Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research 3/2019

15-10-2018 | Original Article

Acceptance and Cognitive Reappraisal as Regulation Strategies for Symptom Annoyance in Individuals with Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms

Auteurs: Maria Kleinstäuber, Japhia-Marie Gottschalk, Judith Ruckmann, Thomas Probst, Winfried Rief

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 3/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Emotion processing has been demonstrated to have a strong impact on somatic symptom perception. In the current quasi-experimental trial associations between the application of emotion regulation strategies and symptom-related outcomes were examined in subjects with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUS; n = 48) and in mentally healthy individuals (n = 48). Somatic symptoms were repeatedly induced four times in both samples. After each symptom induction, participants were instructed to apply another of four emotion regulation strategies. Symptom-related outcomes were rated before and after a strategy was applied. Hierarchical linear models showed that in the MUS group cognitive reappraisal was significantly and acceptance was marginally associated with lower symptom annoyance scores compared with compassionate self-support. In healthy subjects distraction was associated with better mood scores compared with compassionate self-support. Future research should examine the effects of acceptance and cognitive reappraisal strategies applied by MUS subjects over a longer period of time.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
go back to reference Berking, M., & Whitely, B. (2014). Affect regulation training. A practitioners` manual. Heidelberg: Springer. Berking, M., & Whitely, B. (2014). Affect regulation training. A practitioners` manual. Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research. Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.
go back to reference First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research.
go back to reference Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Margraf, J. (1994). Mini-DIPS: Diagnostic short-interview for mental disorders [Mini-DIPS: Diagnostisches Kurz-Interview bei psychischen Störungen]. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Margraf, J. (1994). Mini-DIPS: Diagnostic short-interview for mental disorders [Mini-DIPS: Diagnostisches Kurz-Interview bei psychischen Störungen]. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Rief, W., Heuser, J., Mayrhuber, E., Stelzer, I., Hiller, W., & Fichter, M. M. (1996b). The classification of multiple somatoform symptoms. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184, 680–687.CrossRefPubMed Rief, W., Heuser, J., Mayrhuber, E., Stelzer, I., Hiller, W., & Fichter, M. M. (1996b). The classification of multiple somatoform symptoms. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184, 680–687.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sharpe, M., Mayou, R., & Bass, C. (1995). Concepts, theories and terminology. In R. Mayou, C. Bass, & M. Sharpe (Eds.), Treatment of functional somatic symptoms (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sharpe, M., Mayou, R., & Bass, C. (1995). Concepts, theories and terminology. In R. Mayou, C. Bass, & M. Sharpe (Eds.), Treatment of functional somatic symptoms (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Acceptance and Cognitive Reappraisal as Regulation Strategies for Symptom Annoyance in Individuals with Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms
Auteurs
Maria Kleinstäuber
Japhia-Marie Gottschalk
Judith Ruckmann
Thomas Probst
Winfried Rief
Publicatiedatum
15-10-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9973-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2019

Cognitive Therapy and Research 3/2019 Naar de uitgave