Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

19-11-2015 | Original Article

Action induction due to visual perception of linear motion in depth

Auteurs: Claudia Classen, Armin Kibele

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2017

Abstract

Visually perceived motion can affect observers’ motor control in such a way that an intended action can be activated automatically when it contains similar spatial features. So far, effects have been mostly demonstrated with simple displays where objects were moving in a two-dimensional plane. However, almost all actions we perform and visually perceive in everyday life are much more complex and take place in three-dimensional space. The purpose of this study was to examine action inductions due to visual perception of motion in depth. Therefore, we conducted two Simon experiments where subjects were presented with video displays of a sphere (simple displays, experiment 1) and a real person (complex displays, experiment 2) moving in depth. In both experiments, motion direction towards and away from the observer served as task irrelevant information whereas a color change in the video served as relevant information to choose the correct response (close or far positioned response key). The results show that subjects reacted faster when motion direction of the dynamic stimulus was corresponding to the spatial position of the demanded response. In conclusion, this direction-based Simon effect is modulated by spatial position information, higher sensitivity of our visual system for looming objects, and a high salience of objects being on a collision course.

vorige artikel Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect

volgende artikel Sensorimotor synchronization: neurophysiological markers of the asynchrony in a finger-tapping task

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Colors were chosen for the same reasons as described in Classen and Kibele (2015).

With this experimental condition we wanted to examine a small question alongside that is not of further interest for the main hypotheses of our study. For this reason we will outline the results of this condition but will subsequently not address it any further.

Note: all participants used their right index finger to press the proximal key and their left index finger to press the distal key. To rule out impacts of handedness in this experiment, we replicated experiment 1 with changed index finger to response key mapping (n = 5). The results were similar and allowed us to assume that handedness is no factor of influence here.

One might argue that the stimulus is becoming smaller from the close to the far position and that a size effect is responsible for the different magnitudes of the Simon effects. It is well known that stimulus size affects simple reaction time in such a way that reaction times are shorter to larger as to smaller stimuli. Nevertheless, this only holds for stimuli smaller than 0.5° (e.g. Froeberg, 1907; O’Donell, Barraza, & Colombo, 2010). The stimulus size at the far position corresponds to a visual angle of 1.2° (with a viewing distance of 70 cm). Therefore, reaction times should not be affected by stimulus size here.

In an experiment of our own conducted in our lab, we tested choice reaction times with different colors on different backgrounds and found that there was no difference between the color magenta (RGB 255, 0, 255) and green (RGB 0, 255, 0) on a gray background (RGB 128, 128, 128) (Hofmann, 2012).

Bortz, J. (1999). Statistik: Für Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics: For Social Scientists] (5th ed.). Berlin: Springer.

Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2004). A Simon effect with stationary moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.39. PubMed

Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2005). Is direction position? Position- and direction-based correspondence effects in tasks with moving stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(3), 467–506. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000016. CrossRef

Box, G. E. P. (1954). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 484–498. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177728717. CrossRef

Classen, C., & Kibele, A. (2015). Action induction by visual perception of rotational motion. Psychological Research,. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0693-6.

De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731. PubMed

Dent, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (2011). Neuropsychological evidence for a competitive bias against contracting stimuli. Neurocase, 17(2), 112–121. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2010.498381. CrossRefPubMed

Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. doi: 10.1037/h0055392. CrossRefPubMed

Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(7), 999–1010. doi: 10.3758/BF03194829. CrossRefPubMed

Froeberg, S. (1907). The relation between the magnitude of stimulus and the time of reaction. Archives of Psychology, 16(8), 1–38.

Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of Box’s results on the use of the F-distribution in multivariate analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(3), 885–891. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706545. CrossRef

Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Hofmann, J. (2012). Der Einfluss von Farbe auf die Reaktionszeit im Wettkampfsport: eine empirische Grundlagenuntersuchung zur Frage danach, ob der Vorteil bestimmter Kleiderfarben im Wettkampfsport auf farbabhängige Reaktionszeiten zurückgeführt werden kann [Impact of color on reaction time in competitive sports: A basic examination about the question whether the advantage of special colors of sportswear is due to color dependent reaction times]. Unpublished master‘s thesis. University of Kassel.

Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59(3), 176–186. doi: 10.1007/BF00425832. CrossRefPubMed

Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103. CrossRefPubMed

Jouen, F., Lepecq, J.-C., Gapenne, O., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2000). Optic flow sensitivity in neonates. Infant Behavior & Development, 23, 271–284. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00044-3. CrossRef

Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253. CrossRefPubMed

Lin, J. Y., Franconeri, S., & Enns, J. T. (2008). Objects on a collision path with the observer demand attention. Psychological Science, 19(7), 686–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02143.x. CrossRefPubMed

Michaels, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 231–240. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.231. PubMed

O’Donell, B. M., Barraza, J. F., & Colombo, E. M. (2010). The effect of chromatic and luminance information on reaction times. Visual Neuroscience, 27(3–4), 119–129. doi: 10.1017/S0952523810000143. CrossRefPubMed

Prinz, W. (1990). A Common Coding Approach to Perception and Action. In W. Prinz, P. Bieri, & O. Newmann (Eds.), Relationships Between Perception and Action. Current Approaches. Berlin: Springer.

Proctor, R. W., Van Zandt, T., Lu, C.-H., & Weeks, D. J. (1993). Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: perception of affordances or directional coding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(1), 81–91. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.81. PubMed

Rigon, J., Massaccesi, S., & Umiltà, C. (2011). A Simon effect for depth in three-dimensional displays. The American Journal of Psychology, 124(4), 395–403. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.4.0395. CrossRefPubMed

Schiff, W., Caviness, J. A., & Gibson, J. J. (1962). Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of “looming”. Science, 136(3520), 982–983. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3520.982. CrossRefPubMed

Skarratt, P., Cole, G., & Gellatly, A. H. (2009). Prioritization of looming and receding objects: equal slopes, different intercepts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(4), 964–970. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.964. CrossRef

Stins, J. F., & Michaels, C. F. (1997). Stimulus-response compatibility is information-action compatibility. Ecological Psychology, 9(1), 25–45. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0901_2. CrossRef

Takeuchi, T. (1997). Visual search of expansion and contraction. Vision Research, 37(15), 2083–2090. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00225-8. CrossRefPubMed

von Mühlenen, A., & Lleras, A. (2007). No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1297–1310. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1297.

Wittfoth, M., Buck, D., Fahle, M., & Herrmann, M. (2006). Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception. NeuroImage, 32(2), 921–929. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.034. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Action induction due to visual perception of linear motion in depth
Auteurs: Claudia Classen
Armin Kibele
Publicatiedatum: 19-11-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0724-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2017

Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number

More attentional focusing through binaural beats: evidence from the global–local task

Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation

Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information

Physiological threat responses predict number processing

Age-related emotional bias in processing two emotionally valenced tasks