Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

6 Richtlijnen als hulpmiddel bij de verbetering van de zorg

Auteurs : dr. Jako Burgers, dr. Mirrian Smolders, dr. Hub Wollersheim, prof.dr. Richard Grol

Gepubliceerd in: Implementatie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

  • Richtlijnen zijn een van de hulpmiddelen in de vertaalslag van onderzoeksresultaten en nieuwe inzichten naar de klinische praktijk waardoor de kwaliteit van zorg kan worden verbeterd.
  • Of richtlijnen de kwaliteit van zorg daadwerkelijk verbeteren, hangt af van meerdere factoren, waaronder kenmerken van de richtlijn zelf.
  • Kenmerken van richtlijnen die kunnen bijdragen aan hun gebruik in de praktijk zijn onder andere:
    • een duidelijke doelstelling en specifieke doelgroep zijn omschreven;
    • de wetenschappelijke onderbouwing van de aanbevelingen is duidelijk beschreven en up-to-date;
    • de richtlijn sluit aan bij de opvattingen, normen en waarden van de doelgroep;
    • de formulering van de aanbevelingen is helder en voldoende specifiek;
    • de richtlijn laat ruimte voor aanpassingen gericht op de individuele patiënt;
    • de structuur van de richtlijn is helder en de lay-out is attractief;
    • de richtlijn is eenvoudig te raadplegen in de praktijk via een samenvatting, flowchart of elektronische applicaties.
  • Richtlijnen die worden ontwikkeld binnen een gestructureerd en gecoördineerd programma waarbij de doelgroep actief betrokken wordt, zijn het meest effectief.
  • Ten behoeve van de implementatie kunnen landelijke richtlijnen als basis worden gebruikt voor de ontwikkeling van afgeleide producten specifiek gericht op de verschillende beroepsgroepen en patiënten en van lokale protocollen en werkafspraken.
Literatuur
go back to reference Everdingen JJE van, Burgers JS, Assendelft WJJ, et al. (red.). Evidence-Based Richtlijnontwikkeling. Een leidraad voor de praktijk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2004. Everdingen JJE van, Burgers JS, Assendelft WJJ, et al. (red.). Evidence-Based Richtlijnontwikkeling. Een leidraad voor de praktijk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2004.
go back to reference Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg. Richtlijnen voor richtlijnen. Den Haag: Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg, 2010. Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg. Richtlijnen voor richtlijnen. Den Haag: Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg, 2010.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, January 2009. Beschikbaar op: http://www.nice.org.uk. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, January 2009. Beschikbaar op: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk.
go back to reference The AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:18-23. The AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:18-23.
go back to reference Alonso-Coello P, Irfan AB, Sola I, et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(6):e58.PubMed Alonso-Coello P, Irfan AB, Sola I, et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(6):e58.PubMed
go back to reference Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:401-6.CrossRefPubMed Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:401-6.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Boivin A, Green J, Meulen J van der, et al. Why consider patients’ preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developers. Med Care 2009;47:908-15.CrossRefPubMed Boivin A, Green J, Meulen J van der, et al. Why consider patients’ preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developers. Med Care 2009;47:908-15.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid Diseases. Implications for Pay for Performance. JAMA 2005;294:716-24.PubMed Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid Diseases. Implications for Pay for Performance. JAMA 2005;294:716-24.PubMed
go back to reference Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ 2010a:182:E472-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ 2010a:182:E472-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010b;182(18):E839-42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010b;182(18):E839-42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Buchan H. Gaps between best evidence and practice: causes for concern. MJA 2004;180:S48-S49.PubMed Buchan H. Gaps between best evidence and practice: causes for concern. MJA 2004;180:S48-S49.PubMed
go back to reference Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, et al. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diab Care 2002;25:1933-9.CrossRef Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, et al. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diab Care 2002;25:1933-9.CrossRef
go back to reference Burgers JS. Quality of clinical practice guidelines. Thesis. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University, 2002a. Burgers JS. Quality of clinical practice guidelines. Thesis. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University, 2002a.
go back to reference Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE, et al. Characteristics of high quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:148-57.CrossRefPubMed Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE, et al. Characteristics of high quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:148-57.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, et al. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care 2003a;15:31-45.CrossRefPubMed Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, et al. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care 2003a;15:31-45.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Burgers JS, Everdingen JJE van. Evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling: het EBRO-platform. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004;148:2057-9.PubMed Burgers JS, Everdingen JJE van. Evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling: het EBRO-platform. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004;148:2057-9.PubMed
go back to reference Burgers JS. Cultuur en context in richtlijnen. Huisarts Wet 2004a;47:283-7. Burgers JS. Cultuur en context in richtlijnen. Huisarts Wet 2004a;47:283-7.
go back to reference Burgers JS, Everdingen JJE van. Beyond the evidence in clinical guidelines. Lancet 2004b; 364:392-3.CrossRefPubMed Burgers JS, Everdingen JJE van. Beyond the evidence in clinical guidelines. Lancet 2004b; 364:392-3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Burgers JS, Boluyt N. De kwaliteit van CBO-richtlijnen en NHG-standaarden beoordeeld met het AGREE Instrument. Huisarts Wet 2004c;47:394-9.CrossRef Burgers JS, Boluyt N. De kwaliteit van CBO-richtlijnen en NHG-standaarden beoordeeld met het AGREE Instrument. Huisarts Wet 2004c;47:394-9.CrossRef
go back to reference Casparie AF, Everdingen JJE van, Grol RPTM, et al. Ontwikkeling en implementatie van kosteneffectieve richtlijnen. Med Contact 1998;53:88-90. Casparie AF, Everdingen JJE van, Grol RPTM, et al. Ontwikkeling en implementatie van kosteneffectieve richtlijnen. Med Contact 1998;53:88-90.
go back to reference Christiaens T, Backer D De, Burgers JS, Baerheim A. Guidelines, evidence and culture. Comparison of four European guidelines on cystitis. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004;22:141-5.CrossRefPubMed Christiaens T, Backer D De, Burgers JS, Baerheim A. Guidelines, evidence and culture. Comparison of four European guidelines on cystitis. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004;22:141-5.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cretin S. Implementing guidelines: an overview. Report. Santa Monica: RAND, 1998. Cretin S. Implementing guidelines: an overview. Report. Santa Monica: RAND, 1998.
go back to reference Durieux P, Chaix-Couturier C, Durand-Zaleski I, Ravaud P. From clinical recommendations to mandatory practice. The introduction of regulatory guidelines in the French Healthcare system. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:969-75.CrossRefPubMed Durieux P, Chaix-Couturier C, Durand-Zaleski I, Ravaud P. From clinical recommendations to mandatory practice. The introduction of regulatory guidelines in the French Healthcare system. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:969-75.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. Developing valid guidelines: methodological and procedural issus from the North of England evidence based guideline development project. Qual Health Care 1996;5:44-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. Developing valid guidelines: methodological and procedural issus from the North of England evidence based guideline development project. Qual Health Care 1996;5:44-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Eccles M, Mason J, Freemantle N. Developing valid cost effectiveness guidelines: a methodological report from the North of England evidence based guideline development project. Qual Health Care 2000;9:127-32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eccles M, Mason J, Freemantle N. Developing valid cost effectiveness guidelines: a methodological report from the North of England evidence based guideline development project. Qual Health Care 2000;9:127-32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Eisenberg JM. Globalize the evidence, localize the decision: evidence-based medicine and international diversity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:166-8.CrossRef Eisenberg JM. Globalize the evidence, localize the decision: evidence-based medicine and international diversity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:166-8.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisinger F, Geller G, Burke W, Holtzman NA. Cultural basis for differences between US and French clinical recommendations for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Lancet 1999;353:919-20.CrossRefPubMed Eisinger F, Geller G, Burke W, Holtzman NA. Cultural basis for differences between US and French clinical recommendations for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Lancet 1999;353:919-20.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Elwyn G. Shared decision making. Patient involvement in clinical practice. Thesis. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University, 2001. Elwyn G. Shared decision making. Patient involvement in clinical practice. Thesis. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University, 2001.
go back to reference Everdingen J van. Zorg over richtlijnen; invloed maatschappij op richtlijnontwikkeling in de zorg neemt toe. Med Contact 2006;61:1760-2. Everdingen J van. Zorg over richtlijnen; invloed maatschappij op richtlijnontwikkeling in de zorg neemt toe. Med Contact 2006;61:1760-2.
go back to reference Everdingen JJE van, Burgers JS Assendelft WJJ, et al. (red.). Evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling. Een leidraad voor de praktijk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2004. Everdingen JJE van, Burgers JS Assendelft WJJ, et al. (red.). Evidence-based richtlijnontwikkeling. Een leidraad voor de praktijk. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2004.
go back to reference Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh M, et al., for the ADAPTE working group. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: a review of methods and experiences. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:167-76.CrossRefPubMed Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh M, et al., for the ADAPTE working group. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: a review of methods and experiences. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:167-76.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fervers B, Burgers JS, Voellinger R, et al. Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation. Qual Saf Health Care 2011; Jan 5 [Epub ahead of print]. Fervers B, Burgers JS, Voellinger R, et al. Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation. Qual Saf Health Care 2011; Jan 5 [Epub ahead of print].
go back to reference Gevers JKM, Biesaart MCIH. Medische beslissingen, kostenoverwegingen en richtlijnen voor medisch handelen; kanttekeningen vanuit het recht. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999;143:2629-32.PubMed Gevers JKM, Biesaart MCIH. Medische beslissingen, kostenoverwegingen en richtlijnen voor medisch handelen; kanttekeningen vanuit het recht. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999;143:2629-32.PubMed
go back to reference GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490-8. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490-8.
go back to reference Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-72.CrossRef Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-72.CrossRef
go back to reference Grol RPTM, Everdingen JJE van, Casparie AF. Consensus over consensus. Een kritische beschouwing van de procedure van de CBO-consensusontwikkeling. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1990;134:1186-9.PubMed Grol RPTM, Everdingen JJE van, Casparie AF. Consensus over consensus. Een kritische beschouwing van de procedure van de CBO-consensusontwikkeling. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1990;134:1186-9.PubMed
go back to reference Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice:observational study. BMJ 1998;317:858-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice:observational study. BMJ 1998;317:858-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Grol R, Cluzeau FA, Burgers JS. Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration. Br J Cancer 2003;89(Suppl1): S4-S8.CrossRef Grol R, Cluzeau FA, Burgers JS. Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration. Br J Cancer 2003;89(Suppl1): S4-S8.CrossRef
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Hirsch J, Guyatt G. Clinical experts or methodologists to write clinical guidelines? Lancet 2009;374:273-4.CrossRef Hirsch J, Guyatt G. Clinical experts or methodologists to write clinical guidelines? Lancet 2009;374:273-4.CrossRef
go back to reference Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. An experimental study of determinants of the extent of disagreement within clinical guideline development groups. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:240-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. An experimental study of determinants of the extent of disagreement within clinical guideline development groups. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:240-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Behandelrichtlijnen en geneesmiddelenformularia vatbaar voor beïnvloeding door farmaceutische industrie. Den Haag: Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, 2009. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Behandelrichtlijnen en geneesmiddelenformularia vatbaar voor beïnvloeding door farmaceutische industrie. Den Haag: Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, 2009.
go back to reference Jacoby I. The consensus development program of the National Institutes of Health: current practices and historical perspectiveness. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1985;1:420-32.CrossRefPubMed Jacoby I. The consensus development program of the National Institutes of Health: current practices and historical perspectiveness. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1985;1:420-32.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kahn KL, Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, et al. Measuring the clinical appropriateness of the use of a procedure. Can we do it? Med Care 1988;26:415-22.CrossRefPubMed Kahn KL, Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, et al. Measuring the clinical appropriateness of the use of a procedure. Can we do it? Med Care 1988;26:415-22.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koerselman GF, Korzec A. Voorstel voor een checklist bij het afwijken van richtlijnen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:1757-9.PubMed Koerselman GF, Korzec A. Voorstel voor een checklist bij het afwijken van richtlijnen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:1757-9.PubMed
go back to reference Kort S de, Burgers JS, Willemse P, Willems D. Hidden values in formulating guidelines for palliative chemotherapeutic cancer treatments. Neth J Med 2009;67:62-8.PubMed Kort S de, Burgers JS, Willemse P, Willems D. Hidden values in formulating guidelines for palliative chemotherapeutic cancer treatments. Neth J Med 2009;67:62-8.PubMed
go back to reference Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 2008;300:436-8.CrossRefPubMed Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA 2008;300:436-8.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kraemer, Gostin LO. Science, politics, and values: the politicization of professional practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301:665-7.CrossRefPubMed Kraemer, Gostin LO. Science, politics, and values: the politicization of professional practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301:665-7.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO/Nederlandse Patiënten Consumenten Federatie (NPCF). Richtlijnontwikkeling: een praktische handleiding voor patiëntenvertegenwoordigers. Utrecht: CBO/NPCF, 2008. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO/Nederlandse Patiënten Consumenten Federatie (NPCF). Richtlijnontwikkeling: een praktische handleiding voor patiëntenvertegenwoordigers. Utrecht: CBO/NPCF, 2008.
go back to reference Lawrence M, Olesen F. Indicators of quality in health care. Eur J Gen Pract 1997;3:103-8.CrossRef Lawrence M, Olesen F. Indicators of quality in health care. Eur J Gen Pract 1997;3:103-8.CrossRef
go back to reference Légaré F, Boivin A, Weijden T van der, et al. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol. Implement Sci 2009;4:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Légaré F, Boivin A, Weijden T van der, et al. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol. Implement Sci 2009;4:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Lomatan EA, Michel G, Lin Z, Shiffman RN. How ‘should’ we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Safe Health Care 2010;19(6):509-13. Lomatan EA, Michel G, Lin Z, Shiffman RN. How ‘should’ we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Safe Health Care 2010;19(6):509-13.
go back to reference Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Westert GP. Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Qual Safe Health Care 2009;18:385-92.CrossRef Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Westert GP. Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Qual Safe Health Care 2009;18:385-92.CrossRef
go back to reference Mason J, Freemantle N, Nazareth I, et al. When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals? JAMA 2001;286:2988-92.CrossRefPubMed Mason J, Freemantle N, Nazareth I, et al. When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals? JAMA 2001;286:2988-92.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assessment 1998;2:1-88. Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assessment 1998;2:1-88.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, January 2009. Beschikbaar op: www.nice.org.uk.. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, January 2009. Beschikbaar op: www.​nice.​org.​uk.​.
go back to reference Naylor CD. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet 1995;345:940-2. Naylor CD. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet 1995;345:940-2.
go back to reference Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM. Inleiding in evidence-based medicine (3e herziene druk). Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2008.CrossRef Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM. Inleiding in evidence-based medicine (3e herziene druk). Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2008.CrossRef
go back to reference Ollenschläger G, Marshall C, Qureshi S, et al. Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes - by founding the Guidelines International Network G-I-N. Qual Safe Health Care 2004;13:455-60.CrossRef Ollenschläger G, Marshall C, Qureshi S, et al. Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes - by founding the Guidelines International Network G-I-N. Qual Safe Health Care 2004;13:455-60.CrossRef
go back to reference Pagliari C, Grimshaw J. Impact of group structure and multi-disciplinary evidence-based guideline development: observed study. J Eval Clin Pract 2002;8:145–53.CrossRefPubMed Pagliari C, Grimshaw J. Impact of group structure and multi-disciplinary evidence-based guideline development: observed study. J Eval Clin Pract 2002;8:145–53.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Raats CJ, Veenendaal H van, Versluijs MM, Burgers JS. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:413-7.CrossRefPubMed Raats CJ, Veenendaal H van, Versluijs MM, Burgers JS. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:413-7.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Raine R, Sanderson C, Hutchings A, et al. An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. Lancet 2004;364:429-37.CrossRefPubMed Raine R, Sanderson C, Hutchings A, et al. An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. Lancet 2004;364:429-37.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg. Richtlijnen voor richtlijnen. Den Haag, 2010. Rijk SHE. Duur en inefficiënt. Nieuwe richtlijn voor ICU’s is geen verbetering. Med Contact 2004;59:1734-5. Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg. Richtlijnen voor richtlijnen. Den Haag, 2010. Rijk SHE. Duur en inefficiënt. Nieuwe richtlijn voor ICU’s is geen verbetering. Med Contact 2004;59:1734-5.
go back to reference Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140: S1-S43.PubMedPubMedCentral Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140: S1-S43.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009;301:868-9.CrossRefPubMed Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009;301:868-9.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J, et al. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res 2000;34:1429-48.PubMedPubMedCentral Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J, et al. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res 2000;34:1429-48.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Smolders M, Hermens R, Wollersheim H, Grol R. Evaluatie KKCZ pilotprojecten innovatieve richtlijnontwikkeling. Nijmegen: IQ healthcare, 2009. Smolders M, Hermens R, Wollersheim H, Grol R. Evaluatie KKCZ pilotprojecten innovatieve richtlijnontwikkeling. Nijmegen: IQ healthcare, 2009.
go back to reference Starfield B. Quality of Care Research. Internal elegance and external relevance. JAMA 1998;280:1006-8.PubMed Starfield B. Quality of Care Research. Internal elegance and external relevance. JAMA 1998;280:1006-8.PubMed
go back to reference Stoevelaar HJ, McDonnell J, Beek C van de, Casparie AF. Passende behandeling bij benigne prostaathyperplasie: verfijning van de indicatiestelling door systematische analyse van klinische expertise. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999;143:2425-9.PubMed Stoevelaar HJ, McDonnell J, Beek C van de, Casparie AF. Passende behandeling bij benigne prostaathyperplasie: verfijning van de indicatiestelling door systematische analyse van klinische expertise. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999;143:2425-9.PubMed
go back to reference Stone TT, Schweikhart SB, Mantese A, Sonnad SS. Guideline Attribute and Implementation Preferences Among Physicians in Multiple Health Systems. Qual Manag Health Care 2005;14:177-87.CrossRefPubMed Stone TT, Schweikhart SB, Mantese A, Sonnad SS. Guideline Attribute and Implementation Preferences Among Physicians in Multiple Health Systems. Qual Manag Health Care 2005;14:177-87.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 957-63.CrossRef Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 957-63.CrossRef
go back to reference Weel C van, Schellevis FG. Comorbidity and guidelines: conflicting interests. Lancet 2006;367:550-1.CrossRefPubMed Weel C van, Schellevis FG. Comorbidity and guidelines: conflicting interests. Lancet 2006;367:550-1.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wennekes L, Hermens RP, Heumen K van, et al. Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines. Breast 2008;17:464-71.CrossRefPubMed Wennekes L, Hermens RP, Heumen K van, et al. Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines. Breast 2008;17:464-71.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wersch A van, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Qual Health Care 2001;10(1):10-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wersch A van, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Qual Health Care 2001;10(1):10-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Westert G. Variatie in prestatie. De kwaliteit van de gezondheidszorg aan bod [inaugurele rede]. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2006. Westert G. Variatie in prestatie. De kwaliteit van de gezondheidszorg aan bod [inaugurele rede]. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2006.
go back to reference Wiersma Tj, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Preventie van osteoporose. Voorlopig te broos voor een NHG-standaard. Huisarts Wet 1992;35:428-9. Wiersma Tj, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Preventie van osteoporose. Voorlopig te broos voor een NHG-standaard. Huisarts Wet 1992;35:428-9.
go back to reference Wollersheim H, Burgers J, Grol R. Clinical guidelines to improve patient care. Neth J Med 2005;63(6):188-92.PubMed Wollersheim H, Burgers J, Grol R. Clinical guidelines to improve patient care. Neth J Med 2005;63(6):188-92.PubMed
go back to reference Wollersheim H. Beyond the evidence of guidelines. Neth J Med 2009;67:39-40.PubMed Wollersheim H. Beyond the evidence of guidelines. Neth J Med 2009;67:39-40.PubMed
go back to reference Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Int Med 1990;150:1811-8.CrossRef Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Int Med 1990;150:1811-8.CrossRef
go back to reference Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on an patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ 1997;156:1705-12.PubMedPubMedCentral Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on an patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ 1997;156:1705-12.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
6 Richtlijnen als hulpmiddel bij de verbetering van de zorg
Auteurs
dr. Jako Burgers
dr. Mirrian Smolders
dr. Hub Wollersheim
prof.dr. Richard Grol
Copyright
2015
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1077-7_6