Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
1 Implementatie van verbeteringen in de zorg: een complex probleem hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

8 Beïnvloedende factoren bij implementatie

Auteurs : prof.dr. Michel Wensing, dr. Marije Bosch, prof.dr. Richard Grol

Gepubliceerd in: Implementatie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

  • Uiteenlopende factoren kunnen het verloop van een implementatieproces beïnvloeden en de werking van een implementatiestrategie versterken of verzwakken. Het verkrijgen van inzicht in beïnvloedende factoren bij implementatie is een belangrijk onderdeel van de implementatie van innovaties.
  • De factoren kunnen betrekking hebben op individuen (cognities, motivaties, routines), sociale omgeving (teams en netwerken), organisaties (structuur, cultuur, en beschikbare middelen) en de maatschappelijke omgeving (professionalisering, financiële prikkels, wet- en regelgeving).
  • Van weinig factoren is direct aangetoond dat zij de implementatie van nieuwe werkwijzen in de patiëntenzorg beïnvloeden, zodat voorzichtigheid bij de inschatting van het belang van factoren op zijn plaats is.
vorige hoofdstuk 7 Kwaliteit en veiligheid in de zorg: de rol van indicatoren
volgende hoofdstuk 9 Methoden om invoeringsproblemen op te sporen
Literatuur
Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change: barriers and incentives to achieving evidence based practice. MJA 2004;180:S57-60.PubMed
Achterberg T van, Holleman G, Ven M van de, et al. Promoting evidence-based practice: the roles and activities of professional nurses’ associations. J Adv Nurs 2006;53(5):605-12.CrossRefPubMed
Allen GM, Lexchin J, Wiebe N. Physician awareness of drug costs: a systematic review. PLOS Medicine 2007;4:1486-96.
Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001;40:471-99.CrossRefPubMed
Ayanian JZ, Berwick DM. Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited. Med Decis Making 1991;11:154-8.CrossRefPubMed
Bokhoven MA van, Pleunis-van Empel MCH, Koch H, et al. Why do patients want their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bosch M, Faber M, Cruijsberg J, et al. Effectiveness of patient care teams and the role of clinical expertise and coordination: a literature review. Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:S5-S35.CrossRef
Bosch M, Dijkstra R, Wensing, et al. Organizational culture, team climate and diabetes care in small office-based practices. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Au J, et al. Improving mortality of coronary surgery over the first four years of independent practice: retrospective examination of prospectively collected data from 15 surgeons. BMJ 2004;329:421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bruers JJM, Felling AJA, Truin GJ, et al. Patient orientation and professional orientation of Dutch dentists. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:115-24.CrossRefPubMed
Camp K van de, Vernooij-Dassen MJFJ, Grol RPTM, Bottema BJAM. How to conceptualize professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Teach 2004;26:696-702.CrossRef
Cockburn J, Pit S. Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients’ expectations and doctors’ perceptions of patients’ expectations - a questionnaire study. BMJ 1997;315:520-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Davis SA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence. A systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1094-1102.CrossRefPubMed
Dijkstra RF, Braspenning JCC, Uiters E, et al. Perceived barriers to the implementation of diabetes guidelines in hospitals in The Netherlands. Neth J Med 2000;56:80-5.CrossRefPubMed
Dijkstra R, Braspenning JCC, Huijsmans Z, et al. Patients and nurses determine variation in adherence to guidelines at Dutch hospitals more than internists or settings. Diabet Med 2004;21:586-91.CrossRefPubMed
Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:107-12.CrossRefPubMed
Epstein AM, Lee TH, Hamel MB. Paying physicians for high-quality care. N Engl J Med 2004;350:406-10.CrossRefPubMed
Escher M, Perneger TV, Chevrolet JC. National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors’ decisions about admission to intensive care. BMJ 2004;329:425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Gandjour A, Bannenberg A, Lauterbach KW. Threshold volumes associated with higher survival in health care: a systematic review. Med Care 2003;41(10):1129-41.CrossRefPubMed
Geertsma RH, Parker RC, Krauss S. How physicians view the process of change in their practice behaviour. J Med Educ 1982;57:752-61.PubMed
Glassman PA, Kravitz RL, Petersen LP, et al. Differences in clinical decision making between internists and cardiologists. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:506-12.CrossRefPubMed
Gosden T, Torgerson DJ. The effect of fundholding on prescribing and referral costs: a review of the evidence. Health Policy 1997;40:103-14.CrossRefPubMed
Greer AL. The state of the art versus the state of the science. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1988;4:5-26.CrossRefPubMed
Grol R, Wensing M. Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners’ perceived obstacles and requirements. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:548-52.PubMedPubMedCentral
Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving a evidence-based practice. MJA 2004;180:S57-S60.PubMed
Grol R, Buchan H. Clinical guidelines: what can we do to increase their use? MJA 2006;185(6):301-2.PubMed
Grol R, Weel C van. Getting a grip on guidelines: how to make them more relevant for practice. Br J Gen Pract 2009;59(562):e143-4.CrossRef
Halm EA, Teirstein AS. Clinical practice. Management of community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2002;347(25):2039-45.CrossRefPubMed
Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, et al. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997;156(12):1715-23.PubMedPubMedCentral
Hillman BJ, Joseph CA, Marry MR, et al. Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1604-8.CrossRefPubMed
Hong SW, Ching TY, Fung JPM, et al. The employment of ward opinion leaders for continuing education in the hospital. Med Teacher 1990;23:209-17.CrossRef
Hooi J, Weijden T van der, Grol R. Aanbevelingen voor de implementatie van de “richtlijn beroerte 2000”. Rapport van de werkgroep Implementatie, CBO Richtlijn Beroerte 2000. Maastricht: WOK, 2000.
Hulscher ME, Grol RP, Meer JW van der. Antibiotic prescribing in hospitals: a social and behavioural scientific approach. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10(3):167-75.CrossRefPubMed
Jackevicius CA, Tu JV, Demers V, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes after a change in prescription policy for clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1802-10.CrossRefPubMed
Kitchener M, Caronna CA, Shortell SM. From the doctor’s workshop to the iron cage? Evolving modes of physician control in US health systems. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1311-22.CrossRefPubMed
Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, et al. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q 2003;81:221-48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Moynihan R, Paulsen EJ. Evidence-informed health policy I – Synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci 2008;3:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D, et al. The business case for quality: case studies an an analysis. Health Affairs 2003;22:17-30.CrossRefPubMed
Lomas J, Enkin M, Andersson GM, et al. Opinion leaders versus audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean arthritis. JAMA 1991;265:2202-7.CrossRefPubMed
Loo R. Assessing ‘team climate’ in project teams. Int J Project Manag 2003;21:511-7.CrossRef
Mannion R, Davies HTO, Marshall MN. Cultural characteristics of “high” and “low” performing hospitals. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2005;19:431-9.CrossRefPubMed
Montano DE, Phillips WR. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Pub Health 1995;85:795-800.CrossRef
Ouimet M, Landry R, Amara N, Belkhodja O. What factors induce health care decision-makers to use clinical guidelines? Evidence from provincial health ministries, regional authorities and hospitals in Canada. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:964-76.CrossRefPubMed
Papanikolauou PN, Christidi GD, Ioannidis JPA. Patient outcomes with teaching versus nonteaching healthcare: a systematic review. PLOS Medicine 2006;3:1603-15.
Park W. A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationship among variables of the groupthink model. J Organiz Behav 2000;21:873-87.CrossRef
Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, et al. The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care 1996;34:873-89.CrossRefPubMed
Pham HH, Landon BE, Reschovsky JD, Wu B, Schrag D. Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:972-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon & Schuster Ltd, 2003.
Rosser W. Using the perception-reality gap to alter prescribing patterns. J Med Educ 1983;58:728-32.PubMed
Raad voor de Volksgezondheid & Zorg. Professionals in de gezondheidszorg. Zoetermeer, 2000.
Salisbury C, Bosanquet N, Wilkinson E, et al. The implementation of evidence-based medicine in general practice prescribing. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:1849-51.PubMedPubMedCentral
Schutte K, Yano EM, Kilbourne AM, Wickrame B, Kirschner JE, Humphreys K. Organizational contexts of primary care approaches for managing problem drinking. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2009;36:435-45.CrossRefPubMed
Scott A. Agency, incentives and the behaviour of general practitioners: the relevance of principal agent theory in designing incentives for GPs in the UK. Aberdeen: Departments of Public Health and Economics, Aberdeen University, 1997.
Shaw B, Cheater F, Baker R, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome idenfied barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Library 2005.
Sheaff R, Smith K, Dickson M. Is GP restratification beginning in England? Social Policy & Administration 2002;36:765-79.CrossRef
Steenkiste B van, Weijden T van der, Stoffers H, Grol R. Barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk tables in routine general practice. Scan J Prim Health Care 2004;22(1):32-7.CrossRef
Steenkiste B van, Weijden T van der, Stoffers H, Kester A, Timmermans DR, Grol R. Improving cardiovascular risk management: a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a decision support tool for patients and physicians. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14(1):44-50.CrossRefPubMed
Steenkiste BC van, Weijden T van der, Stoffers JHEH, Grol RPTM. Patients’ responsiveness to a decision support tool for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in primary care. Patient Educ Couns 2008;72:63-70.CrossRefPubMed
Stross JK. The educationally influential physician. J Cont Educ Health Prof 1996;16:167-72.CrossRef
Sutherland K, Christianson JB, Leatherman S. Impact of targeted financial incentives on personal health behaviour: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2008;65:S36-S78.CrossRef
Wensing M, Hombergh P van den, Doremalen J van, et al. General practitioners’ workload associated with practice size rather than chronic care organization. Health Policy 2009;89:124-9.CrossRefPubMed
West E, Barron DN, Dowsett J, Newton JN. Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:633-46.CrossRefPubMed
Wheelan SA, Burchill CN, Tilin F. The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care 2003;12:527-34.PubMed
Winkens R. Improving test ordering in general practice. The effects of feedback. Proefschrift. Maastricht: Maastricht University, 1994.
Winkenwerder W, Levy BD, Eisenberg JM, et al. Variation in physicians’ decision-making thresholds in management of a sexually transmitted disease. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:369-73.CrossRefPubMed
Zaat JO, Eijk JT van. General practitioners’ uncertainty, risk preferences, and use of laboratory tests. Med Care 1992;30:846-54.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
8 Beïnvloedende factoren bij implementatie
Auteurs
prof.dr. Michel Wensing
dr. Marije Bosch
prof.dr. Richard Grol
Copyright
2015
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Implementatie

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1076-0

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1077-7

Copyright: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1077-7_8