Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

13-09-2020

A multicenter cross-sectional study of the quality of life and iron chelation treatment satisfaction of patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, in routine care settings in Western Greece

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research
Auteurs:
Vassilis Goulas, Alexandra Kouraklis-Symeonidis, Kyriaki Manousou, Vassileios Lazaris, George Pairas, Paraskevi Katsaouni, Eugenia Verigou, Vassiliki Labropoulou, Vassiliki Pesli, Panagiotis Kaiafas, Urania Papageorgiou, Argiris Symeonidis
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with iron chelation therapy (ICT) of patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) managed under routine care conditions.

Patients and methods

This was an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted in three hospital-based Thalassemia Units of Western Greece. Patients confidentially completed the 36-item short-form (SF-36) and the “satisfaction with ICT” (SICT) instruments to assess HRQoL and ICT satisfaction respectively.

Results

One hundred and thirty-one adult TDT patients [74 female, median (IQR) age: 41 (36–47) years] were enrolled. Eighty patients (61.1%) were receiving parenteral ICT, with or without oral chelators (Group I), whereas 51 (38.9%) were only receiving oral ICT (Group II). The median SF-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores were 76.3 and 75.7 among Group I, and 76.9 and 74.5 among Group II patients, not differing between the two groups. In their majority, Group I (84.6%) and Group II (92.9%) patients reported preferring oral ICT. Moreover, Group I patients reported greater perceived ICT effectiveness (median SICT score: 4.3 versus 4.2; p = 0.039), whereas patients receiving deferasirox-containing ICT reported higher treatment acceptance (median SICT score: 4.0 versus 3.6, p = 0.038) and greater satisfaction with the burden of their ICT (median SICT score: 4.4 versus 3.9, p = 0.033).

Conclusion

TDT patients prefer to receive oral ICT and are more satisfied of the burden of deferasirox-containing ICT, even though those receiving parenteral ICT are more satisfied by the effectiveness of their treatment. No differences in HRQoL were not noted between patients receiving parenteral versus oral ICT.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel