Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

16-04-2019 Open Access

A qualitative study investigating the meaning of participation to improve the measurement of this construct

Tijdschrift:: Quality of Life Research

Auteurs:: Astrid de Wind, Allard J. van der Beek, Edwin J. Boezeman, Rosalie Swenneker, Johannes R. Anema, Angela G. E. M. de Boer, Heleen Beckerman, Jan L. Hoving, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Micky Scharn, Mariska Stam, Caroline B. Terwee, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen, Sietske J. Tamminga

» Naar de volledige tekst

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to improve the measurement of participation. Research questions were as follows: (1) What constitutes participation according to adults? (2) Do they mention participation subdomains that are not covered in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) item bank “Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities”?

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 adults from the general population. Interviews were thematically analysed using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as conceptual framework. Thereafter, assigned codes were compared to PROMIS item bank.

Results

Participants mentioned a variety of participation subdomains that were meaningful to them, such as socializing and employment. All subdomains could be classified into the ICF. The following subdomains were not covered by the PROMIS item bank: acquisition of necessities, education life, economic life, community life, and religion and spirituality. Also a distinction between remunerative (i.e. paid) and non-remunerative (i.e. unpaid) employment, and domestic life was missing. Several ICF sub-codes were not mentioned, such as ceremonies.

Conclusions

Many participation subdomains were mentioned to be meaningful. As several of these subdomains are not covered in the PROMIS item bank, it may benefit from extension with new (patient-)reported subdomains of participation.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Meer informatie

van der Holst, M., Groot, J., Steenbeek, D., Pondaag, W., Nelissen, R. G., & Vliet Vlieland, T. P. (2017). Participation restrictions among adolescents and adults with neonatal brachial plexus palsy: The patient perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1380717.

Schuring, M., Mackenbach, J., Voorham, T., & Burdorf, A. (2011). The effect of re-employment on perceived health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(7), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.103838. CrossRef

Hammel, J. S. M., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(19), 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534. CrossRef

Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(6), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006. CrossRef

Alonso, J., Bartlett, S. J., Rose, M., Aaronson, N. K., Chaplin, J. E., Efficace, F., et al. (2013). The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS(R)) initiative. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-210. CrossRef

University, N. (2018). PROMIS ^® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System). Accessed May 3, 2018, from http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis.

Terwee, C. B., Crins, M. H. P., Boers, M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Roorda, L. D. (2019). Validation of two PROMIS item banks for measuring social participation in the Dutch general population. Quality of Life Research, 28, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1995-0. CrossRef

WHO (2018). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Accessed May 3, 2018, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.

Tucker, C. A., Cieza, A., Riley, A. W., Stucki, G., Lai, J. S., Bedirhan Ustun, T., et al. (2014). Concept analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS((R))) and the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1677–1686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0622-y. CrossRef

10.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. CrossRef

11.

GmbH, S. S. D. (2018). ATLAS.ti. Accessed May 3, 2018, from https://atlasti.com/.

12.

Hahn, E. A., DeWalt, D. A., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., DeVellis, R. F., Correia, H., et al. (2014). New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants. Health Psychology, 33(5), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000055. CrossRef

13.

Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., de Vet, H. C., Dekker, J., Westhovens, R., van Leeuwen, J., et al. (2014). Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1733–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6.

14.

Terwee CB, K. A., de Schipper, E., Crins, M. H., Klausch, T., Smeets, R., de Vet, H., et al. (2017). Calibration of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS item banks Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities in patients undergoing rehabilitation and in the general population. Quality of Life Research, 26, 93.

15.

Chang, F. H., & Coster, W. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the construct of participation in adults with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(9), 1791–1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.008. CrossRef

16.

Norlander, A., Iwarsson, S., Jonsson, A. C., Lindgren, A., & Mansson Lexell, E. (2018). Living and ageing with stroke: An exploration of conditions influencing participation in social and leisure activities over 15 years. Brain Injury. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1463561.

17.

Sverker, A., Thyberg, I., Ostlund, G., Waltersson, E., & Thyberg, M. (2014). Participation in work in early rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative interview study interpreted in terms of the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.789086. CrossRef

18.

Boezeman, E. J., & Ellemers, N. (2009). Intrinsic need satisfaction and the job attitudes of volunteers versus employees working in a charitable volunteer organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X383742. CrossRef

19.

Ostlund, G., Bjork, M., Thyberg, I., Valtersson, E., & Sverker, A. (2018). Women’s situation-specific strategies in managing participation restrictions due to early rheumatoid arthritis: A gender comparison. Musculoskeletal Care. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1225.

20.

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543. CrossRef

21.

Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health, 31(4), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259. CrossRef

22.

Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320(7227), 114–116. CrossRef

23.

Baumhauer, J. F. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—Are they living up to their potential? New England Journal of Medicine, 377(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1702978. CrossRef

24.

Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. CrossRef

25.

van der Meij, E., Anema, J. R., Leclercq, W. K. G., Bongers, M. Y., Consten, E. C. J., Schraffordt Koops, S. E., et al. (2018). Personalised perioperative care by e-health afte intermediate-grade abdominal surgery: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet, 392, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31113-9. CrossRef

Titel: A qualitative study investigating the meaning of participation to improve the measurement of this construct
Auteurs:: Astrid de Wind
Allard J. van der Beek
Edwin J. Boezeman
Rosalie Swenneker
Johannes R. Anema
Angela G. E. M. de Boer
Heleen Beckerman
Jan L. Hoving
Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
Micky Scharn
Mariska Stam
Caroline B. Terwee
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
Sietske J. Tamminga
Publicatiedatum: 16-04-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02179-9
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Tijdschrift: Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip