Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The wide range of tools and methods developed for measuring and valuing health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluations are appropriate for use in most populations. However, for certain populations, specific tools may need to be developed to reflect the particular needs of that population. Patients without capacity—particularly patients with severe dementia—are such a population. At present, the tools available to economists for measuring and valuing quality of life in these patients lack validity. Here, we seek to understand the framework within which common instruments have been developed, critique these instruments with respect to patients with severely restricted capacity and to develop a new way of thinking about how to value health-related quality of life in such patients.
In this essay, we describe and critique the conceptual framework by which common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life have been developed.
We show that current common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life in general populations are not appropriate for populations with severely restricted capacity.
We propose a new framework for thinking about quality of life in this population, based on notions of observable person-centred outcomes and utility derived from processes of care.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Briggs, Andrew, Calxton, Karl, & Sculpher, Mark. (1). Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drummond, Michael F. (2005). MJSGWTBJOaGLS: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reisberg, B., Sclan, S. G., Franssen, E., Kluger, A., & Ferris, S. (1994). Dementia staging in chronic care populations. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8(Suppl 1), S188–S205. PubMed
Coast J, Lavender S. (2009). An exploration of the economics of end of life care; Health Economists Study Group, Winter 2009.
Round, J. (2012). Is a QALY still a QALY at the end of life? Journal of Health Economics, 31(3), 21–52.
Edlin, R., McCabe, C., Round, J., Wright, J., Claxton, K., Sculpher, M., & Cookson, R. (2013). Understanding Harris’ understanding of CEA: Is cost effective resource allocation undone? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 18(1), 34–39.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health Measurement Scales (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2007). Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation (ed) (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Selai, C., Trimble, M. R., Rosser, M. N., & Harvey, R. J. (2012). Assessing quality of life in dementia: Preliminary psychometric testing of the Quality of Life Assessment Schedule (QOLAS). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11, 219–243. CrossRef
Dolan P, R Layard, R Metcalfe (2011) Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures.
Stiglitz J, A Sen, JP Fitoussi (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.
Weiner, M. F., Martin-Cook, K., Svetlik, D. A., Saine, K., Foster, B., & Fontaine, C. S. (2000). The quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 1, 114–116. PubMed
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (2002). Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 510–519. PubMed
Barton, G. R., Sach, T. H., Jenkinson, C., Avery, A. J., Doherty, M., & Muir, K. R. (2008). Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores? Health Quality Life Outcomes, 6, 51. CrossRef
Lawton, M. P. (1997). Assessing quality of life in Alzheimer disease research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11(Suppl 6), 91–99. PubMed
Cooper C, Mukadam N, Katona C, Lyketsos CG, Blazer D, Ames D, Rabins P, Brodaty H, de Mendonca LC, Livingston G (2012) Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Interventions to Improve Quality of Life and Well-being in People With Dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry.
Brennan V, S Dixon (2012) A literature review for empirical studies of process utility; ISPOR 17th Annual Internation Meeting.
Jones L, Harrington J, Scott S, Davis S, Lord K, Vickerstaff V, Round J, Candy B, Sampson EL (2012) CoMPASs: IOn programme (Care Of Memory Problems in Advanced Stages of dementia: Improving Our Knowledge): protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2.
Jie, W., Weiss, David J., & Edwards, Ward. (2010). A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions. Theory and Decision, 68, 101–114. CrossRef
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (1999). And the ABC research group: Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
- A framework for understanding quality of life in individuals without capacity
Elizabeth L. Sampson
- Springer International Publishing