Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 12/2018

14-08-2018

A qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics

Auteurs: Tasneem L. Talib, Paige DeChant, Jacob Kean, Patrick O. Monahan, David A. Haggstrom, Madison E. Stout, Kurt Kroenke

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Sleep, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue (SPADE pentad) symptoms are common, but often unrecognized and undertreated in primary care. In an effort to improve symptom outcomes, primary care clinics are integrating patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), such as the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), into practice. Whether patients with SPADE symptoms perceive these measures as useful is unknown. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore patients’ perceptions of the utility of symptom-based PROs in primary care.

Methods

As part of a mixed-methods study, 23 patients (age 24–77 years) with one or more SPADE symptoms participated in one-on-one interviews about the use, implementation and visual display of PROMIS. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Five themes emerged: (1) PROs may foster communication about symptoms; (2) data from PROs may prompt clinical actions; (3) the visual display of symptom scores could be useful for patients and providers, though modifications may enhance interpretation; (4) implementation may vary according to patients’ perception of PRO features (e.g., length); and (5) PROs may be useful, but only to the extent that they are valued, prioritized, and used.

Conclusions

According to patients, the use of PROs to measure symptoms in primary care clinics has the potential to be useful. However, patients are reluctant to complete PROs if they perceive that clinicians do not use the measures to improve care. Barriers to implementation in primary care (e.g., duration of visit) should be addressed to enhance the utility of PROs. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02383862.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Kroenke, K. (2001). Studying symptoms: Sampling and measurement issues. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(9 Pt 2), 844–853. CrossRef Kroenke, K. (2001). Studying symptoms: Sampling and measurement issues. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(9 Pt 2), 844–853. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kroenke, K. (2003). Patients presenting with somatic complaints: Epidemiology, psychiatric comorbidity and management. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(1), 34–43. CrossRef Kroenke, K. (2003). Patients presenting with somatic complaints: Epidemiology, psychiatric comorbidity and management. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(1), 34–43. CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Wilhelm, K. A., Finch, A. W., Davenport, T. A., & Hickie, I. B. (2008). What can alert the general practitioner to people whose common mental health problems are unrecognised? The Medical Journal of Australia, 188(12 Suppl), S114–S118. PubMed Wilhelm, K. A., Finch, A. W., Davenport, T. A., & Hickie, I. B. (2008). What can alert the general practitioner to people whose common mental health problems are unrecognised? The Medical Journal of Australia, 188(12 Suppl), S114–S118. PubMed
9.
go back to reference Edwards, T. M., Stern, A., Clarke, D. D., Ivbijaro, G., & Kasney, L. M. (2010). The treatment of patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: A review of the literature. Mental Health and Family Medicine, 7(4), 209–221. Edwards, T. M., Stern, A., Clarke, D. D., Ivbijaro, G., & Kasney, L. M. (2010). The treatment of patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: A review of the literature. Mental Health and Family Medicine, 7(4), 209–221.
11.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. (2001). Cossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Cossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
12.
go back to reference Hurtado, M. P., Swift, E. K., & Corrigan, J. M. (2001). Envisioning the national health care quality report. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press. Hurtado, M. P., Swift, E. K., & Corrigan, J. M. (2001). Envisioning the national health care quality report. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
15.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123. CrossRef Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123. CrossRef
16.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register, 74(35), 65132–65133. US Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register, 74(35), 65132–65133.
18.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Meads, D., et al. (2017). Functionality and feedback: A realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(2), 1–280. CrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Wright, J., Meads, D., et al. (2017). Functionality and feedback: A realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(2), 1–280. CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Chou, C., Harle, M. T., Morrissey, M., et al. (2000). Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer, 89(7), 1634–1646. CrossRef Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Chou, C., Harle, M. T., Morrissey, M., et al. (2000). Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer, 89(7), 1634–1646. CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. CrossRef Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
A qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics
Auteurs
Tasneem L. Talib
Paige DeChant
Jacob Kean
Patrick O. Monahan
David A. Haggstrom
Madison E. Stout
Kurt Kroenke
Publicatiedatum
14-08-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1968-3