Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
1 Werkwijze binnen de kinderfysiotherapie hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

6 Meetinstrumenten

A Voor de motorische ontwikkeling van kinderen

Auteurs : Marina M. Schoemaker, Marjolijn Ketelaar, H. A. Reinders-Messelink

Gepubliceerd in: Kinderfysiotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Informatie over het functioneren van kinderen kan op verschillende niveaus van het ICF-CY-model verkregen worden. In dit deel van hoofdstuk 6 wordt besproken welke instrumenten beschikbaar zijn om het functioneren van kinderen op lichaamsfunctie-, activiteiten- en participatieniveau in kaart te kunnen brengen. Sommige instrumenten meten duidelijk één concept op één bepaald niveau, andere instrumenten meten het functioneren in termen van meerdere concepten op meerdere niveaus (zie tabel 6.2 voor een overzicht van de instrumenten en het ICFCY-niveau dat zij beogen te meten). In hoofdstuk 6B wordt een overzicht gegeven van instrumenten die inzicht geven in de kwaliteit van leven van kinderen.
vorige hoofdstuk 5 Pedagogisch perspectief in de kinderfysiotherapie
volgende hoofdstuk 6 Meetinstrumenten
Literatuur
Wit J de, Tak JA. Theoretische achtergronden van klinische diagnostiek. In: Kievit T, Wit J de, Groenendaal JHA, Tak JA, red. Psychodiagnostiek voor de hulpverlening aan kinderen. Amersfoort: Acco, 1988.
Smits-Engelsman BCM. Het gebruik van motorische tests: praktijk en theorie. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother. 1995;105:130-6.
Maloney MP, Ward MP. Psychological assessment. A conceptual approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
Laszlo JI, Bairstow PJ. Perceptual-motor behaviour. Developmental assessment and therapy. New York: Praeger, 1985.
Netelenbos JB. Motorische ontwikkeling van kinderen. Handboek 1: Introductie. Amsterdam: Boom, 1998.
Burton AW, Miller DE. Movement skill assessment. Leeds: Human Kinetics, 1998.
Galahue DL, Ozmun JC. Understanding motor development. Maddison: Brown & Benchmark, 1989.
Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research. Tokyo: Holt Saunders, 1976.
Terwee CB, de Vet HCW, Scholten RJPM. Klinimetrie. In: Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, red. Evidence-based medicine. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2008. p. 134-49.
World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Genève: WHO, 2001.
Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP, eds. Spasticity: disordered motor control. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1980. p. 485-95.
Scholtes VAB, Becher JG, Beelen A, Lankhorst GJ. Clinical assessment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a critical review of available instruments. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:64-73.PubMedCrossRef
Haugh AB, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR. A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:899-907.PubMedCrossRef
Gracies JM, Burke K, Clegg NJ, et al. Reliability of the Tardieu Scale for assessing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:421-8.PubMedCrossRef
Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, et al. Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:664-70.PubMedCrossRef
Yam WKL, Leung MSM. Interrater reliability of modified Ashworth scale and modified Tardieu scale in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2006;21:1031-5.PubMedCrossRef
Numanoglu A, Günel MK. Intraobserver reliability of modified Ashworth scale and modified Tardieu Scale in the assessment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46:196-200.PubMedCrossRef
Kelly B, MacKay-Lyons MJ, Berryman S, et al. Assessment protocol for serial casting after botulinum toxin A injections to treat equines gait. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008;20:233-41.PubMedCrossRef
McKay AH, Walt SE, Lobb G, Stott NS. Intraobserver reliability of the modified Tardieu scale in the upper limb of children with hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:267-72.CrossRef
Alhusaini AA, Dean CM, Crosbie J, et al. Evaluation of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy using Ashworth and Tardieu Scales compared with laboratory measures. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:1242-7.PubMedCrossRef
Empelen R van. Tonusonderzoek bij kinderen, 2de dr. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2007.CrossRef
Pol RJ van de, Trijffel E van, Lucas C. Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2012;56:7-17.
Trijffel E van, Pol RJ van de, Oostendorp RAB, Lucas C. Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2012;56:223-35.CrossRef
Becher J, Doorenbosch C, Folmer K, et al.; Centrum voor Kinderrevalidatiegeneeskunde. Handleiding standaard lichamelijk onderzoek bij kinderen met een cerebrale motorische parese. Amsterdam: Reed Business, 2011.
Aylward GP, Verhulst SJ. Predictive utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) risk status classifications: clinical interpretation and application. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:25-31.PubMedCrossRef
Council on Children With Disabilities. Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, and Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006;118:405-20.CrossRef
Gucuyener K, Ergenekon E, Soysal AS, et al. Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener with premature infants. Brain Dev. 2006;28:104-8.PubMedCrossRef
Leonard CH, Piecuch RE, Cooper BA. Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener with low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001;26:33-40.PubMedCrossRef
Hess CR, Papas MA, Black MM. Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener with an environmental risk group. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29:321-30.PubMedCrossRef
Dunn W. Sensory Profile-NL: Handleiding. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers, 2006.
Dunn W. Sensory Profile user’s manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, 1999.
Ermer J. Dunn W. The Sensory Profile: A discriminant analysis of children with and without disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:283-90.PubMedCrossRef
Tomchek SD, Dunn W. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the Short Sensory Profile. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:190-200.PubMedCrossRef
Brown T, Leo M, Austin DW. Discriminant validity of the Sensory Profile in Australian children with autism spectrum disorder. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28:253-66.PubMedCrossRef
Dunn W. Infant/toddler Sensory Profile users’ manual. San Antonio: Pearson Education, 2002.
Hadders-Algra M. The neurological examination of the child with minor neurological dysfunction, 3rd ed. Clin Dev Med. Londen: Mac Keith, 2010.
Peters LHJ, Maathuis KGB, Kouw E, et al. Test-retest, inter-assessor and intra-assessor reliability of the Touwen examination. Eur J Pediatr Neurol. 2008;12:328-33.CrossRef
Peters LHJ, Maathuis, CGB, Hadders-Algra M. Limited motor performance and minor neurological dysfunction at school age. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:271-8.PubMedCrossRef
Hadders-Algra M. Two distinct forms of minor neurological dysfunction: perspectives emerging from a review of data of the Groningen Perinatal Project. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:561-71.PubMedCrossRef
Batstra L, Neeleman J, Hadders-Algra M. The neurology of learning and behavioural problems in pre-adolescent children. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;108:92- 100.PubMedCrossRef
Kikkert HK, Jong C de, Hadders-Algra M. Minor neurological dysfunction and cognition in 9-year-olds born at term. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89:263-70.PubMedCrossRef
Bourke-Taylor H. Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function: Construct validity and correlation with the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:92-6.PubMedCrossRef
Klingels K, Cock P de, Desloovere K, et al. Comparison of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test in hemiplegic CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:904-9.PubMedCrossRef
Gilmore R, Sakzewski L, Boyd R. Upper limb activity measures for 5- to 16-year-old children with congenital hemiplegia: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:14-21.PubMedCrossRef
Randall MJ, Johnson LM, Reddihough DS. The Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Melbourne: Royal Children’s Hospital, 1999.
Randall M, Carlin J, Chondros P, Reddihough D. Reliability of the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:761-7.PubMedCrossRef
Heineman KR, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M. The Infant Motor Profile: a standardized and qualitative method to assess motor behaviour in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:275-82.PubMedCrossRef
Heineman KR, La Bastide-van Gemert S, Fidler V, et al. Construct validity of the Infant Motor Profile: relation with prenatal, perinatal and neonatal risk factors. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:e209-15.PubMedCrossRef
Heineman KR, Middelburg KJ, Hadders-Algra M. Development of adaptive motor behaviour in typically developing infants. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:618-24.PubMedCrossRef
Heineman KR, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M. Infant Motor Profile and cerebral palsy: promising associations. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(suppl 4):40-5.PubMedCrossRef
Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Osten ET, et al. Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance. Phys Ther. 1995;75:585-96.PubMed
Nuijsink J. Asymmetry and infants born preterm [thesis]. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2012.
Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the test of infant motor performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:263-72.PubMedCrossRef
Heineman KR, Hadders-Algra MD. Evaluation of neuromotor function in infancy – A systematic review of available methods. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29:315-23.PubMedCrossRef
Noble Y, Boyd R. Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:129-39.PubMedCrossRef
Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:254-66.PubMedCrossRef
Kim SA, Lee YJ, Lee YG. Predictive value of Test of Infant Motor Performance for infants based on correlation between TIMP and Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35:860-6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Beery KE, Beery NA. The Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration: administration, scoring, and teaching manual, 7th ed. Bloomington: NCS Pearson, 2010.
Beery KE. The Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, 4th edition with supplemental developmental tests of visual-motor integration and motor coordination: administration, scoring and teaching manual. Parsippany: Modern Curriculum Press, 1997.
Chinner A, Brown T, Stagnitti K. The reliability of two visual motor integration tests used with children. J Occup Ther Schools Early Interv. 2011;4:129-40.CrossRef
Brown T, Unsworth C, Lyons C. An evaluation of the construct validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration using the Rasch Measurement Model. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56:393-402.PubMedCrossRef
Hammill DD, Pearson NA, Voress JK, Reynolds CR. Full range test of Visual Motor Integration: examiner’s manual. Austin: Pro-Ed, 2006.
Brown T, Chinner A, Stagnitti K. Convergent validity of two visual motor integration tests. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:295-303.CrossRef
Goyen TA, Duff S. Discriminant validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration in relation to children with handwriting dysfunction. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52:109-15.CrossRef
Brouwer-de Jong EA, Burgmeijer RJF, Laurent de Angulo MS. Ontwikkelingsonderzoek op het consultatiebureau. Handboek bij het vernieuwde Van Wiechenonderzoek. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1996.
Jacobusse GW, Buuren S van, Verkerk PH. Ontwikkeling van de D-score; een samenvattende maat voor het Van Wiechenonderzoek. Tijdschr JGZ. 2008;40:11-4.
Hafkamp-de Groen E, Dusseldorp E, Boere-Boonekamp MM, et al. Relatie tussen het Van Wiechenonderzoek (D-score) op 2 jaar en het intelligentieniveau op 5 jaar. Tijdschr JGZ. 2009;41:10-4.
Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994.
Bartlett DJ, Fanning JE. Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to characterize the motor development of infants born preterm at eight months corrected age. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;23:31-45.PubMedCrossRef
Pin TW, Valle K de, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric properties of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22:278-286.PubMedCrossRef
Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:254-66.PubMedCrossRef
Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MJ. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:485-91.PubMedCrossRef
Haastert IC van, Vries LS de, Helders PJ, Jongmans MJ. Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. J Pediatr. 2006;149:617-22.PubMedCrossRef
Bayley N. Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, 1993.
Bayley N. Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1969.
Meulen BF van der, Smrkovsky M. Bayley ontwikkelingsschalen. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1983.
Tieman BL, Palisano RJ, Sutlive AC. Assessment of motor development and function in preschool children. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:189-96.PubMedCrossRef
Meulen BF van der, Ruiter SAJ, Lutje Spelberg HCL, Smrkovsky M. Bayley Scales of Infant Development-second edition; Nederlandse versie. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers, 2002.
Ruiter SAJ, Lutje Spelberg HCL, Meulen BF van der. Bayley Scales of Infant Development-second edition; Nederlandse versie. Deel II: Normering en psychometrische kenmerken. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers, 2005.
Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, 3rd ed. San Antonio: Pearson Education, 2006.
Graham HK, Harvey A, Rodda J, et al. The functional mobility scale (FMS). J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24:514-20.PubMedCrossRef
Harvey A, Graham HK, Morris ME, et al. The functional mobility scale: Ability to detect change following single event multilevel surgery. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:603-7.PubMedCrossRef
Harvey A, Robin J, Morris ME, et al. A systematic review of measures of activity limitation for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:190-8.PubMedCrossRef
Harvey A, Rosenbaum P, Hanna S, et al. Longitudinal changes in mobility following single-event multilevel surgery in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44;137-43.PubMedCrossRef
Harvey AR, Morris ME, Graham HK, et al. Reliability of the functional mobility scale for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010;30:139-49.PubMedCrossRef
Russell D, Rosenbaum PL, Gowland C, et al. Manual for the Gross Motor Function Measure. Hamilton: McMaster University, 1993.
Kruijsen A, Schie PEM van, Verschuren O, et al. Actuele ontwikkelingen rondom de GMFM, GMFCS en motorische ontwikkelingscurven voor kinderen en jongeren met cerebrale parese. In: Calders P, Geraets JJXR, Nijs J, et al. red. Jaarboek fysiotherapie/kinesitherapie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2012. p. 279-93.
Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, et al. The gross motor function measure: A means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;31;341-52.PubMedCrossRef
Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Avery LM, Lane M. Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 & GMFM-88) user’s manual. Clin Dev Med159. Londen: Mac Keith, 2002.
Russell DJ, Avery LM, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Improved scaling of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy: Evidence of reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:873-85.PubMed
Russell DJ, Avery LM, Walter SD, et al. Development and validation of item sets to improve efficiency of administration of the 66-item gross motor function measure in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:e48-54.PubMedCrossRef
Ketelaar M, Schie P van, Gorter JW, et al. Actuele ontwikkelingen in de Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Ned Tijdschr Kinderfysiother. 2003;15:5-7.
Ketelaar M, Petegem-van Beek E van, Veenhof C, et al. Gross Motor Function Measure: Nederlandse handleiding. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, 1999.
Petegem-van Beek E van, Veenhof C, Ketelaar M, Vermeer A. Onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid van de Nederlandse versie van de Gross Motor Funstion Measure (GMFM). Bewegen Hulpverlening. 1998;15:292-302.
Veenhof C, Ketelaar M, Petegem-van Beek E van, Vermeer A. De Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM): Een onderzoek naar de responsiviteit van de Nederlandse vertaling. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother. 2003;113:36-41.
Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:214-23.PubMedCrossRef
Palisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:424-8.PubMedCrossRef
Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: A study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:292-6.PubMedCrossRef
Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:744-50.PubMedCrossRef
Morris C, Galuppi BE, Rosenbaum PL. Reliability of family report for the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:455-60.PubMedCrossRef
Gorter JW, Ketelaar M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Use of the GMFCS in infants with CP: The need for reclassification at age 2 years or older. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:46-52.PubMedCrossRef
Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:974-85.PubMed
Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, et al. Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy. creation of motor development curves. JAMA. 2002;288:1357-63.PubMedCrossRef
Gorter JW, Panhuis M van, Ketelaar M, Volman C. Using the Gross Motor Function Classification System: The value of short introduction compared to extended training. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44(suppl 92):45.
Gorter JW, Boonacker CWB, Ketelaar M. Meten in de praktijk: Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Ned Tijdschr Fysiother. 2005;115:116.
Smits DW, Gorter JW, Hanna SE, et al.; PERRIN Plus Study Group. Longitudinal development of gross motor function among Dutch children and young adults with cerebral palsy: An investigation of motor growth curves. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:378-84.PubMedCrossRef
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, et al. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Boston: New England Medical Center, 1992.
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Faas RM. A content validity study of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1991;3:177-84.CrossRef
Nichols DS, Case-Smith J. Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1996;8:15-24.CrossRef
Wassenberg-Severijnen JJE, Custers JW. PEDI-NL. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Nederlandse vertaling. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers, 2005.
Custers JW. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory: The Dutch adaptation [thesis]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, 2001.
Custers JW, Wassenberg-Severijnen JE, Net J van der, et al. Dutch adaptation and content validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:250-8.PubMedCrossRef
Wassenberg-Severijnen JE. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Calibrating the Dutch version [thesis]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, 2005.
Wassenberg-Severijnen JE, Custers JW, Hox JJ, et al. Reliability of the Dutch Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:457-62.PubMedCrossRef
Custers JW, Net J van der, Hijtink H, et al. Discriminative validity of the Dutch Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1437-41.PubMedCrossRef
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Dumas HM, et al. Accuracy and precision of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory computer-adaptive tests (PEDI-CAT). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:1100-6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service, 1984.
Sparrow SS, Carter AC, Cicchetti DV, et al. Vineland Screener 0-6 jaar. Leiden: PITS, 2008.
Duijn G van, Dijkxhoorn Y, Noens I, et al. Vineland screener 0-12 years research version (NL). constructing a screening instrument to assess adaptive behaviour. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18:110-7.PubMedCrossRef
Bildt A de, Kraijer D, Sytema S, Minderaa R. The psychometric properties of the vineland adaptive behavior scales in children and adolescents with mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005;35:53-62.PubMedCrossRef
Bildt AA de, Kraijer DW. Vineland-Z, Dutch version of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale – survey form (manual). Leiden: PITS, 2003.
Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla D. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 2nd ed. Circle Pines: AGS Publishing, 2005.
The WeeFIM II Clinical Guide, Version 6.0. Buffalo: Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, 2006.
Msall ME, DiGaudio K, Rogers BT, et al. The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). Conceptual basis and pilot use in children with developmental disabilities. Clin Pediatr. 1994;33:421-30.CrossRef
Niemeijer AS, Reinders-Messelink HA, Disseldorp LM, Nieuwenhuis MK. Feasibility and reliability of the WeeFIM instrument in Dutch children with burns. Phys Ther. 2012;92:958-66.PubMedCrossRef
Disseldorp LM, Niemeijer AS, Baar ME van, et al. How disabling are pediatric burns? Functional independence in Dutch pediatric patients with burns. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:29-39.PubMedCrossRef
Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, et al. The manual ability classification system (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:549-54.PubMedCrossRef
Imms C, Carlin J, Eliasson AC. Stability of caregiverreported manual ability and gross motor function classifications of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:153-9.PubMedCrossRef
Plasschaert VF, Ketelaar M, Nijnuis MG, et al. Classification of manual abilities in children with cerebral palsy under 5 years of age: How reliable is the manual ability classification system? Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:164-70.PubMedCrossRef
Meeteren J van, Nieuwenhuijsen C, Grund A de, et al.; Transition Research Group South West Netherlands. Using the manual ability classification system in young adults with cerebral palsy and normal intelligence. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1885-93.PubMedCrossRef
Ohrvall AM, Eliasson AC. Parents’ and therapists’ perceptions of the content of the manual ability classification system, MACS. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17:209-16.PubMedCrossRef
Arnould C, Penta M, Renders A, Thonnard JL. ABILHAND-kids: A measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology. 2004;63:1045-52.PubMedCrossRef
Gilmore R, Sakzewski L, Boyd R. Upper limb activity measures for 5- to 16-year-old children with congenital hemiplegia: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:14-21.PubMedCrossRef
Klingels K, Jaspers E, Van de Winckel A, et al. A systematic review of arm activity measures for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:887-900.PubMedCrossRef
Wang TN, Lin KC, Wu CY, et al. Validity, responsiveness, and clinically important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1086-91.PubMedCrossRef
Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Holmefur M, Kottorp A, Eliasson AC. The assisting hand assessment: Current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:259-64.PubMedCrossRef
Holmefur M, Aarts P, Hoare B, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. Test-retest and alternate forms reliability of the assisting hand assessment. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:886-91.PubMedCrossRef
Sköld A, Hermansson L, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Eliasson AC. Development and evidence of validity for the Children’s Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:436-42.PubMedCrossRef
Hamstra-Bletz E, Blöte AW. A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary schools. J Learn Disabil. 1987;23:689-99.
Hamstra-Bletz E. Het kinderhandschrift. Ontwikkeling en beoordeling [proefschrift]. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, 1993.
Evers A, Vliet-Mulder JC, Groot CJ. Documentatie van tests en testresearch in Nederland. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2000.
Overvelde A, Bommel I van, Bosga I, et al. KNGF Evidence Statement. Motorische schrijfproblemen bij kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother. 2011;121:1-65.
Smits-Engelsman B, Stevens M, Vrencken I, Hagen A van. Systematische Opsporing Schrijfproblemen (SOS): een hulpmiddel voor leerkrachten bij het signaleren van motorische schrijfproblemen van leerlingen in het basis- en speciaal onderwijs. Ned Tijdschr Kinderfysiother. 2005;17:16-20.
Van Waelvelde H, De Mey B, Smits-Engelsman B. Handleiding SOS: systematische opsporing van schrijfmotorische problemen. Gent: Arteveldehogeschool en Universiteit Gent, 2008.
Van Waelvelde H, Hellinckx T, Peersman W, Smits- Engelsman B. SOS, a screening instrument to identify children with handwriting impairments. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012;32:306-19.PubMedCrossRef
Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service, 1978.
Bruininks R, Bruininks B. Bruininks-Osteretsky test of motor proficiency, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, 2005.
Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the Bruininks- Osteretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition (BOT-2). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2007;27:87-102.PubMedCrossRef
Kiphard EJ, Schilling F. Körper-koordinationstest für Kinder (KTK). Weinheim: Beltz, 1974.
Kiphard EJ, Schilling F. Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1970;118:473-9.PubMed
Smits-Engelsman BCM, Henderson SE, Michels CGJ. The assessment of children with a Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Netherlands: the relationship between the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder. Hum Mov Sci. 1998;17:699-711.CrossRef
Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Lefevre J, et al. The KörperkoordinationsTest für Kinder: reference values and sutability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21:378-88.PubMedCrossRef
Henderson SE, Sugden DA. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, 1992.
Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2, 2nd ed. (Movement ABC-2) (Examiner’s Manual). Londen: Harcourt Assessment, 2007.
Smits-Engelsman BCM. Nederlandse bewerking van de Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Handleiding, Amsterdam: Pearson, 2010.
Wuang YP, Su JH, Su CY. Reliability and reponsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children- Second Edition Test in children with developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:160-5.PubMedCrossRef
Schulz J, Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: factor structure comparisons across three age groups. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32;1361-9.PubMedCrossRef
Frijters MCT, Westenberg Y, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Vergelijking van de Movement-ABC-2 test en De Bayley Scales of Infant Development Motorische Schaal (BSID-II-NL-M) bij kinderen van 36 tot 43 maanden. Ned Tijdschr Kinderfysiother. 2010;22:14-5.
Jelsma LD, Bergen-Verhoef LLJ van, Niemeijer AS, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Overeenstemming tussen de Movement Assessment Battery for Children second edition en de Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Profiency second edition bij kinderen van 7-11 jaar. Ned Tijdschr Kinderfysiother. 2010;22:16-7.
Beek I van, Booij JC, Niemeijer AS, Smits-Engelsman BMC. De Movement ABC-2 Test en de Korperkoordinations test für Kinder vergeleken bij 11-16-jarigen. Ned Tijdschr Kinderfysiother. 2010;22:18.
Geuze RH, Jongmans MJ, Schoemaker MM, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: a review and discussion. Hum Mov Sci. 2001;20:7-47.CrossRef
Schoemaker MM, Niemeijer AS, Flapper BCT, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Validity and reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Checklist for children with and without motor impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:368-71.PubMedCrossRef
Wilson BN, Kaplan BJ, Crawford SG, et al. Reliability and validity of a parent questionnaire on childhood motor skills. Am J Occup Ther. 2000;54:484-93.PubMedCrossRef
Schoemaker MM, Flapper B, Verheij NP, et al. Evaluation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening instrument. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:668-73.PubMedCrossRef
Blank R, Smits-Engelsman B, Polatajko H, Wilson P. European Academy for Childhood Disability (EACD): Recommendations on the definition, diagnosis and intervention of developmental coordination disorder (long version). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:54-93.PubMedCrossRef
Rihtman T, Wilson BN, Parush S. Development of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for preschoolers and preliminary evidence of its psychometric properties in Israel. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1378-87.PubMedCrossRef
Dellen T van, Vaessen W, Schoemaker MM. Clumsiness: definition and selection of subjects. In: Kalverboer AF, ed. Developmental biopsychology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.
Schoemaker MM, Flapper BCT, Reinders-Messelink HA, De Kloet A. Validity of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for Developmental Coordination Disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27:190-9.PubMedCrossRef
Ulrich DA. Test of gross motor development, second edition, examiner’s manual. Austin: Pro-Ed, 2000.
Ulrich DA. Test of gross motor development. Austin: Pro-Ed, 1985.
Kuiper D, Niemeijer A, Reynders K. Toepasbaarheid van de Test of Gross Motor Development in Nederland: een exploratief onderzoek. Bewegen Hulpverlening. 2000;17:3-14.
Niemeijer AS, Smits-Engelsman BCM, Schoemaker MM. Neuromotor task training for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder; a controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:406-11.PubMedCrossRef
Fisher AG, Bryze K, Hume V, Griswold LA. School AMPS: process skills, 2nd ed. Fort Collins: Three Star Press, 2007.
Fisher AG, Bryze K, Atchison BT. Naturalistic assessment of functional performance in school-settings: Reliability and validity of the School AMPS scales. J Outcome Meas. 2000;4:491-512.PubMed
Atchison BT, Fisher AG, Bryze K. Rater reliability and internal scale and person response validity of the School Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:843-50.CrossRef
Munkholm M, Löfgren B, Fisher AG. Reliability of the School AMPS measures. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19, 2-8.PubMedCrossRef
Fingerhut P, Madill H, Darrah J, et al. Classroom-based assessment: validation for the School AMPS. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56: 210-3.PubMedCrossRef
Fisher AG, Duran GA. Schoolwork task performance of students at risk of delays. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11;191-8.CrossRef
Aaron DJ, Kriska AM, Dearwater SR, et al. The epidemiology of leisure physical activity in an adolescent population. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:847-53.PubMedCrossRef
Aaron DJ, Kriska AM, Dearwater SR, et al. Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past year physical activity in adolescents. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:191-201.PubMed
Momenan AA, Delshad M, Sarbazi N, et al. Reliability and validity of the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) in an Iranian urban adult population. Arch Iran Med. 2012;15:279-82.PubMed
Groen WG, Takken T, Net J van der, et al. Habitual physical activity in Dutch children and adolescents with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2011;17:e906-12.PubMedCrossRef
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 4th ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications, 2005.
Duijn HM van, Niezen AA, Cardol M, et al. De Nederlandse versie van de Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Amsterdam: VUmc, 1999.
Cusick A, Lannin NA, Low K. Adapting the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for use in a paediatric clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:761-6.PubMedCrossRef
Sakzewski L, Boyd R, Ziviani J. Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:232-40.PubMedCrossRef
Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen ICJM, et al. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:660-7.PubMedCrossRef
Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, et al. Family-centred functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: an emerging practice model. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:83-102.
Aarts PB, Jongerius PH, Geerdink YA, et al. Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:509-18.PubMedCrossRef
Turner-Stokes L. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:362-70.PubMedCrossRef
Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Gorter JW. Goal attainment scaling in pediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:550-6.PubMedCrossRef
Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Lindeman E, et al. Interrater reliability of goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;9:429-32.CrossRef
Palisano R. Validity of goal attainment scaling in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1993;73:651-60.PubMed
Law LSH, Dai OSM, Siu AMH. Applicability of goal attainment scaling in the evaluation of gross motor changes in children with cerebral palsy. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2004;22:22-8.CrossRef
Steenbeek D. Meester-Delver A, Becher JG, Lankhorst GJ. The effect of botulinum toxin type A treatment of the lower extremity on the level of functional abilities in children with cerebral palsy: evaluation with goal attainment scaling. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:274-82.PubMedCrossRef
King G, Law M, King S, et al. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;23:63-90.PubMedCrossRef
Mc Manus V, Corcoran P, Perry IJ. Participation in everyday activities and quality of life in pre-teenage children living with cerebral palsy in South West Ireland. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:50.
Dahan-Oliel N, Shikako-Thomas K, Majnemer A. Quality of life and leisure participation in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: A thematic analysis of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:427-39.PubMedCrossRef
Bult MK, Verschuren O, Gorter JW, et al. Crosscultural validation and psychometric evaluation of the Dutch language version of the children’s assessment of participation and enjoyment (CAPE) in children with and without physical disabilities. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:843-53.PubMedCrossRef
Maher CA, Williams MT, Olds T, Lane AE. Physical and sedentary activity in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:450-7.PubMedCrossRef
Tol E van, Gorter JW, DeMatteo C, Meester-Delver A. Participation outcomes for children with acquired brain injury: A narrative review. Brain Inj. 2011;25:1279-87.PubMedCrossRef
Imms C. Children with cerebral palsy participate: A review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1867-84.PubMedCrossRef
Murphy NA, Carbone PS. Promoting the participation of children with disabilities in sports, recreation, and physical activities. Pediatrics. 2008;121:1057-61.PubMedCrossRef
Nieuwenhuijsen C, Donkervoort M, Nieuwstraten W, et al.; Transition Research Group South West Netherlands. Experienced problems of young adults with cerebral palsy: Targets for rehabilitation care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1891-7.PubMedCrossRef
Stevenson CJ, Pharoah PO, Stevenson R. Cerebral palsy – the transition from youth to adulthood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:336-42.PubMedCrossRef
Mulders AHM, Meihuizen-de Regt MJ, Moor JMH de. Kinderrevalidatie: Een plaatsbepaling. In: Meihuizen-de Regt MJ, Moor JMH de, Mulders AHM, red. Kinderrevalidatie. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2003. p. 1-47.
Carey H, Long T. The pediatric physical therapist’s role in promoting and measuring participation in children with disabilities. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012;24:163-70.PubMedCrossRef
Henry AD. Development of a measure of adolescent leisure interests. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:531-9.PubMedCrossRef
Law M, Finkelman S, Hurley P, et al. Participation of children with physical disabilities: Relationships with diagnosis, physical function, and demographic variables. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11:156-62.CrossRef
Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health – some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:569-76.PubMedCrossRef
Ketelaar M, Bult MK, Gorter JW, et al. Participatie; klaar om deel te nemen? Ned Tijdschr Fysiother. 2012;122:68-75.
Bedell G, Coster W. Measuring participation of schoolaged children with traumatic brain injuries: Considerations and approaches J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:220-9.
King G, Law M, King S, et al. Children’s assessment of participation and enjoyment (CAPE) and preferences for activities of children (PAC). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, 2004.
King GA, Law M, King S, et al. Measuring children’s participation in recreation and leisure activities: Construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child Care Health Dev. 2007;33:28-39.PubMedCrossRef
Bult M, Ketelaar M. Children’s assessment of participation and enjoyment (CAPE) and preferences for activities of children (PAC). Nederlandse bewerking. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information, 2010.
Metagegevens
Titel
6 Meetinstrumenten
Auteurs
Marina M. Schoemaker
Marjolijn Ketelaar
H. A. Reinders-Messelink
Copyright
2016
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Kinderfysiotherapie

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1591-8

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1592-5

Copyright: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1592-5_12