The effective use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can play a critical role in improving health care delivery and patient experience with care. However, PROs are not widely collected and used in clinical practice. This study aims to understand current opportunities and challenges with the use of PROs and the potential for health information technology (IT) to advance their use.

Methods

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality held two technical expert panel (TEP) meetings to discuss the current use of PROs, challenges, and opportunities in implementation, and how health IT can be leveraged to support effective PRO use in clinical practice. Results were synthesized to identify major themes and takeaways based on different stages of PRO data utilization.

Results

Findings from the TEP meetings indicated varying degrees of PRO usage in ambulatory care settings. Practices often lack a business case to collect PROs. Primary care physicians face more challenges than specialists in selecting appropriate PRO measures due to extensive variation in their patient populations. Providers also need training to use PRO data for shared decision making and population health management. Potential research areas to address PRO implementation challenges include measures harmonization, implementation process and workflow, electronic data collection and integration, and user-friendly data displays.

Conclusions

Opportunities exist during different stages of PRO implementation to advance the use of PROs in clinical practice. Health IT can be utilized to address challenges in data collection, integration, and visualization to make PRO data accessible and understandable to patients and providers.

vorige artikel Association of nutritional status and health-related quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease

volgende artikel Patient versus proxy response on global health scales: no meaningful DIFference

Lavallee, D. C., Chenok, K. E., Love, R. M., Petersen, C., Holve, E., Segal, C. D., et al. (2016). Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Affairs (Millwood), 35(4), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362.CrossRef

Basch, E. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1611252.CrossRefPubMed

Blumenthal, K. J., Chang, Y., Ferris, T. G., Spirt, J. C., Vogeli, C., Wagle, N., et al. (2017). Using a self-reported global health measure to identify patients at high risk for future healthcare utilization. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(8), 877–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4041-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Baumhauer, J. F. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—are they living up to their potential? The New England Journal of Medicine, 377(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1702978.CrossRefPubMed

Working Group on Health Outcomes for Older Persons with Multiple Chronic, C. (2012). Universal health outcome measures for older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60(12), 2333–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04240.x.CrossRef

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009). Guidance for industry, patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2017.

Philpot, L. M., Barnes, S. A., Brown, R. M., Austin, J. A., James, C. S., Stanford, R. H., et al. (2017). Barriers and benefits to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care: a qualitative study. American Journal of Medical Quality. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860617745986.CrossRefPubMed

National Insititue of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis. Accessed 6 Apr 2017.

Roos, E. M., & Lohmander, L. S. (2003). The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Nilsdotter, A. K., Lohmander, L. S., Klassbo, M., & Roos, E. M. (2003). Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2016). CMS quality measure development plan: supporting the transition to the merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) and alternative payment models (APMs). Baltimore: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

12.

Franklin, P. D., Allison, J. J., & Ayers, D. C. (2012). Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA, 308(12), 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.12568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

MN Community Measurement (2013). 2013 health care quality report: compare clinic, medical group and hospital performance. http://mncm.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2013-HCQR-Final-2.4.2014.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2017.

14.

Pitzen, C., & Larson, J. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures and integration into electronic health records. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12(10), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2016.014118.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Porter, M. E., Larsson, S., & Lee, T. H. (2016). Standardizing patient outcomes measurement. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(6), 504–506. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1511701.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2017). Implementation and evaluation of new health information technology (IT) strategies for collecting and using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (U18). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/pa-17-247.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

17.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2017). Utilizing health information technology to scale and spread successful practice models using patient-reported outcomes (R18). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/pa-17-077.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

18.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2018). AHRQ step up app challenge: advancing care through patient assessments. https://www.ahrq.gov/stepupappchallenge/index.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

19.

Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety Health Care, 19(Suppl 3), i68–i74. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.042085.CrossRef

20.

Ciemins, E. (October 2016). What patients know: patient-reported outcomes. Group Practice Journal. http://www.amga.org/wcm/GPJ/RCV/wcm/PI/GPJ/Archives/2016/10.aspx. Accessed 14 Mar 2017.

21.

Abernethy, A. P., Ahmad, A., Zafar, S. Y., Wheeler, J. L., Reese, J. B., & Lyerly, H. K. (2010). Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Medical Care, 48(6 Suppl), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181db53a4.CrossRef

22.

Arcia, A., Velez, M., & Bakken, S. (2015). Style guide: an interdisciplinary communication tool to support the process of generating tailored infographics from electronic health data using EnTICE3. EGEMS (Wash DC), 3(1), 1120. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1120.CrossRef

23.

Benze, G., Nauck, F., Alt-Epping, B., Gianni, G., Bauknecht, T., Ettl, J., et al. (2017). PROutine: a feasibility study assessing surveillance of electronic patient reported outcomes and adherence via smartphone app in advanced cancer. Annals of Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2017.07.05.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bliven, B. D., Kaufman, S. E., & Spertus, J. A. (2001). Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Quality of Life Research, 10(1), 15–22.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Colaianni, C. A., Levesque, P. A., & Lindsay, R. W. (2017). Integrating data collection into office work flow and electronic health records for clinical outcomes research. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 19(6), 528–532. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1344.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Fredericksen, R., Crane, P. K., Tufano, J., Ralston, J., Schmidt, S., Brown, T., et al. (2012). Integrating a web-based, patient-administered assessment into primary care for HIV-infected adults. Journal of AIDS and HIV Research, 4(2), 47–55.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Gurland, B., Alves-Ferreira, P. C., Sobol, T., & Kiran, R. P. (2010). Using technology to improve data capture and integration of patient-reported outcomes into clinical care: pilot results in a busy colorectal unit. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 53(8), 1168–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d87468.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hartzler, A. L., Chaudhuri, S., Fey, B. C., Flum, D. R., & Lavallee, D. (2015). Integrating patient-reported outcomes into spine surgical care through visual dashboards: lessons learned from human-centered design. EGEMS (Wash DC), 3(2), 1133. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1133.CrossRef

29.

Lucas, S. M., Kim, T. K., Ghani, K. R., Miller, D. C., Linsell, S., Starr, J., et al. (2017). Establishment of a web-based system for collection of patient-reported outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Urology, 107, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.058.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Tirosh, O., Tran, P., Renouf, J., Pergaminelis, N., Purdie, C. N., Ho, A., et al. (2017). PROMsBase: Web-based repository portal for patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics. Health Informatics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217725904.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Valuck, R. J., Anderson, H. O., Libby, A. M., Brandt, E., Bryan, C., Allen, R. R., et al. (2012). Enhancing electronic health record measurement of depression severity and suicide ideation: a distributed ambulatory research in therapeutics network (DARTNet) study. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 25(5), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110053.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Wu, A. W., Jensen, R. E., Salzberg, C., & Snyder, C. (2013). Advances in the use of patient reported outcome measures in electronic health records. In support of the PCORI National Workshop to Advance the Use of PRO measures in Electronic Health Records. Atlanta.

33.

Baumhauer, J. F., Dasilva, C., Mitten, D., Rubery, P., & Rotondo, M. (2018). The cost of patient-reported outcomes in medicine. NEJM Catalyst. https://catalyst.nejm.org/cost-pro-collection-patient-reported-outcomes/. Accessed 2 Oct 2018.

34.

Kotronoulas, G., Connaghan, J., Grenfell, J., Gupta, G., Smith, L., Simpson, M., et al. (2017). Employing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to support newly diagnosed patients with melanoma: feasibility and acceptability of a holistic needs assessment intervention. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 31, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2017.10.002.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology
Auteurs: Chun-Ju Hsiao
Christine Dymek
Bryan Kim
Brigid Russell
Publicatiedatum: 25-01-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02112-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2019

Development and validation of the caregiver roles and responsibilities scale in cancer caregivers

Measuring fatigue in cancer patients: a common metric for six fatigue instruments

Multidimensionality of the PROMIS self-efficacy measure for managing chronic conditions

Leveraging Latent Dirichlet Allocation in processing free-text personal goals among patients undergoing bladder cancer surgery

The effects of clinical illness severity and physical activity on health-related quality of life in schizophrenia

Psychometric properties and correlates of a brief scale measuring the psychological construct mattering to others in a sample of women recovering from breast cancer