Skip to main content
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
ZOEKEN
MENU 1 2 3 4
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2015

01-01-2015

A cross-cultural study to assess measurement invariance of the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire across Serbian and Iranian children and adolescents

Auteurs: Dejan Stevanovic, Peyman Jafari

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The KIDSCREEN questionnaire for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessments in children and adolescents was simultaneously developed across 13 European countries, and it was subsequently translated and culturally adapted to over 30 different languages across the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement equivalence of the KIDSCREEN-27 across Serbian and Iranian children and adolescents.

Methods

The items in the KIDSCREEN-27 were analyzed for differential item functioning (DIF) across Iranian and Serbian populations using ordinal logistic regression with three different criteria. The sample included 330 Iranian and 329 Serbian children and adolescents and 330 and 314 of their parents, respectively.

Results

Across the two samples, DIF was detected in 16 (59 %) of 27 items in the child self-reports and in 20 (74 %) of 27 items in the parent/proxy report. However, using alternative criteria based on magnitude detected for DIF, only three items in the parent/proxy report showed significant DIF.

Conclusion

Our study provided more evidence that the KIDSCREEN-27 possesses DIF items across different cultures, but their impact is probably small, and the questionnaire could be used for cross-cultural HRQOL comparisons.
vorige artikel The associations among hand dexterity, functional performance, and quality of life in diabetic patients with neuropathic hand from objective- and patient-perceived measurements
volgende artikel Validation of a pediatric oral health-related quality of life scale in Navajo children
Literatuur
1.
Sartorius, N., & Kuyken, W. (1994). Translation of health status instruments. In J. Orley & W. Kuyken (Eds.), Quality of life assessment: International perspectives. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
2.
Bullinger, M. (1997). The challenge of cross-cultural quality of life assessment. Psychology and Health, 12(6), 815–825. CrossRef
3.
Stewart, A. L., & Napoles-Springer, A. (2000). Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Medical care,  38(9), II102–II124.
4.
Bullinger, M. (2004). The Challenge of cross-cultural quality of life assessment. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Researching Well-being in Developing Countries, Delmenhorst, Germany, 2–4th July 2004.
5.
Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1998). A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Quality of Life Research, 7(4), 323–335. PubMedCrossRef
6.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 737–756. PubMedCrossRef
7.
Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155–175. CrossRef
8.
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. PubMedCrossRef
9.
Acquadro, C., Conway, K., Hareendran, A., & Aaronson, N. (2008). Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value in Health, 11(3), 509–521. PubMedCrossRef
10.
Bullinger, M., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Leplège, A., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., et al. (1998). Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 913–923. PubMedCrossRef
11.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., & the European KIDSCREEN Group. (2006). The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires–Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents—Handbook. Lengerich: Papst Science Publisher.
12.
Baars, R. M., Atherton, C. I., Koopman, H. M., Bullinger, M., & Power, M. (2005). The European DISABKIDS project: Development of seven condition-specific modules to measure health related quality of life in children and adolescents. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 3, 70. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Wetzel, R., Nickel, J., & Bullinger, M. (2006). Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: Methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics, 24, 1120–1199. CrossRef
14.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Power, M., et al. (2008). The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Value in Health, 11, 645–658. PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Auquier, P., Bruil, J., et al. (2010). Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life and Research, 19, 1487–1500. CrossRef
16.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Auquier, P., Erhart, M., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bruil, J., et al. (2007). The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Quality of Life and Research, 16, 1347–1356. CrossRef
17.
Robitail, S., Simeoni, M. C., Erhart, M., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Bruil, J., Auquier, P., et al. (2006). Validation of the European proxy KIDSCREEN-52 pilot test health-related quality of life questionnaire: First results. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(596), e1–10. PubMed
18.
Robitail, S., Simeoni, M. C., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Bruil, J., Auquier, P., & the KIDSCREEN Group. (2007). Children proxies’ quality-of-life agreement depended on the country using the European KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 469–478. PubMedCrossRef
19.
Robitail, S., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Simeoni, M. C., Rajmi, l L., Bruil, J., Power, M., et al. (2007). Testing the structural and cross-cultural validity of the KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire. Quality of Life and Research, 16, 1335–1345. CrossRef
20.
Erhart, M., Ottova, V., Gaspar, T., Jericek, H., Schnohr, C., Alikasifoglu, M., et al. (2009). Measuring mental health and well-being of school-children in 15 European countries using the KIDSCREEN-10 Index. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 160–166. PubMedCrossRef
21.
Stevanovic, D., Tadic, I., Novakovic, T., Kisic-Tepavcevic, D., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2013). Evaluating the Serbian version of the KIDSCREEN quality-of-life questionnaires: Reliability, validity, and agreement between children’s and parents’ ratings. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1–9.
22.
Jafari, P., Bagheri, Z., & Safe, M. (2012). Item and response-category functioning of the Persian version of the KIDSCREEN-27: Rasch partial credit model. Health and quality of life outcomes, 10(1), 127. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., et al. (2009). A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(3), 288–295. PubMedCrossRef
24.
Clark, P. C., & LaHuis, D. M. (2011). An examination of power and type I errors for two differential item functioning indices using the graded response model. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 229–246. CrossRef
25.
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(4), 361–370. CrossRef
26.
Crane, P. K., van Belle, G., & Larson, E. B. (2004). Test bias in a cognitive test: Differential item functioning in the CASI. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 241–256. PubMedCrossRef
27.
Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., et al. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life and Research, 16, 69–84. CrossRef
28.
Crane, P. K., Hart, D. L., Gibbons, L. E., & Cook, K. F. (2006). A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 478–484. PubMedCrossRef
29.
Gelin, M. N., & Zumbo, B. D. (2003). Differential item functioning results may change depending on how an item is scored: An illustration with Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 65–74. CrossRef
30.
31.
Michel, G., Bisegger, C., Fuhr, D. C., & Abel, T. (2009). Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1147–1157. PubMedCrossRef
32.
Erhart, M., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Hagquist, C., Robitail, S., & van Buuren, S. (2006). Does correcting for differential item functioning (DIF) using two different techniques enhances the validity and diagnostic quality of adolescents HRQoL test scores? Quality of Life Research, 15, A113–A114.
33.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 859–883. PubMedCrossRef
34.
Roessner, V., Becker, A., Rothenberger, A., Rohde, L. A., & Banaschewski, T. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison between samples of Brazilian and German children with ADHD/HD using the child behavior checklist. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 257, 352–359. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
A cross-cultural study to assess measurement invariance of the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire across Serbian and Iranian children and adolescents
Auteurs
Dejan Stevanovic
Peyman Jafari
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0754-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2015

Quality of Life Research 1/2015 Naar de uitgave

Quantitative Methods Special Section

Quantifying ‘problematic’ DIF within an IRT framework: application to a cancer stigma index

Quantitative Methods Special Section

Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments

OriginalPaper

A qualitative study to develop a patient-reported outcome for dysmenorrhea

OriginalPaper

Validation of a pediatric oral health-related quality of life scale in Navajo children

Quantitative Methods Special Section

Time to health-related quality of life score deterioration as a modality of longitudinal analysis for health-related quality of life studies in oncology: do we need RECIST for quality of life to achieve standardization?

Quantitative Methods Special Section

The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire revisited: a psychometric evaluation