Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

5 Kenmerken van succesvolle innovaties

Auteurs : prof.dr. Richard Grol, prof.dr. Michel Wensing

Gepubliceerd in: Implementatie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Nieuwe werkwijzen, richtlijnen of procedures moeten aan bepaalde eisen voldoen en op een bepaalde manier worden gepresenteerd om aantrekkelijk te zijn voor de beoogde gebruikers.
Enkele kenmerken van innovaties, zoals aansluiting bij bestaande normen en waarden van de doelgroep, de mogelijkheid ze uit te proberen, en een heldere en aantrekkelijke vormgeving, hebben over het algemeen een positieve invloed op de adoptie.
Betrokkenheid van gebruikers bij de ontwikkeling van een innovatie en het bieden van de mogelijkheid deze aan te passen aan de eigen situatie, bevorderen eveneens de implementatie. Vele innovaties zijn ‘halffabrikaten’ die in de praktijk verder worden vormgegeven.

vorige hoofdstuk 4 Planning en organisatie van implementatie

volgende hoofdstuk 6 Richtlijnen als hulpmiddel bij de verbetering van de zorg

Assema P van, et al. Nationwide implementation of guided supermarket tours in the Netherlands: a dissemination study. Health Education Research 1998;13(4).

Boivin A, Green J, Meulen J van der, et al. Why consider patients’ preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developers. Med Care 2009;47(8):908-15.CrossRefPubMed

Burgers JS, Grol RPTM, Zaat JOM, et al. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:15-9.PubMedPubMedCentral

Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, et al. Integrated care pathways. BMJ 1998;316:133-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cretin S. Implementing guidelines: an overview. RAND-report, 1998.

Edwards A, Elwyn G. How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients’ decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Med Decis Making 1999;19:428-34.CrossRefPubMed

Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006;333:417-20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Evans R. Achieving informed decision making using a web-based technology, Prosdex. Proefschrift. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 2009.

Everdingen J van, Mokkink H, Klazinga N, et al. De bekendheid en verspreiding van CBO richtlijnen onder medisch specialisten. TSG 2003;81(8):468-72.

Field M, Lohr K (eds). Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new agency. Washington DC: National Academic Press, 1990.

Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J, et al. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidem 2002;55:717-722.CrossRef

Gawande A. The checklist manifesto. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2009.

Gladwell M. The tipping point. London: Abacus, 2005.

Grilli R, Lomas J. Evaluating the message: the relationship between compliance Rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Med Care 1994;32(3):202-13.CrossRefPubMed

Grol R, Beurden W van, Binkhorst T, et al. Patient education in family practice. The consensus reached by patients, doctors and experts. Fam Pract 1991;8:133-9.PubMed

Grol R, Eccles M, Maisonneuve H, et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines. The European experience. Dis Man Health Outcomes 1998;4:255-66.CrossRef

Grol R. Has guideline development gone astray. Yes. BMJ 2010; 340:c343.CrossRef

Guyatt G, Meade M, Jaeschke R, et al. Practitioners of evidence based care. BMJ 2000;320:954-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360(5): 491-9.CrossRefPubMed

Hayward R, Wilson M, Tunis B, et al. More informative abstract of articles describing clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:731-7.CrossRefPubMed

Hunter D, Fairflied G. Disease management. BMJ 1997;315:50-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Huttin C. The use of clinical guidelines to improve medical practice: main issues in the United States. Int J Qual Health Care 1997;9:207-14.PubMed

Knottnerus J, Dinant GJ. Medicine based evidence, a prerequisite for evidence based medicine. BMJ 1997;315:1109-10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kotler P, Roberto E. Sociale marketing. Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1991.

Latosinsky S, Thirlby R, Urbach D, et al. CAGS and ACS evidence based reviews in surgery. 32: Use of a surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality. Can J Surg 2010;53(1):64-6.PubMedPubMedCentral

Ley P. Patients understanding and recall in clinical communication failure. In: Pendleton D, et al. (eds). Doctor-patient communication. London: Academic Press, 1983.

Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:597-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Naylor CD. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence based medicine. Lancet 1995;345:840-2.CrossRefPubMed

Orlandi M. Promoting health and preventing disease in health care settings: an analysis of barriers. Prev Med 1987; 16(1):119-30.CrossRefPubMed

Peperstraten A van, Nelen W, Grol R, et al. The effect of a multifaceted empowerment strategy on decision making about the number of embryos transferred in in vitro fertilisation: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;341:c2501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pronovost P, Vohr E. Safe patients, smart hospitals. Hudon Street Press, 2010.

Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon & Schuster Ltd, 2003.

Rogers E. Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovation. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1995; 21:324-8.PubMed

Sackett D, Richardson W, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.

Sanazaro P. Determining physicians performance. Continuing medical education and other interacting variables. Eval Health Prof 1983;2:197-210.CrossRef

Schellekens W. Een passie voor patiënten. Med Contact 2000;55:412-4.

Schouten LMT. Quality improvement collaborative. Cost-effectiveness and determinants of success. Proefschrift. Nijmegen, 2010.

Sheldon T, Guyatt G, Haines A. Getting research findings into practice: When to act on the evidene? BMJ 1998; 317:139-42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Spence W. Innovation. The communication of change in ideas, practices and products. London: Chapman and Hall, 1994.

Starfield B. Quality of Care Research. Internal elegance and external relevance. JAMA 1998; 280:1006-8.CrossRefPubMed

Tomlin Z, Humphrey C, Rogers S. General practitioners’ perceptions of effective health care. BMJ 1999;318: 1532-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K, et al. Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. BMJ 2010;340:b5433.CrossRefPubMed

Vries E de, Prins H, Crolla R, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. New Engl J Med 2010;363:1928-37.CrossRefPubMed

Wasson J, Jette A, Johnson D, et al. A replicable and customizable approach to improve ambulatory care and research. J Ambulatory Care Man 1997;20(1):17-27.CrossRef

Watkins C, Harvey I, Langley C, et al. General practitioners’ use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:11-5.PubMedPubMedCentral

Weel C van, Knottnerus J. Evidence based intervention and comprehensive treatment. Lancet 1999;353:916-8.CrossRefPubMed

Wensing M, Bij A van der, Laurant M. Implementatie van bewegingsprogramma’s voor ouderen. Verslag van een literatuurstudie. Den Haag: ZON, 2000.

Wolfe R. Organisational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. J Man Studies 1994;31: 406-31.

Zaltman G, Duncan R. Strategies for planned change. New York: John Wiley, 1977.

Titel: 5 Kenmerken van succesvolle innovaties
Auteurs: prof.dr. Richard Grol
prof.dr. Michel Wensing
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Implementatie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1076-0

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1077-7

Copyright: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1077-7_5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen