Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
We conducted a meta-analysis of single-subject research studies investigating the effectiveness of antecedent strategies grounded in behavioral momentum for improving compliance and on-task performance for students with autism. First, we assessed the research rigor of those studies meeting our inclusionary criteria. Next, in order to apply a universal metric to help determine the effectiveness of this category of antecedent strategies investigated via single-subject research methods, we calculated effect sizes via omnibus improvement rate differences (IRDs). Outcomes provide additional support for behavioral momentum, especially interventions incorporating the high-probability command sequence. Implications for research and practice are discussed, including the consideration of how single-subject research is systematically reviewed to assess the rigor of studies and assist in determining overall intervention effectiveness .
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
*Adcock, J., & Cuvo, A. J. (2009). Enhancing learning for children with autism spectrum disorders in regular education by instructional modifications. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2008.07.004.
Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2012). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
*Banda, D. R., & Kubina, R. M. (2006). The effects of a high-probability request sequencing technique in enhancing transition behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 507–516.
*Banda, D. R., & Kubina, R. M. Jr. (2010). Increasing academic compliance with mathematics tasks using the high-preference strategy with a student with autism. Preventing School Failure, 54, 81–85. doi: 10.1080/10459880903217564.
*Benavides, C. A., & Poulson, C. L. (2009). Task interspersal and performance of matching tasks by preschoolers with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 619–629. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2008.12.001.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children aged 8 years: Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 63(2): 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6302.pdf.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Author.
Ducharme, J. M., & Shecter, C. (2011). Bridging the gap between clinical and classroom intervention: Keystone approaches for students with challenging behavior. School Psychology Review, 40, 257–274.
*Esch, K., & Fryling, M. J. (2013). A comparison of two variations of the high-probability instructional sequence with a child with autism. Education and Treatment of Children, 36, 61–72. doi: 10.1353/etc.2013.0008.
Ganz, J. B., Davis, J. L., Lund, E. M., Goodwyn, F. D., & Simpson, R. L. (2012a). Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: Investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.023. CrossRefPubMed
Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. L., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012b). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 60–74. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1212-2. CrossRefPubMed
Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Mason, R. A., Rispoli, M. J., Heath, A. K., & Parker, R. I. (2011). An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: Participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1500–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.011. CrossRef
Gast, D. K., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral science (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Horner, R. H., Day, H. M., Sprague, J. R., O’Brien, M., & Heathfield, L. T. (1991). Interspersal requests: A nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 265–278. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-265. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hulac, D. M., & Benson, N. (2011). Getting students to work smarter and harder: Decreasing off-task behavior through interspersal techniques. School Psychology Forum, 5, 29–36. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spf.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C.§614 et seq.
*Jung, S., Sainato, D. M., & Davis, C. A. (2008). Using high-probability request sequences to increase social interactions in young children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 163–187. doi: 10.1177/1053815108317970.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, L., & Holloway, J. (2015). An investigation of the effectiveness of behavioral momentum on the acquisition and fluency outcomes of tacts in three children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 182–192. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.007.
*Killu, K., Sainato, D. M., Davis, C. A., Ospelt, H., & Paul, J. N. (1998). Effects of high-probability request sequences on preschoolers’ compliance and disruptive behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 347–368. doi: 10.1023/A:1022875331474.
*Koegel, L. K., Singh, A. K., & Koegel, R. L. (2010). Improving motivation for academics in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1057–1066. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0962-6.
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., & Menzies, H. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors. New York: Guilford.
Ledford, J. R., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Controversial and critical issues in single case research. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 377–396). New York: Routledge.
*Majdalany, L. M., Wilder, D. A., Greif, A., Mathisen, D., & Saini, V. (2014). Comparing massed-trial instruction, distributed-trial instruction, and task interspersal to teach tacts to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 657–662. doi: 10.1002/jaba.149.
*Meier, A. E., Fryling, M. J., & Wallace, M. D. (2012). Using high-probability foods to increase the acceptance of low-probability foods. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 149–153. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-149.
National Autism Center (2009). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 1. Randolph. MA: Author.
National Autism Center (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 2. Randolph. MA: Author.
*Normand, M. P., & Beaulieu, L. (2011). Further evaluation of response-independent delivery of preferred stimuli and child compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 665–669. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-665.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The Improvement Rate Difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150. CrossRef
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2014). Non-overlap analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances (pp. 127–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14376-005. CrossRef
*Pitts, L., & Dymond, S. (2012). Increasing compliance of children with autism: Effects of programmed reinforcement for high-probability requests and varied inter-instruction intervals. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.03.013.
Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212–227.
*Romano, J. P., & Roll, D. (2000). Expanding the utility of behavioral momentum for youth with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 15, 99–111. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(200004/06)15:2<99::AID-BIN48>3.0.CO;2-K.
Sansosti, F. J., Doolan, M. L., Remaklus, B., Krupko, A., & Sansosti, J. M. (2014). Computer-assisted interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders within school-based contexts: A quantitative meta-analysis of single-subject research. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi: 10.1007/s40489-014-0042-5.
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significant of differences by examining overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55, 182–186. CrossRef
Shadish, W. R., Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., Rindskopf, D. M., Boyajjan, J. G., & Sullivan, K. J. (2014). Analyzing single-case designs: d, G, hierarchical models, Bayesian estimators, generalized additive models, and the hopes and fears of researchers about analyses. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances (pp. 247–281). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
*Smith, M. R., & Lerman, D. C. (1999). A preliminary comparison of guided compliance and high-probability instructional sequences as treatment for noncompliance in children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 183–195. doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00002-5.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015a). Table 204.30: Children 3 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by type of disability: Selected years, 1976-77 through 2011–2012. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Digest of Education Statistics (2015th ed.). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_204.30.asp.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015b). Table 204.60: Percentage distribution of students 6 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by educational environment and type of disability: Selected years, fall 1989 through fall 2011. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Digest of Education Statistics (2015th ed.). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_204.60.asp.
*Volkert, V. M., Lerman, D. C., Trosclair, N., Addison, L., & Kodak, T. (2008). An exploratory analysis of task-interspersal procedures while teaching object labels to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 335–350. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-335.
Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., …, Schultz, T. R. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
- A Meta-Analysis of Single-Subject Research on Behavioral Momentum to Enhance Success in Students with Autism
Richard J. Cowan
- Springer US