Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Article

A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals

Auteurs: Heath E. Matheson, Nicole C. White, Patricia A. McMullen

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Theories of embodied object representation predict a tight association between sensorimotor processes and visual processing of manipulable objects. Previous research has shown that object handles can ‘potentiate’ a manual response (i.e., button press) to a congruent location. This potentiation effect is taken as evidence that objects automatically evoke sensorimotor simulations in response to the visual presentation of manipulable objects. In the present series of experiments, we investigated a critical prediction of the theory of embodied object representations that potentiation effects should be observed with manipulable artifacts but not non-manipulable animals. In four experiments we show that (a) potentiation effects are observed with animals and artifacts; (b) potentiation effects depend on the absolute size of the objects and (c) task context influences the presence/absence of potentiation effects. We conclude that potentiation effects do not provide evidence for embodied object representations, but are suggestive of a more general stimulus–response compatibility effect that may depend on the distribution of attention to different object features.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Currently, there is no unified theory of embodied cognition, and many accounts have been provided. For instance, see Wilson (2002) for a general overview of the issues associated with embodied cognition; see the perceptual symbols theory of Barsalou (2003); and see Lakoff and Johnson (1999) for a general theoretical and philosophical framework. A similar approach has been described in the literature on common-coding (e.g., Hommel, Müsseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001) and regarding semantic representation (Allport, 1985). Additionally, the idea that artifacts ‘afford’ actions was first developed by Gibson (1979). For our purposes, Shapiro (2011) has identified at least three distinct aspects of the embodied cognition hypothesis; in the present experiment, we are specifically referring to the ‘conceptualization’ hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that simulations and reactivations in modality-specific systems form the basis of object identification. According to the conceptualization hypothesis, we must simulate (or reactivate) our visual, auditory and motor experiences with a hammer to know an object is hammer.
 
2
This effect has also been referred to as the orientation effect (see Vainio, Ellis, & Tucker, 2007), the visuo-motor priming effect (Craighero, Fadiga, Umiltà & Rizzolatti, 1996) or simply the correspondence or compatibility effect (see Phillips & Ward, 2002; Cho & Proctor, 2010). However, we feel that ‘potentiation’ is a more descriptive and less ambiguous term.
 
3
Consistent patterns of results have been reported using similar paradigms. For instance, Tucker and Ellis (1998, 2004) have shown that participants are faster at making precision grasps (e.g., pinching with the index finger and thumb) when shown an object that affords a precisions grasp (e.g., a clothes peg) than when shown an object that does not (e.g., a wine bottle); conversely, power grasps (e.g., grasping with the whole hand) were primed by objects that afford power grasps (e.g., a wine bottle) but not other objects (e.g., a clothes peg). While these results are consistent with theories of embodied cognition, it could be argued that they arise because of a general ‘dimensional overlap’ between stimuli and responses (Kornblum et al., 1990).
 
4
Note, the effect size we report is the generalized eta squared. The generalized eta is designed to reduce the influence of the number of factors in an experiment. However, the standard interpretations of the small, medium, and large effect sizes still apply (see Olejnik & Algina, 2003).
 
5
This conclusion is based on the interpretation of the pattern of data across Experiment 1 and 2. To ensure the reliability of this interpretation, we combined data from the two experiments and included Experiment as a between subject factor. The three-way interaction between experiment, compatibility, and category was marginally significant in the accuracy data, F (1, 48) = 2.9, p < 0.09, η G 2  = 0.009, and significant in the logRT data, F (1, 48) = 6.47, p = 0.001, η G 2  = 0.002. These interactions support our conclusions.
 
6
We recognize that the direction of the potentiation effect depends on our definition of ‘compatibility’; therefore, in this way the effect’s direction is arbitrary. For simplicity, we retain our definition throughout this report and discuss the consequences in the “General Discussion”. Importantly, whether we consider the potentiation effect as ‘reversed’ or not has no consequences for the main conclusion we draw here.
 
7
This argument is based on findings that a participant’s own hand will bias attention in the visual field. We thank one reviewer for suggesting that it is unknown whether a hand image (that is not the participant’s own hand) will affect attention similarly. Future research should explore whether own vs. other hand images influence attention in similar ways.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. D. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 207–244). New York: Churchill Livingstone. Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. D. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 207–244). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
go back to reference Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 269(1497), 1225–1232.CrossRef Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 269(1497), 1225–1232.CrossRef
go back to reference Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. The Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRef Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. The Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRef
go back to reference Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 341–358.PubMed Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 341–358.PubMed
go back to reference Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106, 27–58.PubMedCrossRef Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106, 27–58.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: a TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3074–3078.PubMedCrossRef Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: a TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3074–3078.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cate, A., Goodale, M., & Köhler, S. (2011). The role of apparent size in building- and object-specific regions of ventral visual cortex. Brain Research, 4, 09–122. Cate, A., Goodale, M., & Köhler, S. (2011). The role of apparent size in building- and object-specific regions of ventral visual cortex. Brain Research, 4, 09–122.
go back to reference Chao, L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484.PubMedCrossRef Chao, L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon-effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 853–861.PubMed Cho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon-effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 853–861.PubMed
go back to reference Cho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 737–749.PubMed Cho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 737–749.PubMed
go back to reference Cho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding. Psychological Research,. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0458-4.PubMed Cho, D., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding. Psychological Research,. doi:10.​1007/​s00426-012-0458-4.PubMed
go back to reference Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport, 8, 347–349.PubMedCrossRef Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport, 8, 347–349.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(11), 512–519.CrossRef Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(11), 512–519.CrossRef
go back to reference Gerlach, C., Law, I., & Paulson, O. (2002). When action turns into words: activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1230–1239.PubMedCrossRef Gerlach, C., Law, I., & Paulson, O. (2002). When action turns into words: activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1230–1239.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
go back to reference Helbig, H., Graf, M., & Keifer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221–228.PubMedCrossRef Helbig, H., Graf, M., & Keifer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221–228.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Helbig, H., Steinwender, J., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2010). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 251–258.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Helbig, H., Steinwender, J., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2010). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 251–258.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1257–1270. Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1257–1270.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46(11), 1762–1776. Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46(11), 1762–1776.
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. Psychological review, 97(2), 253–270. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. Psychological review, 97(2), 253–270.
go back to reference Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2009a). Eye-tracking study of animate objects. Psihologija, 42(3), 307–327.CrossRef Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2009a). Eye-tracking study of animate objects. Psihologija, 42(3), 307–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2009b). Eye-tracking study of inanimate objects. Psihologija, 42(4), 417–436.CrossRef Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2009b). Eye-tracking study of inanimate objects. Psihologija, 42(4), 417–436.CrossRef
go back to reference Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Breuer, A. T. (2011). Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1470–1484.PubMed Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Breuer, A. T. (2011). Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1470–1484.PubMed
go back to reference McMullen, P., & Jolicoeur, P. (1990). The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections. Memory and Cognition, 18(1), 99–115.PubMedCrossRef McMullen, P., & Jolicoeur, P. (1990). The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections. Memory and Cognition, 18(1), 99–115.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mounoud, P., Dushcherer, K., Moy, G., & Perraudin, S. (2007). The influence of action perception on object recognition: a developmental study. Developmental Science, 10(6), 836–852.PubMedCrossRef Mounoud, P., Dushcherer, K., Moy, G., & Perraudin, S. (2007). The influence of action perception on object recognition: a developmental study. Developmental Science, 10(6), 836–852.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of the monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2580–2601.PubMed Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of the monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2580–2601.PubMed
go back to reference Newman, A. J., Tremblay, A., Nichols, E. S., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The influence of language proficiency on brain activation in native and late learners of English: an ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1205–1223.PubMedCrossRef Newman, A. J., Tremblay, A., Nichols, E. S., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The influence of language proficiency on brain activation in native and late learners of English: an ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1205–1223.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized Eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434–447.PubMedCrossRef Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized Eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434–447.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2190–2201.PubMedCrossRef Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2190–2201.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Phillips, J. C., & Ward, R. (2002). S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9, 540–558.CrossRef Phillips, J. C., & Ward, R. (2002). S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9, 540–558.CrossRef
go back to reference Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), 793–797. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), 793–797.
go back to reference Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510–532.PubMedCrossRef Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510–532.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166–177.PubMed Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166–177.PubMed
go back to reference Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185–195. Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185–195.
go back to reference Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.PubMedCrossRef Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). Visual object affordances: object orientation. Acta Psychologia, 124, 238–255.CrossRef Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). Visual object affordances: object orientation. Acta Psychologia, 124, 238–255.CrossRef
go back to reference R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 Aug 2012. R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://​www.​R-project.​org/​. Accessed 1 Aug 2012.
go back to reference Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(3), 493–498.CrossRef Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(3), 493–498.CrossRef
go back to reference Tremblay, R., & Ransijn, J. (2011). LMERConvenienceFunctions: a suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. R Package Version, 1(6), 7. Tremblay, R., & Ransijn, J. (2011). LMERConvenienceFunctions: a suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. R Package Version, 1(6), 7.
go back to reference Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.PubMed Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.PubMed
go back to reference Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185–203.PubMedCrossRef Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185–203.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vainio, L., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). The role of visual attention in action priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 241–261.PubMedCrossRef Vainio, L., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). The role of visual attention in action priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 241–261.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vu, K. P. (2007). Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory and Cognition, 35(6), 1463–1471.PubMedCrossRef Vu, K. P. (2007). Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory and Cognition, 35(6), 1463–1471.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58, 475–482. Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58, 475–482.
go back to reference Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 625–636.PubMedCrossRef Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 625–636.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Witt, J., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S., & Culham, J. (2010). A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1215–1219.PubMedCrossRef Witt, J., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S., & Culham, J. (2010). A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1215–1219.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yang, S.-J., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Seeing and doing: ability to act moderates orientation effects in object perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 639–648.PubMedCrossRef Yang, S.-J., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Seeing and doing: ability to act moderates orientation effects in object perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 639–648.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals
Auteurs
Heath E. Matheson
Nicole C. White
Patricia A. McMullen
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0502-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2014

Psychological Research 4/2014 Naar de uitgave